Development of a nuclear quadrupole based technique for measuring - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Development of a nuclear quadrupole based technique for measuring - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Development of a nuclear quadrupole based technique for measuring charge homogeneity, and its application for YBCO Outline: What is charge homogeneity, and why is it interesting? Current experimental methods for measuring charge
Outline:
- What is charge homogeneity, and why is it
interesting?
- Current experimental methods for measuring
charge homogeneity, and their drawbacks.
- A new idea to tackle the problem.
- Experimental results
- Conclusions
b a c
YBCO7
O - Cu - Y - Ba -
YBCO6
Y1Ba2Cu3O7-
Planes Chains
Cu(2) Cu(1)
2
Cu
3
Cu
2
Cu
3
Cu
2
Cu
3
Cu
2
Cu
3
Cu
2
Cu
3
Cu
2
Cu
3
Cu
2
Cu
3
Cu
2
Cu
3
Cu
2
Cu
3
Cu
<15%
2
Cu
3
Cu
2
Cu
3
Cu
2
Cu
3
Cu
- The stripes theory claims that one dimensional
charge structures in the planes play a crucial role in the mechanism of superconductivity.
- Higher doping more stripes
- There is partial experimental evidence for stripes.
Motivation - Stripes
inhomogeneity higher Tc inhomogeneity Higher doping
SC
Evidence for inhomogeneity using SR
Low doping
Tg SC
6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.8 6.9 100 200 300 400
AF
Temperature [K] Doping value - y
Tc
Superconducting
Orthorhombic Tetragonal
TN
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Doping Value Tetragonal Orthorhombic
- This result supports the presence of some
magnetic structure (not necessarily in the form of stripes).
- Increasing the doping decreases the
inhomogeneity.
- It looks as if the structure is a remainder of
the AF phase.
K.M.Lang et al, Nature, 415, 412 (2002)
Evidence for inhomogeneity using STM
Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+
p0.18±0.02 p0.14±0.02
Surface
560
Outline:
- Motivation: what is
charge homogeneity, and why is it interesting?
- What is the experimental
evidence for homogeneity , and what are the drawbacks?
- Our new idea how to
deal with this problem.
- Results
- Conclusions
TIME TO FALL ASLEEP
Summary of the introduction
- Some theories are based on structures
in the planes.
- There is incomplete experimental
evidence for such structures. A new technique, based on the nuclear quadrupole interaction. Solution
Electric quadrupole interaction
Nucleus
z y x
I I I
1 2 1 2 1 q
Vij= V(r)
zz yy xx
V V V
j i ij
r r V V
2
) ˆ ˆ ( ˆ ˆ 3 6 ˆ
2 2 2 2 y x z q q
I I I I H
2 2 2
y
1
zz yy xx zz q
V V V V
x
- The quadrupole interaction is sensitive to
the symmetry of the charge distribution, and can be a useful tool for our purpose.
- determines the homogeneity of the charge
distribution: =0 – Homogenous charge distribution =1 – Inhomogenous charge distribution
The NQR Hamiltonian for spin 3/2
3 3 3 3 6 3 ˆ q
q
H
1 1 1 1 3 1 2 ˆ
2
q
q
H
3 1
2
q
NQR experimental setup
26 27 28 29 30 31 32
Cu(1)
63Cu(2)
Frequency [MHz]
Y=6.675 T=100K
Intensity/f
2 [a.u.]
63Cu(2) 65Cu(2)
Y=7 T=100K
NQR Spectrum of YBCO
<> Vzz||c
? <> is known only for optimal doping
6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.8 6.9 100 200 300 400
AF
Temperature [K] Doping value - y
Tc
Superconducting
Orthorhombic Tetragonal
TN
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Doping Value Tetragonal Orthorhombic
65Cu(2) 63Cu(2)
Cu(1)
63Cu(2)
The EFG tensor for Cu(2) in YBCO7
b a c Vzz Vyy Vxx Vxx<Vyy<Vzz Vzz Vzz || c
YBCO in a magnetic field
Bo
Bo || c || Vzz z b a c
X Z
Bo
Orientation
Orientation quality
X-ray diffraction
Unoriented Sample
X Z
) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( 3
1
Sin Sin Sin Sin t Cos B 1 1 1 1 2
q
=0
1 1 1 1 3 1 2
2
q ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( 2
1
Sin g Cos f Sin g Cos f Cos f Sin g Cos f Sin g t Cos B
0
Sample Vzz
Echo Intensity vs. - Theoretical Result
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Intensity[a.u]
[degree]
Intensity (=90)/Intensity (=0)
<>=0 < || >0
||
Intensity(=90)\Intensity(=0)
NQR Spectrum of YBCO
26 27 28 29 30 31 32
Cu(1)
63Cu(2)
Frequency [MHz]
Y=6.675 T=100K
Intensity/f
2 [a.u.]
63Cu(2) 65Cu(2)
Y=7 T=100K
YBCO6.675 YBCO7- YBCO7 <> Vzz||c
?
63Cu(2) 65Cu(2)
Cu(1)
63Cu(2)
H1
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
[degree] Intensity [a.u.]
YBCO7
H1
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Intensity [a.u.] [degree]
YBCO7
H1
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Intensity [a.u.] [degree]
YBCO7
H1
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Intensity [a.u.] [degree]
YBCO7
H1
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Intensity [a.u.] [degree]
YBCO7
H1
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Intensity [a.u.] [degree]
YBCO7
H1
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Intensity [a.u.] [degree]
YBCO7
H1
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Intensity [a.u.] [degree]
YBCO7
H1
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Intensity [a.u.] [degree]
YBCO7
H1
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Intensity [a.u.] [degree]
YBCO7
H1
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Intensity [a.u.] [degree]
YBCO7
H1
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Intensity [a.u.] [degree]
YBCO7
H1
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Intensity [a.u.] [degree]
YBCO7
H1
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Intensity [a.u.] [degree]
YBCO7
H1
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Intensity [a.u.] [degree]
YBCO7
H1
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Intensity [a.u.] [degree]
YBCO7
H1
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Intensity [a.u.] [degree]
YBCO7
H1
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Intensity [a.u.] [degree]
YBCO7
H1
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Intensity [a.u.] [degree]
YBCO7
H1
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Intensity [a.u.] [degree]
YBCO7
H1
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Intensity [a.u.] [degree]
YBCO7
H1
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Intensity [a.u.] [degree]
YBCO7
H1
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Intensity [a.u.] [degree]
YBCO7
H1
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Intensity [a.u.] [degree]
YBCO7
H1
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Intensity [a.u.] [degree]
YBCO7
H1
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Intensity [a.u.] [degree]
YBCO7
H1
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Intensity [a.u.] [degree]
YBCO7
H1
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Intensity [a.u.] [degree]
YBCO7
H1
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Intensity [a.u.] [degree]
YBCO7
H1
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Intensity [a.u.] [degree]
YBCO7
H1
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Intensity [a.u.] [degree]
YBCO7
H1
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Intensity [a.u.] [degree]
YBCO7
H1
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Intensity [a.u.] [degree]
YBCO7
H1
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Intensity [a.u.] [degree]
YBCO7
H1
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Intensity [a.u.] [degree]
YBCO7
H1
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Intensity [a.u.] [degree]
YBCO7
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
H1
Intensity [a.u.] [degree]
YBCO7
Intermediate Conclusions:
- ADNQR can be applied successfully to
measure .
- For YBCO7 we obtained =0 ±0.1. This
agrees with the known result.
- Since we measure || we can further
conclude that there is no spatial fluctuation in the charge distribution.
<>=0 < || >0
20 40 60 80 100 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Intensity [a.u]
[degree]
YBCO6.675 27.501MHz YBCO7- 30.53MHz YBCO7 31.15MHz
20 40 60 80 100
Results of ADNQR for different samples
=0.6 ± 0.1 =1 ± 0.1 =0 ± 0.1 YBCO6.675 YBCO7- YBCO7
Higher doping Higher homogeneity
- The stripes theory claims that one dimensional
charge structures in the planes play a crucial role in the mechanism of superconductivity.
- Higher doping more stripes
- There are experimental evidences for stripes.
Motivation - Stripes
inhomogeneity higher Tc inhomogeneity Higher doping
6.0 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 7.0 3.82 3.84 3.86 3.88 3.90 3.92 3.94
T=300K
Orthorhombic Tetragonal
b a c/3
Lattice Constants [Angstrom] Doping value - y
b a c
a=b =0 a b 0 Theory
The effect is due to charges and not to lattice structure
- J. D. Jorgensen et al, PRB , 41, 1863
(1990)
Is it a structural or a charge effect?
6.675 < 7 Experiment 6.675 > 7
Summary:
- ADNQR can be applied successfully to measure .
- For YBCO7 we obtained =0 (high homogeneity).
- We found the first evidence for charge
inhomogeneity in the bulk of highly doped YBCO (YBCO6.675 ).
- We can safely say that YBCO6.675 is less homogenous
than YBCO7. There is an anticorrelation between Tc and homogeneity
Acknowledgements
- Prof. Amit Keren
- Prof. Emil Polturak
Galina Bazalitsky Mordehai Ayalon Shmuel Hoida Leonid Iomin Rinat Assa, Ariel Maniv, Oshri Peleg, Eva Segal, Oren Shafir, Meni Shay, Lior Shkedy
Amit Kanigel
Electric quadrupole interaction
Nucleus
z y x
I I I
1 2 1 2 1 q
Vij= V(r)
zz yy xx
V V V
j i ij
r r V V
2
1
zz yy xx zz q
V V V e V
) ˆ ˆ ( ˆ ˆ 3 6 ˆ
2 2 2 2 y x z q q
I I I I H
2 2 2
< || >=0.01
20 40 60 80 100
- 1.0
- 0.8
- 0.6
- 0.4
- 0.2
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Location [unit cell]
< || >=0.15 < || >=0.47
20 40 60 80 100
- 1.0
- 0.8
- 0.6
- 0.4
- 0.2
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Location [unit cell]