density models for credit risk
play

Density models for credit risk Nicole El Karoui, Ecole - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Density models for credit risk Nicole El Karoui, Ecole Polytechnique, France e d Monique Jeanblanc, Universit Evry; Institut Europlace de Finance Ying Jiao, Universit e Paris VII Workshop on stochastic calculus and finance, July


  1. Density models for credit risk Nicole El Karoui, Ecole Polytechnique, France e d’´ Monique Jeanblanc, Universit´ Evry; Institut Europlace de Finance Ying Jiao, Universit´ e Paris VII Workshop on stochastic calculus and finance, July 2009, Hong-Kong Financial support from La Fondation du Risque and F´ ed´ eration Bancaire Fran¸ caise 1

  2. Density Hypothesis Density Hypothesis Let (Ω , A , F , P ) be a filtered probability space. A strictly positive and finite random variable τ (the default time) is given. Our goals are • to show how the information contained in the reference filtration F can be used to obtain information on the law of τ , • to investigate the links between martingales in the different filtrations that will appear. 2

  3. Density Hypothesis We assume the following density hypothesis: there exists a non-atomic non-negative measure η such that, for any time t , there exists an F t ⊗ B ( R + ) -measurable function ( ω, θ ) → α t ( ω, θ ) which satisfies P ( τ ∈ dθ |F t ) = α t ( θ ) η ( dθ ) , P − a.s. The conditional distribution of τ is characterized by the survival probability defined by � ∞ G t ( θ ) := P ( τ > θ |F t ) = α t ( u ) η ( du ) θ Let � ∞ G t := G t ( t ) = P ( τ > t |F t ) = α t ( u ) η ( du ) t Observe that the set A t := { G t > 0 } contains a.s. the event { τ > t } . 3

  4. Density Hypothesis The family α t ( . ) is called the conditional density of τ w.r.t. η given F t . Note that • G t ( θ ) = E ( G θ |F t ) for any θ ≥ t � ∞ • the law of τ is P ( τ > θ ) = α 0 ( u ) η ( du ) θ � ∞ • for any t , α t ( u ) η ( du ) = 1 0 • For an integrable F T ⊗ σ ( τ ) r.v. Y T ( τ ), one has, for t ≤ T : � ∞ E ( Y T ( τ ) |F t ) = E ( Y T ( u ) α T ( u ) η ( du ) |F t ) 0 • The default time τ avoids F -stopping times, i.e., P ( τ = ϑ ) = 0 for every F -stopping time ϑ . � ∞ G t ( θ ) := P ( τ > θ |F t ) = α t ( u ) η ( du ) 4 θ

  5. Density Hypothesis The family α t ( . ) is called the conditional density of τ w.r.t. η given F t . Note that • G t ( θ ) = E ( G θ |F t ) for any θ ≥ t � ∞ • taking, w.l.g., α 0 ( u ) = 1, the law of τ is P ( τ > θ ) = η ( du ) θ � ∞ • for any t , α t ( u ) η ( du ) = 1 0 • For an integrable F T ⊗ σ ( τ ) r.v. Y T ( τ ), one has, for t ≤ T : � ∞ E ( Y T ( τ ) |F t ) = E ( Y T ( u ) α T ( u ) η ( du ) |F t ) 0 • The default time τ avoids F -stopping times, i.e., P ( τ = ϑ ) = 0 for every F -stopping time ϑ . � ∞ G t ( θ ) := P ( τ > θ |F t ) = α t ( u ) η ( du ) 5 θ

  6. Density Hypothesis By using the density, we adopt an additive point of view to represent the conditional probability of τ � ∞ G t ( θ ) = α t ( u ) η ( du ) θ In the default framework, the “intensity” point of view is often preferred, and one uses a multiplicative representation as � θ G t ( θ ) = exp( − λ t ( u ) η ( du )) 0 where λ t ( u ) = − ∂ u ln G t ( u ) is the “forward intensity”. 6

  7. Computation of conditional expectations Computation of conditional expectations Let D = ( D t ) t ≥ 0 be the smallest right-continuous filtration such that τ is a D -stopping time, and let G = F ∨ D . Any G t -measurable r.v. H G t may be represented as H G t = H F t 1 { τ>t } + H t ( τ )1 1 { τ ≤ t } where H F t is an F t -measurable random variable and H t ( τ ) is F t ⊗ σ ( τ ) measurable t = E [ H G t 1 { τ>t } |F t ] H F a.s. on A t ; = 0 if not . G t 7

  8. Computation of conditional expectations Computation of conditional expectations Let D = ( D t ) t ≥ 0 be the smallest right-continuous filtration such that τ is a D -stopping time, and let G = F ∨ D . Any G t -measurable r.v. H G t may be represented as H G t = H F t 1 { τ>t } + H t ( τ )1 1 { τ ≤ t } where H F t is an F t -measurable random variable and H t ( τ ) is F t ⊗ σ ( τ ) measurable t = E [ H G t 1 { τ>t } |F t ] H F a.s. on A t ; = 0 if not . G t 8

  9. Computation of conditional expectations Immersion property In the particular case where α t ( θ ) = α θ ( θ ) , ∀ θ ≤ t one has � t � t G t = 1 − α t ( θ ) η ( dθ ) = 1 − α T ( θ ) η ( dθ ) = P ( τ > t |F T ) a.s. 0 0 for any T ≥ t and P ( τ > t |F t ) = P ( τ > t |F ∞ ). This last equality is equivalent to the immersion property (i.e. F martingales are G -martingales). Conversely, if immersion property holds, then P ( τ > t |F t ) = P ( τ > t |F ∞ ) hence, the process G is decreasing and the conditional survival functions G t ( θ ) are constant in time on [ θ, ∞ ), i.e., G t ( θ ) = G θ ( θ ) for t > θ . � ∞ G t := P ( τ > t |F t ) = α t ( u ) η ( du ) 9 t

  10. Dynamic point of view and density process Dynamic point of view and density process Regular Version of Martingales One of the major difficulties is to prove the existence of a universal c` adl` ag martingale version of this family of densities. 10

  11. Dynamic point of view and density process F -decompositions of the survival process G • The Doob-Meyer decomposition of the super-martingale G is given by � t G t = 1 + M F t − α u ( u ) η ( du ) 0 where M F is the c` adl` ag square-integrable martingale defined as � t � ∞ M F � � t = − α t ( u ) − α u ( u ) η ( du ) = E [ α u ( u ) η ( du ) |F t ] − 1 . 0 0 • Let ζ F := inf { t : G t − = 0 } . We define λ F G t − for any t ≤ ζ F and t := α t ( t ) let λ F t = λ F t ∧ ζ F for any t > ζ F . The multiplicative decomposition of G is given by � t � t 0 λ F 0 λ F t e − s η ( ds ) s η ( ds ) dM F G t = L F dL F where t = e t . 11

  12. Dynamic point of view and density process F -decompositions of the survival process G • The Doob-Meyer decomposition of the super-martingale G is given by � t G t = 1 + M F t − α u ( u ) η ( du ) 0 where M F is the c` adl` ag square-integrable martingale defined as � t � ∞ M F � � t = − α t ( u ) − α u ( u ) η ( du ) = E [ α u ( u ) η ( du ) |F t ] − 1 . 0 0 • Let ζ F := inf { t : G t − = 0 } . We define λ F G t − for any t ≤ ζ F and t := α t ( t ) let λ F t = λ F t ∧ ζ F for any t > ζ F . The multiplicative decomposition of G is given by � t � t 0 λ F 0 λ F t e − s η ( ds ) s η ( ds ) dM F G t = L F dL F where t = e t . 12

  13. Dynamic point of view and density process � t Proof: 1) First notice that ( 0 α u ( u ) η ( du ) , t ≥ 0) is an F -adapted continuous increasing process. By the martingale property of ( α t ( θ ) , t ≥ 0), for any fixed t , � ∞ � ∞ G t = α t ( u ) η ( du ) = E [ α u ( u ) η ( du ) |F t ] , a.s.. t t � t From the properties of the density, 1 − G t = 0 α t ( u ) η ( du ) and � t � ∞ M F t := − ( α t ( u ) − α u ( u )) η ( du ) = E [ α u ( u ) η ( du ) |F t ] − 1 . 0 0 2) By definition of L F t and 1), we have � t � t � t 0 λ F 0 λ F 0 λ F dL F s η ( ds ) dG t + e s η ( ds ) λ F s η ( ds ) dM F t = e t G t η ( dt ) = e t , which implies the result. △ 13

  14. Dynamic point of view and density process Relationship with the G -intensity Definition: Let τ be a G -stopping time. The G -compensator Λ G of τ is 1 { τ ≤ t } − Λ G the G -predictable increasing process such that (1 t , t ≥ 0) is a G -martingale. The G -compensator is stopped at τ , i.e., Λ G t = Λ G t ∧ τ . Λ G coincides, on the set { τ ≥ t } , with an F -predictable process Λ F , i.e. Λ G t 1 { τ ≥ t } = Λ F t 1 { τ ≥ t } . • the G -compensator Λ G of τ admits a density given by α t ( t ) λ G 1 { τ>t } λ F t = 1 t = 1 1 { τ>t } . G t − In particular, τ is a totally inaccessible G -stopping time. • For any t < ζ F and T ≥ t , we have α t ( T ) = E [ λ G T |F t ]. 14

  15. Dynamic point of view and density process Relationship with the G -intensity Definition: Let τ be a G -stopping time. The G -compensator Λ G of τ is 1 { τ ≤ t } − Λ G the G -predictable increasing process such that (1 t , t ≥ 0) is a G -martingale. The G -compensator is stopped at τ , i.e., Λ G t = Λ G t ∧ τ . Λ G coincides, on the set { τ ≥ t } , with an F -predictable process Λ F , i.e. Λ G t 1 { τ ≥ t } = Λ F t 1 { τ ≥ t } . • the G -compensator Λ G of τ is absolutely continuous w.r.t. η with α t ( t ) λ G 1 { τ>t } λ F t = 1 t = 1 1 { τ>t } . G t − In particular, τ is a totally inaccessible G -stopping time. • For any t < ζ F and T ≥ t , we have α t ( T ) = E [ λ G T |F t ]. 15

  16. Dynamic point of view and density process Relationship with the G -intensity Definition: Let τ be a G -stopping time. The G -compensator Λ G of τ is 1 { τ ≤ t } − Λ G the G -predictable increasing process such that (1 t , t ≥ 0) is a G -martingale. The G -compensator is stopped at τ , i.e., Λ G t = Λ G t ∧ τ . Λ G coincides, on the set { τ ≥ t } , with an F -predictable process Λ F , i.e. Λ G t 1 { τ ≥ t } = Λ F t 1 { τ ≥ t } . • the G -compensator Λ G of τ is absolutely continuous w.r.t. η with α t ( t ) λ G 1 { τ>t } λ F t = 1 t = 1 1 { τ>t } . G t − In particular, τ is a totally inaccessible G -stopping time. • For any t < ζ F and T ≥ t , we have α t ( T ) = E [ λ G T |F t ]. 16

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend