Detector for the PRISM: PRIME - PRI SM M uon to E lectron conversion - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

detector for the prism prime pri sm m uon to e lectron
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Detector for the PRISM: PRIME - PRI SM M uon to E lectron conversion - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Detector for the PRISM: PRIME - PRI SM M uon to E lectron conversion - Akira SATO Department of Physics, Osaka University The Project-X Muon Workshop November 8th (Monday), 2010, FNAL PRIME: from stopping targets to detectors Thin Stopping


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Detector for the PRISM: PRIME

  • PRISM Muon to Electron conversion -

Akira SATO Department of Physics, Osaka University The Project-X Muon Workshop November 8th (Monday), 2010, FNAL

slide-2
SLIDE 2

PRIME: from stopping targets to detectors

  • Thin Stopping Targets
  • due to mono-energetic muons
  • Graded Field at Muon Target

Solenoid

  • To maximize transmission efficiency
  • f the curved solenoid.
  • Curved Solenoid
  • To suppress low momentum

electrons.

  • Low Mass Tracker
  • to be transparent to γ’s.
  • f < 1 MHz
  • Electron Calorimeter
  • Trigger
  • Cosmic Muon suppression
  • f < 1 MHz
  • No Time Window
  • pure muon beam
  • + curved solenoid
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction

  • The parameters of muon beam for the

PRISM would have many advantages.

  • ex). Thinner stopping target to

get better electron energy resolution.

  • but also would make a very high

instantaneous detector hit rate Rinst.

  • Rough estimation
  • Rinst
  • = 2x1012µ/s / 103pulse/s / 10-6/s
  • =~1015Hz
  • Detector cannot work!
  • We use a Spiral Solenoid

Spectrometer to suppress the instantaneous rate.

Muon intensity 2x1012 µ/sec Mean momentum 68 MeV Momentum spread 3 %

  • Rep. rate

1000 Hz Pulse width 100 nsec Beam size (H.) ~100 mm Beam size (V.) ~80 mm

will be changed to 40MeV/c +- 3% Muon beam param. in this study

This talk shows a MC study for the stopping target and the spectrometer.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

References of this talk

!"#$%& !'&()'#* !"(+,$'-(,($ .'$ % /01!2 ! 3( 4')5($6#') 78"($#-(),9

:9 !%6%' ;("%$,-(), '. /<=6#+6> ?=',' @)#5($6#,=> ?=',' ABA> C%"%) D+,'E($ FG> FBBH

! "#$%&'()$*&#

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

PRISM Tech. note by N.Sasao

A Letter of Intent to The J-PARC 50-GeV Proton Synchrotron Experiment An Experimental Search for the µ− − e− Conversion Process at an Ultimate Sensitivity of the Order of 10−18 with PRISM

The PRIME Working Group January 1, 2003

PRIME-LoI to J-PARC

http://www-ps.kek.jp/jhf-np/LOIlist/pdf/L25.pdf

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Layout and Magnetic Field in This Study

  • 540 deg. spiral solenoid for the electron spectrometer.
  • cf. COMET has a 180 deg solenoid for the spectrometer.

Spiral Solenoid Iron Shield Target Section Detector Section TOP VIEW

Spiral Solenoid Spectrometer for PRISM

1 m 1 m Track Chamber Calorimeter Target SIDE VIEW

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Magnetic Field Configuration

Solenoid Field Strength [T]

Solenoid Field Strength [T] Curved Solenoid Target Section Detector Section Path Length [m]

  • 2

2 4 6 8 10 14 12 20 22 24 26

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Muon Stopping Targets

for the narrow energy spread muon beam

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Muon Stopping Target:

!"#$%&'#&('

! "!! #!! $!! %!! &!!! ! !'& !'" !'( !'# !') !'$ !'* !'% !'+ &

Range in Ti [mm] 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

pµ = 68MeV/c ± 3%

σrange=38µm

It is dominated by momentum distribution.

Ti target of 1mm is enough to stop muons.

If the performance of phase rotation at PRISM gets better, there is still a room to get a muon-stopping target thinner by a factor of two at most (to about 500 µm full width). Range in Ti [mm] pµ [GeV/c]

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Parameters of Stopping Targets

In the following studies, PRISM cf.COMET Number of layers 20 17 Disk thickness 50µm 200µm Disk diameter 5cm 10cm Disk spacing 5cm 5cm Material Ti Al

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Energy Loss of Outgoing Electrons

  • 10

20 30 40 50

Energy loss in the stopping targets [keV]

  • 100 200 300 400 500

Traversed target thickness [µm]

escaping from the upstream exit

7keV

20 layers of 50µm Ti disks (D=5cm, 5cm separation)

79.3% 20.7%

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • cf. Energy Loss of Outgoing Electrons for COMET

98 100 102 104 108 106 500 1000 2000 3000 4000

pe (MeV/c)

1500

ID Entries Mean RMS 200 14874 104.2 0.7730

3500 2500

Figure 6.6: Momentum distribution of µ−−e− conversion signal electrons, including the effect of energy loss in the muon-stopping target.

700keV

from COMET-CDR

17 layers of 200µmTi disks (D=10cm, 5cm separation)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Tracking Detector

  • Main detector to measure Ee
  • Thickness should be about 0.01 radiation-length to

suppress γ backgrounds.

  • Spatial resolution < 0.5 mm
  • Hit multiplicity ~ 1 per plane per event
  • Straw tube tracker
  • 5mmΦ, 208 tubes per sub-layer
  • four layers per station
  • anode readout (X, X’, Y, Y’)
  • five stations, 48 cm apart

A Prototype chamber tested by beam. Anode position resolution of 112 µm.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Track Fitting Simulation

  • 5 x-y Tracking Stations
  • 1-T uniform B
  • 480 mm spacing
  • Polyimide:160µmt per plane
  • Multiple Scattering by Break Point

Method

  • Require single hit for each plane
  • σ[tracking] = 150 keV/c
  • Momentum resolution
  • COMET: rms[total] = 770 keV/c
  • the energy loss uncertainly in the

muon-stopping target is large.

  • PRISM: rms[total] ⇒150 keV/c

hfmomdif

Entries 126083 Mean -0.04918 RMS 0.1531

  • 2
  • 1.5
  • 1
  • 0.5

0.5 1 1.5 2 1 10

2

10

3

10

4

10

hfmomdif

Entries 126083 Mean -0.04918 RMS 0.1531

Momentum(Fit-True)

hfmomdio_norm Entries 115967 Mean 103.3 RMS 0.2285 Momentum (MeV/c) 103 103.5 104 104.5 105 105.5 106 Counts per 0.05 MeV/c 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 hfmomdio_norm Entries 115967 Mean 103.3 RMS 0.2285

Electron Momentum

run time: 2 x 107 sec

BR=10-16

σ[tracking] = 150 keV/c

COMET

pfit - ptrue

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Spiral Solenoid Spectrometer

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Principle of Electron Transport Solenoid

  • A center of helical trajectory of

charged particles in a curved solenoidal field is drifted by

  • This effect can be used for

charge and momentum selection.

  • This drift can be compensated by

an auxiliary field parallel to the drift direction given by

  • Blockers in the curved solenoid

improve the background suppression.

Charged Particle Trajectory in Curved Solenoids

D = p qB θbend 1 2

  • cos θ +

1 cos θ

  • D : drift distance

B : Solenoid field !bend : Bending angle of the solenoid channel p : Momentum of the particle q : Charge of the particle ! : atan(PT/PL)

Bcomp = p qr 1 2

  • cos θ +

1 cos θ

  • p : Momentum of the particle

q : Charge of the particle r : Major radius of the solenoid ! : atan(PT/PL)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Layout and Magnetic Field in This Study

  • The performance of the spectrometer was studied by MC simulation.

Spiral Solenoid Iron Shield Target Section Detector Section TOP VIEW

Spiral Solenoid Spectrometer for PRISM

1 m 1 m Track Chamber Calorimeter Target SIDE VIEW

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Magnetic Field Configuration

Solenoid Field Strength [T]

Solenoid Field Strength [T] Curved Solenoid Target Section Detector Section Path Length [m]

  • 2

2 4 6 8 10 14 12 20 22 24 26

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Trajectory in the spiral solenoid

slide-17
SLIDE 17

COMET 180deg. PRISM 540deg.

  • Electron Transport Efficiency
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Detector Rate

  • Particles entering the detector are expected to be dominated by DIO electrons.
  • Positively charged particles and neutrals would be altered out, to a large

extent, by the spiral solenoid section.

  • We estimated the number of entering particles using the transport efficiency

and the decay in orbit electron spectrum.

Cut conditions

  • No. of DIO particles

per pulse

Signal efficiency z>-0.25[m]; x>-0.35[m]. < 0.1 92.4% z>-0.30[m]; x>-0.35[m]. < 0.4 100% z>-0.35[m]; x>-0.35[m]. < 0.8 100%

Muon intensity 2x1012 µ/sec Mean momentum 68 MeV Momentum spread 3 %

  • Rep. rate

1000 Hz Pulse width 100 nsec

used for acc. estimation

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Acceptance of the spiral spectrometer

5"#%$ 6-,71+1-, 8%)+1-, 92")+1-, :%3"2; 6< !"2=%+ 0+-**1,= 2"+% +"2=%+ <>>? "00@3%7 6A 9-2B"27 712%)+1-,4 +"2=%+ CD4E? 6E F$-);%2 )@+ GH%2+1)"$I 0*12"$ 0-$%,-17 CD4E? J31,!K>4E> 6& F$-);%2 )@+ G/-21L-,+"$I 0*12"$ 0-$%,-17 CD4E? M31,!K>4EN 6N 01, "! >#EE 7%+%)+-2 ON4E? 6O P$ % <N> Q;%RS +"2=%+ &<4A?

Overall efficiency is 41%

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Summary (Detector)

  • Detecter system from the stopping target to the detectors for

PRISM is studied.

  • Thin enough stopping target for the aimed energy

resolution.

  • Spiral solenoid spectrometer
  • with DIO blocker to reduce detector rate
  • detector instantaneous hit rate is <0.4 / pulse (~1µs) =

4x105Hz

  • Straw chamber 200 straws/plane -> 2kHz/wire
  • Calorimeter 1000 segments -> 400Hz/segment
  • overall acceptance is 40%
  • They look very nice!
  • We need to study and optimize the design for the new PRISM

parameters.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Phase Rotator Linac in the PRISM-LoI

Appendix H Alternative Phase Rotator Scheme

H.1 Phase Rotator Linac

Although the base line of the phase rotator is FFAG, another phase rotator scheme that uses a simple linac is also being studied : namely PRISM-Linac. The main reason for this study is as follows. While the muons captured by the solenoid magnetic field can be transported sufficiently as long as the magnetic field continues, we need a special care to transfer them to a FODO transport system composed of bending magnets, Q-magnets and so on. When we use a linac instead of the ring as a phase rotator, the muons are captured and transported by a continuous solenoid field till the end (stopping target), and thus the transfer between the two different transport system, solenoid channel and FODO channel, vanishes. In addition, this system does not need fast kickers for injection to and extraction from the ring, which requires special care to be taken. The drawbacks of this linac scheme may be: 1) although unwanted particles such as oppositely charged muons diffuse in the phase rotator, they are also transported by the solenoid channel, 2) the cost may be high. The first issue can be solved by use of a curved solenoid, which is already described in section 5.2. The resulted system is shown in Fig.H.1 schematically. The following sections describe such an alternative scheme and a rough simulation result of a muon yield.

!"#$%& !'&()'#* +,-. /-0. 123456.787-3.787+929. !"#$%& !'&()'#* +,-. :1. ,11. ,,1. ,;1. <=>!46?7"@%A(7$'B%B'$ <$#.%$C7<$'B') <$'*DEB#')7F%$G(B <$'B') H(%. ID."7

Figure H.1: Schematic layout of the PRISM-Linac 92

A Letter of Intent to The J-PARC 50 GeV Proton Synchrotron Experiments The PRISM Project −A Muon Source of the World-Highest Brightness by Phase Rotation −

PRISM Working Group January 1st, 2003

http://www-ps.kek.jp/jhf-np/LOIlist/pdf/L24.pdf

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Phase Rotator Linac in the PRISM-LoI

!"#$ %&'"( )* !"#$ %&'"( )* !"#$ %&'"( )* !"#$ %&'"( )* !"#$ %&'"( )* !"#$ %&'"( )* %+"#$ %&+"( )* %*,-./0123,4567552,0/81615-

%9 %' +9 +' )9 9&% 9&%' 9&+ 9&+' 9&) 9&)' 9&: 9&:' "5(

+;*,45<=>5,?10? )+*,@!"#$A )!*,@!"#$A :9*,@!"#$A +;*,@!"#$A ::*@!"#$A :;*@!"#$A '+* @%+"#$B%&+"(A

6,CD-E

Figure H.3: Rough simulation shows how the phase rotation goes. Six 3m-cavities lined up with 1m spacing generate 9 MV in total. 12-MHz one is used to fit the waveform.

+* ;* %F +9G)9* :F H I J>=KL061=2,6/>356 !,=>,%+F M/.6L>5NO50/P,-5061=2 QK1/4/610,5R./2-1=2 O>1<6,-5061=2 JS/-5,T=6/6=> U6=..123,6/>356