Dagenham CCG Commissioning Strategy Plan Contents 1 Vision and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Dagenham CCG Commissioning Strategy Plan Contents 1 Vision and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Barking and Dagenham CCG Commissioning Strategy Plan Contents 1 Vision and strategic goals Context 2 B&D CCG priorities 3 4 BHRUT viability: long term financial modelling Appendices: 2013/14 commissioning timetable 2 Vision and
2
Contents
Vision and strategic goals 1 Context 2 B&D CCG priorities 3 BHRUT viability: long term financial modelling 4 Appendices: 2013/14 commissioning timetable
Vision and strategic goals
“Improving health and health outcomes for local people through clinically led commissioning of sustainable, safe, high quality local health services”
- Address the health needs and health inequalities of our population by
prevention of ill health and promotion of wellbeing
- Improve the quality of health services, standards of care and outcomes for
local residents across all health services, hospital, primary and community services
- Deliver strategic and transformational change needed to ensure high quality
and sustainable services into the future
- Ensure financial sustainability and deliver best value for money for services
commissioned
- Develop an urgent care strategy that supports the public in using primary
care
4
Contents
Vision and strategic goals 1 Context 2 B&D CCG priorities 3 BHRUT viability: long term financial modelling 4 Appendices: 2013/14 commissioning timetable
Population profile
5
1 DH Expo Book 2012 2 NHS Information Centre 2010 3 IMD 2010 - average score SECTION 2. CONTEXT England NHS B & D CCG
Male Female
Map showing deprivation (IMD national quintiles) in Barking & Dagenham by LSOA (IMD 2010 Score) Total population1 173,375 Number registered with B & D GPs2 191,073 Barking & Dagenham has a relatively young population compared to the England average Barking & Dagenham has a deprived population compared to the rest of London
▪ Young population ▪ High proportion of children ▪ Particularly high number of
0-5s
▪ Low proportion of over 65s ▪ Barking and Dagenham is
8th most deprived area in London
▪ Large new housing
developments planned Key findings or issues
1 – most deprived quintile 5 – least deprived quintile
7th most deprived of 31 PCT areas in London3
WORKING DRAFT
SOURCE: Network of Public Health Observatories 2011, NHS IC 2010/11, ONS 2012
Provider landscape
- Main acute provider, BHRUT, is challenged financially,
and second largest acute provider, Barts Health, is running a deficit
- Main acute provider has serious quality issues
- 6th lowest number of GPs per weighted population in
London, 0.56 GPs/1000 weighted population, compared to London average of 0.66
- 74% of GP practices have 3 or fewer GPs, compared to
national average of 46%
Quality improvement areas for providers
BHRUT Overall progress has been made on the recommendations made by the CQC. Action is needed on:
- Health Acquired Infection
- Serious Incident Management:
- Eliminating Mixed Sex Accommodation
- Formal Complaints
- National Cancer Patient Experience Survey
2011-12
- National Hip Fracture database outputs
NELFT
- Infection Control and Prevention Training
Compliance
- Serious Incident Management
- Safeguarding Children Training Compliance
- Ofsted/CQC recommendations to B&D
Trust/PCT and LA
- Problems with Health Visiting Recruitment
National GP patient survey
- Impression of waiting time at surgery
- Rating of nurse giving you enough time
- Confidence and trust in the nurse
- Overall experience of out-of-hours GP
services
8
Contents
Vision and strategic goals 1 Context 2 B&D CCG priorities 3 BHRUT viability: long term financial modelling 4 Appendices: 2013/14 commissioning timetable
BHR CCG priorities
- Commission safe, sustainable, high quality
services for the local population
- Integrate care
- Redesign urgent and emergency care services
- Staying healthy
- Increasing productivity
B&D CCG proposed priorities 2013-18
Developing a locality-led approach to provision
- f integrated health and social care services that
will have an early impact on:
- Urgent care
- Children and young people
- Integrated care – for older people and people
with long term conditions
Opportunities: Urgent care
- Developing a locality model for primary care
urgent care
- Review Walk in Centre provision in Barking
- Increase utilisation of urgent care centres at
KGH and Queen’s Hospital and review provision of UCCs
- Implementation of NHS 111 including Co-
- rdinate my Care (for end of life care)
Opportunities: Children and young people
- Review Child and Adolescent mental health strategy
including Improving Access to Psychological Therapies
- Implement CQC recommendations for Looked After
Children and Young Offenders
- Review speech and language therapy for children
with special educational needs and disabilities
- Short breaks for carers
- Review urgent care pathway for children (linked to
urgent care above)
Opportunities: Integrated Care Strategy
- BHR Integrated Care Coalition agreed Case for Change
and to develop integrated care strategy to achieve a viable sustainable health and social care system.
- Integrated care strategy focuses on frail, older people
and those with long term conditions
- Service model has been developed - based on locality
focus of delivery of care and more care provided closer to home
- Improved productivity for community services will
allow a reduced community bed-base for BHR to provide more activity in the community
Other key opportunities
- Planned care – reducing secondary care activity and managing demand
- Maternity – B&D births at Barking Birthing Centre and Newham
- Productivity - Medicines management and contract review
- Cancer – implementing London models of care and standardisation of
pricing
- Mental health – improving access to psychological therapies and
review of CAMHS services (see children and young people priority above)
- Primary care – continuous quality improvement and review of
enhanced services
15
Contents
Vision and strategic goals 1 Context 2 B&D CCG priorities 3 BHRUT viability: long term financial modelling 4 Appendices: 2013/14 commissioning timetable
BHR CCG approach to achieving high quality and financial balance
- GP leaders and CCGs fully support the
HealthforNEL programme agreed in October 2011
- Collaborative commissioning across the
three CCGs has been designed to ensure a consistent and coherent integrated care strategy to wrap around BHRUT, reducing the complexity and enabling pathways to be streamlined.
- Collaborative BHR CCGs leadership team
established to drive whole system change focusing on 3 programmes:
– Implementation of integrated care and out of hospital strategy (many of BHRUT productivity gains will require system support e.g. LOS reduction requires all partners to ensure appropriate discharge and post acute care in place). – Acute reconfiguration programme driving up quality standards – BHRUT LTFM: delivering a viable Trust
Integrated Care Strategy Trust LTFM Acute reconfiguration
BHRUT viability: long term financial modelling
- CCGs want to see BHRUT become a
viable high quality local provider for their residents and recognise their role in supporting BHRUT to deliver .
- BHRT estimated “do nothing” financial
gap is c£126m by 2016/17.
- The Trust, supported by E&Y is
working on developing a more robust long term clinical and financial strategy.
- Discussions are ongoing about options
to bridge the remaining gap, e.g. potential to repatriate some work back to BHRT currently flowing into central London.
- Financial risk arrangements will be
considered through this process.
Trust productivity savings £94m
PFI funding £16m Gap £16m Closing the gap by 2016/17
18
Contents
Vision and strategic goals 1 Context 2 B&D CCG priorities 3 BHRUT viability: long term financial modelling 4 Appendices: 2013/14 commissioning timetable
Commissioning Timetable for 2013-14
August 2012 September October November December January 2013 February March April
Integrated Care Coalition Meetings CCG board meetings Health and Wellbeing Board Meetings
Commissioning intentions and priorities agreed 1st draft Commissioning strategy plan agreed by CCGs CCG allocations expected EY support to development of integrated care commissioning strategy and outline business case Baseline of current services Options development Modelling of economic impact Options appraisal
- Dev. of
strategic
- utline case
EY support to development of BHRUT long-term financial model and clinical strategy Contract negotiations Production of detailed provider delivery plans Refinement of provider delivery plans Completion of provider delivery plans Contracts signed
NELC Board Meetings
Final Commissioning strategy plan agreed by CCGs
Comments
Members are invited to comment on:
- Progress made towards strategic goals
- Priorities for 2013-18
- The QIPP opportunities outlined in the