development activities at kek
play

Development Activities at KEK 2017/8/9 Topical workshop on high - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The CW and Pulsed SRF Linac Development Activities at KEK 2017/8/9 Topical workshop on high repetition-rate XFEL physics and technology @Shanghai, China Kensei Umemori (KEK) on behalf of KEK-SRF group Outline Introduction SRF


  1. The CW and Pulsed SRF Linac Development Activities at KEK 2017/8/9 Topical workshop on high repetition-rate XFEL physics and technology @Shanghai, China Kensei Umemori (KEK) on behalf of KEK-SRF group

  2. Outline • Introduction • SRF activities at KEK • Development of pulse SRF accelerator ➢ ILC ➢ STF • Development of CW SRF accelerator ➢ Compact ERL (cERL) ➢ ERL based EUV-FEL • SRF R&D ➢ Nitrogen doping (for High-Q operation) ➢ Nitrogen infusion (for High-Q and high-gradient operation) ➢ CW SRF gun • Summary

  3. Introduction Merit of Superconducting cavity • High accelerating voltage can be obtained due to very small surface loss. 𝑸 = 𝑾 𝟑 ➢ For example, typical surface losses for 1.3GHz cavity are 𝑺 10W for 10MV and 100W for 33MV (CW) Surface resistance is 6 order smaller than normal conducting cavity (1.3GHz) Demerit of superconducting cavity • He refrigerator is essential to cool SRF cavities and to keep temperature. ➢ Several hundreds times of electric power is needed for operation of He refrigerator to keep 2.0K. Lower heat load (high-Q operation) is important • High-Q (low heat load) ⇒ Reduce surface loss ⇒ Reduce cryogenic load ⇒ Reduce construction and operation cost

  4. Important parameters for SRF One example of measurement for SRF cavity Rs [Ω] Qo 1/T [1/K] Qo =2πf x U / P Eacc[MV/m] U: Stored energy in cavity [J] P: Loss at cavity surface [W] Qo ∝ 1/Rs Rs: Surface resistance[Ω] Eacc : Accelerating gradient [MV/m]

  5. SRF Activity at KEK

  6. SRF R&D Nano-beam R&D cERL CW SRF R&D Cavity fabrication 6th IHEP-KEK SCRF Collaboration Meeting (July 15, 6 IHEP)

  7. ILC / STF

  8. ILC Acc. Design Overview (in TDR) Damping Ring e- Source e+ Main Liinac Physics Detectors Item Parameters e+ Source C.M. Energy 500 GeV e- Main Linac Key Technologies Length 31 km 1.8 x10 34 cm -2 s -1 pre-accelerator Luminosity few GeV source Repetition 5 Hz Nano-beam Technology KeV Beam Pulse Period 0.73 ms damping extraction SRF Accelerating Technology Beam Current 5.8 mA (in pulse) ring & dump few GeV 250-500 GeV final focus few GeV Beam size (y) at FF 5.9 nm SRF Cavity G. 31.5 MV/m IP bunch main linac Q 0 Q 0 = 1x10 10 compressor collimation 6th IHEP-KEK SCRF Collaboration 8 Meeting (July 15, IHEP)

  9. ILC Site Candidate Location in Japan: Kitakami • Preferred site selected by JHEP community, • Endorsed by LCC, in 2013 High-way Oshu Express- Ofunato Rail Kesen-numa Sendai Ichinoseki IP Region 6th IHEP-KEK SCRF Collaboration Meeting (July 15, 9 IHEP)

  10. STF Cryomodules STF-1 (4 cavities) in 2008 S1-Global (4+4 cavities) in 2010 4 cavities per batch Proc. in SRF11 Proc. in SRF09 STF-2 (12 cavities) in 2014~ STF Cavity Package Quantum Beam (2 cavities) in 2012 Capture CM in STF-2 accelerator Proc. in IPAC12 Proc. in IPAC16 15/Jul/2017 6th KEK-IHEP Collaboration Meeting 10

  11. STF-2 Accelerator Layout To be constructed Cold box CM1 + CM2a (Twelve cavities) View from downstream Waveguide system To be constructed Cold box Capture CM (Two cavities) Chicane RF Gun View from upstream 15/Jul/2017 6th KEK-IHEP Collaboration Meeting 11

  12. Summary of Cavity Performance Not measured in 3 rd C.T. Significantly degraded in 3 rd C.T. K t for CAV#1 and #8 was never changed! 15/Jul/2017 12 6th KEK-IHEP Collaboration Meeting

  13. Vector-sum Operation with 8 Cavities Trend graph of Ave. E acc and Δ f Each pulse for 8 cavities during vector-sum operation 35.9 MV/m 35.7 MV/m 31.8 MV/m 28.3 MV/m 30 min 30.6 MV/m 27.3 MV/m 30.1 MV/m 27.8 MV/m 30.9 MV/m ± 0.02 MV/m They satisfy the ILC specification! 46Hz ± 1.8Hz 15/Jul/2017 6th KEK-IHEP Collaboration Meeting 13

  14. Compact ERL

  15. Main linac module Compact ERL HOM damped (for 100mA circulation to suppress HOM-BBU in design) Prototype for 3-GeV class ERL light source 9-cell cavity (ERL-model2)× 2 or high-current CW linac RF frequency: 1.3 GHz 20MeV Recirculation Input power : 20kW CW (SW) (return) loop 15 MV/m ( design ) E acc : Q 0 > 1  10 10 Unloaded-Q: Dump Cryostat Two 9-cell SC cavities HOM Main-linac absorber Merger Tuner Injector-linac Photocathode Target Energy : 35MeV 3MeV DC gun  Change 20MeV due Input couplers e- (Not SRF Gun) to field emission Requirement was satisfied at V.T. Heavy F.E Tuner 2-cell Cavity was met @9-10MV/m after string assembly. Injector module 2-cell cavity × 3 Design parameters of the cERL Cryostat Double coupler 35 MeV  20MeV Nominal beam energy RF frequency: 1.3 GHz 5 MeV  2.9MeV Nominal Injector energy Input power : Beam current 10 mA (initial goal) 10kW/coupler (10mA, 5MeV) 180kW/coupler (100mA, 10MeV) 100mA (final) Input Coupler 7.6MV/m ( 5MeV ) E acc : 0.1 ‒ 1 mm  mrad Normalized emittance 15MV/m (10MeV) HOM Coupler & e- Q 0 > 1  10 10 RF Feedthrough Unloaded-Q: Bunch length 1-3ps (usual) Requirement was satisfied at V.T and for initial 10mA requirement . (bunch compressed) 100fs (short bunch) 15

  16. Beam current upgrade 2016 Japan Accelerator Society Meeting, Shogo Sakanaka • Beam current increased step by step. • Now 1mA(CW) electron beam is operated with energy recovery mode. Experiment ① Laser Compton scattering Experiment ② THz generation Bright X-ray LCS beam can be generated by Electron bunch was compressed to ~250fs using using 0.9 mA with low emittance beam. sextupole magnet. THz component generated by Imaging was successfully taken. a coherent transition radiation (CTR) monitor is analyzed by a Michelson interferometer. HyPix-3000 from RIGAKU From a rough estimation by CTF spectrum, 250 fs bunch length was achieved by bunch compression SDD THz radiation was successfully generated Apr/2015 An X-ray image of a hornet which was taken using LCS-produced X-ray (2015.Apr)

  17. ML2 ML1 Energy recovery at main linac E=2.9MeV E=2.9 MeV E=19.9 MeV Pin – Pref ~ Ploss + Pbeam Δ(Pin – Pref) ~ Pbeam ← Beam loading ML ML1:Acc ML2: Decc ML2 Energy recovery ML1+ML2 Energy loss measured from the graph = 4 W. (+-4W) Required power without recovery is : ML1 17.14 MV x 900 uA = 15.4 kW Energy Recovery is almost 100.0% (error +-0.03%) Cavity voltage : ※ different slop of ML1/ML2 come from energy 8.56 MV (ML1), 8.57 MV (ML2) difference of (acceleration – deceleration) beam Current: 0 ~ 900uA

  18. Typical one day operation of cERL SRF Synchronized with 80K line temperature Injector Piezo tuner 55 m 3 /h; ML cavities ON INJ Control voltages for piezo Vacuum pressure in cavities (~ 10 -7 Pa) tuners (for 3 cavities) Piezo FB: Field & Vac ON 34 m 3 /h; ML cavities OFF GV open & loss GV close E acc in cavities (~3.2 MV/m) D f = 2 kHz No data 3.5 hours 12:00 12:00 18:00 18:00 Drift due to temperature change of tuner system Main linac (Stop 2K operation during night time) Vc (ML1&2) 8.57MV Field & Vac 8 hours ML Piezo tuner 8 hours Piezo voltages D f = Vac.(ML1) (~10^-7Pa) 1kHz QL~1*10^7 Vac. (ML2) (~10^-8Pa) Piezo feedback works well 12:00 24:00 12:00 24:00

  19. Parameter Specification Example of high current ERL-FEL Wavelength 13.5 nm Proposal of 10kW class Output power 10 kW ERL based EUV-FEL Bunch chare 60 pC Beam energy 800 MeV Presented by Norio NAKAMURA ERL2015 ( https://www.bnl.gov/erl2015/ ) Accelerating gradient 12.5 MV/m (main linac) 1 st Arc 9-cell cavity × 64 Number of SRF cavity Bunch compressed Beam repetition 162.5 MHz Beam current 9.75 mA Beam Dump Design strategy (main linac) 10MeV, 10mA Epeak/Eacc is 1.5 times reduced from cERL cavity to overcome field emission. 8.6 MV/m  12.5MV/m 10kW FEL output Energy recovery 2 nd Arc Merger Is needed. Injector Linac Gun 10MeV, 10mA decompressed

  20. SRF R&D

  21. High-Q & high-G for pulse linac (ex. ILC) High-Q for CW linac (ex. CW XFEL) 25mTorr N2 25mTorr N2 N-dope N-infusion @120 deg C, 48hours @800 deg C, 2min High-Q & High-Q High-G A. Grassellino 「 High grad/high Q via N TTC meeting ( 2014/Dec ) A. Melnychuk infusion 」 (LCWS2016) 「 Update on N doping at Fermilab 」 N goes to N goes to around several ten nm tens um S. Aderhold / A. Grassellino (TTC@Saclay) A. Romanenco (Linac14)

  22. Results of N-doping at KEK large Without N-dope ↓ furnace (2.7 .7Pa N-dope, , 20min in ) All cases, Q-value became worse after N-doping. ↑ • We tried N-doping at KEK furnaces, but Without N-dope results were not successful. • KEK furnace pumped by a diffusion pump.

  23. N-dope/N-infusion trial using J-PARC furnace • J-PARC has oil-free furnace with cryo-pump(10,000 litter/sec) and three TMPs(3,000 litter/sec x 3). • Vacuum level reached to ~1e-6 Pa. • Normally used for degassing of beam-duct and components.

  24. VT results of N-doping VT4(reference measurement) N-doping 15um EP  VT5 Additional 10um EP → VT6 • Magnetic field canceled. (< 1mG) • Cooled down with thermal gradient Quench VT4(reference) Rs =3.3nΩ VT5(N-dope) Rs =1.8nΩ VT6(add EP) Rs =1.2nΩ  Very high Q up to high field  Q = 2.4e11@11MV/m, 1.4K  Q = 3.3e10@14MV/m, 2.0K  Quench at 19MV/m  No field emission  First success in Japan

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend