de vito a dual arm high degree of freedom lightweight
play

DE VITO: A Dual-arm, High Degree-of-freedom, Lightweight, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TAROS 2019 DE VITO Falck et al. TAROS 2019 July 3, 2019 DE VITO: A Dual-arm, High Degree-of-freedom, Lightweight, Inexpensive, Passive Upper-limb Exoskeleton for Robot Teleoperation Fabian Falck 1 , Kawin Larppichet 1 , Petar Kormushev


  1. TAROS 2019 DE VITO – Falck et al. – TAROS 2019 July 3, 2019 DE VITO: A Dual-arm, High Degree-of-freedom, Lightweight, Inexpensive, Passive Upper-limb Exoskeleton for Robot Teleoperation Fabian Falck 1 , Kawin Larppichet 1 , Petar Kormushev Robot Intelligence Lab, Dyson School of Design Engineering, Imperial College London 1 Equal contribution

  2. DE VITO – Falck et al. – TAROS 2019 Motivation • Major advances in autonomous robot perception, planning and control in recent decades • Super-human hardware • Sensors (3D LIDAR, 360-degree vision) vs. • Actuators (AC servo, hydraulic motor) • Yet, the vast majority of human tasks in dynamic, unstructured environments far from being executed autonomously • à Teleoperation as a realistic, complementary transition solution, combined Vision (often) Reality with reliability and precision of autonomy

  3. DE VITO – Falck et al. – TAROS 2019 Exoskeletons – Related work Semi-circular bearing Four-bar linkage Key disadvantages of previous designs: • Complicated design (large number of (moving) parts) à high material cost • Bulky, heavy design (> 10 kg) Three non-90- Figure 3 : comparison of internal rotation measurement mechanism. Semi-circular Our work guideway (top left) [4], Four-bars linkages (top right) ADDIN degree linkage RW.CITE{{doc:5b9b02cde4b09ad10da468e0 EvanAckerman 2017}}[20], three none-90-degree linkage (bottom left)[21], offset linkage (bottom right)

  4. DE VITO – Falck et al. – TAROS 2019 DE VITO 1 - Design Key features: • Dual-arm upper-limb exoskeleton • 7 DOFs • Passive measurement • Light-weight (~5x lighter than related work) • Simplistic (mostly 3D printed) • Energy-efficient • Total material cost (at least 10x less than related work) 1 Design Engineering's Virtual Interface for TeleOperation Figure 2 : CAD model of the exoskeleton

  5. DE VITO – Falck et al. – TAROS 2019 Human arm motion and coverage + 2 3 1 - 0 - + - + 0 0 4 5 6 0 0 7 + - - + + + - - 0 Anatomic Joint description and Motion description Human arm Exoskeleton Coverage per- part type RoM [deg.] RoM [deg.] centage [%] Figure SEQ Figure \* ARABIC 1 : Human arm motion ADDIN Glenohumeral joint Flexion/Extension (158,53) (110,55) 78 RW.CITE{{doc:5a94859ee4b06ab1c08d3613 [NoInformation] 2015}}[15] (ball and socket Shoulder Adduction/Abduction (0,170) (0,110) 64 joint) Medial/Lateral rotation (70,90) (110,110) 100 Elbow Elbow joint (hinge Flexion/Extension (146,0) (110,110) 75 joint) Forearm Radioulnar joint Pronation/Supination (71,84) (110,110) 100 (pivot joint) Wrist joint (saddle Flexion/Extension (73,71) (110,55) 88 Wrist joint) Adduction/Abduction (33,19) (25,180) 100

  6. DE VITO – Falck et al. – TAROS 2019 Design variants and Singularities (right arm) A Singularity pose: C A Upper Arm forwards B Upper Arm outwards B C Upper Arm downwards à “relaxed position” à chosen variant

  7. DE VITO – Falck et al. – TAROS 2019 Chosen design specification • 3D printed joints and mounts • Carbon rod linkages Z 0,1 • Total weight: 3.2 kg X 0,1 • Weight of each arm: 0.85 kg • Total material cost: ~200 GBP Z 2 Index i a i α i d i θ i 1 0 0 0 θ 1 2 0 π 0 θ 2 Z 3 2 upper linkage Z 4 3 0 π 0.37 θ 3 2 4 0 − π 0 θ 4 2 5 0 π 0.33 θ 5 2 6 0 − π − 0 . 07 θ 6 Z 6 2 lower linkage Z 5 Z 7 7 0 π − 0 . 07 θ 7 2

  8. DE VITO – Falck et al. – TAROS 2019 Lower arm and Nunchuk controller Open/close the gripper Open/close the gripper Z Z Z Z C C Emergency stop C C Emergency stop Fine manipulation Fine manipulation (pitch and yaw) (pitch and yaw) L R L R Figure 5 : Wrist joint design and end-effector controller Figure 12 : buttons mapping of both right and left Nunchuk controller Figure 5 : Wrist joint design and end-effector controller Figure 12 : buttons mapping of both right and left Nunchuk controller

  9. DE VITO – Falck et al. – TAROS 2019 Electronic components and communication Circuit board body and wiring diagram: • ROS node for communication • Arduino mega between master and slave • Potentiometers

  10. DE VITO – Falck et al. – TAROS 2019 Kinematic mapping algorithms 1) Joint space one-to-one mapping: 3) Cartesian space mapping: + θ o ff set θ slave = θ master P slave end-e ff ector = P master end-e ff ector + d o ff set i i i Two modes for arbitrary seventh DOF: 2) Joint space scaled mapping: 1 2 + θ o ff set θ slave = c i ∗ θ master i i i Subsequent inverse kinematics solving Figure 11 : Cartesian mapping example Horizontal gripping posture (top), Vertical gripping posture (bottom)

  11. DE VITO – Falck et al. – TAROS 2019 Qualitative experiments on Robot DE NIRO Figure 14 : Setup of the Brick stacking experiment

  12. DE VITO – Falck et al. – TAROS 2019 Conclusion and Future work • DE VITO, a dual-arm upper limb • Refinement of kinematic exoskeleton teleoperating Robot DE control algorithms NIRO on various manipulation tasks • Further qualitative and • Mechanical and electronics design, quantitative validation of kinematic mapping and experiments design CAD models, documentation, code, videos at: http://www.imperial.ac.uk/robot-intelligence/robots/de_vito/

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend