Dark Matter in the Left Right Twin Higgs Model Ethan Dolle - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

dark matter in the left right twin higgs model
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Dark Matter in the Left Right Twin Higgs Model Ethan Dolle - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Dark Matter in the Left Right Twin Higgs Model Ethan Dolle University of Arizona Work done with Shufang Su and Jessica Goodman arXiv:0712.1234v1 [hep-ph] 1 Outline Left-Right Twin Higgs Model Relic Density Analysis Conclusion 2


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Dark Matter in the Left Right Twin Higgs Model

Ethan Dolle University of Arizona Work done with Shufang Su and Jessica Goodman

arXiv:0712.1234v1 [hep-ph]

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Outline

  • Left-Right Twin Higgs Model
  • Relic Density Analysis
  • Conclusion
slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Left-Right Twin Higgs Model

  • Chacko, Goh, and Harnik:

arXiv:hep-ph/0506256v1

  • Solution to Little Hierarchy Problem
  • To avoid EW precision constraints, add a second

Higgs that couples to gauge bosons only

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Left-Right Twin Higgs Model

slide-5
SLIDE 5

4

SM Higgs doublet

EWSB

Left-Right Twin Higgs Model

slide-6
SLIDE 6

4

Couples only to gauge bosons

SM Higgs doublet

EWSB

Left-Right Twin Higgs Model

slide-7
SLIDE 7

4

Couples only to gauge bosons

SM Higgs doublet

EWSB

SU(2)L Higgs doublet

Left-Right Twin Higgs Model

slide-8
SLIDE 8

4

Couples only to gauge bosons

SM Higgs doublet

EWSB

SU(2)L Higgs doublet

Left-Right Twin Higgs Model

slide-9
SLIDE 9

4

Couples only to gauge bosons

SM Higgs doublet

EWSB

SU(2)L Higgs doublet

Left-Right Twin Higgs Model

DM candidate

slide-10
SLIDE 10

5

  • couples only to gauge bosons:

Could be achieved by imposing a discrete symmetry

Left-Right Twin Higgs Model

slide-11
SLIDE 11

5

Good

  • couples only to gauge bosons:

Could be achieved by imposing a discrete symmetry

Left-Right Twin Higgs Model

slide-12
SLIDE 12

5

Good Bad

  • couples only to gauge bosons:

Could be achieved by imposing a discrete symmetry

Left-Right Twin Higgs Model

slide-13
SLIDE 13

5

Good Bad

  • couples only to gauge bosons:

Could be achieved by imposing a discrete symmetry

Left-Right Twin Higgs Model

Natural WIMP candidates

  • The lighter one of is stable, weakly interacting
slide-14
SLIDE 14

6

In addition to the CW potential, we can add terms to the Lagrangian:

Left-Right Twin Higgs Model

slide-15
SLIDE 15

6

In addition to the CW potential, we can add terms to the Lagrangian:

Left-Right Twin Higgs Model

bulk mass for and (optional)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

6

In addition to the CW potential, we can add terms to the Lagrangian:

Left-Right Twin Higgs Model

bulk mass for and (optional)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

6

In addition to the CW potential, we can add terms to the Lagrangian:

Left-Right Twin Higgs Model

bulk mass for and (optional) Impose neutral mass splitting to make it kinematically forbidden. Current CDMS limit:

slide-18
SLIDE 18

6

In addition to the CW potential, we can add terms to the Lagrangian:

Left-Right Twin Higgs Model

bulk mass for and (optional) mass splitting between and (necessary) Impose neutral mass splitting to make it kinematically forbidden. Current CDMS limit:

slide-19
SLIDE 19

6

In addition to the CW potential, we can add terms to the Lagrangian:

Left-Right Twin Higgs Model

bulk mass for and (optional) mass splitting between and (optional) mass splitting between and (necessary) Impose neutral mass splitting to make it kinematically forbidden. Current CDMS limit:

slide-20
SLIDE 20

7

Left-Right Twin Higgs Model

slide-21
SLIDE 21

7

Left-Right Twin Higgs Model

Parameterize by

slide-22
SLIDE 22

7

Left-Right Twin Higgs Model

Parameterize by

Mass

slide-23
SLIDE 23

7

Left-Right Twin Higgs Model

Parameterize by

Mass

slide-24
SLIDE 24

7

Left-Right Twin Higgs Model

Parameterize by

Mass

Related to

slide-25
SLIDE 25

7

Left-Right Twin Higgs Model

Parameterize by For :

Mass

We looked at both cases, treating splittings as free parameters.

Related to

In general, for :

slide-26
SLIDE 26

8

  • micrOmegas: considers co-annihilations when

mass splittings are small

  • Solve Boltzmann equation
  • WMAP:
  • Modest choice of parameters yields

Relic Density Analysis

  • Low mass region:
  • High mass region:
slide-27
SLIDE 27

9

Relic Density Analysis

Low mass:

slide-28
SLIDE 28

9

Relic Density Analysis

Low mass:

  • 3 regions:
slide-29
SLIDE 29

9

Relic Density Analysis

Low mass:

W pole Z pole

  • 3 regions:
  • W/Z pole (co-annihilations)
slide-30
SLIDE 30

9

Relic Density Analysis

Low mass:

W pole Z pole

  • 3 regions:
  • W/Z pole (co-annihilations)
  • Gauge boson pair

(annihilations)

Gauge pair

slide-31
SLIDE 31

9

Relic Density Analysis

Low mass:

W pole Z pole

  • 3 regions:
  • W/Z pole (co-annihilations)
  • Gauge boson pair

(annihilations)

Gauge pair

slide-32
SLIDE 32

9

Relic Density Analysis

Low mass:

W pole Z pole

  • 3 regions:
  • W/Z pole (co-annihilations)
  • Gauge boson pair

(annihilations)

Gauge pair

slide-33
SLIDE 33

9

Relic Density Analysis

Low mass:

W pole Z pole

  • 3 regions:
  • W/Z pole (co-annihilations)
  • Gauge boson pair

(annihilations)

  • bb pair (annihilations)

Gauge pair bb pair

slide-34
SLIDE 34

9

Relic Density Analysis

Low mass:

W pole Z pole

  • 3 regions:
  • W/Z pole (co-annihilations)
  • Gauge boson pair

(annihilations)

  • bb pair (annihilations)

Gauge pair bb pair

slide-35
SLIDE 35

10

Relic Density Analysis

Low mass:

  • 2 regions:
  • W/Z pole (co-annihilations)
  • Gauge boson pair

(annihilations)

slide-36
SLIDE 36

10

Relic Density Analysis

Low mass:

  • 2 regions:
  • W/Z pole (co-annihilations)
  • Gauge boson pair

(annihilations)

  • Change with splittings
slide-37
SLIDE 37

11

Relic Density Analysis

Low mass

  • case
slide-38
SLIDE 38

11

Relic Density Analysis

Low mass

Sh1 →qq _ ^^

  • Co-annihilations: W/Z pole
  • case
slide-39
SLIDE 39

11

Relic Density Analysis

Low mass

Sh1 →qq _ ^^ SS→W+W-/ZZ ^^

  • Co-annihilations: W/Z pole
  • Annihilations: gauge bosons
  • case
slide-40
SLIDE 40

11

Relic Density Analysis

Low mass

Sh1 →qq _ ^^ SS→W+W-/ZZ ^^

  • Co-annihilations: W/Z pole
  • Annihilations: gauge bosons
  • case
  • case
slide-41
SLIDE 41

11

Relic Density Analysis

Low mass

Sh1 →qq _ ^^ SS→W+W-/ZZ ^^

  • Co-annihilations: W/Z pole
  • Annihilations: gauge bosons
  • case
  • case
  • Co-annihilations: W/Z pole

SA →qq _ ^^

slide-42
SLIDE 42

11

Relic Density Analysis

Low mass

Sh1 →qq _ ^^ SS→W+W-/ZZ ^^

  • Co-annihilations: W/Z pole
  • Annihilations: gauge bosons
  • case
  • case
  • Co-annihilations: W/Z pole
  • Annihilations: gauge bosons

SA →qq _ ^^ SS→W+W-/ZZ ^^

slide-43
SLIDE 43

11

Relic Density Analysis

Low mass

Sh1 →qq _ ^^ SS→W+W-/ZZ ^^

  • Co-annihilations: W/Z pole
  • Annihilations: gauge bosons
  • Annihilations: bb pair
  • case
  • case
  • Co-annihilations: W/Z pole
  • Annihilations: gauge bosons

SA →qq _ ^^ SS→W+W-/ZZ ^^ SS→bb ^^ _

slide-44
SLIDE 44

12

Relic Density Analysis

High mass

slide-45
SLIDE 45

12

  • Two regions:
  • Bulk (annihilations)

Relic Density Analysis

High mass

slide-46
SLIDE 46

12

  • Two regions:
  • Bulk (annihilations)
  • ZH pole (co-annihilations)

Relic Density Analysis

High mass

mS~mZH/2

^

slide-47
SLIDE 47

12

  • Two regions:
  • Regions change by:
  • Bulk (annihilations)
  • ZH pole (co-annihilations)
  • changing f

Relic Density Analysis

High mass

mS~mZH/2

^

slide-48
SLIDE 48

12

  • Two regions:
  • Regions change by:
  • Bulk (annihilations)
  • ZH pole (co-annihilations)
  • changing f

Relic Density Analysis

High mass

  • changing

mS~mZH/2

^

slide-49
SLIDE 49

13

Relic Density Analysis

High mass

  • mS -f contour

^

slide-50
SLIDE 50

13

Relic Density Analysis

High mass

Bulk

  • mS -f contour

^

  • Bulk: mS constant

^

slide-51
SLIDE 51

13

Relic Density Analysis

High mass

Bulk Pole

  • mS -f contour

^

  • Bulk: mS constant

^

  • Pole: mS varies (mS ~ mZH/2)

^

^

slide-52
SLIDE 52

13

Relic Density Analysis

High mass

Bulk Pole

  • mS -f contour

^

  • mS - contour

^

  • Bulk: mS constant

^

  • Pole: mS varies (mS ~ mZH/2)

^

^

slide-53
SLIDE 53

13

Relic Density Analysis

High mass

Bulk Pole Bulk

  • mS -f contour

^

  • mS - contour

^

  • Bulk: mS constant

^

  • Pole: mS varies (mS ~ mZH/2)

^

^

  • Bulk: mS varies

^

slide-54
SLIDE 54

13

Relic Density Analysis

High mass

Bulk Pole Bulk Pole

  • mS -f contour

^

  • mS - contour

^

  • Bulk: mS constant

^

  • Pole: mS varies (mS ~ mZH/2)

^

^

  • Bulk: mS varies

^

  • Pole: mS constant (mS ~ mZH/2)

^

^

slide-55
SLIDE 55

13

Relic Density Analysis

High mass

Bulk

Large areas of parameter space where WMAP results are accessible

Pole Bulk Pole

  • mS -f contour

^

  • mS - contour

^

  • Bulk: mS constant

^

  • Pole: mS varies (mS ~ mZH/2)

^

^

  • Bulk: mS varies

^

  • Pole: mS constant (mS ~ mZH/2)

^

^

slide-56
SLIDE 56

14

  • Bulk mass is then given

entirely by CW potential

  • Recall for :
  • There exists regions

where

Relic Density Analysis

High mass

slide-57
SLIDE 57

15

  • High mass region requires a little tuning (splittings of

a few GeV), and works with minimal setup ( )

  • Left Right Twin Higgs Model provides a natural

dark matter candidate

  • Can obtain WMAP results with a wide range of

splittings for low mass region

  • Thank you!

Conclusion