Defining Yield Policies in a Viability Approach L. Chapel 1 G. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

defining yield policies in a viability approach
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Defining Yield Policies in a Viability Approach L. Chapel 1 G. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Defining Yield Policies in a Viability Approach L. Chapel 1 G. Deffuant 1 S. Martin 1 C. Mullon 2 1 LISC Cemagref 2 GEODES IRD V European Conference on Ecological Modelling, 2005 Introduction Study of the Southern Benguela ecosystem by Mullon


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Defining Yield Policies in a Viability Approach

  • L. Chapel1
  • G. Deffuant1
  • S. Martin1
  • C. Mullon2

1LISC

Cemagref

2GEODES

IRD

V European Conference on Ecological Modelling, 2005

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction

Study of the Southern Benguela ecosystem by Mullon

  • C. Mullon, P. Curry and L. Shannon

Viability model of trophic interactions in marine ecosystems. Natural Resource Modeling, 17:27-58, 2004.

Problem: Given constant values of fisheries, how ensuring the persistence of the ecosystem ? Solution: Study the model in a viability perspective We focus here on the yield policies

Chapel, Deffuant, Martin & Mullon Defining Yield Policies in a Viability Approach 2 / 19

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Outline

1

Southern Benguela ecosystem

2

Viability theory

3

Results

4

Summary

Chapel, Deffuant, Martin & Mullon Defining Yield Policies in a Viability Approach 3 / 19

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Southern Benguela ecosystem

Description

5 groups

  • Detritus
  • Phytoplankton
  • Zooplankton
  • Pelagic Fish
  • Demersal Fish

Sustainable system: the biomass of each species must remains in a given interval

Detritus Phytoplankton Zooplankton Pelagic Demersal

Chapel, Deffuant, Martin & Mullon Defining Yield Policies in a Viability Approach 5 / 19

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Southern Benguela ecosystem

Model

Dynamical model of biomass evolution of each species, including

  • consumption
  • predation
  • yield
  • non-assimilated biomass

(only for detritus)

6th compartment: fisheries

Detritus Phytoplankton Zooplankton Pelagic Demersal Yield Yield Fisheries

Chapel, Deffuant, Martin & Mullon Defining Yield Policies in a Viability Approach 6 / 19

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Southern Benguela ecosystem

Specifications of the model

Thresholds for biomass mi ≤ Bi ≤ Mi Trophic flows fixed by the predator and the prey Thresholds for fisheries ym ≤ Y ≤ yM Maximal variation |Y ′| ≤ ∆

B3 B5 (r53 ± δr53)B5 + (d35 ± δd35)B3 ☞ ☞Y ′☞ ☞ ≤ ∆

Detritus Phytoplankton Zooplankton Pelagic Demersal Fisheries

Chapel, Deffuant, Martin & Mullon Defining Yield Policies in a Viability Approach 7 / 19

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Southern Benguela ecosystem

Specifications of the model

Question: How define yield policies that allow the sustainability of the ecosystem ?

Chapel, Deffuant, Martin & Mullon Defining Yield Policies in a Viability Approach 8 / 19

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Viability theory

Definition

Viable state: There exists at least one evolution which allows to stay in the viability constraint set

Chapel, Deffuant, Martin & Mullon Defining Yield Policies in a Viability Approach 10 / 19

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Viability theory

Definition

Viability kernel: Set of all viable states

Chapel, Deffuant, Martin & Mullon Defining Yield Policies in a Viability Approach 11 / 19

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Viability theory

Definition

Control policies: Flexibility for the stakeholders

Heavy control policy Cautious control policy

Chapel, Deffuant, Martin & Mullon Defining Yield Policies in a Viability Approach 12 / 19

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Viability theory

Algorithm

17 controls: trophic flows between species (δrij, δdij) and maximal variation of the yield (|Y ′|) Particular algorithm, based on a statistical learning method, Support Vector Machines, which approximates the viability kernel Grid of 45000 points Viability kernel: subset of R6

J.-P. Aubin Viability theory. Birkhauser, 1991.

  • P. Saint-Pierre

Approximation of viability kernel. Applied Mathematics & Optimisation, 29:187-209, 1994.

Chapel, Deffuant, Martin & Mullon Defining Yield Policies in a Viability Approach 13 / 19

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Results

Main Results

A high level of detritus is necessary to ensure a viable path The levels of all the compartments have an influence on the boundary of the viability kernel Yield policies can be defined from the viability kernel

Chapel, Deffuant, Martin & Mullon Defining Yield Policies in a Viability Approach 15 / 19

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Results

Example of results I

Low level of pelagic fish

demersal fish fisheries

✧✦ ★✥

  • maximal values of demersal fish
  • maximal threshold for fisheries

Chapel, Deffuant, Martin & Mullon Defining Yield Policies in a Viability Approach 16 / 19

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Results

Example of results II

High level of pelagic fish

demersal fish fisheries

✣✢ ✤✜

  • minimal values of demersal fish
  • minimal threshold for fisheries

Chapel, Deffuant, Martin & Mullon Defining Yield Policies in a Viability Approach 17 / 19

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Summary

We focus on constraints on the ecosystem Fisheries can be included in the problem. Viability kernel helps to define yield policies Future work Other parameters to include ? Improve the accuracy of the results

Chapel, Deffuant, Martin & Mullon Defining Yield Policies in a Viability Approach 19 / 19