Present Light-source Activities and Future ERL Plans at KEK S. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

present light source activities and future erl plans at
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Present Light-source Activities and Future ERL Plans at KEK S. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Present Light-source Activities and Future ERL Plans at KEK S. Sakanaka Photon Factory, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) Site Map of KEK (High Energy Accelerator Research Organization) KEKB Neutrino Beamline PF-AR PF


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Present Light-source Activities and Future ERL Plans at KEK

  • S. Sakanaka

Photon Factory, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Site Map of KEK (High Energy Accelerator Research Organization)

KEKB PF storage ring PF-AR Neutrino Beamline

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The Photon Factory at KEK

  • Two synchrotron light sources

PF storage ring (2.5 GeV) PF-AR (6.5 GeV)

  • More than 2,500 users

Number of users Operation time/year (PF-ring)

1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

8 2 8 3 8 4 8 5 8 6 8 7 8 8 8 9 9 9 1 9 2 9 3 9 4 9 5 9 6 9 7 9 8 9 9 2

Total operation time Scheduled user's time Net user's time

Fiscal year Operation time (hrs.)

Scientific-field distribution

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Photon Factory (PF) storage ring

  • 1982 Commissioned.
  • 1986 First low-emittance: 400 → 130 nm·rad
  • 1997 Second low-emittance: 130 → 36 nm·rad

Inside photo. 0.014 Synchrotron tune 312 Harmonic number 500.1 MHz RF frequency (9.60, 4.28) Betatron tune (νx, νy) 36 nm·rad Natural beam emittance 187.03 m Circumference 2.5 GeV Nominal beam energy Principal parameters.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Layout of the PF storage ring

6C 7C 6B 6A 7B 4C 4B 4B 1 2 3C 3 4A B5 B6 B7 B8 B9 B10 B4 B3 B2 3C 1 3A 3B 2A 2C 1B 1C 3C 2 B1 B28 B27 28B 28A 27A 27B 27A 1 2 B26 B25 B24 B23 B22 B21 B11 B12 B20 B19 18A 18C 19A 19B 20B 20A 21 17B 18B 17C 17A 16B 16A 16A 1 2 15A B18 B17 B16 15C 14C1 14C2 14A 14B 13A 13C 12C 12A 11B 13B 13B 1 2 12B 11A 11D 10B 9C 9A 10A 8C 2 10C 11C 7A 8B 8A B13 B14 B15 T 15B T 25m

U#2 RF MPW#13 MPW#16 Revolver#19 EMPW#28 Injection VW#14 RF Six insertion devices 22 beamlines More than 60 experimental stations

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Upgrade to the low-emittance lattice (1997)

  • Each FODO-cell was reconstructed to two FODO-cells

Before reconstruction After reconstruction

Beam optics in the normal-cell section

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Orbit stabilization using the global feedback system

  • An integrated system for the beam-position measurement and the global feedback.
  • This system can measure the COD in every 12 ms.
  • Using fast-response correctors, we can correct the vertical orbit variations at

frequencies of up to 0.3 Hz.

Block diagram Photo of the VME system.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Damped accelerating cavities

  • Harmful higher-order-modes can be damped by using

microwave absorbers (made of SiC) in the beam pipe.

  • We tuned remaining trapped-modes so as to avoid any

coupled-bunch instabilities.

140 464 260 150 100

Cavity Fixed Tuner SiC Absorber

Cross section of one cavity unit. Damped cavities as installed.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Improvement in the beam lifetime by rf-phase modulation

Modulated rf voltage

2 4 6

  • 2
  • 1

1 2

Bunch

RF voltage (MV)

ωt

[ ]

) 2 cos( ) 2 cos( 1 2

2 2

t t

s s m s s

ω ω φ φ ω ε ω φ λ φ − = + + +

  • 0 cotφ

φ ε

m

=

Modulate the rf phase at a frequency of 2ωs Parametric resonance

2 4 6 8 10 12

modulation Synchrotron

  • scillation

Phase

2 4 6 8 10 12

ωst

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Typical operation (24 hours)

02/04/11 09:00 02/04/11 21:00 02/04/12 09:00 20 40 60 80

Lifetime (hrs.) Date and Time

100 200 300 400 500

With phase modulation Current (mA)

April, 2002

slide-11
SLIDE 11

PF-AR

Inside photo. 6.66 MeV Radiation loss / turn 640 Harmonic number 508.58 MHz RF frequency (10.15, 10.23) Betatron tune (νx, νy) 294 nm·rad Natural beam emittance 377.26 m Circumference 6.5 - 5 GeV Beam energy Principal parameters.

  • 1986 Parasitic usage of SR from the TRISTAN booster ring.
  • 1998 Switched to dedicated light source.
  • 2001 Major upgrade
slide-12
SLIDE 12

NE3 NW2 NE1 NE5

Notrh-East Experimental hall

NE9 NW12

North-West Experimental hall North Experimental hall

10 m

Upgrade of the PF-AR (2001)

New experimental hall New copper chambers New in-vacuum undulators Insertion devices in-vacuum: 3 conventional : 1 EPICS-based Control

slide-13
SLIDE 13

In-vacuum undulator (NW-2)

Allows tapered configuration for XAFS experiments Spectrum range: 5 - 25 keV

NdFeB Type of magnet 3.6 m Undulator length 1.8 keV Typical 1st harmonic 0.8 T Peak magnetic field 90 Number of periods 40 mm Undulator period 10 mm Minimum gap Parameters

Courtesy: S. Yamamoto

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Typical operation

10 20 30 40 50 60

PF-AR operation (Feb. 23-24, 2003)

10:00 5:00 19:00 14:00 0:00 14:00

Time Beam current (mA)

10 20 30 40 50

Lifetime (hrs.)

  • Beam energy

6.5 GeV for usual experiments 5 GeV for medical application

  • Full-time single bunch operation
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Brilliance of the synchrotron radiation

1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 101 102 103 104 105 Brilliance (photons/sec/mm2/mrad2/0.1%b.w.)

Photon energy (eV)

PF E=2.5GeV, I=400mA ε=36nmrad 1% coupling PF-AR E=6.5GeV, I=50mA ε=168nmrad 1% coupling

Revolver #19

A B C D

U#02 AR-NE#03 MPW #13-U MPW #16-U MPW #16-W MPW #13-W AR-EMPW #NE01 EMPW #28 PF-Bend AR-Bend VW#14

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Future plan: Energy Recovery Linac based light source

Suitable balance for two requirements is very important for the Photon Factory.

  • Provide highly-advanced tools for investigating, analyzing,

and processing materials.

  • Provide wide-purpose, high performance tools with

sufficient capacity for investigating new materials. ERL-based light source is being recognized as the most promising light source.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Requirements from the scientists

  • Spectrum range : from soft x-ray to hard x-ray
  • Average brilliance (at 0.1 nm) : > 1022 ph/s/0.1%/mm2/mrad2
  • Average flux : > 1016 ph/s/0.1%
  • Pulse length : < 1 ps is available
  • Beam stability : less than 1/10 of beam sizes
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Tentative ERL plan at KEK

  • Beam energy : 2.5 GeV (phase I) - 5 GeV (phase II)
  • Provide the 1st harmonic undulator radiation of 1 Å with an

undulator period of 15 mm (present minimum).

  • Insertion devices: 5 m × 12, 30 m × 4, 200 m × 1

407 m 279 m U200

U30 U30 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U5 U30 U30

615 m

E=2.5 - 5.0 GeV C=1253 m

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Principal parameters (goal)

10 pm·rad Beam emittance at 5 GeV 10 - 20 MV/m Acceleration gradient 1.3 GHz RF frequency 1 - 0.1 ps Bunch length (r.m.s.) 5×10-5 Energy spread (r.m.s.) 0.1 mm·mrad Normalized beam emittance 1253 m Circumference 100 mA Average beam current 10 MeV Injection energy 2.5 - 5.0 GeV Beam energy

  • Aims at realizing diffraction-limited light source at the photon

energy of about 10 keV

  • Requirements for electron sources and for emittance preservation

will be very stringent.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Standard 5m undulator

Spectrum range of undulator radiation from a standard 5 m undulator.

By S. Yamamoto

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Anticipated spectrum for long undulator

Calculated brilliance for 30, 60, 100, 120 and 200-m undulators. Undulator period: 2.0 cm, beam current: 100 mA. Optimized betatron functions for each undulator lengths were used. Requirement for the energy spread

kN E

E

4 1 ≤ σ

By S. Yamamoto

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Superconducting accelerator

Performance of L-band single-cell accelerating cavities which were treated using Electroplishing (EP) technique at KEK.

  • High-gradient of up to 40 MV/m have been achieved with L-band

superconducting cavities (DESY/Cornell/JLab/KEK).

108 109 1010 1011 10 20 30 40 50

K-14 : half cell annealed at 1400

  • C, EP, HPR, Bake

K-8 : BP, 760

  • C anneald, EP, HPR, Bake

K-9 : BP, 760

  • C annealed, EP, HPR, Bake

JL-1 : fabricated at CEBAF, CP, EP, HPR, Bake K-11 : CP, 760

  • C annealed, EP, HPR, Bake

K-22 : CP, EP, HPR, Bake

Qo Eacc [MV/m] 1.5 ~ 1.8 K

For the ERL: 10 - 20 MV/m

Courtesy: K. Saito

slide-23
SLIDE 23

High-gradient with 9-cell cavities

Performance of DESY 9-cell cavities which were treated using Electroplishing (EP) technique at KEK.

  • High-gradient performance has also been demonstrated with 9-

cell cavities which were treated by the EP technology.

10

8

10

9

10

10

10

11

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 DESY CP+HPR (lower Q) DESY CP+HPR (higher Q) AC72 : EP(KEK)+HPR(DESY)+Bake(DESY) AC73 : EP(KEK)+HPR(DESY)+Bake(DESY) AC78 : EP(KEK)+HPR(DESY)+Bake(DESY) Qo Eacc [MV/m] TESLA500 Specification TESLA800 Specification

Courtesy: K. Saito

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Superconducting accelerator for the ERL

  • TESLA-type 9-cell cavities, 1.3 GHz, operated at 2K
  • Accelerating gradient : 20 MV/m (phase I: 10 MV/m)
  • Key technology for high gradient:

Electropolishing (EP), High-pressure water rinsing, etc.

  • Cost reduction: Nb-Cu clad seamless cavity

Simplification of the treatments

  • Higher-order-mode damping and tuning
  • Engineering design of cryomodule, reduction in length
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Parameters of ERL superconducting cavities based on TESLA-type design

10 - 20 MV/m Operation gradient 29.6 W/cavity at 2K (at 20 MV/m) 7.4 W/cavity at 2K Dynamical heat loss (at 10 MV/m) 130 Hz (FWHM) Cavity bandwidth at Qext = 1 × 107 1 × 107 Qext of input coupler 315 kHz/mm ∆f/∆L ±315 kHz Tuning range 42.6 Gauss/(MV/m) Hp/Eacc 2.0 Ep/Eacc 1036 Ω R/Q 70 mm Iris diameter 1.87 % Cell-to-cell coupling kcc 1.036 m Active length L 1.5 × 1010 Unloaded quality factor Q0 1300 MHz Accelerating frequency

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Heat loads for cryogenic plant

1.5 1.3 Safety factor for Q-value 1.5 × 1010 1.5 × 1010 Q0 8.9 kW (4.3 K equiv..) 500 W (equiv. 4.5 K) 337 W (at 4.3 K equiv.) 10 W (at 4.3 K equiv.) 20 W 18 W (at 4.3 K equiv.) 74 W (at 2K) 222 W (4.3 K equiv.) 10 MV/m Phase I (2.5 GeV) 20 MV/m Gradient 35 kW (4.3 K equiv.) Total heat load for 25 modules 500 W (equiv. 4.5 K) Transfer loss 1 km 1380 W (at 4.3 K equiv) Total heat load/module 10 W (4.3 K equiv.) Heat leaks at 80 K shield/module 20 W Heat leaks at 4.5 K shield/module 18 W (at 4 K.3 equiv.) Heat leaks at 2 K shield/module 296 W (at 2K) 888 W (4.3 K equiv.) Dynamical loss/(10 cavities) Phase II (5 GeV)

  • Phase I : 10-kW (at 4.3 K) class cryogenic plant
  • Phase II: add three more 10-kW class plants
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Design issues of the arc

  • Minimize emittance growth and energy spread due to

1) incoherent SR 2) coherent SR

  • Variable R56 for bunch compression / no-compression

Compensation for higher-order terms (T566 etc.)

  • House many undulators (requirement: about 20)

Optimum optics for undulators.

  • Precise circumference control
  • Tunable betatron phase advance per arc (for multibunch BBU)
  • Limitation due to site
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Preliminary design of the arc (unit cell)

TBA lattice 7-m straight for I.D. ρ = 17 m Beam optics for unit cell. Designed by Y. Kobayashi Tuning range for R56 (-0.1 to 3.4 cm)

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Preliminary design of the arc

by Y. Kobayashi Lattice configuration of π-arc Beam optics for the complete arc

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Beam dynamics issues

  • Multibunch BBU effect and other issues have been investigated

by Y. Shobuda.

  • Under simulations, it is possible to obtain the threshold current
  • f more than 100 mA for the multibunch instability by adjusting

betatron phase advance per circulation, and by other means. Simulation model Courtesy:

  • Y. Shobuda
slide-31
SLIDE 31

Electron sources

  • Ultra-low emittance (0.1 π•mm•mrad) and high average current (100 mA)

require very ambitious challenges for electron sources.

  • Some experience on RF photocathode gun at KEK.

(BNL/Waseda-U/KEK/Tokyo-U/Spring-8)

  • Photocathode RF gun seems to be not very promising for the ERL

1) Very difficult to reduce the emittance below 1 π•mm•mrad 2) Under CW operation, one must lower the field gradient considerably

  • DC photocathode gun seems very promising (GaAs NEA)

1) High quantum efficiency (but short lifetime of cathode) 2) Ultra-low emittance ( < 1 π•mm•mrad) is possible, in principle 3) Long-time experiences as the polarized sources (but low-currents)

  • KEK is pushing R&D for DC photocathode guns under collaboration with

Nagoya Univ. (Prof. Nakanishi et al.)

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Summary and present status of KEK-ERL plan

  • During the past year, a preliminary planning was carried out.
  • Based on the tentative plan, an interim report "Study Report on

the Future Light Source at the Photon Factory" is being published as the KEK report (in Japanese).

  • Trying to make a consensus among the users.
  • Investigations on many issues are under way.
  • R&D for the superconducting technologies, precise short-

period undulators, etc., are progressing as natural extensions.

  • R&D for ultra-low emittance electron source has started.