D avid G. Lamothe, P.E. Senior Project Manager GZA - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

d avid g lamothe p e
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

D avid G. Lamothe, P.E. Senior Project Manager GZA - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Geotherm al Heating/ Cooling System s Presented to : NH Joint Engineering Societies 6 th Annual Conference Presented by : D avid G. Lamothe, P.E. Senior Project Manager GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. Manchester, New Hampshire Date: October 4,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Geotherm al Heating/ Cooling System s

Presented to: NH Joint Engineering Societies 6th Annual Conference Presented by: David G. Lamothe, P.E.

Senior Project Manager GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. Manchester, New Hampshire Date: October 4, 2012

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Presentation Outline

  • What is geothermal heating/cooling?
  • How does it work?
  • Why consider geothermal?
  • Types of Ground Loops
  • Permit Considerations
  • Financial Incentives
  • What is the “State of the Practice?”
  • Photos and Case Studies
slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

W hat is “Geotherm al”?

NOT HOT ROCKS!!!! NOT POWER PRODUCTION

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

W hat is “Geotherm al”?

Ground Source Heat Pumps (GSHPs) Low temperature thermal exchange

(~40-90°F)

Uses renewable energy stored in the earth to heat and cool

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

How Does I t W ork?

Furnace and AC replaced by GSHP

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

W hy Geotherm al?

Green Technology LEED Zero Net Energy Lower Maintenance Energy Efficiency Carbon Reduction

Save $$$

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

W hy Geotherm al?

To do your own comparison based on current fuel prices, your system’s efficiency, etc., go to: www.nhclimateaudit.org/calculators.php Fuel Type Fuel Unit Cost Fuel Unit of Measure Efficiency of Heating Unit Price per Million Btu Coal 330 Ton 75% 16.98

  • No. 2 Fuel Oil

3.661 Gallon 78% 33.84 Natural Gas 1.0556 Therm 78% 13.53 Propane 3.178 Gallon 78% 44.61 Wood 210 Cord 60% 17.50 Electricity 0.13706 kWh 99% 40.56 Wood Pellets 243.86 Ton 80% 18.47 Kerosene 3.968 Gallon 80% 36.74 Geothermal 0.13706 kWh 330% 12.17

Heating Cost Comparison

Note: Fuel Unit Costs are based on average prices in the State of New Hampshire as of September 3, 2012.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

W hy Geotherm al?

~55°F

Mean earth temperature

CONSISTENTLY

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

W hy Geotherm al?

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Room Temperature Δ=15°F Δ=-50°F Δ=20°F Mean Earth Temperature Winter Low Air Temperature Summer High Air Temperature

Temperature, °F

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Energy Efficiency

Earth Coupling (3 to 5 kW)

Heating and Cooling (4 to 6 kW)

Grid (1 kW)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Geotherm al Operation – SUMMER

Heat is Absorbed by Soil/Rock from Fluid GEOEXCHANGE SYSTEM (REJECTS HEAT BTUs) Earth = HEAT SINK

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Geotherm al Operation – W I NTER

Heat is Absorbed by Fluid from Soil /Rock GEOEXCHANGE SYSTEM (EXTRACTS BTUs) Earth = HEAT SOURCE

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Single Building

District system graphic

Wells drilled and connected in circuits Vault/manifold Supply and Return Headers

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

District System

Serves multiple buildings

District system graphic

Central Well Field Vault/manifold

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Hybrid System

  • Economic and/or design decision to optimize

performance and limit capital costs

  • Combine geothermal wells and heat pumps

with:

– Chillers or cooling towers to boost cooling – Solar thermal collectors to boost heating – Supplemental fossil fuel for heating

To serve peak demand that occurs only a portion of total operating time

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Hybrid System

200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Load (MBh)

Load Profile

Max Heating (MBh) Max Cooling (MBh)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Distribution System s ( Building Side) Geothermal Heat Pump

  • Transfers heat from the ground loop

to water or air distributed to the building Media:

– Water-to-water (hydronic systems) – Water-to-air

Distribution System

  • Ducted forced air system
  • Hydronic/Chilled Beams
  • Radiant floor (hydronic) heating with

ducted cooling

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Ground Heat Exchanger ( Ground Loop)

Exchanges heat with the ground

– Open to Diffusion Wells (ODW) – Standing Column Wells (SCW) – Closed Loops (CL)

  • Vertical
  • Horizontal

Also - Pond Loops

  • Direct
  • Indirect
slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Open Loop System

  • Direct use of groundwater
  • Typ. <200 feet deep
  • Typ. used in highly

transmissive aquifers (Cape Cod, Long Island)

  • More efficient
  • Aquifer characteristics

important (flow/temp/chemistry)

  • More stringent permitting to

reinject water

  • More maintenance than

closed loops (water quality can cause fouling)

Extraction Well Injection Well

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Available drawdown for extraction

Available depth to water for injection

Ratio of injection wells to extraction wells may be 2:1 to 4:1

Open Loop System

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Standing Colum n W ell

(Credit: Water Energy)

  • Combine extraction and

injection well

  • Typically 1,500 feet deep
  • In-well pump
  • Efficiency comes from

advective heat transfer

  • Performance is

dependent upon quality

  • f water encountered and

ability to bleed

  • Typ. 6.5 in.
  • diam. in rock,

uncased

20’ (min.) into rock

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

W hat is “Bleed?”

90 gpm 100 gpm 10 gpm Drywell, water body

Induces Flow to Well

Issues: Responsibly discharged to same aquifer Subject to permitting requirements Environmental Concerns? Foundation Settlement?

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Deviation

Most projects require 0.01 ft/ft = 15 ft Then there’s reality……

210 feet away from point of entry!

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Deviation

210 feet from point

  • f entry at 294°

Stabilizers and low down pressure used to limit deviation.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Deviation

NY State – oil and gas regulations require a deviation or verticality survey for all wells (incl. geothermal) > 500 feet deep unless MWD techniques used.

NH, MA – no requirement - yet…..

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Closed Loop Vertical W ells

  • Closed pipe loop
  • Indirect heat exchange

with ground

  • Typ. 300 - 500 feet deep
  • Ground temperature,

thermal conductivity and diffusivity important

  • Lower maintenance

than open systems

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Closed Loop Vertical W ells

1.25-inch HDPE pipe

Thermally enhanced grout Factory fused U-bend Soil / Rock

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Closed Loop - Horizontal Slinky

Advantages

  • Lower Installation Cost

Disadvantages

  • Lower Thermal Capacity
  • Significant Site Disruption
slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

Closed Loop – Vertical Slinky

Advantages

  • Less Site Disruption
  • Lower Cost

Disadvantages

  • Suitable Soils Needed
  • Thermally Inefficient
  • Long Lengths Needed
slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

Lake/ Pond Loop

Advantages

  • High Efficiency
  • Low Installation Cost
  • Easy to Install/Repair

Disadvantages

  • Limited Application
  • Primarily for cooling
  • Regulatory Issues
  • Environmental Impacts
slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

Selection of Ground Loop

Permitting Risk Tolerance (O&M, Cost) Logistics Recommended Ground Loop

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

Selection of Ground Loop  Logistics – Phasing/sequencing

 Physical restrictions – available space for well field  Closed loop closer spacing but more wells typ. required

 Geology

 Soil, bedrock, and groundwater conditions  Depth to rock, water quantity and quality  Unstable rock – CL recommended  Environmental conditions

 Soil or groundwater contamination in vicinity?  AUR/AUL?

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

 Permitting requirements

  • More rigorous for open systems

 Client’s risk tolerance

 Permitting  O&M / Cost (Estimated payback period)  Water quality issues - Poor water quality (i.e. high Fe, Mn

  • r hard water, low pH) – CL recommended to avoid

scaling and fouling issues

(Risk tolerance is often primary factor in selection) Selection of Ground Loop

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

Perm it Considerations - NH

  • NHDES
  • State UIC registration
  • (Underground Injection Control)
  • More rigorous permitting for Open Loop vs. Closed

Loop

  • UIC registration for CL
  • Open systems (Open, SCW):
  • UIC registration
  • Water Use Registration and Reporting for > 20,000 gpd (~14 gpm) –

report monthly use on a quarterly basis

  • Groundwater Withdrawal Program (>57,600 gpd = 40 gpm) needs

large groundwater withdrawal permit

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

Perm it Considerations – NH ( Continued) Open Loop

For Commercial/Industrial/Institutional Residential is Exempt

  • Raw Water Quality Testing Required for
  • VOCs
  • Primary inorganics (As, nitrate/nitrite)
  • Radiological (Gross Alpha/Beta, Radium, Uranium)
  • Secondary inorganics (Na, Cl, Fe, Mn)
  • pH, temperature, TDS
  • Bacteria (total coliform [fecal and E. coli]) for discharge

water

  • If bleed used – must return to same aquifer
slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

Perm it Considerations – NH ( Continued) Closed Loop

  • Allowed antifreeze (DRAFT)
  • Propylene glycol
  • Ethanol
  • Also Methanol, Potassium Acetate, Calcium Magnesium Acetate (CMA)
  • Pipe Materials
  • HDPE
  • Fiberglass
  • Grout:
  • Bentonite slurry, Bentonite and sand, Cement & Sand
slide-37
SLIDE 37

37

Perm it Considerations -MA

  • MassDEP
  • State UIC registration
  • (Underground Injection Control)
  • More rigorous permitting for Open Loop vs. Closed

Loop

  • 1 page UIC registration for CL
  • Open systems – UIC registration, water withdrawal

reporting/registration/permitting for > 100,000 gpd (=70 gpm), [determination of non-consumptive use]

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

Perm it Considerations – MA ( Continued) Open Loop

  • Raw Water Quality Testing Required
  • Selected Organics
  • Primary inorganics (As, nitrate/nitrite)
  • Radiological (Gross Alpha/Beta, Radium, Uranium)
  • Secondary inorganics (Na, Cl, Fe, Mn)
  • pH
  • Bacteria (total coliform [fecal and E. coli]) for discharge

water

  • Bleed – should return to same aquifer

If > 5% to different aquifer, requires justification

slide-39
SLIDE 39

39

Perm it Considerations – MA ( Continued) Closed Loop

  • Allowed antifreeze
  • Propylene glycol
  • Ethanol
  • Pipe Materials
  • HDPE
  • Fiberglass
  • Grout - Bentonite slurry or Bentonite and sand
slide-40
SLIDE 40

40

Financial I ncentives for Geotherm al

  • 20 to 40% heating/cooling energy savings
  • Federal Tax Credits (sunset 2013 comm/2016 res)
  • State Tax Credits in some states
  • Utility Rebates
  • Where to Start?

 Database of State Incentives for Renewables & Efficiency (“DSIRE”, www.dsireusa.org)  http://energy.gov/savings

slide-41
SLIDE 41

41

Geotherm al Payback Period

  • Depends on the situation

 New construction?  Replacing an old system?  Condition of existing system?

  • 7 to 15 years typical
  • <7 years possible, particularly for older systems in

need of replacement due to avoided costs

Look at Life Cycle Costs (Capital, O&M)

slide-42
SLIDE 42

42

Geotherm al Team

  • Geothermal Team Integration is Critical

 Professional Engineers/Geologists  Certified Mechanical GeoDesigner  Certified Driller/Installer  Architect  Mechanical/HVAC Engineers  Construction Contractor  Commissioning Agent

  • Are LEED objectives being met?
  • System operating instructions/debug

No one should be tied to a certain method or technology

slide-43
SLIDE 43

43

“State of the Practice” for Geotherm al?

  • Phase I - Feasibility Study
  • Educate owners
  • Due Diligence to evaluate anticipated conditions and

recommend a ground loop type for the site

  • GZA w/ Energy Modeler, System Designer input
  • Recommend a ground loop type (SCW, CL, ODW)
  • Test well
  • Phase II - Design Plans and Specifications
  • System Designer w/ GZA input
  • Phase III - Well Field Construction
  • Driller w/ GZA observation
slide-44
SLIDE 44

44

“State of the Practice” for Geotherm al?

  • Phase I - Feasibility Study
  • Educate owners
  • Due Diligence to evaluate anticipated conditions and

recommend a ground loop type for the site

  • GZA w/ Energy Modeler, System Designer input
  • Recommend a ground loop type (SCW, CL, ODW)
  • Test well
slide-45
SLIDE 45

45

Test W ell

  • Test well or “first” well of the geothermal

well field for consideration in design of remaining well field

  • Obtain site-specific geologic information

(soil, depth to and type of rock, groundwater quantity and quality)

  • Estimate thermal properties via thermal

conductivity test (CL)

  • Pump test and water quality testing (SCW or

ODW)

slide-46
SLIDE 46

46

Test W ell I nstallation Standing Colum n

Preparing the well for grouting Installation

  • f Geo-loop

Mud rotary with 12-inch stabilizer to 20’ into rock, set 8” dia. casing

  • Drill rig
  • Auxiliary compressor/ support truck
  • Booster compressor
  • Two rolloff dumpsters
  • Two open weir tanks and one frac tank
slide-47
SLIDE 47

47

Test W ell I nstallation Standing Colum n

(Credit: Water Energy)

  • Typ. 6.5 in.
  • diam. in rock,

uncased

20’ (min.) into rock

10-12” dia. mud rotary to 20’ into rock 6.5” dia. air rotary to 1,500 ft.

slide-48
SLIDE 48

48

Test W ell I nstallation Closed Loop

Drilling 6-inch borehole 6-inch mud rotary bit used to set temp./perm. casing into rock, then air rotary to bottom of hole

slide-49
SLIDE 49

49

Test W ell I nstallation Closed Loop

Preparing the well for grouting Installation

  • f Geo-loop

Test Well

slide-50
SLIDE 50

50

Therm al Conductivity Test Closed Loop

slide-51
SLIDE 51

51

GZA and Geotherm al – 3 -Phase Approach

  • Phase I - Feasibility Study
  • Due Diligence to evaluate anticipated conditions and

recommend a ground loop type for the site

  • GZA w/ Energy Modeler, System Designer input
  • Recommend a ground loop type (SCW, CL, ODW)
  • Test well
  • Phase II - Design Plans and Specifications
  • System Designer w/ GZA input
  • Phase III - Well Field Construction
  • Driller w/ GZA observation
slide-52
SLIDE 52

52

W ell Field Construction

Observe:

  • Well depth and construction
  • Pressure Testing

– U-bends – Circuits – Supply and Return – Well Field

  • Circuit Piping Configuration
slide-53
SLIDE 53

53

W ell Field Construction

slide-54
SLIDE 54

54

W ell Field Construction

slide-55
SLIDE 55

55

W ell Field Construction

Looping and grouting

slide-56
SLIDE 56

56

W ell Field Construction

slide-57
SLIDE 57

57

W ell Field Construction

slide-58
SLIDE 58

58

W ell Field Construction

Vault construction and manifold

slide-59
SLIDE 59

59

W ell Field Construction

Prefabricated Vault and Manifold Circuit supply and return stubs Main supply and return stubs

slide-60
SLIDE 60

60

W ell Field Construction

Main supply and return lines Electrofusion

slide-61
SLIDE 61

61

$- $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 $3,000 SCW I nstall CL I nstall SCW ( 3 0 yr) CL ( 3 0 yr) Total System Cost ($000)

244 Tons 235 Tons 113 Tons 140 Tons

Case Studies and Cost Com parisons

Consider Life-Cycle Costs!

30 year cost includes O&M, Monitoring and Reporting

slide-62
SLIDE 62

62

New England Geotherm al Professionals Association

Mission

To educate and advocate for the advancement of the Geothermal Heat Pump industry in New England to increase energy efficiency and reduce dependency on fossil fuels

www.negpa.org

  • To become part of NEGPA

Membership@negpa.org

  • Information on NEGPA

Info@negpa.org

slide-63
SLIDE 63

63

Questions?

David Lamothe, P.E., IGSHPA AI

GZA Senior Project Manager 603-232-8716 david.lamothe@gza.com