RTIA Customer Satisfaction Survey Customer Satisfaction Survey - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

rtia customer satisfaction survey customer satisfaction
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

RTIA Customer Satisfaction Survey Customer Satisfaction Survey - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

RTIA Customer Satisfaction Survey Customer Satisfaction Survey Presentation Objectives Methodology Respondent profile and travel behavior Satisfaction rating highlights: overall, 2010 vs. 2004, visitor vs. resident, business vs.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

RTIA Customer Satisfaction Survey

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Customer Satisfaction Survey Presentation

  • Objectives
  • Methodology
  • Respondent profile and travel behavior
  • Satisfaction rating highlights: overall, 2010 vs. 2004,

visitor vs. resident, business vs. leisure

  • Recommendations and opportunities
slide-3
SLIDE 3

The Good News

  • Overall excellent satisfaction results (only 3 attributes

had a mean rating of below 5 on a 7-point satisfaction scale)

  • All but one area rated in 2010 improved over the

same or similar area ratings from 2004; the remaining

  • ne was statistically unchanged
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Objectives

  • Determine traveler profiles and travel behaviors
  • Determine satisfaction in 8 areas: arrival, check-in,

TSA checkpoint, airport personnel, food and beverage, airport amenities, facilities, overall

  • Obtain feedback on air service, how to improve RTIA

experience, and favorite aspect of RTIA

  • Identify differences between visitors/residents,

business/leisure travelers

  • Compare ratings to 2004 baseline survey
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Methodology

  • Intercept survey developed by KPS3, RTIA and

InfoSearch, completed June 24-July 21

  • 802 surveys completed by InfoSearch staff, with 47%

in B-gates, 26% in C-gates, 27% in all-access areas

  • Timing scheduled, opportunistic given summer travel

patterns, conferences, events

  • Actual results were close to goals of 40% residents,

40-45% business travelers, 50/50 male/female

  • Sample size: 95% confidence level
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Respondent Profile

  • 38% residents/62% visitors
  • 37% business/63% leisure (48% of visitors traveling
  • n business were due to conference/trade show)
  • Most common departure cities: Seattle, Las Vegas,

San Diego, Phoenix, Chicago

  • Most common destination cities: Seattle, Las Vegas,

Los Angeles, Denver, San Jose

  • Half of visitors reported primary destination once here
  • f Reno/Sparks; 23% reported Tahoe
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Respondent Profile

  • Males 51%/Females 49%
  • Mean age of adult traveler: 46.7
  • 73% employed, 12% retired
  • 1/3 each high school grads, college grads, post-grad
  • 21% household income of less than $50K, 36% in

$50K - $100K, and 42% of $100K or more

slide-8
SLIDE 8

RSCVA 2007 Visitor Profile Comparison

  • Mean age of adult traveler: 54 (vs. 46.7)
  • Median household income: $77,200 (vs. 42% with

$100K or more)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Overall Experience Satisfaction

Highest (7/7) Rating of 5 or 6 Rating of below 5 42% 48% 10%

Mean: 6.12 out of 7, where 7 was Very Satisfied and 1 was Not at All Satisfied. So 90% rated overall experience with 5, 6 or 7.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Distribution of Satisfaction Ratings

Mean Value: 6 or > Mean Value: 5 to 5.99 Mean Value: <5 29 21 3

Distribution of the 53 attributes rated on a 7-point scale, where 7 was Very Satisfied and 1 was Not at All Satisfied. Only 3 were rated as less than 5 (Food & Beverage Related).

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Top Rated 3 Attributes

  • Ease of passenger drop off
  • Courtesy and professionalism of TSA staff
  • Wait time at TSA checkpoint

NOTE: Visitors rated 16 of the 53 attributes much higher than did residents, especially in the F&B category. Leisure travelers rated 20 of the 53 attributes much higher than business, especially in air service and F&B, as well as in overall experience at RTIA.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Lowest Rated 3 Attributes

  • Variety of eating places
  • Value of food for money paid
  • Prices of food and/or beverages

NOTE: Visitors rated 16 of the 53 attributes significantly higher than did residents, especially in the F&B category.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Personnel

  • Most respondents rated airline personnel
  • Less than half rated other personnel
  • Highest rated: airport custodial staff and lowest

curbside security (but all were above a mean of 6.0)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Food and Beverage

  • All attributes rated below 6, with cleanliness rated

highest and prices of food/beverage lowest

  • Lowest 3 attributes: Variety of eating places, value of

food for $ paid, prices of food/beverage

  • Visitors rated 10 of the 12 attributes much higher than

residents.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Amenities

  • Highest rating was for free Wi-Fi and lowest was for

availability of electrical outlets/workstations

  • Several were “less familiar”: Olympic exhibit, pet

relief area, free Wi-Fi

  • Majority spend at least 60 minutes beyond TSA

checkpoint and less than 20 in all-access area

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Amenities

If more offerings were available beyond security:

  • 43% would spend more on F&B, 19% on books/

news/personal items, 12% on bar/alcohol, 10% on personal services

  • 54% in total indicated they would spend more on at

least one of those items, if offered

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Overall Satisfaction

  • Highest rated: friendliness and courtesy of staff
  • Then: safety and secure feeling and website (but only

half rated the website)

  • Lowest rated: overall quality of air service (5.82)
  • 42% provided the highest rating of 7!
  • Overall satisfaction mean rating equivalent between

visitors and residents, but leisure travelers rated it higher than business travelers

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Comparing 2004 and 2010 Ratings

Biggest increases in mean scores, 2004 vs. 2010:

  • Free Wi-Fi/Internet availability
  • Overall quality of air service
  • TSA checkpoint wait time
  • Availability of healthy foods

NOTE: Overall satisfaction with experience at RTIA increased from a mean of 5.8 in 2004 to 6.12 in 2010.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Comparing 2004 and 2010 Ratings

Positive note: increase in check-in process rating:

  • Efficiency and ease of check-in (5.94 to 6.34)

Other strong ratings of attributes not rated in 2004:

  • Space to move around in check-in lobby (6.32)
  • Attractiveness, décor of check-in lobby (6.29)
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Air Service Suggestions

The most frequent mentions for better air service (quantity, frequency, etc.) of 330 responses:

  • San Francisco
  • New York City
  • Chicago
  • Denver
  • Houston
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Suggestions to Improve Experience

  • F&B (18%), Shopping (10%), Something to do (8%)
  • Air service (9%)
  • Electronics/Wi-Fi/Phones/TVs (Technology) (6%)
  • TSA Security – i.e. single security point (6%)
  • Gambling – i.e. remove them, too noisy (5%)
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Favorite Aspect, Feature, Service

  • Small size (13%) and calm and easy (11%) and fast/

quick in general (4%)

  • Location/convenience/access (16%)
  • Cleanliness (7%)
  • Décor (7%)
  • Friendly staff ( 6%)
  • Gambling, slots (positive comments) (5%)
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Opportunities & Recommendations

Capital expenditures/facilities:

  • Single security point, move concessions beyond;

results show people want more F&B, shopping beyond checkpoint (could improve revenue)

  • Tired areas that need improvement; perceived as

“dirtier,” less favorable (gates, baggage claim); due to nature of our travelers we are compared to many new airports. Ratifies decision to expand refurbishing to baggage claim area.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Opportunities & Recommendations

Capital expenditures/facilities:

  • Technology services (outlets, recharge stations) – but

improving this could impact revenue. Again, being compared to higher-tech airports – esp by business

  • travelers. Relo of concessions an opportunity to add

tech stations (find sponsors)?

  • Signage improvements indicated by results; better

directionals in key locations and to inform on services lacking awareness (Gate K-9, Wi-Fi, concessions beyond check-point, website)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Opportunities & Recommendations

Communications with travelers:

  • Pre-arrival communications -- including where to

print boarding passes once printers are removed: mobile website, mobile app, signage promoting pre- arrival information (in parking area, on way into airport property) pre-arrival tips on FourSquare and eventually other sites. Also can promo eventual move to 3-D bar code for check in for participating airlines.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Opportunities & Recommendations

Food & Beverage:

  • Before the relocation, RTIA will in early 2011 evaluate

the concessions as part of the centralized security check-in project (Checkpoint of the Future)

  • After relocation and possible changes to pricing and

variety, repeat survey on just F&B

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Opportunities & Recommendations

Internal communications and staff development:

  • Employee communications and recognition about

results

  • Customer service training noted for some staff:

already completed for curbside security and also policy changes that are more customer-centric

  • Benchmark for next survey and performance criteria
  • Recognition for the TSA staff, wait time results
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Opportunities & Recommendations

External communications/marketing:

  • Media communications and all other channels: results
  • f sat survey vis a vis JD Powers
  • More air service improvement communications and

marketing (although it was one of “most improved” it still needs ongoing attention)

  • Reinforce positive brand attribute ratings (ease,

convenience, friendly, service-oriented, nice/clean)

  • Gateway to Tahoe positioning (passenger destination
  • f Tahoe lower due to summer, vs. winter?)
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Opportunities & Recommendations

External communications/marketing:

  • Local residents rated most attributes lower than

visitors did: continue focused efforts on telling the airport story relative to other airports of its size, its innovation and actions to provide greater services, facilities and amenities

  • Plan for next Customer Sat Survey – late 2012/early

2013 (winter)

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Questions and Discussion

Thank you from KPS3 and InfoSearch International.