diagnosis and evaluation of intellectual disability
play

Diagnosis and Evaluation of Intellectual Disability Nothing to - PDF document

Diagnosis and Evaluation of Intellectual Disability Nothing to Disclose Cynthia J Curry, MD Professor of Pediatrics, Emerita, UCSF Goals for Today.. Understand the cause Establish the Why study and diagnose recurrence risk


  1. Diagnosis and Evaluation of Intellectual Disability Nothing to Disclose Cynthia J Curry, MD Professor of Pediatrics, Emerita, UCSF Goals for Today….. • Understand the cause • Establish the Why study and diagnose recurrence risk • Recap the explosion in • Anticipate problems intellectual disability/delay? • Order appropriate our genetic knowledge surveillance • Discuss a rational • ? Options for evaluation strategy treatment/prenatal dx • END the diagnostic • Illustrate how new odyssey! diagnoses help and • Improve support for impact patients parents and their families

  2. First there are th e basics… . • A maternal history • Illnesses • Exposures • Delivery • Child’s developmental history pedigree • A family history • A physical exam Physical Exam • Height weight and head circumference • Patient should be undressed • Specific measurements and 764 genes for descriptions • Eyes Autism‐ • Ears overlapping • Hands phenotypes • Feet Wright‐2015

  3. Eyes The Mouth The Hands Ears

  4. SKIN Genetic testing • Is it just • Biochemical hypopigmented scarring? • Chromosomes • Ashleaf spots • Fragile X • Vitiligo? • Microarray • Pigmentary mosaicism • Gene Panels • Café au Lait spots • Exome sequencing • Whole Genome sequencing During my lifetime there there have been truly dramatic developments in genetic testing that Karyotypes 3‐6% have changed our ability to diagnose intellectual disability

  5. Routine Karyotypes 1970‐1990 The Trisomies FISH FISH 6‐10% Fluorescence in‐situ hybridization

  6. 4p‐ 22q11.2 deletion Wolf Hirschhorn • Preferred term over syndrome DiGeorge or VeloCardioFacial • Greek Helmet nose • A myriad of symptoms • Seizures • 25% have psychiatric • Severe FTT issues • 95% have velopharyngeal • Severe ID insufficiency • In many, need array • Most common of the microdeletion syndrome s Fragile X • 0.5% ID FRAGILE X 0.5% • Most common XL ID • Trinucleotide repeat disorder • >250 repeats‐full expansion • Girls may be as affected as boys ( due to random X inactivation) • A routine test for all unexplained ID

  7. Chromosome Microarray Array CGH 15‐23% • Detects small gains or losses of DNA • Can detect deletions or duplications beyond resolution of chromosome analysis • A FIRST TIER test!! • In most cases replaces a karyotype • Currently SNP array ( not oligo or BAC) • 15q11.2 deletion‐ 9% • Proximal 16p11.2 deletion ‐ 5% • Proximal 16p11.2 duplication‐ 5% • 15q13.3 deletion ‐4% • 16p13.1 duplication 4% Microarray abnormalities • NRN1 deletion 4% • 22q13 deletion 3% in my early “unknowns” Most common array abnormalities in autism

  8. Exome Sequencing 24‐33% Exome sequencing • 22,000 genes • Exons code for protein • Massively parallel sequencing • Bioinformatics is critical Principles in Exome Sequencing • Do a Trio if possible‐ • Give the lab clear clinical information • Results: • Normal……but NOTHING FOUND is not always NOTHING! • Pathogenic‐ Seen before • Likely Pathogenic‐ Some overlap • Variant of Unknown Significance (VUS) • Novel gene • Not predicted to be damaging • Doesn’t explain phenotype

  9. Finding the Causes for Known Syndromes • Kabuki syndrome • KMTD2‐AD • KMD6A‐ XL • Cornelia de Lange syndrome • NIPBL~ 50% • SMC1A XL • HDAC8 XL • SMC3 • RAD21 FOXG2 Yield in 100 cases‐ Children’s Mercy Hospital Rare/Unusual SC4MOL syndromes • Severe ID • Can’t diagnose with usual testing or gestalt • No clear path to diagnosis • Exomes are the answer! CDG1A

  10. Yield by Diagnosis Joubert • Severity important syndrome • More severe= more likely to be positive “incidental” findings • Distinct phenotype such as a • Approved by ACMG skeletal dysplasia or arthrogryposis • 59 Conditions increases yield • Actionable • Distinct clues: • Can opt out • seizures • brain malformations 3M Syndrome • global disability An important class of disorders When the yield is that will be missed on Exomes lower… • In a non‐ exonic region • Trinucleotide Expansions Curry –Jones • When array not done! • Myotonic dystrophy Syndrome • When it is not genetic • Fragile X • Spinal Cerebellar Ataxias • When it is mosaic • Huntington Disease • Need to study a different tissue ( skin, muscle etc) MCAP Syndrome Negative Exomes in Myotonic Dystrophy

  11. Other common ID Whole genome syndromes that Seq ? 26% (pilo Exomes will miss Methylation/ Imprinting disorders !!! Prader Willi syndrome Angelman Syndrome Beckwith Syndrome Clinical Utility • Clinically Available for ~$5,000 • Utility over Exome and exome reanalysis unclear • Used at the Undiagnosed Disease Network (UDN) • Project ”Baby Bear” • Not currently in widespread use • Several direct to consumer testing options but not geared to analyzing ID

  12. Family One • Baby followed since birth in 2003 with diagnosis of “Perinatal Arterial Illustrating take home Stroke” messages about • Neonatal seizures genetic testing with • PVL and mild corpus callosum findings‐MRI several cases • Mild CP but ID, behavior problems, minimal speech, aggression and anger issues dominant • Attributed to father ‘s “genes” • 1.4 Mb Duplication 17q12 • Well described Referral of Sister microduplication syndrome • Seizures • Aggression, meltdowns, borderline IQ • MRI abn including • “what is going on here?” PVL • Family history negative for • Variable ID normal to developmental issues ( ex the two quite severe sisters) • Behavior issues • We ordered straight forward work up common • Psych issues common for delay and behavioural issues starting with the older girl • In this family inherited Abnormal results • Microarray ordered ,expecting negative from their NORMAL mother results

  13. Lessons from this family…… • Examine a previous diagnosis in light of new information • A patient evaluated in 2003 will not have had up to date testing Rasmussen et al., AJMG, 2016 Kamath et al., AJMG B. 2018 • Array abnormalities can be 17q12 duplication children and families inherited from a NORMAL parent • CP can have many causes – including microarray abnormalities 2019‐ Face2Gene • Phone and Computer APP • Computer facial recognition • 1000 of syndromes Family twos • Still in development as new • Followed since birth cases added • ID in mom and child • Not clear they were the same? • Array and Fra X negative • Reevaluation. What now? Exomes?

  14. Differential from Face2Gene Lessons from this family • Reevaluate your ”unknowns” • Face2Gene is always worth a shot! Critical thinking required! • With 4000 syndromes no dysmorphologist can hold all gestalts in head • Absence of the defining syndrome does not exclude the diagnosis

  15. Re‐referred at age 5 to rule out Williams Syndrome Family 3‐ 21 month old with DD • Negative in 2015 • Reanalysis in 2017 revealed truncating variant in PPM1D • First paper on PPM1D appeared in 2014! Exomes Jansen et al AJHG, 2014

  16. So the mom asked…. • What about the Williams like personality? • And….Aren’t there any USA mothers that would like to chat about our kids? Collected 8 US families • So, I took the bait ….. ( 6 unpublished) • Found out a LOT about this interesting syndrome! The Face‐ 2‐5 years Face‐ mid‐childhood

  17. Personalities in PPM1D vs Williams The amazing PPMID moms! PPM1D WILLIAMS • Sociable • VERY sociable • Formed an informal email/phone • ”Cocktail Party” support group • ”Cocktail Party” • Have submitted an application to • Anxiety • Anxiety become a 501C3 • Hyperacusis • Hyperacusis • Have investigated possibility of • No fear of danger • No fear of danger participating in stem cell research • Tantrums • Tantrums • Can a national meeting be far • Mild‐mod ID • Mild‐ mod ID behind? • Occasional autism • Occasional ASD • Musicality To Recap….evaluation in ID Lessons from PPM1D • Don’t forget history, physical, pedigree and baseline metabolic testing • Reanalyze negative exomes! • THEN: Usually start with a microarray! • Probably almost as high a yield • Don’t forget Fragile X! as whole genome sequencing • Single gene, if appropriate • Find more families! • If negative, gene panels for ID may be • The first paper is just the appropriate beginning! ( Insurance/coverage) • Empower families • Exomes when other evaluations negative.

  18. We have come a long way…… So where are • We can only guess at the we now? future but know it brings promise for yet more to come • There is much to do……

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend