Detailed Task Analysis and Failure Modes and Effects Analysis HFE - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Detailed Task Analysis

and Failure Modes and Effects Analysis

2

HFE Requirements Development

• Sources

– Customer – Subject Matter Experts – Users, operators – Existing, similar systems – Brainstorming

– Task Analysis

• Goals

– Identify requirements – Unverifiable (“Customer”) Requirements

→ Verifiable (“Engineering”) Requirements

3

Task Analysis

• High-Level Task Analysis

– Hierarchical Task Analysis (HTA) ≈ IDEF0 Nodelist – Functional Flow Charts – Functional Analysis/Modeling

= Activity Analysis/Modeling = Process Analysis/Modeling We do this with IDEF0.

– other methods

• Low-Level Task Analysis

– Detailed Task Analysis (used in IE 545) – GOMS (Goals, Operators, Methods, Selection rules) – Cognitive Task Analysis (CTA) – other methods

4

Task Analysis

• High-Level Task Analysis

– Hierarchical Task Analysis (HTA) ≈ IDEF0 Nodelist – Functional Flow Charts – Functional Analysis/Modeling

= Activity Analysis/Modeling = Process Analysis/Modeling We do this with IDEF0.

– other methods

• Low-Level Task Analysis

– Detailed Task Analysis – GOMS (Goals, Operators, Methods, Selection rules) – Cognitive Task Analysis (CTA) – other methods

5

Hierarchical Task Analysis of Cesarean Delivery Process

(original version, in “org chart” format)

6

Hierarchical Task Analysis of Cesarean Delivery Process

(current IDEF0 nodelist version)

7

Task Analysis

• High-Level Task Analysis

– Hierarchical Task Analysis (HTA) ≈ IDEF0 Nodelist – Functional Flow Charts (handout) – Functional Analysis/Modeling

= Activity Analysis/Modeling = Process Analysis/Modeling We do this with IDEF0.

– other methods

• Low-Level Task Analysis

– Detailed Task Analysis – GOMS (Goals, Operators, Methods, Selection rules) – Cognitive Task Analysis (CTA) – other methods

8

Functional Flow Charts

9

Task Analysis

• High-Level Task Analysis

– Hierarchical Task Analysis (HTA) ≈ IDEF0 Nodelist – Functional Flow Charts (handout) – Functional Analysis/Modeling

= Activity Analysis/Modeling = Process Analysis/Modeling We do this with IDEF0.

– other methods

• Low-Level Task Analysis

– Detailed Task Analysis – GOMS (Goals, Operators, Methods, Selection rules) – Cognitive Task Analysis (CTA) – other methods

10

Part of ECD High-Level Task Analysis (IDEF0 A3 diagram)

11

Task Analysis

• High-Level Task Analysis

– Hierarchical Task Analysis (HTA) ≈ IDEF0 Nodelist – Functional Flow Charts (handout) – Functional Analysis/Modeling

= Activity Analysis/Modeling = Process Analysis/Modeling We do this with IDEF0.

– other methods

• Low-Level Task Analysis

– Detailed Task Analysis – GOMS (Goals, Operators, Methods, Selection rules) – Cognitive Task Analysis (CTA) – other methods

12

ECD Detailed Task Analysis

Tasks (leaf nodes) selected for DTA

13

ECD Detailed Task Analysis

14

Detailed Task Analysis Fields

(for IE 545)

Field Description Potential Requirements

Task Name, brief description reminders (task, steps) Start Cue Event, interval, stimulus that triggers task performance Information Info operator needs to perform task info to display, visibility, ... Decision(s) Decisions, evaluations, calculations

• perator makes to perform tasks

decision aids, other JPAs Actions Actions operator needs to perform task controls, tools Frequency & Duration How often, how long automation, seating, supports, ... Environmental Conditions Illumination, temperature, vibration, noise, acceleration, ... lighting, clothing, ... Potential Errors, Risks Omissions, commissions, mistakes, slips, … Risk level based on frequency, consequences, detectability JPAs, other countermeasures Remarks/Comments Additional useful info to aid TA

• thers (optional)

see handout

15

ECD Detailed Task Analysis

16

Questions for Detailed Task Analysis

Source: Chapanis, A. (1996). Human Factors In Systems Engineering. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., p. 107.

17

Some Sensory / Cognitive / Motor Action Verbs

(useful in Decision/Action TA fields)

• Attend to
• Detect
• Distinguish between
• Feel
• Hear
• Read
• View
• Remember
• Calculate
• Count
• Decide among
• Estimate
• Evaluate
• Generate
• Predict
• Process
• Configure
• Disengage
• Engage
• Grasp
• Manipulate
• Move
• Open
• Pick up
• Position
• Press
• Reach to
• Reach to
• Release
• Transfer
• Turn
• Wait for
• Walk to

18

Supplementary Information for Detailed Task Analysis

• See handouts

19

Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA)

20

Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA)

• Purpose

– Systematically, prospectively, identify ways in which a process

(system) can fail: Failure Modes.

– Identify factors potentially contributing to failures. – Estimate risk of failure – Identify countermeasures – Develop requirements

• Method (HMSEM)

– Select task on which to perform FMEA (TA should have been

completed on it)

– Prepare task FMEA worksheet from [template] worksheet

• copy [template] worksheet
• rename new task FMEA worksheet to task's A-number
• copy task row from [Summary] worksheet to row 6 of new task FMEA

worksheet

• (optionally) hide non-FMEA columns (A-Z)

– Perform FMEA

21

Example FMEA

(from electronics inspection/repair workstation design project)

22

FMEA Fields

• Contributing Factors

– Circumstances, conditions, events, factors, ... anything that might

make a failure mode more likely.

• Potential Failure Mode

– A way in which the process/system can fail.

• Potential Effects of Failure Mode

– Consequences of the failure.

• Severity

– Numeric rating of the estimated severity of consequences, of the

failure, e.g.,

• 1. negligible
• 2. minor
• 3. moderate
• 4. major
• 5. catastrophic

23

FMEA Fields (2)

• Probability

– Numeric rating of the estimated probability that the failure will

• ccur, e.g.,
• 1. Remote
• 2. Unlikely
• 3. Occasional
• 4. Common
• 5. Frequent

24

FMEA Fields (3)

• Non-detectability

– Numeric rating of the difficulty of detecting the failure in time to

prevent or mitigate its consequences, e.g.,

1.Should the failure occur, there is a virtual certainty that the existing controls will detect it. 2.Very high 3.Should the failure occur there is a high probability that the existing controls will detect it. 4.Moderately high 5.Existing controls have difficulty detecting the failure 6.Low 7.Controls are weak. Detection could depend on a lucky catch. 8.Remote 9.Very remote 10.No controls for this failure mode exist

• RPN: Risk Priority Number

– RPN = Probability x Severity x Non-detectability

25

FMEA Fields (4)

• Potential Remediations

– Design strategies that could reduce the likelihood of the failure

mode.

• Design Requirements

– Abbreviated requirements statements for remediations. – Requirement numbers (for future reference).