destruction of health care infrastructure sendai sewage
play

Destruction of Health Care Infrastructure Sendai sewage treatment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

FLOODING & P UBLIC H EALTH IMPACT Paul R Hunter The Norwich Medical School University of East Anglia D IRECT IMPACTS ON HEALTH Pre-onset phase Injuries Onset phase Death by drowning Injuries Post-onset phase


  1. FLOODING & P UBLIC H EALTH IMPACT Paul R Hunter The Norwich Medical School University of East Anglia

  2. D IRECT IMPACTS ON HEALTH ▪ Pre-onset phase ▪ Injuries ▪ Onset phase ▪ Death by drowning ▪ Injuries ▪ Post-onset phase ▪ Faecal oral disease ▪ Vector and rodent-borne disease ▪ Respiratory infections ▪ Skin infections ▪ Mental health Few et al 2004

  3. I NDIRECT IMPACTS ON HEALTH ▪ Damage to health care infrastructure ▪ Chemical contamination of food and water stocks ▪ Damage to water and sanitation infrastructure ▪ Damage to crops and/or disruption of food supplies ▪ Damage/destruction of property (e.g. lack of shelter may lead to increased exposure to vectors) ▪ Population displacement Few et al 2004

  4. Destruction of Health Care Infrastructure

  5. Sendai sewage treatment plant

  6. Onagawa

  7. D EATHS

  8. A NNUAL REPORTS OF FLOODING EVENTS GLOBALLY 250 200 150 100 50 0 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 http://www.emdat.be/ Data taken from EM-DAT

  9. A NNUAL REPORTS OF DEATHS FROM FLOODING 40000 Venezuela 1999 35000 Bangladesh 1974 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 Data taken from EMDAT

  10. A NNUAL REPORTS OF DEATHS FROM FLOODING PER EVENT 10000 1000 100 10 1 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 Data taken from EMDAT

  11. A NNUAL REPORTS OF N UMBERS AFFECTED BY FLOODING 300.000.000 250.000.000 200.000.000 150.000.000 100.000.000 50.000.000 0 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 Data taken from EMDAT

  12. D EATHS PER 10000 PEOPLE AFFECTED BY FLOODING 1000 100 10 1 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 0,1 Data taken from EMDAT

  13. D EATHS PER EVENT BY WHO S UB -R EGION 1960-2016 0,6 0,5 0,4 E D 0,3 C B 0,2 A 0,1 0 AFR-D AFR-E AMR-A AMR-B AMR-D EMR-B EMR-D EUR-A EUR-B EUR-C SEAR-B SEAR-D WPR-A WPR-B

  14. D EATHS PER EVENT BY WHO REGION TYPE 1960-2016 0,7 0,6 0,5 0,4 0,3 0,2 0,1 0 ABC DE 60 - 79 80 - 99 2000+

  15. A CUTE MORBIDITY High income vs low income countries

  16. HEALTH IMPACTS POST FLOODING ▪ Infectious dissease ▪ Toxicity ▪ Psychological ▪ Adverse Birth Outcomes

  17. F LOODING IN UK

  18. F LOODING IN DEVELOPING NATIONS

  19. I NFECTIOUS DISEASE RISK POST FLOODING DEVELOPED NATIONS DEVELOPING NATIONS ▪ Common source of anxiety ▪ Enteric disease ▪ Outbreaks infrequent ▪ Diarrhoeal disease ▪ Hepatitis E ▪ Giardiasis in Utah ▪ Outbreaks of waterborne disease ▪ Leptospirosis have been described ▪ Vector-borne disease, e.g.: ▪ Cryptosporidium ▪ Malaria ▪ E. coli O157 ▪ Acanthamoeba keratitis

  20. W ATERBORNE DISEASE & WATER QUALITY

  21. H URRICANE K ATRINA

  22. T HE K ATRINA EXPERIENCE ▪ Flood waters contained high levels of faecal indicator bacteria ▪ Surface water indicator bacteria levels returned to pre-event levels within two months ▪ Bifidobacterium and bacterial diversity analysis suggested that indicator bacteria were of human origin ▪ Vibrio and Legionella concentrations higher post event ▪ Giardia and Cryptosporidium present in flood water Sinigalliano et al. 2007

  23. K ATRINA AND G ROUND WATER ▪ Many wells submerged under 0.6 to 4.5m of water ▪ Associated plumbing damaged ▪ Chemical evidence of saltwater intrusion into wells ▪ Some evidence of indicator organisms Van Biersel et al. 2007

  24. C HOLERA AND DIARRHOEA VISITS TO HOSPITAL POST 1998 FLOOD - B ANGLADESH

  25. R EDUCING THE IMPACT OF FLOODING

  26. R EDUCING THE PUBLIC HEALTH IMPACT OF FLOODING ▪ Mitigation ▪ Warning and preparedness ▪ Needs assessment ▪ Surveillance ▪ Response and recovery ▪ Continuing health education

  27. K ATRINA ▪ Of people who did not evacuate the city prior to the arrival of Hurricane Katrina ▪ 1/3 did not get the message ▪ 1/3 heard the message but did not understand how to evacuate. ▪ People who did not evacuate were predominantly from the poorest and most marginalised sections of society. Brodie et al 2006

  28. T HE 2007 S EVERN FLOODS

  29. D ID PEOPLE COMPLY WITH THE ADVICE ? ▪ During the boil water notice ▪ 42% people used unboiled water for food preparation ▪ 38% people used unboiled water for brushing teeth ▪ 29% people used unboiled water for drinking

  30. S OURCES OF INFORMATION IN A DO NOT DRINK NOTICE ISSUED DURING SEVERE FLOODING Local radio Leaflet Water company Local newspaper TV Friend/neighbour internet 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 % reporting use of information source

  31. C ONCLUSIONS ▪ Despite the large number of floods reported annually the quality of the evidence base for public health impacts is still poor. ▪ Not all adverse health effects of flood disasters are unavoidable ▪ By good planning and response many health effects can be eliminated (and appear to have been) or their impact reduced ▪ In a flood emergency use multiple channels of communication.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend