departamento nacional de planeaci n
play

Departamento Nacional de Planeacin www.dnp.gov.co NATURAL CAPITAL - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Departamento Nacional de Planeacin www.dnp.gov.co NATURAL CAPITAL ACCOUNTING FOR BETTER POLICY WAVES NCA Policy Forum German Romero DNP @DNP_colombia DNP_colombia 2016 dnp.gov.co Fotografa: semana.com AGENDA 1. Context of Water Fees


  1. Departamento Nacional de Planeación www.dnp.gov.co

  2. NATURAL CAPITAL ACCOUNTING FOR BETTER POLICY WAVES NCA Policy Forum German Romero DNP @DNP_colombia DNP_colombia 2016 dnp.gov.co Fotografía: semana.com

  3. AGENDA 1. Context of Water Fees in Colombia 2. Computable General Equilibrium Model for Water Accounting (MEGA- German Romero WUF) DNP @simongaviria 3. Results SimonGaviriaM 4. Conclusions Fotografía: semana.com

  4. Contex of the Water Fee Decree 155. Ar8cle 3 Law 99 (Ar8cle 43- WUF) Ar8cle 4 Decree 2811 MADS Decree 4742 Ar8cle 7-12 Law 1450 Law 1151 Ar8cle SENA 108 Ar8cle 18 1974 2005 2007 2011 1993 2004 1972 1991 1995 2004 2006 2010 2014 Resolu8on 240 Resolu8on 872 IDEAM NDP (2014-2018) Resolu8on 865 Na8onal Policy for Green Growth Chapter Code of Renewable Colombian Resolu8on 866 Integrated Water Natural Resources and Cons8tu8on, Chapter 3, Title II Management Resource Environmental Protec8on Fuente: BID-CEPAL 2012

  5. Contex of the Water Fee in Colombia • Water resources protec8on requires COP$412 • People and firms that use water for public or private billions annually pesos to finance 46% of these purposes will pay a fee set by the Na8onal Government. which would guarantee the demand for water resources • The revenues shall be used to pay for the cost of water resources protec8on. • Nowadays revenues from the Water Fee amount to only COP$21 billions pesos, that is 5% of required. Fuente: BID-CEPAL 2012

  6. Water Fee in other countries The current economic signal is very low: Colombia Costa Rica Brasil Economic sector Current (COP$/m3) Propouse (COP$/ (COP$/m3) (COP$/m3) m3) Agricultural 0,84 3,00 5,27 4,63 0,84 Households 10,00 5,97 9,26 Others 0,84 10,00 10,79 555,50 Tomado de MADS (2016) y Ecosimple (2014), Propuesta de ajuste de tarifas mínimas de la tasa por u8lización de agua; citando a MADS (2013), Oficina de Negocios Verdes y Sostenibles

  7. CGE Model • We use the static versión of MEG4C. It Trade include 7 sectors and SAM 2012 • Imports • Exports • MEG4C allows a quantification of direct and indirect impacts of change in Water Fee Public Taxes Expenditur e • It’s based on the National Account Government Sectors Households (DANE) and the National Natural Accounts (WAVES DANE) Taxes Public Expenditur e

  8. CGE model include WUF • Imports Trade • Exports Public Taxes Expenditure Government Sectors Households Government WF WF WF Taxes Public Expenditure Expenditure WF projects

  9. Objetive to the modelling A proposal to modify the WUF was included in the model increasing the minimum fee to $10/m3, but at the same 8me considering in the es8ma8on a use factor of 0,3 for agriculture and of 1 in the other sectors and households (EIECC 2016).

  10. Changes in production Change in produc8on Change in produc8on AlternaSve Base Scenario Scenario 0.10% Sector Change (Trillions of (Trillions of COP) COP) 0.05% Agriculture 73,77 73,68 -0,12% Electricity 27,17 27,16 -0,05% 0.00% Mining 73,21 73,27 0,09% -0.05% Industry/Commerce 333,22 333,16 -0,02% -0.10% Services 68,54 68,52 -0,03% Others (use water) 131,31 131,36 0,04% -0.15% Others (without 476,78 476,69 -0,02% agrop electr indycom otros servs na miner informaSon Fuente: Cálculos propios

  11. Results Summary of impacts and sectorial efficiency m 3 ‘ savings’ m 3 used for ProducSon due to a Supply each million $/m 3 Sector/Crop (Billions of million of Hm3/year of final pesos) pesos of final producSon producSon 221,8 163 $ 735 1360,5 1,63 Cacao 1793,6 1540 $ 859 1164,7 1,40 Palm 1476,2 1435 $ 972 1028,7 1,23 Caña Azúcar 7990,8 9050 $ 1.133 883,0 1,06 Ganadería 1778,1 2218 $ 1.247 801,7 0,96 Arroz Paddy Total 9340,6 29403 $ 3.148 317,7 0,38 Agricultura 221,2 1995 $ 9.019 110,9 0,13 Papa 39,6 888 $ 22.452 44,5 0,05 Frijol 1,1 150 $ 130.919 7,6 0,01 Oleaginosas

  12. Conclusions � Increasing WF brings distor8ons to the economy that turn into losses in produc8on and household welfare and rising prices. � The agricultural sector shows major impacts, even WF for this sector has the lowest increase. � The water account was needed to build the WSAM for the CGE model. � Natural Accoun8ng brings key informa8on for modelling and policy analysis

  13. Departamento Nacional de Planeación www.dnp.gov.co

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend