DC CAS 2012 Preliminary Results District of Columbia Public Schools - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
dc cas 2012
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

DC CAS 2012 Preliminary Results District of Columbia Public Schools - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Jan 01, 2023 133 likes •446 views

July 2012 DC CAS 2012 Preliminary Results District of Columbia Public Schools | 1200 First Street, NE | Washington, DC 20002 | T 202.442.5885 | F 202.442.5026 | www.dcps.dc.gov Main findings 2012 (abbreviated) Overall steady

slide-1
SLIDE 1

District of Columbia Public Schools | 1200 First Street, NE | Washington, DC 20002 | T 202.442.5885 | F 202.442.5026 | www.dcps.dc.gov

DC CAS 2012 Preliminary Results

July 2012

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Main findings 2012 (abbreviated)

  • Overall steady growth since reforms began in 2007
  • Elementary back up after declines in 2010 and 2011
  • Slight decline at secondary level after 4 years of steady progress through 2011

District of Columbia Public Schools | 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Main findings 2012

  • Overall, DCPS composite scores showed DC CAS growth in math, up 2.7 percentage

point from 2011, and science, up 5.3 percentage points, and reversed a two-year trend

  • f declining reading scores with a .5 percentage point increase in reading.
  • Elementary back up after declines in 2010 and 2011
  • One year gain of 2 and 4 percentage points in reading and math, respectively
  • Five year gains of 7 and 17 percentage points in reading and math, respectively
  • One quarter of elementary students increased by at least one performance level in math
  • Slight decline at secondary level after 4 years of steady progress through 2011
  • Five year gains of 12 and 19 percentage points in reading and math, respectively
  • Increased participation rate at secondary level – exceeding federally required 95%
  • Significantly fewer secondary students earning below basic in 2012 v 2007
  • Other findings
  • Two grade-subject combinations lower in 2012 than 2007: Grade 3 and 6 reading
  • Strong five-year gains for the majority of sub-groups
  • Black-white achievement gaps narrower in 3 of 4 areas; wider in elementary reading
  • Year-to-year, gaps narrow slightly in math, widen slightly in reading

District of Columbia Public Schools | 3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

99.3% 99.3% 94.5% 94.2% 99.2% 99.3% 96.1% 95.7%

Reading Math Reading Math Elementary Secondary 2011 2012

95%

Participation Rates – one year change

Impressive increase in percentage of secondary students taking CAS

District of Columbia Public Schools | 4

Elementary Secondary Reading Math Reading Math Tuition Grant Tuition Grant Anacostia Anacostia Residential Residential Roosevelt Roosevelt Spingarn Spingarn Tuition Grant Tuition Grant Dunbar Ballou

Schools with <95% Participation Rate

slide-5
SLIDE 5

District of Columbia Public Schools | 5

Percent of students proficient: Composite results

Strong gains across all areas since 2007; Performance back up after 2 flat years

31.2% 40.8% 44.4% 43.1% 43.1% 44.7% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

+13.5%

+1.6%

slide-6
SLIDE 6

37.5 29.3 29.8 27.1 44.7 46.1 41.9 45.9 Reading Math Reading Math Elementary Secondary 2007 2012

District of Columbia Public Schools | 6

Percent of students proficient: 5-year trends

Very strong gains across all areas since 2007

+7 +17 +12 +19

(Schools with grades 3, 4, and/or 5) (Schools w/o grades 3 or 4 and a grade above 6)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Percent proficient by year

Solid growth in elementary, modest decline in secondary, from 2011 to 2012

District of Columbia Public Schools | 7

37.5 29.3 29.8 27.1 45.6 40.5 39.2 36.5 48.8 48.0 40.1 39.6 44.1 43.2 43.3 43.7 42.8 42.1 44.2 46.4 44.7 46.1 41.8 45.9 Reading Math Reading Math Elementary Secondary 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

+1.9 + 4

  • 2.4
  • 0.5

+7.2 +16.8 +12.0 +18.8

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Performance level distribution (2007-2012)

Far fewer earning Below Basic than in 2007; change from last year is minimal

District of Columbia Public Schools | 8

Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Elementary – Reading Secondary – Reading Elementary – Math Secondary – Math

41% 38% 37% 36% 37% 37% 21% 17% 14% 19% 20% 19% 33% 39% 42% 37% 35% 37% 5% 6% 7% 8% 8% 8% 40% 35% 34% 36% 37% 35% 31% 25% 18% 21% 21% 19% 23% 29% 34% 33% 30% 33% 7% 11% 14% 10% 12% 13% 44% 44% 44% 41% 37% 38% 27% 18% 16% 16% 19% 20% 24% 31% 31% 32% 32% 30% 6% 7% 9% 11% 12% 12% 36% 37% 35% 33% 32% 33% 37% 27% 26% 23% 22% 21% 23% 29% 31% 33% 34% 33% 4% 7% 9% 11% 12% 13%

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Performance level distribution by grade (2012)

Too many students at some grade levels still scoring Basic and Below Basic

District of Columbia Public Schools | 9

Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced

Reading Math

34% 36% 36% 34% 37% 37% 41% 41% 43% 41% 42% 38% 42% 36% 24% 23% 19% 18% 17% 17% 19% 21% 15% 16% 18% 18% 19% 21% 36% 36% 38% 40% 39% 36% 34% 31% 30% 29% 29% 33% 30% 30% 7% 5% 7% 9% 6% 10% 5% 7% 11% 15% 11% 10% 10% 13% 37% 37% 34% 32% 37% 34% 38% 36% 32% 31% 35% 32% 35% 34% 24% 23% 20% 17% 19% 20% 23% 20% 25% 18% 24% 18% 27% 24% 30% 28% 36% 36% 33% 34% 28% 29% 34% 37% 34% 39% 30% 32% 9% 11% 10% 15% 12% 13% 11% 16% 9% 14% 7% 10% 8% 10%

3 4 5 6 7 8 10

2011 2012

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Proficiency trends by grade (2007-2012)

Steady growth in some grades; significant variation in others

District of Columbia Public Schools | 10

Reading Math

20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00 55.00 60.00 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Proficiency changes by grade (table)

Remarkable growth at some grade levels over 5 years; modest declines in a few

District of Columbia Public Schools | 11

Reading Math

2009 2010 2011 2012

Chg from Previous Chg from 2007

Grade 2009 2010 2011 2012

Chg from Previous Chg from 2007

49% 42% 41% 41%

0%

  • 2%

3

46% 39% 38% 39%

1% 9%

48% 46% 45% 48%

3% 11%

4

53% 47% 47% 51%

4% 17%

47% 46% 46% 46%

0% 10%

5

46% 46% 43% 46%

3% 19%

51% 41% 40% 38%

  • 2%
  • 3%

6

42% 40% 42% 44%

2% 16%

37% 44% 44% 43%

  • 1%

17%

7

42% 45% 49% 51%

2% 27%

40% 42% 43% 43%

0% 17%

8

38% 43% 51% 50%

  • 1%

23%

43% 45% 44% 44%

0% 13%

10

42% 44% 40% 42%

2% 14%

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Student performance level changes from 2011 to 2012

District-wide: 21% of students increased, 64% stayed the same, 15% decreased

Movement Count Percentage

Up 2+ levels 59 1% Up 1 level 1507 21% Same level 4668 65% Down 1 level 921 13% Down 2+ levels 32 0%

District of Columbia Public Schools | January 1, 2010 12

Movement Count Percentage

Up 2+ levels 38 1% Up 1 level 852 18% Same level 3050 65% Down 1 level 692 15% Down 2+ levels 63 1%

Movement Count Percentage

Up 2+ levels 16 0% Up 1 level 803 17% Same level 2982 64% Down 1 level 815 17% Down 2+ levels 77 2%

Movement Count Percentage

Up 2+ levels 89 1% Up 1 level 1726 24% Same level 4432 61% Down 1 level 945 13% Down 2+ levels 47 1%

Elementary – Reading Elementary – Math Secondary – Reading Secondary – Math

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Student performance level changes from 2011 to 2012

Approximately one-third of students earning Below Basic in 2011 moved to Basic

District of Columbia Public Schools | 13

Elementary – Reading Elementary – Math

Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced Below Basic

63% 34% 2% 1%

Basic

10% 64% 26% 1%

Proficiency

1% 18% 68% 13%

Advanced

2% 1% 39% 59%

Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced

60% 36% 3% 1% 12% 56% 31% 1% 1% 16% 67% 16% 1% 2% 31% 66%

Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced Below Basic

70% 30% 1% 0%

Basic

16% 66% 17% 1%

Proficiency

3% 23% 59% 15%

Advanced

5% 2% 36% 57%

Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced

64% 33% 3% 1% 19% 57% 23% 0% 2% 18% 69% 11% 3% 2% 20% 74%

Secondary – Reading Secondary – Math

2011 2012 2011 2011 2011 2012 2012 2012

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Sub-group Performance and Achievement Gaps

District of Columbia Public Schools | 14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Proficiency by subgroup - elementary (table)

Modest growth for some subgroups; decline for Asian and ELL students

District of Columbia Public Schools | 15

Reading Math

ELEMENTARY 2009 2010 2011 2012

Chg from Previous Chg from 2007

2009 2010 2011 2012

Chg from Previous Chg from 2007

Black (n=8162)

43% 38% 36% 36%

0% +3%

42% 37% 33% 36%

+3% +13%

Hispanic (n=1881)

50% 45% 47% 48%

+1% +3%

54% 48% 53% 55%

+2% +16%

White (n=1145)

90% 88% 90% 91%

+1% +6%

89% 88% 89% 90%

+1% +12%

Asian (n=203)

74% 77% 73% 71%

  • 2%

+4%

81% 82% 82% 79%

  • 3%

+11%

Mixed Race

(n=168)

81% 85%

ELL (n=1687)

50% 44% 42% 41%

  • 1%
  • 1%

56% 48% 49% 49%

0% +12%

FARMS (n=8067)

41% 36% 34% 34%

0% +2%

41% 36% 34% 36%

+2% +12%

SPED (n=2242)

23% 16% 17% 19%

+2% +3%

21% 19% 19% 20%

+1% +10%

New reporting category for 2012

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Proficiency by subgroup - secondary (table)

Strong 5-year growth. but declines from last year for most sub-groups

District of Columbia Public Schools | 16

Reading Math

SECONDARY 2009 2010 2011 2012

Chg from Previous Chg from 2007

2009 2010 2011 2012

Chg from Previous Chg from 2007

Black (n=6336)

35% 38% 38% 35%

  • 3%

+9%

34% 38% 40% 39%

  • 1%

+16%

Hispanic (n=853)

47% 39% 49% 44%

  • 5%

+10%

53% 47% 52% 49%

  • 3%

+17%

White (n=697)

89% 90% 87% 89%

+2%

  • 4%

84% 89% 89% 88%

  • 1%
  • 4%

Asian (n=168)

75% 76% 67% 67%

0% +11%

87% 84% 86% 88%

+2% +14%

Mixed Race

(n=102)

86% 90%

ELL (n=542)

36% 26% 31% 27%

  • 4%

+11%

47% 38% 45% 44%

  • 1%

+21%

FARMS (n=5219)

32% 33% 33% 31%

  • 2%

+10%

32% 34% 37% 36%

  • 1%

+16%

SPED (n=1966)

14% 15% 13% 12%

  • 1%

+6%

12% 14% 15% 14%

  • 1%

+9%

New reporting category for 2012

slide-17
SLIDE 17

16.2 9.8 5.8 5.0 24.4 17.2 13.0 10.9 22.7 20.7 14.5 11.9 16.0 18.6 14.8 13.9 17.2 18.7 13.0 14.8 17.5 19.3 9.9 11.7 Reading Math Reading Math Elementary Secondary 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

+0.3 +0.6

  • 3.1
  • 3.1

Percent proficient over time – Special Education

District of Columbia Public Schools | 17

+1.3 +9.5 +4.1 +6.7

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Percent proficient over time – English Language Learners

District of Columbia Public Schools | 18

41.9 37.4 16.1 23.1 46.7 45.7 23.4 35.5 49.7 55.9 35.6 46.7 43.7 47.6 26.0 37.5 42.1 49.3 30.8 45.5 41.4 48.9 27.1 43.6 Reading Math Reading Math Elementary Secondary 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

  • 0.7
  • 0.4
  • 3.7
  • 1.9
  • 0.5

+11.5 +11 +20.5

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Percent proficient over time – Free and Reduced Meals

District of Columbia Public Schools | 19

32.2 23.8 21.5 19.5 39.2 34.3 30.5 28.5 40.9 40.6 31.7 32.4 36.0 35.7 32.9 34.3 33.8 33.4 33.3 36.7 34.0 36.5 30.6 36.2 Reading Math Reading Math Elementary Secondary 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

+0.2 +3.1

  • 2.7
  • 0.5

+1.8 +12.7 +9.1 +16.7

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Black-white achievement gap: Elementary

Gap widened slightly in reading; narrowed in math

District of Columbia Public Schools | 20

Reading Math

84.5 87.3 90.2 88.4 89.7 91.5 32.6 40.7 43.4 38.5 35.5 36.2 51.9 46.6 46.8 49.9 54.2 55.3 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 White Black 77.6 84.9 88.8 87.8 88.6 89.6 23.9 34.8 41.9 36.7 33.2 36.6 53.7 50.0 46.9 51.2 55.5 53.0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 White Black

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Black-white achievement gap: Secondary

Gap widened in reading; stayed constant in math

District of Columbia Public Schools | 21

Reading Math

93.1 95.6 88.6 90.5 87.3 88.7 25.8 35.4 35.4 38.1 38.2 35.4 67.2 60.2 53.2 52.4 49.1 53.3 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 White Black 92.5 94.5 83.9 89.1 89.0 88.2 22.5 31.2 34.2 37.6 39.8 39.2 70.1 63.3 49.7 51.5 49.2 49.0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 White Black

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Proficiency changes over time

District of Columbia Public Schools | 22

by school

slide-23
SLIDE 23
  • 30
  • 20
  • 10

10 20 30

Mean: Murch ES (-0.3) Median: Miner ES (-1.3)

Elementary reading proficiency changes, 2011-2012

District of Columbia Public Schools | 23

Top 10 Decliners (% point change)

Turner ES @ Green

  • 15.97

Takoma EC

  • 12.82

Winston EC

  • 11.71

Ketcham ES

  • 11.28

LaSalle-Backus EC

  • 9.53

King, M.L. ES

  • 8.98

Burrville ES

  • 8.31

Kenilworth ES

  • 8.12

Ross ES

  • 7.83

Nalle ES

  • 7.76

Top 10 Gainers (% point change)

Ludlow-Taylor ES 15.36 Thomas ES 14.16 Plummer ES 12.93 Burroughs EC 12.36 Thomson ES 10.18 Davis ES 9.64 Stanton ES 9.59 Tyler ES 9.25 Cleveland ES 8.86 Marie Reed ES 8.54

slide-24
SLIDE 24
  • 30
  • 20
  • 10

10 20 30

Elementary math proficiency changes, 2011-2012

District of Columbia Public Schools | 24

Top 10 Decliners (% point change)

Turner ES @ Green

  • 20.66

J.O. Wilson ES

  • 13.98

Ketcham ES

  • 13.27

Burrville ES

  • 13.01

Orr ES

  • 12.92

LaSalle-Backus EC

  • 11.73

Langdon EC

  • 9.17

Drew ES

  • 8.49

Kenilworth ES

  • 8.4

Mann ES

  • 8.01

Top 10 Gainers (% point change)

Garrison ES 25.11 Thomas ES 21.47 Plummer ES 20 Stanton ES 18.97 Beers ES 18.36 Payne ES 17.17 Hendley ES 16.19 Burroughs EC 16.02 Thomson ES 14.74 Houston ES 13.76

Mean: Shepherd ES (2.2) Median: Brookland ES (1.1)

slide-25
SLIDE 25
  • 30
  • 20
  • 10

10 20 30

Secondary reading proficiency changes, 2011-2012

District of Columbia Public Schools | 25

Top 10 Decliners (% point change)

Luke Moore Alternative HS

  • 19.6

Eliot-Hine MS

  • 12.64

Ellington School of the Arts

  • 11.71

Stuart-Hobson MS (Capitol Hill Cluster)

  • 9.84

Washington Metropolitan HS

  • 8.22

Roosevelt HS

  • 7.95

Benjamin Banneker HS

  • 7.64

Coolidge HS

  • 7.5

Hart MS

  • 6.29

Wilson HS

  • 5.55

Top 9 Gainers (% point change)

Woodson, H.D. HS 8.53 Jefferson MS 3.67 Anacostia HS 3.61 Dunbar HS 3.28 McKinley Technology HS 2.71 Shaw MS @ Garnet-Patterson 2.69 MacFarland MS 1.8 Kelly Miller MS 0.65 Johnson, John Hayden MS 0.43

Mean: CHEC EC (-2.3) Median: Kramer MS (-2.3)

slide-26
SLIDE 26
  • 30
  • 20
  • 10

10 20 30

Secondary math proficiency changes, 2011-2012

District of Columbia Public Schools | 26

Top 10 Decliners (% point change)

Ellington School of the Arts

  • 18.2

Luke Moore Alternative HS

  • 13.88

Ron Brown MS

  • 11.62

Eliot-Hine MS

  • 8.5

Roosevelt HS

  • 6.22

Phelps ACE HS

  • 5.5

MacFarland MS

  • 4.67

Shaw MS @ Garnet-Patterson

  • 4.56

Sousa MS

  • 4.46

Deal MS

  • 4.12

Top 10 Gainers (% point change)

Kelly Miller MS 9.81 Wilson HS 7.12 Cardozo HS @ Meyer 6.43 Johnson, John Hayden MS 6.18 McKinley Technology HS 4.69 Ballou HS 3.57 Woodson, H.D. HS 2.91 Anacostia HS 2.78 Jefferson MS 2.64 Dunbar HS 2.6

Mean: CHEC EC (-1.6) Median: Banneker HS (-0.9)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Science

District of Columbia Public Schools | 27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Science Results – Overall Performance by Grade

Biology is markedly higher than 5th or 8th grade

District of Columbia Public Schools | July, 2012 28

23% 41% 27% 42% 25% 25% 28% 28% 42% 8% 7% 6%

5th Grade 8th Grade Biology

Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Science Results – Performance by Subgroup

District of Columbia Public Schools | July, 2012 29

Asian (n=158) Black (n=5792) Hispanic (n=1061) Mixed Race (n=98) White (n=665) ELL (n=537) FARMS (n=5142) SPED (n=1441)

12% 35% 24% 5% 2% 39% 35% 57% 16% 35% 33% 11% 7% 41% 37% 29% 56% 28% 38% 54% 48% 18% 27% 10% 16% 2% 6% 30% 43% 2% 2% 4%

Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced