Decision on the 2015-2016 Transmission Plan Neil Millar Executive - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

decision on the 2015 2016 transmission plan
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Decision on the 2015-2016 Transmission Plan Neil Millar Executive - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Decision on the 2015-2016 Transmission Plan Neil Millar Executive Director, Infrastructure Development Board of Governors Meeting General Session March 25, 2016 ISO Confidential Approving the plan means approving determinations and


slide-1
SLIDE 1

ISO Confidential

Decision on the 2015-2016 Transmission Plan

Neil Millar Executive Director, Infrastructure Development Board of Governors Meeting General Session March 25, 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

ISO Confidential

Approving the plan means approving determinations and recommendations contained in the plan.

  • Thirteen transmission projects:

– All new reliability projects each of which is less than $50 million – no policy driven projects – no economically driven projects

  • Canceling 13 sub-transmission - primarily local –

previously approved projects in PG&E’s service area No regional transmission solutions found to be needed are eligible for competitive solicitation.

Page 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

ISO Confidential

The 2015-2016 Transmission Planning Process

Slide 3

Phase 1 Development of ISO unified planning assumptions and study plan

  • State and Federal policy

requirements and directives

  • Demand forecasts, energy

efficiency, demand response

  • Renewable and

conventional generation additions and retirements

  • Input from stakeholders

Phase 3

  • Request for bids, receive

proposals, evaluate, and award to successful applicant to build identified reliability, policy and economic transmission projects. Technical Studies and Board Approval

  • Reliability analysis
  • Renewable delivery (policy) analysis
  • Economic analysis
  • Consider Transmission Alternatives, e.g.

preferred resources and energy storage.

  • Publish comprehensive transmission plan

Continued regional and sub-regional coordination

October 2016

Coordination of Conceptual Statewide Plan

April 2015

Phase 2

March 2016

ISO Board Approval

  • f Transmission Plan

Four Consultation Windows

slide-4
SLIDE 4

ISO Confidential

New reliability needs reduced from prior cycles, both in number of projects and capital cost:

Slide 4

Capital Cost in $millions By Service Area

23 22 31 15 2 7 3 2 1 1 9 5 5 11 4 5 1 $0 $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 $1,200 $1,400 $1,600 $1,800 2010/11 Plan 2011/12 Plan 2012/13 Plan 2013/14 Plan 2014/15 Plan 2015/16 Plan Pacific Gas & Electric Southern California Edison Co. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. Valley Electric Association

slide-5
SLIDE 5

ISO Confidential

13 reliability-driven projects are found to be needed

  • 5 projects (red text) were

initially identified in the planning process and approved by management.

  • The remaining 8 projects

were subsequently identified and require Board

  • f Governor approval.

Slide 5

No. Project Name Service Area Expected In- Service Date Project Cost 1 Panoche – Ora Loma 115 kV Line Reconductoring PG&E May-21 $20 M 2 Bellota 230 kV Substation Shunt Reactor PG&E Dec 2020 $13-19 M 3 Cottonwood 115 kV Substation Shunt Reactor PG&E Dec 2019 $15-19 M 4 Delevan 230 kV Substation Shunt Reactor PG&E Dec 2020 $19-28 M 5 Ignacio 230 kV Reactor PG&E Dec 2020 $23.4-35.1 M 6 Los Esteros 230 kV Substation Shunt Reactor PG&E Dec 2020 $24-36 M 7 Wilson 115 kV SVC PG&E Dec 2020 $35-45 M 8 15 MVAR Capacitor at Basilone Substation SDG&E Jun-16 $1.5-2 M 9 30 MVAR Capacitor at Pendleton Substation SDG&E Jun-17 $2-3 M 10 Reconductor TL 605 Silvergate – Urban SDG&E Jun-18 $5-6 M 11 Second Miguel – Bay Boulevard 230 kV Transmission Circuit SDG&E Jun-19 $20-45 M 12 TL600: “Mesa Heights Loop-in + Reconductor SDG&E Jun-18 $15-20 M 13 Eagle Mountain Shunt Reactors SCE Dec-18 $10 M

slide-6
SLIDE 6

ISO Confidential

13 previously approved local PG&E projects are being cancelled, primarily due to lower load projections

  • The projects each were estimated to cost less than $50

million each, and total $192 million.

  • 11 projects were initially identified and cancelled by

management.

  • 2 projects were subsequently identified and require

Board of Governor approval.

– Monta Vista - Wolfe 115 kV Substation Equipment Upgrade (Greater Bay Area) - $1 million – Newark - Applied Materials 115 kV Substation Equipment Upgrade (Greater Bay Area) – $1 million

Page 6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

ISO Confidential

The ISO’s policy-driven analysis focused on the 33% Renewables Portfolio Standard:

  • No policy-driven requirements were identified to achieve

the 33% renewables portfolio standard by 2020

  • Transmission needs to meet the 50% renewables

portfolio standard by 2030 will be explored in future planning cycles.

Slide 7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

ISO Confidential

Economic driven solutions were also explored in the planning process focusing on areas of congestion.

  • Consistent with past findings, congestion was not

sufficient to warrant capital upgrades

Slide 8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

ISO Confidential

Other considerations:

  • No regional transmission solutions recommended for

approval are eligible for competitive solicitation

  • The Lugo-Victorville 500 kV upgrade was found to be

needed and a recommendation will be brought to the Board after coordination with LADWP has taken place in the 2016-2017 planning cycle

  • The LA Basin/San Diego findings continue to

demonstrate meeting future overall area needs – a 230 kV loading issue has been identified that will be addressed in the 2016-2017 planning cycle

Page 9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

ISO Confidential

Regional high voltage transmission access charge projection:

Slide 10

* Existing returns are maintained for existing PTO rate base, and 11% return on equity is

assumed for new transmission capital. Regional High Voltage TAC $/MWh

0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2015 Projection 2016 Projection w/o recommended approvals 2016 Projection with recommended approvals

$13.9 $13.8

FERC-approved PTO revenue requirement increases in 2015 not related to ISO-approved projects higher than projected.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

ISO Confidential

Special studies looked at emerging issues preparing for grid transitioning to low carbon future:

  • 50 percent “energy only” study
  • Frequency response study
  • Gas/electric coordination preliminary study

Efforts in these areas will continue in future planning cycles.

Page 11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

ISO Confidential

Stakeholder feedback provided a wide range of views:

  • Concerns about specific projects, and the ISO’s basis for

moving forward

– Projects driven by high voltage concerns – Previously approved projects – Projects not recommended for approval

  • Deliverability of CPUC-provided 33% renewable

generation portfolios for policy-driven transmission

  • Support for continuation of special studies

Page 12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

ISO Confidential

Management recommends the Board approve the 2015-2016 ISO Transmission Plan.

  • Continues to pursue low emissions strategies in

addressing reliability needs of the ISO controlled grid

  • Enables the state’s 33% RPS goals and sets a

foundation for higher renewable energy goals

  • Provides for prudent and economic development of the

transmission system

Slide 13