decision on the 2015 2016 transmission plan
play

Decision on the 2015-2016 Transmission Plan Neil Millar Executive - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Decision on the 2015-2016 Transmission Plan Neil Millar Executive Director, Infrastructure Development Board of Governors Meeting General Session March 25, 2016 ISO Confidential Approving the plan means approving determinations and


  1. Decision on the 2015-2016 Transmission Plan Neil Millar Executive Director, Infrastructure Development Board of Governors Meeting General Session March 25, 2016 ISO Confidential

  2. Approving the plan means approving determinations and recommendations contained in the plan. • Thirteen transmission projects: – All new reliability projects each of which is less than $50 million – no policy driven projects – no economically driven projects • Canceling 13 sub-transmission - primarily local – previously approved projects in PG&E’s service area No regional transmission solutions found to be needed are eligible for competitive solicitation. Page 2 ISO Confidential

  3. The 2015-2016 Transmission Planning Process Four Consultation Windows April 2015 March 2016 October 2016 ISO Board Approval of Transmission Plan Coordination of Conceptual Statewide Plan Phase 3 • Request for bids, receive Phase 1 proposals, evaluate, and award to successful Development of ISO unified applicant to build identified planning assumptions and Phase 2 reliability, policy and study plan Technical Studies and Board Approval economic transmission projects. • State and Federal policy • Reliability analysis requirements and directives • Renewable delivery (policy) analysis • Demand forecasts, energy • Economic analysis efficiency, demand response • Consider Transmission Alternatives, e.g. preferred resources and energy storage. • Renewable and conventional generation • Publish comprehensive transmission plan additions and retirements • Input from stakeholders Continued regional and sub-regional coordination Slide 3 ISO Confidential

  4. New reliability needs reduced from prior cycles, both in number of projects and capital cost: $1,800 1 $1,600 $1,400 11 5 $1,200 Capital $1,000 Cost in 9 $millions $800 2 5 3 $600 31 $400 23 22 4 1 5 15 $200 1 2 7 $0 2010/11 Plan 2011/12 Plan 2012/13 Plan 2013/14 Plan 2014/15 Plan 2015/16 Plan Pacific Gas & Electric Southern California Edison Co. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. Valley Electric Association By Service Area Slide 4 ISO Confidential

  5. 13 reliability-driven projects are found to be needed Expected In- No. Project Name Service Area Project Cost Service Date Panoche – Ora Loma 115 kV Line 1 PG&E May-21 $20 M Reconductoring 2 Bellota 230 kV Substation Shunt Reactor PG&E Dec 2020 $13-19 M • 5 projects (red text) were Cottonwood 115 kV Substation Shunt 3 PG&E Dec 2019 $15-19 M initially identified in the Reactor planning process and Delevan 230 kV Substation Shunt Reactor PG&E Dec 2020 $19-28 M 4 approved by management. 5 Ignacio 230 kV Reactor PG&E Dec 2020 $23.4-35.1 M Los Esteros 230 kV Substation Shunt 6 PG&E Dec 2020 $24-36 M Reactor • The remaining 8 projects 7 Wilson 115 kV SVC PG&E Dec 2020 $35-45 M were subsequently 8 15 MVAR Capacitor at Basilone Substation SDG&E Jun-16 $1.5-2 M identified and require Board 30 MVAR Capacitor at Pendleton 9 SDG&E Jun-17 $2-3 M Substation of Governor approval. Reconductor TL 605 Silvergate – Urban SDG&E Jun-18 $5-6 M 10 Second Miguel – Bay Boulevard 230 kV 11 SDG&E Jun-19 $20-45 M Transmission Circuit TL600: “Mesa Heights Loop -in + 12 SDG&E Jun-18 $15-20 M Reconductor Eagle Mountain Shunt Reactors SCE Dec-18 $10 M 13 Slide 5 ISO Confidential

  6. 13 previously approved local PG&E projects are being cancelled, primarily due to lower load projections • The projects each were estimated to cost less than $50 million each, and total $192 million. • 11 projects were initially identified and cancelled by management. • 2 projects were subsequently identified and require Board of Governor approval. – Monta Vista - Wolfe 115 kV Substation Equipment Upgrade (Greater Bay Area) - $1 million – Newark - Applied Materials 115 kV Substation Equipment Upgrade (Greater Bay Area) – $1 million Page 6 ISO Confidential

  7. The ISO’s policy -driven analysis focused on the 33% Renewables Portfolio Standard: • No policy-driven requirements were identified to achieve the 33% renewables portfolio standard by 2020 • Transmission needs to meet the 50% renewables portfolio standard by 2030 will be explored in future planning cycles. Slide 7 ISO Confidential

  8. Economic driven solutions were also explored in the planning process focusing on areas of congestion. • Consistent with past findings, congestion was not sufficient to warrant capital upgrades Slide 8 ISO Confidential

  9. Other considerations: • No regional transmission solutions recommended for approval are eligible for competitive solicitation • The Lugo-Victorville 500 kV upgrade was found to be needed and a recommendation will be brought to the Board after coordination with LADWP has taken place in the 2016-2017 planning cycle • The LA Basin/San Diego findings continue to demonstrate meeting future overall area needs – a 230 kV loading issue has been identified that will be addressed in the 2016-2017 planning cycle Page 9 ISO Confidential

  10. Regional high voltage transmission access charge projection: 16.00 $13.9 14.00 $13.8 12.00 Regional 10.00 FERC-approved PTO revenue High requirement increases in 2015 not related to ISO-approved projects Voltage 8.00 higher than projected. TAC $/MWh 6.00 2015 Projection 4.00 2016 Projection w/o recommended approvals 2.00 2016 Projection with recommended approvals 0.00 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 * Existing returns are maintained for existing PTO rate base, and 11% return on equity is assumed for new transmission capital. Slide 10 ISO Confidential

  11. Special studies looked at emerging issues preparing for grid transitioning to low carbon future : • 50 percent “energy only” study • Frequency response study • Gas/electric coordination preliminary study Efforts in these areas will continue in future planning cycles. Page 11 ISO Confidential

  12. Stakeholder feedback provided a wide range of views: • Concerns about specific projects, and the ISO’s basis for moving forward – Projects driven by high voltage concerns – Previously approved projects – Projects not recommended for approval • Deliverability of CPUC-provided 33% renewable generation portfolios for policy-driven transmission • Support for continuation of special studies Page 12 ISO Confidential

  13. Management recommends the Board approve the 2015-2016 ISO Transmission Plan. • Continues to pursue low emissions strategies in addressing reliability needs of the ISO controlled grid • Enables the state’s 33% RPS goals and sets a foundation for higher renewable energy goals • Provides for prudent and economic development of the transmission system Slide 13 ISO Confidential

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend