customer satisfaction survey results
play

Customer Satisfaction Survey Results Prepared by InfoSearch and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Customer Satisfaction Survey Results Prepared by InfoSearch and KPS3: June 15, 2014 Information To Be Covered Objectives Methodology Respondent profile and travel behavior Satisfaction rating highlights: 2014 vs. 2010, visitor


  1. Customer Satisfaction Survey Results Prepared by InfoSearch and KPS3: June 15, 2014

  2. Information To Be Covered � Objectives � Methodology � Respondent profile and travel behavior � Satisfaction rating highlights: 2014 vs. 2010, visitor vs. locals, business vs. leisure � Recommendations and opportunities

  3. But First…The Great News � 56% provided highest satisfaction rating possible, up from 42% in 2010 � Of the 57 attributes rated, 46 had a 6 or higher on a 7-point scale � Of the 52 measures rated in both years, 39 increased significantly, 13 were stable, no decreases � Top 9 largest increases in F&B � No ratings <6.29 on Personnel

  4. Objectives � Visitor characteristics � Key demographics � Satisfaction levels in 8 categories: arrival, check-in, TSA, personnel, F&B, amenities, facilities, overall � Air service "wants" � Visitor type differences � Comparisons to 2010

  5. Methodology � Questionnaire designed to meet objectives and provide trending with 2010 � 708 adult travelers completed via intercept surveys � 7-week period from March 21 through May 7 (2010 was summer travel patterns)

  6. Methodology � Actual results close to goals: 43% residents (40%), 39% business travelers (40-45%), gender 57% male (50-50%) � 2014 compared to 2010: more males (57 vs. 51%), fewer arriving passengers (10 vs. 22%) � Confidence interval of +/- 3.7% at the standard 95% confidence level

  7. Respondent Profile � 43% residents/57% visitors � 39% business travelers, 1/3 of those attending a convention � 10% were arriving/88% departing � Three most common departure cities: Las Vegas, LA, San Francisco � Three most common destination cities: Las Vegas, LA, Seattle

  8. Respondent Profile � Departing passengers headed for 44 states, 12 foreign countries � Of all visitors, 2 of 3 heading to Reno/Sparks (half in 2010), 1 of 6 to Tahoe (23% in 2010) � 90% traveling with no children, half traveling alone, 30% with only one other person � Respondent ages: 18 to 88, mean age was 47.6 (46.7 in 2010)

  9. Respondent Profile � 73% employed, 14% retired, 4% students, 2% military, only 2% unemployed (similar mix in 2010) � 1/3 high school grads, 1/3 college grads, 1/3 some post-grad

  10. Respondent Profile � 21% had annual household income of <$50K, 36% with $50K to $100K, 43% with $100K or more (same as in 2010) � Compared to RSCVA 2013 visitor profile in which 24% had income of <$50K, 38% had income of $50K to $100K, and 29% had income of $100K or more

  11. Satisfaction Ratings � 56% provided highest possible rating up from 42% in 2010 � Mean rating up to 6.38 from 6.12 � 46 had a rating of 6 or higher � Lowest rating was "price of F&B," below 5 ("street plus 10%") � Top three ratings: ease of drop off, space in check in lobby, attractivenesss/décor in check in � ,

  12. Satisfaction Ratings � Of the 52 ratings in 2010, 39 increased significantly, 13 were stable, none decreased � Greatest improvements were in F&B areas, greatest in "variety of places," selection of F&B, tables/ seating, prices, value of food for $ paid

  13. Satisfaction Ratings � Other increases: facilities, bathroom cleanliness, overall amenities, baggage claim, check-in décor, curbside security, quality and selection of shops, art, comfortable seating, OVERALL � Stable: TSA attributes, parking, airport police and custodial staff, overall air service (e.g. non-stop flights)

  14. Check-in and TSA � Most common places to check in: counter and self-serve kiosk � Same percentage reported checking in at airport as in 2010 � All check-in attributes rated higher than 2010, especially check-in areas � Self-reported time for TSA: 6 minutes vs. 5.6 in 2010

  15. Check-in and TSA � TSA Pre (41%): 5.1 minutes vs. regular TSA (59%): 6.6 � Mean TSA time of 6.0 minutes in 2014 similar to 5.6 in 2014 � All TSA areas rated highly, lower by business than leisure � TSA Pre rated all higher

  16. Airline and Airport Personnel � All area ratings increased over 2010, highest for airline personnel and curbside security � Visitors rated curbside security higher than residents � Over half gave highest rating to all � None were below 6.29 (6.0 in 2010 and ** in 2004)

  17. Food and Beverage � All 13 attributes rated higher than in 2010, biggest increases in variety of places and selection � Highest (6.36) was cleanliness and lowest (4.98) was prices � Value and prices were the two lowest rated � Leisure travelers rated healthy foods and variety higher

  18. Amenities (15 and Varied) � All 15 attributes rated higher than in 2010, biggest increase in comfortable seating � Highest ratings: Free WiFi, family bathrooms, cleanliness of bathrooms, availability of shops, pet relief areas, free local calls � Overall rating increased from 5.76 in 2010 to 6.10

  19. Opportunities in Amenities � 39% say they'd spend more time in restaurants if more available � Mean length of time spent in the area beyond TSA: 63.8 minutes � 3 of 6 travelers spent at least 60 minutes in area beyond TSA � They would spend more money on: restaurants and bars by far, then books/news and retail shops

  20. Opportunities in Amenities � 53% said they would spend more on at least one type of item if available � Visitors more likely to want gaming and gifts

  21. Airport Facilities � All 7 attributes increased, highest increase in appearance/décor in gate areas � All rated above 6.0 � Highest rated: ease of access and getting around � Lowest rated: appearance/décor of gate areas

  22. Overall Satisfaction � All areas increased over 2010, with greatest for friendliness/ courtesy, safety/security, website � Highest rating (6.48) for friendliness/courtesy � Lowest (5.88) for overall air service, stable from 2010 � Visitors rated courtesy/ friendliness and air service higher

  23. Overall Satisfaction � Leisure travelers rated interactive kiosks and air service higher than business travelers � Visitors and residents gave statistically same rating for overall experience, as did leisure and business travelers

  24. Air Service Desires � In 2014 cities in 44 states were named (not Arkansas, Delaware, Kentucky, New Hampshire, S. Carolina, W. Virginia) � Statistically similar to 2010 � Most named a city in California or West Region � Said they would on average make 2.1 visits to their stated city

  25. Air Service Desires � Those who named a California city said 3.2 visits, Western Region said 2.0 visits, and 1.5 visits for South Atlantic � Top 7 cities named: NYC, Oakland, Minneapolis, San Diego, Ontario (CA), Chicago and Atlanta

  26. Air Service Desires � Cities with highest projected rate of increased visitation with non-stop flights: Oakland, SLC, Houston, San Jose, Boise � Highest mentions of overall projected visitation: NYC, Oakland, Houston, SLC, San Jose � In 2010, San Francisco was mentioned most

  27. Suggestions (Open-ended) � Top 6 themes : F&B, direct flights/ air service, environment/décor, electronics/outlets, TSA, walking distance � Biggest increase in suggestion type was environment/décor

  28. Favorite Aspect (Open Ended) � Top 5 themes: décor/ remodel/art, location and convenient access, calm/ easy to navigate, cleanliness, relatively small size � From 2010, comments about décor/remodel/art increased from 7 to 16%

  29. Recommendations � Continue to assess opportunities for amenities, shopping, F&B options/prices � Continue to look at means of extending the décor/remodeled look into gate areas (the remodels have paid off in customer perception), outlets � Utilize data procured for air service efforts

  30. Recommendations � Celebrate and communicate the excellent results and specifically, progress in areas that were targets in last survey � Continue the satisfaction survey practice every 3 years

  31. Thank You and Questions?

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend