DEVELOPMENT OF ACCELERATOR-BASED PRODUCTION OF MO-99 Sergey - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

development of accelerator based production of mo 99
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

DEVELOPMENT OF ACCELERATOR-BASED PRODUCTION OF MO-99 Sergey - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SEPTEMBER 13, 2017 DEVELOPMENT OF ACCELERATOR-BASED PRODUCTION OF MO-99 Sergey Chemerisov, Peter Tkac, Mandy Youker, Mike Kalensky, Roman Gromov, Chuck Jonah, Vakho Makarashvili, Brad Micklich, Kurt Alford, Ken Wesolowski, Kevin Quigley, Jim


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Argonne National Laboratory is a U.S. Department of Energy laboratory managed by UChicago Argonne, LLC.

DEVELOPMENT OF ACCELERATOR-BASED PRODUCTION OF MO-99

SEPTEMBER 13, 2017

Sergey Chemerisov, Peter Tkac, Mandy Youker, Mike Kalensky, Roman Gromov, Chuck Jonah, Vakho Makarashvili, Brad Micklich, Kurt Alford, Ken Wesolowski, Kevin Quigley, Jim Bailey, Tom Brossard, David Rotsch, Jim Byrnes, and George Vandergrift

slide-2
SLIDE 2

DEVELOPING A DOMESTIC SUPPLY OF Mo-99

  • NNSA’s Material Management and Minimization Program (M3) is assisting in the

development of different technologies for producing Mo-99

  • Argonne currently has development activities in those three technologies

– Neutron activation of Mo-98

  • NorthStar Medical Technologies, LLC

– Accelerator γ/n reaction on Mo-100

  • NorthStar Medical Technologies, LLC

– Accelerator-driven production of fission-product Mo-99

  • SHINE Medical Technologies
  • All technologies assert they can produce 3000 6-day Ci/week (50% of US requirements)
  • This presentation will cover accelerator-related aspects of the projects
slide-3
SLIDE 3

PRODUCING MO-99 WITHOUT USE OF URANIUM (NORTHSTAR)

Major accelerator-related tasks

  • Development and testing of

beamline components – Achromatic bend – High power beam dump – Fast acting beam valve testing

  • Target temperature monitoring
  • Target window and holder material
  • ptimization
  • Irradiation of sintered Mo targets
  • Side reactions study

Mo100 100

γ

Mo99 99

ga gamma mma neutr tron

  • n

Accelerato tor p prod

  • duc

ucti tion

  • n
  • Under the direction of the NNSA, Argonne,

ORNL and LANL are partnering with NorthStar Medical Isotopes, LLC. to develop and demonstrate accelerator production of 99Mo through the 100Mo(γ,n)99Mo reaction. – The threshold for the reaction is 9 MeV. – The peak cross section is 150 mb at 14.5 MeV.

  • High energy photons are created with a high

power electron beam through bremsstrahlung.

10 20 30 1 2 3 4 5 flux (1011γ/cm2/s/µA) energy (MeV) 50 100 150 cross section (mb)

20 MeV 35 MeV

σ(γ,n)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

PRODUCTION FACILITY CONFIGURATION

Heat deposition on the target is significantly forward peaking; irradiation from two sides will allow reduce enriched material inventory by factor of 2 Use of two accelerators creates line-of- sight problem One of the possible configuration of the production facility accelerator hall

slide-5
SLIDE 5

DEVELOPMENT OF ACHROMATIC BEAM BENDING SYSTEMS

Simulated horizontal (solid) and vertical (dashed) beam envelopes for the achromatic bend assuming an energy spread of ±2% Beam distribution on the target

slide-6
SLIDE 6

900 BENDING SYSTEM DESIGN AND TESTING

Achromatic effect would be received by using of two quadrupoles between main bends for compensation of beam dispersion. Simulations were performed with an electron beam with normalized emittance

  • f 500 mm*mrad and 1500 mm*mrad

and an energy spread of ±2.5%. First

  • rder matched beam envelopes are

shown on plots.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

TESTING OF FAST-ACTING GATE VALVE SYSTEM

Conventional technology used for protecting accelerator vacuum systems does not preserve high quality vacuum in the accelerator systems. Helium is a lightweight and therefore a fast-moving gas. A mitigating factor for the high power system is the use of helium, as an inert gas may protect accelerator components even in the event of a pressure rise following a window failure.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

HIGH POWER BEAM STOP AND COLLIMATOR

High power beam stop

Power deposition from 42 MeV electron beam in aluminum

Beam Beam to Target Collimator with Coolant Channels Coolant Supply and Return Lines Beam Line Tubes

Defocused electron beam at the front plate of the Beam Dump

slide-9
SLIDE 9

TARGET WINDOW MATERIALS CANDIDATES AND CALCULATIONS

Inconel 718 Maraging Steel Beryllium

Stress due to pressure loading. Plotted as stress intensity in MPa. Results of the thermal model are shown here as plots

  • f temperature (°C)

Material Maximum Beam Power (kW) Inconel 718 18 Beryllium 40 250 Maraging Steel 45

Radiation-induced damage studies are in progress

slide-10
SLIDE 10

ACHIEVING RADIOCHEMICAL PURITY

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

relative activity Rf

Tc rel Mo rel

Rf=0.9±0.1

Retention factors for Mo and Tc, after spotting 20 µL of 5× diluted solution of Mo in 5M KOH

  • n TLC and eluting in 0.1M Na2CO3 solution

Target after irradiation

Spotting of mobile phase (Na2CO3) on TLC using phenolphthalein In 2015-16 irradiation tests a fine orange-brown powder was observed on the irradiated Mo disks and target housing . The source of the powder was later traced to the He cooling loop. After dissolution, light orange colored solutions were obtained and radiochemical purity (RCP) tests using thin-layer chromatography (TLC) performed with the undiluted Mo solution did not meet the specifications of ≥95% of activity at Rf = 0.9 ± 0.1 (Rf = retention factor).

slide-11
SLIDE 11

SIDE-REACTION MODELING OF ENRICHED MO-100 TARGET COMPARISON WITH EXPERIMENT

30 MeV 18 kW beam 24 h Irradiation

Enriched Mo-100, 97.4%, 24 hour irradiation

European Pharmacopoeia Requirement

enrichment sample EOB time of counting count duration, sec DT sample enriched Mo-100 Mo100 090517 09/05/17 at 6:24PM 09/06/17 at 4:30PM 64080 20.00% 97.40% Nuclide energy, keV T1/2, hrs A at time of count, uCi A at EOB, uCi 1s, % % of Mo99 at EOB Mo-90 257.34 5.67 2.50E-01 3.73E+00 MDA 0.0403% Mo-93m 1477.2 6.95 3.84E-02 3.48E-01 MDA 0.0038% Mo-99 739.5 66.19 7.34E+03 9.25E+03 3.0% N/A Nb-95m 235.4 86.592 3.10E-01 3.70E-01 MDA 0.0040% Zr-95 756.7 1536.48 2.94E-01 2.97E-01 8.1% 0.0032% Nb-95 765.8 839.52 3.25E-02 3.31E-02 MDA 0.0004% Nb-96 1091.5 23.35 1.42E+00 2.73E+00 3.3% 0.0295%

slide-12
SLIDE 12

AMORE EXPERIMENT

Shielded Enclosure with Target Solution Recirculating pump Shielded Storage Tank Gas Collection System Separation Glove Box Gas Analysis enclosure e beam Mo-99 Product Transfer Cask HEPA, Silver Zeolite Filters

He

Gas Lines Liquid Lines

Experiment will be conducted at 40 MeV beam energy and up to 20 kW beam power 20 L solution will be irradiated with neutrons generated in a depleted-uranium (DU) target (Zr-clad DU discs were manufactured at LANL) Maximum solution power will be ≤ 0.5 kW/L Up to 20 Ci of Mo-99 will be produced

slide-13
SLIDE 13

AMORE DU TARGET DESIGN

Target

DU disks 2 mm thick Target diameter 50 mm Water cooling Back disks are 6 mm thick

Electron beam

2 4 6 8 10 12 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Heat Generation (kW/cm^3) 1/2 Disk Thickness (cm)

DU Disk Sizing

Boiling 300C Center

Parametric plot of heat generation vs. target half thickness for disk target geometry. The red line is defined by 300°C maximum temperature in DU disk; the blue line is defined by 100°C maximum surface temperature to prevent boiling

  • f the coolant.

20 kW 30 kW

Target Disk Thick Target Disk Thin Spacer Thin Spacer Thick Beam Window Coolant Flow Across Disk Face Flow Control Orifices Support Bar and Flow Divider Compression Spring Housings and Flow Divider Disk Installed in Spacer Coolant Outlet

slide-14
SLIDE 14

OVERVIEW OF 20L PROCESS TANK DESIGN

Inner Process Tank Outer Cooling/ Moderator Tank Target Sleeve Thru both Tanks Instrument and Dry Well Penetrations Connections for Top Cooling Coil and Condenser/Heat Exchanger and Process Heat Exchanger/ Condenser Inside of Tank Overall Tank Assembly Size: ø22” x 22” H Removable Flange View Port Process Fluid Level

slide-15
SLIDE 15

PHASE 2 TARGET SOLUTION NEUTRON FLUX AND POWER DEPOSITION

Energy deposition (watts/cm3/kW) in the uranyl sulfate solution, for 35 MeV electron beam. Left – side view. Right – top view. Fission rates (# fissions/cm3/kW) in the uranyl sulfate solution, 35 MeV electron beam. Left –– side

  • view. Right – top view.
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Mo-99 PRODUCTION IN AMORE EXPERIMENT

  • Uranyl sulfate LEU sollutionirradiated with neutrons from the depleted uranium

target

  • Target production goal 20 Ci
  • Estimated time to production of 20 Ci = 17.3 hours

5 10 15 20 25 30 5 10 15 20 25 Mo-99 activity (Ci) irradiation time (hours)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

SUMMARY

NorthStar

  • Achromatic bending systems for production facility were developed

and tested

  • High power beam dump and collimator for production facility power

was developed and tested

  • New materials for target window were proposed. Testing of the

materials is underway

  • Source of contamination in helium cooling system was identified

and eliminated. Mo-99 produced after clean-up met radiochemical purity specification

  • Experimental verification of side reactions showed better then

expected Mo-99 purity AMORE experiment

  • Complete experimental setup for irradiation of 20 L of uranyl sulfate

solution is assembled.

  • We are in process of commissioning of the experiment
slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • This work is conducted in collaboration with

LANL and ORNL

  • The submitted manuscript has been created by

UChicago Argonne, LLC, Operator of Argonne National Laboratory (“Argonne”). Argonne, a U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science laboratory, is operated under Contract No. DE- AC02-06CH11357. The U.S. Government retains for itself, and others acting on its behalf, a paid- up nonexclusive, irrevocable worldwide license in said article to reproduce, prepare derivative works, distribute copies to the public, and perform publicly and display publicly, by or on behalf of the Government.

  • Work supported by the U.S. Department of

Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration's (NNSA's) Office of Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation, under Contract DE- AC02-06CH11357.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

  • George Vandergrift
  • Peter Tkac
  • Mandy Youker
  • Mike Kalensky
  • Thad Heltemes
  • Roman Gromov
  • Chuck Jonah
  • Vakho Makarashvili
  • Brad Micklich
  • Lohman Hafenrichter
  • Kurt Alford
  • Ken Wesolowski
  • Kevin Quigley
  • Jim Bailey
  • Tom Brossard
  • David Rotsch