Development and Applications of GNSS Drifters with Water Quality Measurements in Shallow Rivers and Estuaries
Charles Wang Richard Brown Kabir Suara Yanming Feng
1
Development and Applications of GNSS Drifters with Water Quality - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Development and Applications of GNSS Drifters with Water Quality Measurements in Shallow Rivers and Estuaries Charles Wang Richard Brown Kabir Suara Yanming Feng 1 Background Why studying shallow water bodies? about 60% of global population
Charles Wang Richard Brown Kabir Suara Yanming Feng
1
Photo credit: Visit Brisbane: http://www.visitbrisbane.com.au/
3
Design Application
processing and management
based models
Management of estuarine systems
collaboration with Sunshine Coast Council
Scales of interest in estuary Drifter capabilities High resolution Medium resolution
(Off‐the‐shelf) O [1 m] Position error ~ 2 cm* ~ 20 cm* ~ 3 m* O [0.01 Hz] Frequency 10 Hz 1 Hz 1 Hz Cut‐off freq 1 Hz ‐ 0.01 Hz
* Position error RT‐Flow
and Conductivity
6
7
8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 4 7 8.012 8.421 10
Measured pH Value (pH) Calibration Solution (pH)
Water Quality Sensor Comparison QUT Waspmote Atlas
QUT Sensor (Multi 3430)
Temperature Sensor
0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 4 7 8.012 8.421 10
Measured pH Value Change (pH) Calibration Solution (pH)
Water Quality Sensor Noise Comparison
QUT Waspmote Atlas
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 4 7 8.012 8.421 10
Time (seconds) Calibration Solution (pH)
Water Quality Sensor Response Time Comparison
QUT Waspmote Atlas
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
50 minutes deployment of RT‐Flow at Currimundi Lake during opening
18
position component validated using fixed location tidal height measurements.
GPS drifter data is sensitive to height measurement and thus could be used to monitor both both velocity change and height during flood .
1.34 1.36 1.38 1.4 1.42 1.44 1.46 x 10
5
0.5 1
Time from 00:00 on 29/09/2013(sec) Local Tidal Elevation (m AHD)
Drifter measured elevation Fixed local station 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 x 10
5
0.5 1 Fixed local station Drifter measured elevation
19
Questions are:
mechanisms governing dispersion in the system?
Open inlet experiment containing trajectories driven by for both ebb and flood tides Closed inlet condition, drifters travelled in ebb‐ward direction about 20o aligned with dominant surface wind direction North
0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1
Mean horizontal velocity magnitude (m/s)
10-2 10-1 100 101
Mean dispersion coefficient (m2/s)
Open inlet ( Ebb) Open inlet ( Flood) Closed inlet
Closed inlet dispersion Open inlet - Flood dispersion Open inlet- Ebb dispersion
23
24