deleting edges to save cows using graph theory to control
play

Deleting Edges to Save Cows: Using Graph Theory to Control the - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Deleting Edges to Save Cows: Using Graph Theory to Control the Spread of Disease in Livestock Kitty Meeks University of Glasgow LMS Women in Mathematics Day, Edinburgh, 22 nd April 2016 Joint work with Jessica Enright (University of Stirling)


  1. Deleting Edges to Save Cows: Using Graph Theory to Control the Spread of Disease in Livestock Kitty Meeks University of Glasgow LMS Women in Mathematics Day, Edinburgh, 22 nd April 2016 Joint work with Jessica Enright (University of Stirling)

  2. The animal contact network

  3. The animal contact network

  4. The animal contact network

  5. The animal contact network MARKET MARKET

  6. The animal contact network

  7. The animal contact network

  8. Modifying the network Vertex-deletion

  9. Modifying the network Vertex-deletion E.g. vaccinate all animals at a particular animal holding.

  10. Modifying the network Vertex-deletion E.g. vaccinate all animals at a particular animal holding. Edge-deletion

  11. Modifying the network Vertex-deletion E.g. vaccinate all animals at a particular animal holding. Edge-deletion E.g. ◮ Double fence lines

  12. Modifying the network Vertex-deletion E.g. vaccinate all animals at a particular animal holding. Edge-deletion E.g. ◮ Double fence lines ◮ Testing or quarantine for animals on a particular trade route

  13. Modifying the network Vertex-deletion E.g. vaccinate all animals at a particular animal holding. Edge-deletion E.g. ◮ Double fence lines ◮ Testing or quarantine for animals on a particular trade route Cost of modifications The cost of deleting individual vertices/edges may vary; this can be captured with a weight function on vertices and/or edges.

  14. How do we want to change the network?

  15. How do we want to change the network? Desirable properties may include: ◮ Bounded component size

  16. How do we want to change the network? Desirable properties may include: ◮ Bounded component size ◮ Bounded degree

  17. How do we want to change the network? Desirable properties may include: ◮ Bounded component size ◮ Bounded degree ◮ Bounded d -neighbourhood

  18. How do we want to change the network? Desirable properties may include: ◮ Bounded component size ◮ Bounded degree ◮ Bounded d -neighbourhood ◮ Low connectivity

  19. How do we want to change the network? Desirable properties may include: ◮ Bounded component size ◮ Bounded degree ◮ Bounded d -neighbourhood ◮ Low connectivity We may additionally want to: ◮ consider the total number of animals in e.g. a connected component, rather than just the number of animal holdings

  20. How do we want to change the network? Desirable properties may include: ◮ Bounded component size ◮ Bounded degree ◮ Bounded d -neighbourhood ◮ Low connectivity We may additionally want to: ◮ consider the total number of animals in e.g. a connected component, rather than just the number of animal holdings ◮ place more or less strict restrictions on individual animal holdings

  21. Bounding the component size by deleting edges GOAL: Find the least costly set of edges to delete, so that the remaining graph has no connected component with more than h vertices.

  22. Bounding the component size by deleting edges GOAL: Find the least costly set of edges to delete, so that the remaining graph has no connected component with more than h vertices. This problem has also been called: ◮ Min-Max Component Size Problem ◮ Minimum Worst Contamination Problem ◮ Component Order Edge Connectivity

  23. Bounding the component size by deleting edges GOAL: Find the least costly set of edges to delete, so that the remaining graph has no connected component with more than h vertices. This problem has also been called: ◮ Min-Max Component Size Problem ◮ Minimum Worst Contamination Problem ◮ Component Order Edge Connectivity PROBLEM: There is no polynomial-time algorithm to solve this problem in general unless P=NP (even if h = 3).

  24. Using structural properties of the input ◮ There is an efficient problem to solve this problem on trees (Gross, Heinig, Iswara, Kazmiercaak, Luttrell, Saccoman and Suffel, 2013).

  25. Using structural properties of the input ◮ There is an efficient problem to solve this problem on trees (Gross, Heinig, Iswara, Kazmiercaak, Luttrell, Saccoman and Suffel, 2013). ◮ Animal trade networks are very unlikely to form trees, but they might have some similarities to trees.

  26. Using structural properties of the input ◮ There is an efficient problem to solve this problem on trees (Gross, Heinig, Iswara, Kazmiercaak, Luttrell, Saccoman and Suffel, 2013). ◮ Animal trade networks are very unlikely to form trees, but they might have some similarities to trees. ◮ The treewidth of a graph is a measure of how “tree-like” a graph is, in a specific sense. Trees have treewith equal to 1, and cycles have treewidth 2.

  27. Using structural properties of the input ◮ There is an efficient problem to solve this problem on trees (Gross, Heinig, Iswara, Kazmiercaak, Luttrell, Saccoman and Suffel, 2013). ◮ Animal trade networks are very unlikely to form trees, but they might have some similarities to trees. ◮ The treewidth of a graph is a measure of how “tree-like” a graph is, in a specific sense. Trees have treewith equal to 1, and cycles have treewidth 2. ◮ Often algorithmic problems can be solved more efficiently on graphs with small treewidth.

  28. (Some) cattle trade networks have small treewidth Treewidth of an undirected graph of cattle movements in Scotland over a variety of time windows 18 16 14 12 Treewidth 10 8 6 4 2 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Days Included

  29. New results Theorem (Enright and M., 2015) Suppose we are given a (weighted) graph G on n vertices which has treewidth w. We can determine the least costly set of edges to delete, so that the remaining graph has no connected component with more than h vertices, in time O (( wh ) 2 w n ) .

  30. New results

  31. New results Theorem (Enright and M., 2016+) Suppose we are given a (weighted) graph G on n vertices which has treewidth w. We can determine the least costly set of edges to delete, so that the remaining graph contains no graph from the set F as a subgraph, in time 2 O ( |F| w r ) ( n + 2 r ) , if no element of F has more than r vertices.

  32. Future directions ◮ Budget as parameter, rather than desired component size

  33. Future directions ◮ Budget as parameter, rather than desired component size ◮ Geographic networks – planar graphs

  34. Future directions ◮ Budget as parameter, rather than desired component size ◮ Geographic networks – planar graphs ◮ Why do trade networks have small treewidth?

  35. Future directions ◮ Budget as parameter, rather than desired component size ◮ Geographic networks – planar graphs ◮ Why do trade networks have small treewidth? Thank you

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend