Custer County Airport Master Plan Facility Requirements/Alternatives - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Custer County Airport

Master Plan Facility Requirements/Alternatives June 27, 2019

Introductions Review Existing Conditions Review Forecast Facility Requirements Alternatives

Agenda

Project Status

Planning the future of Custer County Airport

Existing Airfield (page 2-13)

Component Runway 8/26 Runway Length (feet) 5,498 Runway Width (feet) 60 Runway S urface Material Bituminous Asphalt Runways S urface Treatment None S ingle Wheel Pavement S trength <12,500 S WL Runway Design Code A/ B-1 S mall

Existing – Runway

All Weather Runway Crosswind Component (Wind S peed) 10.5 knots 13.0 knots 16.0 knots 20.0 knots Runway 08-26 98.20 % 99.39 %

• Existing – Wind/Weather (page 2-18)

Source: KCUT ASOS, KLJ Analysis

IFR Runway Crosswind Component (Wind S peed) 10.5 knots 13.0 knots 16.0 knots 20.0 knots Runway 08-26 69.06% 98.55%

• Source: KCUT ASOS, KLJ Analysis

5 10 15 20 25 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Based Aircraft Year

Custer Historical Based Aircraft

Forecast – Based Aircraft (page 3-6)

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2018 2023 2028 2033 Based Aircraft Year

Custer Based Aircraft Forecast

Preferred Forecast FAA TAF S D S AS P

Metric 2018 2023 2028 2033 2038 CAGR Single-Engine 12 13 14 15 16 1.44% Helicopter 2 2 2 2 2 0.00% Ultralight/Other

• Total Based

Aircraft 14 15 16 17 18 1.26%

Metric 2018 2023 2028 2033 2038 CAGR Single-Engine Piston 71.0% 71.0% 70.0% 70.0% 69.0%

• 0.14%

Multi-Engine Piston 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 0.00% Turboprop 16.0% 16.0% 17.0% 17.0% 17.0% 0.30% Turbojet 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 0.00% Helicopter 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.53%

Forecast – Operations by Fleet Size (page 3-11)

Fleet Mix S hare Breakdown

Aircraft ID Type ARC Operations Avg./Year Cessna 172/177/182 S ingle Engine Piston A-I 244 18 Beech C90/B200 Turboprop B-II 183 16 Cirrus SR-22 S ingle Engine Piston A-I 57 5 Cessna 210 S ingle Engine Piston A-I 55 5 Socata TBM-700 S ingle Engine Piston A-I 43 4 Pilatus PC-12 Turboprop A-II 42 4 Total 2008-2018 Recorded Operations 624 359

Reported Operations Data Fleet Mix S ample (2008-2018)

S

• urce: KLJ Analysis, CAGR=Compounded Annual Growt h Rat e

S

• urce: KLJ Analysis, FAA Traffic Flow

Management S ystem (TFMS )

Forecast – Critical Design Aircraft (page 3-11)

ARC A-I/Small Aircraft ARC A-II/Small Aircraft Cessna 402 Pilatus PC-12 ARC B-I/Small Aircraft ARC B-II/Small Aircraft Piper Navajo Beech King Air 90 Citation CJ1 Beech King Air 200 Helicopter (less than 7,000 lbs) ARC B-II Aerostar 350 Air Tractor 802 (SEAT)

Metric 2018 2023 2028 2033 2038 CAGR Single-Engine Piston 2,599 2,701 2,799 2,942 3,048 0.80% Multi-Engine Piston 220 228 240 252 265 0.94% Turboprop 586 609 680 715 751 1.25% Turbojet 220 228 240 252 265 0.94% Helicopter 37 38 40 42 88 4.50% Total Operations 3,660 3,804 3,999 4,203 4,417 0.94%

Total Operation Fleet Mix Forecast

Source: KLJ Analysis

Activity Levels Average Annual Compound Growth Rates

• A. Forecast Levels

2018 2023 2028 2033 2038 0-5 Years 0-10 Years 0-15 Years 0-20 Years Operations Itinerant Air Carrier

• Commuter/Air Taxi
• Total Commercial Operations
• General Aviation

1,255 1,314 1,375 1,439 1,507 0.92% 0.92% 0.92% 0.92% Military

• Total Itinerant Operations

1,255 1,314 1,375 1,439 1,507 Local Civil 2,405 2,490 2,624 2,764 2,910 0.95% 0.95% 0.95% 0.95% Military

• Total Local Operations

TOTAL OPERATIONS 3,660 3,804 3,999 4,203 4,417 0.94% 0.94% 0.94% 0.94% Annual Instrument Approaches

• Peak Hour Operations

Based Aircraft Single Engine 12 13 14 15 16 1.61% 1.55% 1.49% 1.44% Multi Engine

• Turbojet
• Helicopter

2 2 2 2 2 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Other

• TOTAL BASED AIRCRAFT

14 15 16 17 18 1.38% 1.34% 1.30% 1.26%

• B. Operational Factors

GA Ops per Based Aircraft 261 253 254 247 245

Forecast – Summary (page 3-14)

S

• urce: KLJ Analysis. Not e: S
• me f igures are rounded

Facility Requirements

VFR Weather - - 8,065 Reduce to 400” – 1-mile - - Improves 370 hours

Instrument Procedures (page 4-5)

Weather Condition Cloud Ceiling Minimum Visibility Minimum Total Observation Percentage Hours Per Year (avg.) VMC 1,000 feet 3 miles 92.07% 8,065 Potential Usable IMC* 400 feet 1 mile 4.22% 370 Closed (Below Minimums) < 400 feet < 1 mile 3.71% 324

Source: National Climatic Data Center data from Custer County Airport AWOS (2008-2014; hourly), KLJ Analysis *Additional capture assumes non-precision approach establish with 400-foot cloud ceiling and 1-mile flight visibility.

Runway Length and Width (page 4-9)

Existing Runway Length = 5,498’ FAA recommended runway length for small general aviation aircraft = 6,700’ With cost of extension and terrain, practicable recommended extension = 6,200’ Existing Runway Width = 60’ With significant amount of variable winds - recommended widening = 75’

Airport and Runway Data Airport Elevation 5619.7 feet Mean Daily Maximum Temperature of Hottest Month 81.3° F Aircraft Classification Recommended Runway Length Small Airplanes 12,500 Pounds or less 10 or more passenger seats 6,700 feet Less than 10 passenger seats at 100 percent of fleet 6,700 feet Less than 10 passenger seats at 95 percent of fleet 6,700 feet S

• urce: FAA AC 150/ 5325-4B, KLJ Analysis. Not e: Runway lengt h requirement s est imat ed based on chart s f or airport planning purposes only.

Design Standard Actual Condition Requirement or Recommendation Existing Future/ Ultimate Runway Identification 8/ 26 8/ 26 8/ 26 Runway Classification Utility Utility Utility Aircraft Classification S mall Aircraft S mall Aircraft S mall Aircraft Runway Design Code (RDC) A/ B-I-Vis (Both) A/ B-I-Vis (Both) A/ B-I-5000 (Both) Approach Reference Code (APRC) B-II-5000 B-II-5000 B-II-5000 Departure Reference Code (DPRC) B-II B-II B-II Pavement Strength (Wheel Loading) 12,500 (DW) 12,500 (DW) 12,500 (DW) Effective Runway Gradient 1.28% 1.28% 2.0% Max. Runway Width 60’ 60’ 75’ Runway Safety Area (RSA) Width 120’ 120’ 120’ RSA Length Beyond Threshold 240’ 240’ 300’ Runway Lighting MIRL MIRL MIRL RPZ Start from Runway 200’ 200’ 200’ RPZ Length 1,000’ 1,000’ 1,000’ RPZ Inner Width 250’ 250’ 250’ RPZ Outer Width 450’ 450’ 450’ Visibility Minimums 3 mile (both) 3 mile (Both) 1 Mile (Both) Approach Type Vis (Both) Vis (Both) NPI (Both) 14 CFR Part 77 Approach Slope 20:1 / 20:1 20:1 (Both) 20:1 (Both) ROFA Width 250’ 250’ 250’ ROFA Length Beyond Threshold 240’ 240’ 240’ ROFZ Width 250’ 250’ 250’ ROFZ Length Past Runway 200’ 200’ 200’ Threshold Siting Surface (TSS) Type Type 2 (Both) Type 2 (Both) Type 4 (Both) TSS Start from Runway End 0’ / 0’ 0’ (Both) 200’ (Both) TSS Length 2,250’ (Both) 2,250’ (Both) 10,000’ (Both) TSS Inner Width 250’ (Both) 250’ ’ (Both) 400’ (Both) TSS Outer Width 700’ (Both) 700’ (Both) 3,400’ (Both) TSS Slope 20:1 (Both) 20:1 (Both) 20:1 (Both) Visual and Instrument NAVAIDs PAPI PAPI PAPI Runway and Taxiway Separation N/ A N/ A N/ A Runway and Parking Separation 300’ 125’ 125’ Runway and Hold Line Separation 125’ 125’ 125’ Centerline Distance to 25’ BRL 300 300 300’

Existing Aera

Hangar Area (page 4-20)

Category Existing Base PAL 1 PAL 2 PAL 3 PAL 4 Aircraft Storage Space (SF) Storage Hangars 20,000 18,500 20,100 21,500 23,000 24,500 Capacity/(Deficiency) 1,500 (100) (1,500) (3,000) (4,500) SASO Conventional 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 FBO (Based)

• 1,500

1,500 1,600 1,600 1,700 Maintenance

• 3,500

3,700 3,900 4,100 4,400 Total Based 23,000 26,500 28,300 30,000 31,700 33,600 Capacity/(Deficiency) (3,500) (5,300) (7,000) (8,700) (10,600) FBO (Transient) 3,600 2,400 3,360 3,360 4,800 6,240 Capacity/(Deficiency) 800 240 240 (1,200) (2,640) Total Space 26,600 28,900 31,660 33,360 36,500 39,840 Capacity/(Deficiency)

• (2,300)

(5,060) (6,760) (9,900) (13,240)

Based Hangars

Existing = 28,175 SF including 1,575 SF of planned hangar removal, new total = 23,000 SF

Transient Hangars

Existing is an as – needed basis

S

• urce: KLJ Analysis. Not e: RED indicat es a def iciency t o exist ing capacit y.

Existing = 7 tiedowns in nested configuration and 7 tiedown on eastern edge. FAA requires apron to accommodate safety setbacks for ADG-I wingspan for aircraft to access parking and fueling.

Apron Area (page 4-21)

Category Existing Base PAL 1 PAL 2 PAL 3 PAL 4 Itinerant Aircraft Parking Itinerant Operations (65% of Total)

• 2,405

2,590 2,624 2,764 2,910 Busy Day (Design Day plus 15.0%)

• 23.0

24.8 25.1 26.5 27.9 Parking Positions (35% of Busy Day)

• 8.1

8.7 8.8 9.3 9.8 Itinerant Aircraft Parking by ADG

• ADG-I Aircraft (700 sy each)
• 8.5

9.1 9.3 9.9 10.4 ADG-II Aircraft (1,200 sy each)

• 2.0

2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 Based Aircraft Parking by ADG ADG-I Aircraft (700 sy each)

• 2.4

2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2 Total Aircraft Parking (sy) ADG-I Aircraft 7,100 5,900 6,400 6,600 6,900 7,300 ADG-II Aircraft 2,400 2,600 2,700 2,900 3,000 Hangar Access & Taxilane 3,800 3,800 3,800 3,800 3,800 3,800 Total Apron Space (sy) 10,900 12,100 12,800 13,100 13,600 14,100 Capacity/(Deficiency)

• (1,200)

(1,900) (2,200) (2,700) (3,200)

S

• urce: KLJ Analysis. Not e: RED indicat es a def iciency t o exist ing capacit y.

Questions/Comments on Facility Requirements or Forecasts

Alternatives

How do we layout the airport to meet these requirements? Single-Engine Air Tanker (SEAT) Operations: Requires 4,200 SY Additional Hangars for based and transient aircraft Runway expansion to 6,200’ long and 75’ wide

Existing Airfield

6,200’ Runway

250’ OFA $9.5m 500’ OFA $13.4m

A/B-I 250’ OFA A/B-II 500’ OFA

Questions/Comments

Kent Penney, Senior Aviation Planner kent.penney@kljeng.com 605.939.5794 m 605.721.5553 o Amber Channel, Aviation Planner amber.channel@kljeng.com