Development of a nuclear quadrupole based technique for measuring - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

development of a nuclear
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Development of a nuclear quadrupole based technique for measuring - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Development of a nuclear quadrupole based technique for measuring charge homogeneity, and its application for YBCO Outline: What is charge homogeneity, and why is it interesting? Current experimental methods for measuring charge


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Development of a nuclear quadrupole based technique for measuring charge homogeneity, and its application for YBCO

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline:

  • What is charge homogeneity, and why is it

interesting?

  • Current experimental methods for measuring

charge homogeneity, and their drawbacks.

  • A new idea to tackle the problem.
  • Experimental results
  • Conclusions
slide-3
SLIDE 3

b a c

YBCO7

O - Cu - Y - Ba -

YBCO6

Y1Ba2Cu3O7-

Planes Chains

Cu(2) Cu(1)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

2 

Cu

3 

Cu

2 

Cu

3 

Cu

2 

Cu

3 

Cu

2 

Cu

3 

Cu

2 

Cu

3 

Cu

2 

Cu

3 

Cu

2 

Cu

3 

Cu

2 

Cu

3 

Cu

2 

Cu

3 

Cu

<15%

2 

Cu

3 

Cu

2 

Cu

3 

Cu

2 

Cu

3 

Cu

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • The stripes theory claims that one dimensional

charge structures in the planes play a crucial role in the mechanism of superconductivity.

  • Higher doping  more stripes 
  • There is partial experimental evidence for stripes.

Motivation - Stripes

inhomogeneity higher Tc inhomogeneity Higher doping

slide-6
SLIDE 6

SC

Evidence for inhomogeneity using SR

Low doping

Tg SC

6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.8 6.9 100 200 300 400

AF

Temperature [K] Doping value - y

Tc

Superconducting

Orthorhombic Tetragonal

TN

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

Doping Value Tetragonal Orthorhombic

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • This result supports the presence of some

magnetic structure (not necessarily in the form of stripes).

  • Increasing the doping decreases the

inhomogeneity.

  • It looks as if the structure is a remainder of

the AF phase.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

K.M.Lang et al, Nature, 415, 412 (2002)

Evidence for inhomogeneity using STM

Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+

p0.18±0.02 p0.14±0.02

Surface

 560

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Outline:

  • Motivation: what is

charge homogeneity, and why is it interesting?

  • What is the experimental

evidence for homogeneity , and what are the drawbacks?

  • Our new idea how to

deal with this problem.

  • Results
  • Conclusions

TIME TO FALL ASLEEP

Summary of the introduction

  • Some theories are based on structures

in the planes.

  • There is incomplete experimental

evidence for such structures. A new technique, based on the nuclear quadrupole interaction. Solution

slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Electric quadrupole interaction

Nucleus

z y x

I I I

                    1 2 1 2 1    q

Vij= V(r)

  

zz yy xx

V V V

j i ij

r r V V    

2

 

) ˆ ˆ ( ˆ ˆ 3 6 ˆ

2 2 2 2 y x z q q

I I I I H       

2 2 2

y

1         

zz yy xx zz q

V V V V

x

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • The quadrupole interaction is sensitive to

the symmetry of the charge distribution, and can be a useful tool for our purpose.

  •  determines the homogeneity of the charge

distribution: =0 – Homogenous charge distribution =1 – Inhomogenous charge distribution

slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14

 

slide-15
SLIDE 15

The NQR Hamiltonian for spin 3/2

                 3 3 3 3 6 3 ˆ      q

q

H 

                1 1 1 1 3 1 2 ˆ

2

  q

q

H 

3 1

2

  

q

slide-16
SLIDE 16

NQR experimental setup

slide-17
SLIDE 17

26 27 28 29 30 31 32

Cu(1)

63Cu(2)

Frequency [MHz]

Y=6.675 T=100K

Intensity/f

2 [a.u.]

63Cu(2) 65Cu(2)

Y=7 T=100K

NQR Spectrum of YBCO

<> Vzz||c

? <> is known only for optimal doping

6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.8 6.9 100 200 300 400

AF

Temperature [K] Doping value - y

Tc

Superconducting

Orthorhombic Tetragonal

TN

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

Doping Value Tetragonal Orthorhombic

65Cu(2) 63Cu(2)

Cu(1)

63Cu(2)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

The EFG tensor for Cu(2) in YBCO7

b a c Vzz Vyy Vxx Vxx<Vyy<Vzz Vzz Vzz || c

slide-19
SLIDE 19

YBCO in a magnetic field

Bo

Bo || c || Vzz  z b a c

slide-20
SLIDE 20

X Z

Bo

Orientation

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Orientation quality

X-ray diffraction

Unoriented Sample

slide-22
SLIDE 22

X Z

             ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( 3

1

      Sin Sin Sin Sin t Cos B                1 1 1 1 2

q

 

=0

               1 1 1 1 3 1 2

2

  q                 ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( 2

1

         

       

Sin g Cos f Sin g Cos f Cos f Sin g Cos f Sin g t Cos B 

0

Sample Vzz

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Echo Intensity vs.  - Theoretical Result

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

    

Intensity[a.u]

[degree]

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Intensity (=90)/Intensity (=0)

<>=0 < || >0

||

Intensity(=90)\Intensity(=0)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

NQR Spectrum of YBCO

26 27 28 29 30 31 32

Cu(1)

63Cu(2)

Frequency [MHz]

Y=6.675 T=100K

Intensity/f

2 [a.u.]

63Cu(2) 65Cu(2)

Y=7 T=100K

YBCO6.675 YBCO7- YBCO7 <> Vzz||c

?

63Cu(2) 65Cu(2)

Cu(1)

63Cu(2)

slide-26
SLIDE 26

H1

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

 [degree] Intensity [a.u.]

YBCO7

slide-27
SLIDE 27

H1

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Intensity [a.u.]  [degree]

YBCO7

slide-28
SLIDE 28

H1

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Intensity [a.u.]  [degree]

YBCO7

slide-29
SLIDE 29

H1

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Intensity [a.u.]  [degree]

YBCO7

slide-30
SLIDE 30

H1

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Intensity [a.u.]  [degree]

YBCO7

slide-31
SLIDE 31

H1

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Intensity [a.u.]  [degree]

YBCO7

slide-32
SLIDE 32

H1

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Intensity [a.u.]  [degree]

YBCO7

slide-33
SLIDE 33

H1

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Intensity [a.u.]  [degree]

YBCO7

slide-34
SLIDE 34

H1

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Intensity [a.u.]  [degree]

YBCO7

slide-35
SLIDE 35

H1

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Intensity [a.u.]  [degree]

YBCO7

slide-36
SLIDE 36

H1

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Intensity [a.u.]  [degree]

YBCO7

slide-37
SLIDE 37

H1

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Intensity [a.u.]  [degree]

YBCO7

slide-38
SLIDE 38

H1

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Intensity [a.u.]  [degree]

YBCO7

slide-39
SLIDE 39

H1

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Intensity [a.u.]  [degree]

YBCO7

slide-40
SLIDE 40

H1

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Intensity [a.u.]  [degree]

YBCO7

slide-41
SLIDE 41

H1

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Intensity [a.u.]  [degree]

YBCO7

slide-42
SLIDE 42

H1

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Intensity [a.u.]  [degree]

YBCO7

slide-43
SLIDE 43

H1

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Intensity [a.u.]  [degree]

YBCO7

slide-44
SLIDE 44

H1

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Intensity [a.u.]  [degree]

YBCO7

slide-45
SLIDE 45

H1

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Intensity [a.u.]  [degree]

YBCO7

slide-46
SLIDE 46

H1

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Intensity [a.u.]  [degree]

YBCO7

slide-47
SLIDE 47

H1

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Intensity [a.u.]  [degree]

YBCO7

slide-48
SLIDE 48

H1

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Intensity [a.u.]  [degree]

YBCO7

slide-49
SLIDE 49

H1

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Intensity [a.u.]  [degree]

YBCO7

slide-50
SLIDE 50

H1

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Intensity [a.u.]  [degree]

YBCO7

slide-51
SLIDE 51

H1

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Intensity [a.u.]  [degree]

YBCO7

slide-52
SLIDE 52

H1

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Intensity [a.u.]  [degree]

YBCO7

slide-53
SLIDE 53

H1

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Intensity [a.u.]  [degree]

YBCO7

slide-54
SLIDE 54

H1

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Intensity [a.u.]  [degree]

YBCO7

slide-55
SLIDE 55

H1

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Intensity [a.u.]  [degree]

YBCO7

slide-56
SLIDE 56

H1

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Intensity [a.u.]  [degree]

YBCO7

slide-57
SLIDE 57

H1

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Intensity [a.u.]  [degree]

YBCO7

slide-58
SLIDE 58

H1

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Intensity [a.u.]  [degree]

YBCO7

slide-59
SLIDE 59

H1

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Intensity [a.u.]  [degree]

YBCO7

slide-60
SLIDE 60

H1

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Intensity [a.u.]  [degree]

YBCO7

slide-61
SLIDE 61

H1

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Intensity [a.u.]  [degree]

YBCO7

slide-62
SLIDE 62

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

H1

Intensity [a.u.]  [degree]

YBCO7

slide-63
SLIDE 63
slide-64
SLIDE 64

Intermediate Conclusions:

  • ADNQR can be applied successfully to

measure .

  • For YBCO7 we obtained =0 ±0.1. This

agrees with the known result.

  • Since we measure || we can further

conclude that there is no spatial fluctuation in the charge distribution.

<>=0 < || >0

slide-65
SLIDE 65

20 40 60 80 100 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Intensity [a.u]

 [degree]

YBCO6.675 27.501MHz YBCO7- 30.53MHz YBCO7 31.15MHz

20 40 60 80 100

Results of ADNQR for different samples

=0.6 ± 0.1 =1 ± 0.1 =0 ± 0.1 YBCO6.675 YBCO7- YBCO7

Higher doping  Higher homogeneity

slide-66
SLIDE 66
  • The stripes theory claims that one dimensional

charge structures in the planes play a crucial role in the mechanism of superconductivity.

  • Higher doping  more stripes 
  • There are experimental evidences for stripes.

Motivation - Stripes

inhomogeneity higher Tc inhomogeneity Higher doping

slide-67
SLIDE 67

6.0 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 7.0 3.82 3.84 3.86 3.88 3.90 3.92 3.94

T=300K

Orthorhombic Tetragonal

b a c/3

Lattice Constants [Angstrom] Doping value - y

b a c

a=b  =0 a  b    0 Theory

The effect is due to charges and not to lattice structure

  • J. D. Jorgensen et al, PRB , 41, 1863

(1990)

Is it a structural or a charge effect?

6.675 < 7  Experiment 6.675 > 7

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Summary:

  • ADNQR can be applied successfully to measure .
  • For YBCO7 we obtained =0 (high homogeneity).
  • We found the first evidence for charge

inhomogeneity in the bulk of highly doped YBCO (YBCO6.675 ).

  • We can safely say that YBCO6.675 is less homogenous

than YBCO7. There is an anticorrelation between Tc and homogeneity

slide-69
SLIDE 69

Acknowledgements

  • Prof. Amit Keren
  • Prof. Emil Polturak

Galina Bazalitsky Mordehai Ayalon Shmuel Hoida Leonid Iomin Rinat Assa, Ariel Maniv, Oshri Peleg, Eva Segal, Oren Shafir, Meni Shay, Lior Shkedy

Amit Kanigel

slide-70
SLIDE 70

Electric quadrupole interaction

Nucleus

z y x

I I I

                    1 2 1 2 1    q

Vij= V(r)

  

zz yy xx

V V V

j i ij

r r V V    

2

1         

zz yy xx zz q

V V V e V

 

) ˆ ˆ ( ˆ ˆ 3 6 ˆ

2 2 2 2 y x z q q

I I I I H       

2 2 2

slide-71
SLIDE 71

< || >=0.01

20 40 60 80 100

  • 1.0
  • 0.8
  • 0.6
  • 0.4
  • 0.2

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Location [unit cell]

< || >=0.15 < || >=0.47

slide-72
SLIDE 72

20 40 60 80 100

  • 1.0
  • 0.8
  • 0.6
  • 0.4
  • 0.2

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Location [unit cell]

< || >=0.47 < || >=0.32