DENR FY 2016 Budget Request Status Quo Budget Request A. UE.NR is - - PDF document

▶
denr fy 2016 budget request
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

DENR FY 2016 Budget Request Status Quo Budget Request A. UE.NR is - - PDF document

Jan 09, 2023 295 likes •600 views

. South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources Protecting South Dakota's Tomor. row .. Today DENR FY 2016 BUDGET REQUEST presented to the JOINT APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE February 18, 2015 DENR Programs Secretary Division of

slide-1
SLIDE 1

. South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources

Protecting South Dakota's Tomor. row .•. Today

DENR FY 2016 BUDGET REQUEST

presented to the

JOINT APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE

February 18, 2015

slide-2
SLIDE 2

DENR Programs

Secretary

Division of Environmental Services (DES) DENR Budget Brief - page 5

Air Quality

Drinking Water

Feedlot Permit

Groanchn1ter Quality

l\.6nerals and Mining

Surface Water Quality Waste Management Water Rights

Division of Financial and Technical &sistance (DFT A) DENR Budget Brief - page 4

Geological Sun·ey " ' ater and " ' aste

Funding

Watenbed Protection

DENR Administratin Services

Facilities l\llanage,ment F~cal . :Management Information Se~ic:es Legal Senioes

BOARDS A1'1D COl\lli\USSI ONS

Board of Board of BoaJ'dof State Board of Small Petroleum ,·;vater " iater &. l\-fi.nern.ls and EmeJ·aencv

.. .

Operntor Business Release 1'.fanagement Natural Emironm. ent Resporue Ce. rti:fication Clean Afr Compensation Re.sou.rc,es Co1:runis~ion Advisory Boal'd P:me; J

  • \Vate:r U,e
  • Sta<te 1

.Vater Plan

  • Air Qua i!y
  • Chemic
  • rl)iate1 and
  • Air Qua ity
  • Releaee

Appropriation

  • Financial
  • Asb-i!Sto;

Reporting lJ/::i;tenra.ter

Sn:,;ill Bu.sines;

Compensation

  • \Vate:r Qualify

Assietmce for

  • Ha.zan!oue
  • Community

Operator Omlbud!;i!!'.iJ!ll& R.egula.tiom \'" ater & Solid \Va;te Right to Know Certification As.:iisbJ1ce

  • Dri~king

\Varte Project:;

  • Mi.nmg

,:vater

  • Oil a:nd Gas
  • Solid \Va.ate

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • 1. DENR's Budget

Review of FY 2014 End of Year Budget Status

  • Excluding its informational budgets, 74% ofDENR's budget is personnel

services;. 260/o is operating; DENR utilized 9·1

  • /o ofits total budget authority
  • DENR utilized 98% of its FTE allocation
  • DENR utilized 100% ofits general funds
  • No transfers between personal services and operating ·were needed
  • 2. Informational Budgets
  • Regulated Substance Response F,md

a.. Create,d by d1e 1988 Legislature to deal ,;1,,,:itl1 environmental cleanups b.. Uti lized $262,747 last year on 3 site:,,

  • c. FY 2014 end-of-year bala;nce - $4.74 nulhoo.
  • d. Includes Sl,990,000 transfer to LUST Trust subaccount established by SDCL 34A-1 2-3.1

to provide EPA-mandated reimbursement for cleanup of 42 petroleum release sit.es.

  • e. Future liabilities to the Fund
  • Environ.mental cleanups - about 200 to 250 spills per year
  • EPA Brolun Ivfine Superfund site - state must provide 10% match for the projected

$97 million EPA Superfund cleanup; the state is then 100% liable for long-term

1,,vater treatment costs after EPA leaves

  • Subaccount - cleanup ofpet:roleum release sites eligible for LUST Trust
  • Environment.al Livestock Cleanup Fund
  • a. Created by die 1998 Legislature to act as a safety net for environ.mental livestock

cleanups; the Legislature capped the fund at $2 111.i.llion

  • b. Utilized $0 last year
  • c. FY 2014 end-of-year ba]ance - $1.25 million
  • d. Future liabdities to the Fund
  • Safety net for agricultural livestock operations
  • Potential bankruptcies pose largest risks
  • Petroleum Release Compensation Fund
  • a. Created by the 1988 Legislature to financially assist tank owners with the cle:

mup cost of petroleum releases and to meet the federal financial responsibility requirements for regulated underground tank owners

  • b. Utilized $720,591 of

the informational budgetto pay 210 claims at 11 1 sites; includes remoi,.-a1 of 121 abandoned underground petroleum storage tanks

  • c. FY 2014 end-of-year balance - $4.03 nullion
  • d. Future ]iabdities to the Fund
  • Reimbursement for cleanup of

petroleum leaks and spills from tanks

  • Reimbursement for eligible cases cleaned up with federal LUST Trust funds
  • Provide training to tank owners to comp]y wiili federa] training rnquiremen1s
  • Abandotmcl underground petroleum tank removals

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Overview of DENR's Budget Request DENR FY 2016 Budget Request

  • Status Quo Budget Request
  • A. UE.NR is requesting NO expansion in FTEs
  • B. DENR is requesting NO expansion in personal senrices
  • C. DE.NR is requesting ~O expansion in operating expenses
  • D. DENR wiU continue to use its existing resources to get the job done

Cf!NRGon.or~• Fund

lludl!l"'Hi"""ry

1.-tala ll'i•c

..

;;,..,..

Putting UE.NR's FY 2016 Budget Request in context ·with historical budget history:

  • DENR's 2016 general fund budget request is ($274,434) less than its FY 2009 budget.
  • DENR

's 2016 general fund budget request has fewer general funds than in FY 2008.

  • DENR''S 2016 budget request has (24.3) fe·wer FTE than FY 1987.
D.1- ·R n , nc R , HD 1i"T1r 111_ ,011'\"

,,.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

DENRGOALS

  • 1. Protect public health and the environment,
  • 2. Maintain a business-friendly climate, and
  • 3. Treat everyone as our customer.

Including federal grant commitments DENR uses hundreds of measures to see if it is getting the job done; the number of Performance Indicators in the Budget Book are:

  • 40 for the Division of

Technical and Financial Assistance,

  • 240 for the Dh ision of Em,

;ronmental Services, and

  • 14 for the Petroleum Release Compensation Program.

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

50 II

410

I!

10

C>

16 l4 2

Key Envkonmental Measure:

Meeting Federal Ambient Air Quality Standards

Particulate Matter 10 Trends in South Dakota

lO

"' "'

.u

2&

21

. .

26

z,.

,..

2 4 )112• ,. • ,. ;M 1.C

n

  • 11 •

2

n

  • 23
  • 22

2l

.

  • ...

J..!( ]o

IU

ll l'l

)I N ,a 20

~o

lC

........ >- fi"-

.....

u .

17

.1.a 11

,.

· · ~

H

'

  • -
  • I
C.

GCl7 ,_ -

2000 200t :3Xl2 2003 2004 2

2CXll! 2007 a:al 3lOCI 2010 :!01

20 2 :!l13

Calendar YeaJ

Particulate Matter 2.5 Trends for South Dakota

sf,.

I

a

I IT!e

1J

I, ,,=

~ 10

10 10

10

lD

... ... ...

  • ;a

2001 ,,=

  • 1
  • y

1

7
  • - - - -
  • -
  • ..- -
  • -
  • I

2003

200!

  • -..:.

~.;.

  • I

2007 Cal n d

Y,

'

.c

  • I
  • ~

.c

  • =
  • 7
  • 6

4

  • ..
  • -

........

  • - -

20,0

201 1

2012

SD is 1 of only 7 states in full "Attainment"

.J

  • i -

I- I-

  • -
I

2013 6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Looming Air Quality Issues

that could impact South Dakota's Full Attainment Status

  • 1. EPA's Proposed 111(b) Rules
  • EPA's plan to cut carbon dioxide emissions from NEW power plants.

* EPA's carbon dioxide limit for coal-fired plants - 1,100 pounds per megawatt-hour * EPA's carbon dioxide limit for natural-gas fired plants - 1,000 pounds per megawatt

  • hour for larger units
  • Result will be no new coal-fired plants built as the technology to meet the llimits for

new coal-fired plants is not commercially available.

  • 2. EPA's Proposed 111(d) Rules
  • EPA's plan to cut carbon dioxide emissions from EXISTING power plants
  • South Dakota has only one coal-fired power plant (Big Stone near Milbank) and
  • ne natural gas combined cyc le plant (Deer Creek near Brookings)

* About 74 percent of our electrical production in 2012 was renewable (50 percent hydropower and 24 percent wind) making us a leader in low carbon emissions with

  • nly three states emitt:

ing less carbon dioxide than South Dakota.

* Result will be EPA's standard for SD of only 741 pounds per megawatt-hour is not possible without shutting down the Big Stone plant and stranding $384 million of pollution controls currently under construction to meet EPA's Regional Haze rule. * HB 1203 jeopardizes our potential litigation against EPA

  • 3. EPA's Proposed Ozone Rules
  • As indicated by graphs on preceding page, South Dakota's air meets ALL federal ambient

air quality standards, but EPA recently proposed to lower the air quality standard for

  • zone from the current level of 0.075 parts per million to betvveen 0.060 and 0.070.
  • DENR monitors ozone at six sites throughout the state; the graph below shows ozone

concentrations at all six sites are GREATER than 0.060 parts per million.

  • If South Dakota does not meet the new lower ozone standard, EPA will impose control

measures at a signi· ficant cost that will result in no environmental benefit.

0 !lCl1

  • a. 0 10

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

100

7

100 75

25

!!I - .c:

IA ,II

.. -

IQ

  • ,__
  • ,__

, -

  • Key Environmental Measure:

Meeting Surface Water Quality Standards

Percent or Fecal Coliform Samples That Meet South Dakota Surface Water Quality Standards

...

,a

...

""' """

...

.c:

;,.

I&

""'

;;

  • ::

;;

  • 11 ..
  • II -

II

  • ..

Cl

a

  • ,__
  • ""

,__ - ,__ -

  • I!

I!

,__

  • ,__ -
  • - - -
  • """

.. .. -

IA

.-.

SI

  • la

II

  • ,__ - -·

,-.

  • -
  • 2002

2003 2004 2005 2008 2007 200!! 2009

2010 201 1

2012 2013 201

S Q te F:1s ,o.a1 Y

  • ar

Percent of Total Suspended Solids Samples That Meet Sout h D kota Surface Water Quality Samples ,- ,-

  • ~

~ '

.. l ·l - ;l

'l

.. :L

r;L ;l -:L

;l

1 : l!i.

ll

al

~

  • I;:-

:s .. 1 : ,_

  • i

Ii

:;; '1

;:

II

:.\

"'

Cl

II

a

  • - - - -

Iii,-. -

  • - - - -

1 :

  • ,__ -

,__

  • ......

,__

  • ,-
  • ,__ -
  • ,__ - - - -

,__

  • - -

,__ -

..,,

2002 2003 2004

2CXJl:i

2006 2007 2008 2000 2010

2011 20, 2

2013 20, .. $ ... te Fl Pl Yw<

Whi e 78 to 99 percent of the samples are meeting standards, some waters are f' sted as " impaired" under federal definitions.

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • o1~, Big Sioux Segments in Red and Orange are

"lmpairednon Total Maximum Daily Load List

THE 2014 SOlJTH DAKOTA INTEGRA TEO REPORT FOR SIJRF"ACE WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT

PrepandBy SOUTH l!)J.K0TA OE:PARTM NT OF 5NVIRONMENT N-10 NATURAL

RESOURCES

Lower Big Sioux. ! River Basin

  • --=

~==:zll.lM

ln~gratedl R~port Cate,go ry Leg imd

Jn"'11il: D.Jla (3)

Upper Big Sioux River Basin

. ·--¢r-·

..

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Big Sioux River Water Quality Hlead ines

''Impaired"

segments of the Big Sioux River have generated some unflattering headlines during the past year:

  • 1. Programs created to further improve Big Sioux River

.,,ar. 21, 2014, Written by Nick Lowrey

  • 2. Officials: Clean up Big Sioux River,,

Skunk Creek in Sioux Fa

11 S By Peter Harriman -Argus Leader, May 26, 2014

  • 3. Lall

ley: Lawmaker reaction to Skunk Creek pollution stinks

Patrick Lalley, plalley@argus!eacter.com 9:23 a.m. CDT June 29. , 201 ·4

  • 4. Big Sioux water quality at risk, board chairman warns

Peter Harriman, SFA 12:28 a.m. CDT June 16, 2014

  • 5. Group mulls signs to warn of pollutii
  • n in Big Sioux

J.L At'feo, jatveo@argusleader.com 12:37 a.m. CDT Ju,ry 11, 201·4

  • 6. Skunk Creek poll

lution incentives catch on

Peter Harriman, pharrima@arqusleader.com 12:22 a.m. CDT Au9·

1..Nst 8, 2014

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

/)j"":':',.:.:(t::::::;"' Background Behind Big Sioux Water Quality

  • Watershed
  • 5,382 square miles in South Dakota
  • 3,000 square miles in Minnesota and Iowa

c, Monitoring

  • 19 DENR water quality monitoring stations
  • 23 USGS flow gauging stations
  • 37 lakes
  • Water quality impairments
  • Too many bacteria (fecal coliform & E. Coli) impair recreational use
  • Too much sediment (Total Suspended Solids) impairs fishery use
  • Too many nutrients (nitrogen & phosphorus) in lakes promote algae

growth which impairs fishery and recreational use

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Beadle

S nllom

n r

v,son

n$01'l

Point Source Municipal Pollution:

Communities along Big Sioux River that have Upgraded Wastewater Treatment Faci1 lities

La e Co I

Turn r

Y n on So 11th Dakota Department of

Enmonnumt and Natural Re1ourru

Continuous Discharger Intermittent Discharger X No Discharge Facility Flandreau Corson Village Brandon Valley Springs Sanitary District Jefferson

0 5 10 20 30 40 50

  • Mis

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Gosts to Reduce Point Source Municipal! Pollution to the Big Sioux River

COMMUNITY CONSTRUCTION

lYPE OF WASTEWATER

YEARS TREATEMENT SYSTEM Summit 1959, 2000, 2010 4 cell pond system Watertown 1930, 1960, 1085 mechanical plant with infiltration/ 1992, 1998 percolation basins Castlewood 1957 2 cell pond with artificial wet.lands Estelline 1963, 1985, 1996 5 cell pond system Bruce 1977 3 cell pond system Volga 1959, 1970, 1990, 3 cell pond system with aeration 2013 cells and artificial wetlands Brookings 1980, 2013-2015 advanced mechanical plant Flandreau 1979 3 cell pond system Egan 1973 2 cell pond with artificial wet.lands Trent 1972, 19'99 3 cell pond with artificial wetlands Dell Rapids 1975, 2001 5 cell pond system with aeration

,___

....

Baltic 1994 2 cell pond Sioux Falls 1985 advanced mechanical plant Corson Villlage 1970 septic tanks with 2 cell pond Brandon 1983, 1991 , 1993, 3 cell pond system with aeration 2002

,___

Valley Springs 1999 3 cell pond with artificial wetlands Canton 1956, 1980, 2010 4 cell pond system with aeration Hudson 1974 2 cell pond system with infiltration/percolation basins Jefferson 1961, 2004 4 cell pond with artificial wetlands TOTAL Color legend: c:::J - continuous discharger

c:::J - intermittent discharger

~

  • no discharge

TREATMENT CAPITAL COSTS ONLY; NO SEWER LINE COSTS $100,000 $33,727,272 $264,000 $704,767 $256,000 $1,316,993 $44,154,000 $1,295,000 $67,000 $173,000 $1,301,818 $565,909 $86,392,344 unknown $1,430,393

·"

$420,000 $3,358,000 $101 ,000 $635,000

$176,266,521

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Examples of Municipa Wastewater Treatment in the Big Sioux Basin DENR provides financial assistance to publicly owned wastewater treatment systems through the State Water Planning Process using funds from the state Water and Environment Fund and EPA State Revolving Funds to build:

Artificial wetlands for wastewater treatment Wastewater stabilization pond Aerial view of Sioux Falls advanced mechanical plant

1

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Large Livestock Operations Are Also Point Sources

Runoff and manure regulated by DENR's General Water Pollution Control Permit for Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations

rrli acion

  • rea. in . 1

" Conce trated Anim Feeding Operation (CAFO)

  • South Dakota Department of

Agriculture's County Site Analysis Program helps local officials site new livestock operations.

  • Working together, growing our livestock industry protects water quality.

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Clarlc

20

Best Management Practices Used to Reduce Nonpoint Source Pollution in the Big Sioux

40 M~es

Big Sioux Basin Best Management Practices Implementation

Four projects support improvements to water quality within lhe Sig Sioux River &Jsin. The NE Glacial kes project seeks lo improve and preserve U1e water quality of natural lakes in the northeast r gion. Other projects Include Improvements to 11\e popular La e Poinsett Area and the Cenlral and Upper Big Sioux. Major impairments in 11\e r ·on include exceedances for sediment and bacleria rn slreem5, chlorophyll and pH impairments in lakes. BMPs to minimize lmpairmenls Include ag asle syst ms, critical planling ar&as. bank stablM zation ands dimenl traps. Water Quality Monltonn11 Sites

  • W.lo<Oua

MonlloMQ

Imp J red w~1et'l

  • -~
  • ,,.,,oi;.,u.
  • --....
  • ---..
  • °"IIO""
  • - Ytallf'!f TMper~
  • -101itl S.,,,

..

ndodllald<(TS!I)

  • pH

Belft Man'"91men1 Praellcn ... A; ......

  • er-..-...

. ---

  • °"'"'

61W'

Open lmplementatlo~ Projects

~

NE Ciloclal H

'-llcS..U.R!r«

fZZI Ull!.lt-

&aoWJ
  • .er

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Best Management Practices Used to Reduce Nonpoint Source Pollution in the Big Sioux

Animal Waste Pond for Open Lot Monos lope Barn for Cattle Riparian Buffers Grassed Waterways Bank Stabilization

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Practices and Costs lo Reduce Nonpoint Source Pollution lo the Big Sioux River Big Sioux River Best Managem1 ent Practice (BMPs) Implemented 2005 - 2014 Using Cost-Share

Best Manaaement Practices Number Comcleted

  • 1. Animal Waste System Installations

43 2.

Feedlot Relocation 3 3. Stream Bank & Shoreline Protection (linear feet) 66,624 If.

4

Conservation Reserve Program Acres Enrolled

1 ;849 ac

5 Conservation Tillage (acres)

4 814 ac_ 6.

RiQ,arian Easements (acr, es)

5 662 ac_

  • 7. Wetland Restoration {acres)

1,481 ac _ 8.

Planned Grazingi Systems (acres) 5,573 ac_

  • 9. Alt,ernative Water systems

13 1 O_

Terrace installation / Restoration (linear feet)

92 ,736 If_ 11 _

Grass Watervvays {linear feet) 38,476 If.

12_

Filter Strips / Critical Area Pia ntings ac. 1 ; .689 ac.

13_ Riparian Buffers / Protection (linear feet) 416,498 If_ 14_

Sediment Traps

118

Funding Sources & Dollars Spent 2005 - 2014

Projects EPA Other Clean Local Othe. r Total Section State Water Federal 319 Funds ! Revolving

  • rtheast

$694,909 $1,584,579 $0.00 $238,374

i343,

178 $2,861 ,040 Glacial Lakes Upper Big

$1 ,578,595

$0.00 $253,937 $2, 168,727 $55,341 $4,056,600 Sioux

I Lake Poinsett

$613,125 $8,561 $0.00

$1 ,650,559

$170,1 28 $2,442,373 Central Big $2, 117,812 $91,548 $5,200,953 $2,338,641 $1,430,261 $11,179,215 Sioux

I Total Funding

$5,004,441 $1,684 688 $5,454,890 $6,396,301 $1,998,908 $20,539,228

Pollutant Load Reductions from Best Management Practices Installed between 2005 - 2014

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • _

.... _

Historical Feca Coliform Trends

in Big Sioux River

Watertown

™ I

T r

r

, -.

....... bt ....

S--fl01

''""""'"'"'

  • 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20

I

I

1

  • .
114c" S- lwa-•*._

Mtarl•1ffl

..,...f)l'ft

...

killd,

Historical Trends in Total Suspended Solids in Big Sioux River

Watertown

Deuel

r

l

fN:JSoll.JIMt'ltcliOWI f$1 To.:.., sv.,.-1'lilla Sol

  • Turner
  • water Monitoring Sites

:l

l:

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

l '

1.-

i. I.

'

"'"""""""''

IIM':" .... 'Nlla~

Am-

Historical Trends in Ammionia

in Big Sioux River

Watertown Deuel l

'I '

I.

Turner

  • wa1er Monitoring, Siles

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

l

J.

  • ·
  • Historical Trends in Di,

ssolved Oxygen in Big Sioux River

Turner

I

Watertown

Deuel

  • Waler Monitoring Siles

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Summary of Water Quatity

  • f the Big Sioux River
  • 1. In spite of increased development, population, and agricultural production

throughout the basin, water quality in the Big Sioux River during the last 35 years has generally improved, but progress is slow, intermittent, and dependent on precipitation and river flows;

  • 2. Reducing pollution from both point and nonpoint sources will remain a high priority

as evidenced by the Big Sioux River being recently named as a "High Impact" project by the US Department of Agriculture; and

  • 3. DENR will continue to provide resources as available to local sponsors to continue

making more water quality improvement projects a reality.

Meanwhile, DENR will continue to manage growing

  • workloads. Examples of growing workloads are:

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

2,700 2.100

,.

eoo

1,500 1,200

900 800 300 12.000 10.000 6 ,000 B.000

<l,000

2.000

Key Environmental Measure:

DENR's ncreasing Workloads

Hazardous Wast.e Generators

2,427 2,2119 1 ,H 4 2002 2003 200! 2006 2007 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Contaminated Splll Sites (Since 1972}

~

10.074 10 ,38!1

9604 ,....9,828

  • 11,334

.

,= -

  • I

6 ,673 9 ,080 ,c:::;

~

rt

1

8,<M6 8 .623

  • ~

ri

::

7 ,1ilS5 8,22 1 ~

~

  • i

7 ,739

1.

7,AOO

~

T

:!I

=

...

  • :l -
  • -

·

  • ..

!

...

!

~

!

...

~.

l -

  • I -
  • 2002

2004 200$ 2006

  • s
  • ,_ -
  • .. -

~

Ill

~

..:

  • -

200?

mte F

  • :II
  • ~
  • 2009

I Vear

  • 5
  • 2010
  • - - -
  • ,_ - -

,_

5 i

!

!

,.r

  • - - -

20 11 2012 2014

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Key Environmental Measure:

DENR's Increasing Workloads

Air Quality Permits Regulated

2002 2003 2004 2005 200& 2001 2008 2009

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Slat Fiscal Ye.or

Water R ght Permits Regula1ed

s.ooo

8,12&

a.ooo

7,603 7.000

6 ,000

~.000 ... 000 3.000

2 .000

,.

  • 2005

2008 2007 2003 2009 2010 2011 2012 201 2014 Stat Ff•c"'I Y

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Key Environmental Measure:

DENR's Increasing Workloads

Number

  • f

Producing OIi Wells In South Dakota

180

171

14;0

140 120 100

~ !! :,

  • z 80

80

40

20

2001 2002 2003 200.1 2005 200G 2007 2008 2009 2010 2012 2013

c .,.f!itn darYear

People Served by Regulated Public Drinking Water Systems

810.000 1 780.000 750000

~

...

~

.-

~

§

~

i

E - >- -

ill

...

>;

  • I
~ i - - - - -

720.000

  • -

690.000

t

J:'.!

  • l:

~

!I -

  • -
  • - -

J!

~

  • ~
  • ~
  • 66().000

630.000

.. -

.....

,..a= - ;

!l II

, I

j

! I

  • ? -
  • -
  • -
  • -
  • - -

600000

~

1 7

2002 2003 2004 1IOOl5 2006 2007

:2008 20<» 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Stale Fl:acal Year

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

DENR's 37 FoxPro Databases Conversion Project

DENR uses technology to boost productivity, efficiency, effectiveness, communication, and services to our customers.

  • DENR has kept up with increased workloads largely by DENR staff

building, maintaining; and using 37 FoxPro databases to manage work, track records, and provide automated customer services.

  • However, Microsoft has announced no FoxPro support after 20 15.
  • DENR has committed $16,020 per month or $192,240 per year

from our existing budget to BIT to convert the FoxPrn databases

  • ver a period of years and include Geographic Information Syslem

(GIS) applications to provide on-line access to our customers.

  • BIT's current status is below; additional resources in SB 55 will

be used to accelerate remaining conversions.

Data.base rvame/Des.cripaon

Dotobo.se Name/De.sr;riptio1i

  • 1. Aird

a ta base - track air polh. 'ta!lts air permits, fees, models - 4% complete

  • 2. Emironmental Fees - ;,;as ewater,

water, air, solid waa.te- 20% comJJ ete

I

Database Nome/Description

  • 13. CoIL,\gg - tracb !icemed co11Structioo

ag,__gi:e:!!ate mines - 100% complete

  • 14. EXl'il - tracb. mineral exploration am

mine perniits

  • 15. Air - tracks permitted asphalt plant and
  • 25. Location :'\otice - dam 'dugou

notice~ - 100% c.omplete

  • 26. Drillers - !fats ancl tracks w ell

driller~ licellied in outh Dakota 2 . Pump Installers - lists: and traw pump i11.st aller~ licensed in SD

  • 3. :'\ew \¥ell-track water quality

samples fr.am new domestic wells t1011m.etal!ic mineral processing plant:.

  • 23. Iquest - generates and trad::s annual
  • 4. Operator Cer·tification - w ater and

wasta•,• ater operntors, houri>, and te1;ts

  • S. SYSNames- track regulated public

drinking w ai ec systems & I•..-ater quality

  • 6. Project :\lanagement - track p am for

water, ,xa~tewater, \\·aste - 76% c.om~ te

  • 7. Soursce \Yater Assessments - source

water are as & pollution sources

  • 8. Emironmental E,·ents Database -

internet ~pill tracking- 1

(,Ci% com12lete

irrigation ,1,-ater u.,,e reporu

  • 16. Wells - tracks permitted oil, gas, and

underground inJec.tion v:ells - 1 CO% comp lete

  • 29. Lakeinfo - lake. data to inc.lude id,.

name, le.gal,. high & lo- w \¥ater mad.:;:.

  • 17. Feedlots - tracks permitted CO!ll.

centrated animal feeding operations

  • 30. Lakelev I - table

,e; ofwate,

r lev-eli; measured semi-awiually in lakes

  • 18. Storm \Vater Database.
  • tracb

permits: from. construe- ti.

  • n and industrial
  • 19. Surface Water Discharge Database -

tracb permits:feeds IOS - 32% complete

  • 20. Temporary Dewate:ring Database -

tracks approved de,vate.ring operatiom

  • 31. Log.s - we.II construction c!ata to

indude legal, depth, log, and driller

  • 32. Obs94a - water

right observation wel ts to incfude legal, yield, and depth

  • 33. S11atdam2 - ,1ate Saf

ety of Dams inventc1)' to include. leg al, o,mer, size

  • 9. TA_NKDATABASE -tracb regulated 21. Recycling Database - in•:entory of all
  • 34. \\le,,el - observation w ell

measurem.enti; ~tor age tanks - 100% complete recyc.ling facilities in $tate - 100%, complete

  • 10. Tier II & TRI- SAR'\ chemical

~torage reJJ2!!s and toxic release~

  • 93

%

  • 11. Ground Water :Monitoring - data

from facili L e$ on shallo,,· aguifers - 6%

  • 12. 1'.ilS or Abruidoned ~·

fined Lands -

Black Hilk invento1y

  • 22. Hazardous Waste Database - tracb

hazardous 1.vaste generators-10()% complete

  • 23. Asbestos Database - c.ertification data

from -.i;ork= and demolition notices -1 '8{)%

  • 24. Solid \Yaste Database - tracb

permitted solid ,1,ai.1:e di~posal sites - 4

%

  • 35. Wpapp - track new applicatiom :for

water righ penruts

  • 36. Wrinfo - :rerie.s of

water right Table: and Wai er me data 3 . Lookup Table~ - ables o replace abbrevi:itions in report; and Caspio 27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

OEN R's One-Stop, GIS Interactive Map

Dashboard

PREVIOU S I ROLLOUTS OF DENR GIS IN11ERAC111 VE MAPS

  • 1. 2012 and 2013 Legislatures - Oil!

and Gas Interactive Map provides linlks to files for 1 ;900 oil and gas holes plus 34,350 test holes and 62)45 water well logs.

  • 2. 201 4 Legislature - Constructii
  • n Aggregate !Interactive Map with 4,651 active

and reclaimed construction aggregate mines such as sand and gravel pits, pegmatite mines, and mineral mines for materials used in cement. 2015 GIS INTERACTIVE MAP ROLLOUTS

  • 1. Property Search for Spilll Sites and Sites wii

tih Environmental Reports -

identifies more than 13,250 sites; demonstrated by Rick Lancaster, DENR

  • 2. Tanks Database -find tank information for about 5,000 closed and active

regulated storage tanks; demonstrated by Nayyer Syed, DENR

  • 3. Recycling Facilities in South Dakota - search 156 different locations for

materials they take to recycle; demonstrated by Nick Emme, DENR

  • 4. Dry Draw Location Notice - search 97,62.

0 filing1 s for water right dry draw location notices; demonstrated by Ron Duvall, DENIR

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

DENR's Legislative Agenda for 2015

BILLS

  • 1. Governor Daugaard's 2015 Executive Reorganization Order No. 2015-01

::;> Transfers authority to regulate bottled water quality from the Department of Public Safety

to DENR

  • 2. !Bureau of Finance and Management's SIB 55 to Amend FY 2015 !Budget

~

Includes special appropriation of $350,000 for the Bureau of Information and Technology to speed up work on DENR's 37 FoxPro Database Conversion Project and provide natural resource data online using GIS interactive maps.

  • 3. Governor Daugaard's 2015 Water and Environment Funding Bill S!

B 173 (also known as the Annual Governor's Omnibus Water Funding Bill)

~

Innovative Wheeling Option gets water to all South Dakota members of Lewis & Clark Regional Water System by putting West River/Lyman-Jones $12.5 million loan prepayment immediately back to work

  • Billl appropriates $7.7 million to Lewis & Clark Regional Water and authorizes

$4.8 million in state Consolidated funding for Big Sioux Community Water and Minnehaha Communi1 ty Water System for Madison Wheeling Option.

  • Wheeling Option saves $17 million of state dollars needed to construct the

remaining segments of the Lewis & Clark service line to livladison.

  • 4. DENR's HB 1014 from Governor Daugaard's Red Tape Review

~

Repeals five unnecessary statutes that have been executed or are obsolete.

  • Deletes another 392 worcls from the code.
  • 5. Governor Daugaard's IBill

l to Develop Model of the lower Big Sioux HB 1188

;;;;> The extensive development in the lower Big Sioux basin makes it the most vulnerable

river segment in South Dakota to threaten loss of life and property from flood damag1 e

  • Appropriates $500;000 to develop a fllood model to predict inundation areas.
  • Amended by House Appropriations to $ 1
  • 6. Governor Daugaard's Recommended FY 2016 Budget Request for DENR

a;::> Status Quo Budget Request

  • DENR i1

s requesting NO expansion in FTEs

  • DENR i1

s requesting NIQ expansion in personal services

  • DENR iis requesting NIQ expansion in operating

29