Destruction of a Magnetic Mirror-Trapped Hot Electron Ring by a - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

destruction of a magnetic mirror trapped hot electron
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Destruction of a Magnetic Mirror-Trapped Hot Electron Ring by a - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Destruction of a Magnetic Mirror-Trapped Hot Electron Ring by a shear Alfven Wave Y. Wang 1 , W. Gekelman 1 , P. Pribyl 1 , D. Papadopoulos 2 1 University of California, Los Angeles 2 University of Maryland, College Park Work supported by ONR MURI


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Destruction of a Magnetic Mirror-Trapped Hot Electron Ring by a shear Alfven Wave

}

Work supported by ONR MURI award (Fundamental Physics Issues on Radiation Belt Dynamics and Remediation), performed at the Basic Plasma Science Facility which is supported by DOE and NSF

  • Y. Wang1, W. Gekelman1, P. Pribyl1, D. Papadopoulos2

1 University of California, Los Angeles 2 University of Maryland, College Park

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Destruction of a magnetic mirror-trapped hot electron ring by a shear Alfvén wave

Motivations and Background

} Radiation Belt Remediation – Artificial

method to control and drain the energetic particles trapped by the Earth’s magnetic field, which can be fed by natural source or human activities (such as High-altitude nuclear explosions) and pose hazards to space satellites.

  • } Rotating Magnetic Field (RMF) source --

The RMF source is an innovative method to efficiently launch waves in space plasmas.

* Image from NASA website

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Destruction of a magnetic mirror-trapped hot electron ring by a shear Alfvén wave

Schematics of the experiment

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Destruction of a magnetic mirror-trapped hot electron ring by a shear Alfvén wave

Hot electron ring generation

4

}

Fast electrons are generated by Electron Cyclotron Resonant Heating (ECRH) at fmicrowave = 2fce. (Peak Power = 15 kW, pulse duration = 30 ~ 50 ms)

}

X-rays are measured outside the 3/8’’ stainless steel vacuum chamber, which cut off x-ray transmission below 100keV.

}

The perpendicular E field generates a hot electron population with large perpendicular energies, which grad-B and curvature drift in the θ-direction and form a hot electron ring in the magnetic mirror.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Destruction of a magnetic mirror-trapped hot electron ring by a shear Alfvén wave

Measurement of the ring size

5 } The size and position of the hot electron

ring is measured by inserting a “luminator probe” along the positive x-

  • axis. The thickness of the ring is ~10cm

° = 47

cone loss

θ

° = ! ! " # $ $ % & − =

56 1 ) ( 1 tan

min max 1 min

B z B θ

} The axial extension of the ring is

measured to be Δz = 211 cm, which corresponds to a minimum hot electron pitch angle of 56o (loss cone = 47o)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Destruction of a magnetic mirror-trapped hot electron ring by a shear Alfvén wave

Rotating Magnetic Field (RMF) antenna

6 } The RMF antenna is composed of 2

  • rthogonal coils, placed in x-z and y-z

planes, with diameters of 8 cm and 9 cm.

} Driven by 2 independent RF drivers,

capable of launching waves with arbitrary polarity.

} The shear Alfvén wave dispersion relation

has been verified.

Measured BAlfven vectors 2 m away from antenna

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Destruction of a magnetic mirror-trapped hot electron ring by a shear Alfvén wave

Disruption of the hot electron ring

} The shear Alfvén wave significantly

enhances hot electron loss, as evidenced by a burst of x-rays.

} The x-ray signal is modulated at the

Alfvén wave frequency. Signal averaged over 1200 shots

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Destruction of a magnetic mirror-trapped hot electron ring by a shear Alfvén wave

} A population of fast electrons persists after the shut-off of

the ECRH, and can be de-trapped by application of the shear Alfvén wave to produce X-ray bursts.

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Destruction of a magnetic mirror-trapped hot electron ring by a shear Alfvén wave

9

}

Electrons lost axially travel ~ 11m along the magnetic field line to the anode. X-rays are generated on the mesh anode.

}

Electrons lost radially are most likely to strike the waveguide, which is the closest metallic

  • bject to the magnetic mirror.

* Graph normalization: Parallel loss is about 2% of radial loss

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Destruction of a magnetic mirror-trapped hot electron ring by a shear Alfvén wave

Alfvén ghost

10

} The fast electrons loss is observed to continue even

after the termination of the Alfvén wave.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Destruction of a magnetic mirror-trapped hot electron ring by a shear Alfvén wave

Deformation of the hot electron ring

11

} The ring becomes asymmetric in the

Alfvén wave field.

} The deformation of the ring gives

rise to the oscillations in the x-ray signal at f=fAlfvén.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Destruction of a magnetic mirror-trapped hot electron ring by a shear Alfvén wave

Deformation of the hot electron ring

12

} The ring becomes asymmetric in the

Alfvén wave field.

} The deformation of the ring gives

rise to the oscillations in the x-ray signal at f=fAlfvén.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Destruction of a magnetic mirror-trapped hot electron ring by a shear Alfvén wave

Deformation of the hot electron ring

13

} The ring becomes asymmetric in the

Alfvén wave field.

} The deformation of the ring gives

rise to the oscillations in the x-ray signal at f=fAlfvén.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Destruction of a magnetic mirror-trapped hot electron ring by a shear Alfvén wave

Role of Alfvén wave polarization

14 } LH and RH waves of arbitrary

amplitudes are mixed together to scatter the hot electrons.

} The x-ray intensity is only related to

the amplitude of the RH component.

} LH and RH waves of same amplitude

and arbitrary phases are mixed.

} The x-ray oscillation is phase locked

to the RH component.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Destruction of a magnetic mirror-trapped hot electron ring by a shear Alfvén wave

X-ray spectrum

15

} X-ray spectrum is measured by analyzing pulse heights from the

NaI(Tl) scintillator x-ray detector. The Alfvén wave de-trapping effect is observed for electrons with a broad range of energy.

Radial loss Axial loss

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Destruction of a magnetic mirror-trapped hot electron ring by a shear Alfvén wave

Proposed de-trapping mechanism

16 } The hot electron ring is deformed in the non-uniform Alfvén wave field,

most likely by the Ewave×B0 drift. It is proposed that the deformation accumulates if the ring azimuthal drift speed matches that of the rotation of the Alfvén wave pattern.

} Collective modes of the ring, with three dimensional spatial distortion, can

affect its confinement and lead to losses.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Destruction of a magnetic mirror-trapped hot electron ring by a shear Alfvén wave

Summary

}

The enhanced loss of fast electrons trapped in a magnetic mirror geometry irradiated by shear Alfvén waves is studied by laboratory experiments.

}

Magnetic mirror trapped fast electrons with energies up to 3 MeV are generated by 2nd harmonic Electron Cyclotron Resonance Heating

}

Shear Alfvén waves are launched by a Rotating Magnetic Field antenna with arbitrary polarity

}

Irradiated by a right-handed circularly polarized shear Alfvén wave, the electrons are lost in both the radial and axial direction with a modulated at fAlfvén. The loss continues even after the termination the wave. }

Test particle simulation confirms that the single particle motion of the trapped fast electrons in presence of a shear Alfvén wave is not adequate to explain the experimental observation.

}

No axial loss is observed in the test particle simulation with a wave amplitude measured in the experiment

}

It is proposed that the deformation of the hot electron ring drives a collective mode of the ring that leads to electron losses from the magnetic mirror.

}

Experimental evidence indicates deformation of the hot electron ring, most likely due to the Ewave×B0 drift in the Alfvén wave field. The deformation grows when the electron azimuthal (grad-B and curvature) drift matches the rotation of the RH shear Alfvén wave. The non-uniform 3D charge distribution in the deformation builds up a large scale global electric field and leads to electron loss.

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Planning next experiment…

18

  • Frequency 8.5-9.6 GHz
  • peak power 225 kW maximum
  • pulse width 0.5 us (or 2.4 us)
  • 0.1% duty cycle maximum
slide-19
SLIDE 19

19