decision on allocation of real time imbalance energy
play

Decision on Allocation of Real-time Imbalance Energy Offset Costs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Decision on Allocation of Real-time Imbalance Energy Offset Costs Greg Cook Manager, Market Design & Regulatory Policy Board of Governors Meeting General Session September 10-11, 2009 Issue: High costs drive the need to re-examine


  1. Decision on Allocation of Real-time Imbalance Energy Offset Costs Greg Cook Manager, Market Design & Regulatory Policy Board of Governors Meeting General Session September 10-11, 2009

  2. Issue: High costs drive the need to re-examine real-time energy offset costs allocation method. ! Real-time offset costs much higher than expected. ! April $14.13 million ! May $21.01 million ! June $11.63 million ! July $9.96 million ! Therefore - need to revise allocation method to reflect cost causation more equitably Slide 2

  3. Two main factors are causing the high real-time energy offset costs: 1. Disconnect between low hour ahead (HASP) and high real-time (RTD) prices ! Often caused by day-ahead overscheduling 2. Settlement price averaging affect (paying out more to generators than receiving from load) ! Generation pays settlement interval prices ! Load pays average hourly prices Slide 3

  4. ISO’s analysis of April data yielded these observations: ! 5% of the hours account for more than 70% of the total monthly costs. ! The difference between RTD and HASP prices during these hours ranged from $38 to over $600. ! ISO exported an average of 1,500 MW in HASP during these hours. ! HASP/RTD price differences accounted for more than 70% of the offset costs. ! This ratio is likely to vary from month to month. Slide 4

  5. Longer term, a number of options are under consideration. ! Implement a two-tier allocation scheme for offset charge. ! Identify and mitigate the causes of large difference between RTD and HASP prices. ! Align the settlement intervals of RT load and generation. ! Settle the HASP imbalance energy by RTD price as adopted by NYISO. Slide 5

  6. Near-term, we recommend exempting load-following metered subsystem (MSS) from real time offset costs. Load following MSS: ! Rely on dispatching their own generation to follow real-time load deviations. ! Are subject to deviation penalties based on their performance. ! Do not drive costs related to real-time load deviations. Slide 6

  7. Next Steps ! File tariff for near term solution ! Develop proposal for resolution based on cost causation ! Stakeholder process ! Develop measures to mitigate HASP/RTD price discrepancies ! Present proposal for decision at October Board Meeting Slide 7

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend