http://www.flickr.com/photos/31375127@N07/
Marcelo A. Dias & Christian D. Santangelo
NSF DMR-0846582
Curved Fold Origami Marcelo A. Dias & Christian D. Santangelo - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Curved Fold Origami Marcelo A. Dias & Christian D. Santangelo NSF DMR-0846582 http://www.flickr.com/photos/31375127@N07/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/31375127@N07/ (Origami) oru to fold + kami, paper = the art of
http://www.flickr.com/photos/31375127@N07/
Marcelo A. Dias & Christian D. Santangelo
NSF DMR-0846582
http://www.flickr.com/photos/31375127@N07/
http://pantspantsnopants.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/classic-
Folding along straight creases.
http://pantspantsnopants.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/classic-
Folding along straight creases. How can one explore new set of shapes?
http://pantspantsnopants.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/classic-
Folding along straight creases. How can one explore new set of shapes? Folding along curved crease patterns!
Bauhaus: Weimar, Dessau, Berlin, Chicago by Hans M. Wingler http://erikdemaine.org/curved/history/
Student's work at the Bauhaus 1927–1928
Erik Demaine, et al., Curved Crease Origami
Kilian at al., Curved Folding
Erik Demaine, et al., Curved Crease Origami
Kilian at al., Curved Folding
Erik Demaine, et al., Curved Crease Origami
Kilian at al., Curved Folding
s
1/κg(s)
c0(s)
One flat developable surface
s
1/κg(s)
c0(s)
One flat developable surface
Folding
ˆ t
1/κg(s)
ˆ n
ˆ b
ˆ u1
ˆ N1
c(s)
Two developables connected by a crease
s
1/κg(s)
c0(s)
One flat developable surface
Folding
ˆ t
1/κg(s)
ˆ n
ˆ b
ˆ u1
ˆ N1
c(s)
Two developables connected by a crease Inextensibility is an isometry:
ϕ
ϕ∗(κg(s)) = κg(s)
Theorem : Assume that for every point p ∈ c0 the absolute value of the curvature of c at point ϕ(p) is greater than that of c0 at p. Then there exist exactly two extensions of ϕ to isometric embeddings of a plane neighborhood of c0 to space.
Fuchs & Tabachnikov, More on Paper Folding, The American Mathematical Monthly (1999).
ˆ t
1/κg(s)
ˆ n
ˆ b
ˆ u1
ˆ N1
c(s)
ˆ t
1/κg(s)
ˆ n
ˆ b
ˆ u1
ˆ N1
c(s)
t, ˆ n, ˆ b
t, ˆ u(i) ∈ Tc(s)(Si), ˆ N(i) ∈ Tc(s)(Si)⊥
κ(s), τ(s) κg(s), κN(s), τg(s)
d ds ˆ t ˆ n ˆ b = κ −κ τ −τ ˆ t ˆ n ˆ b d ds ˆ t ˆ u ˆ N = κg κN −κg τg −κN −τg ˆ t ˆ u ˆ N
Fold as a ... Curve in space Curve on a surface Frame Frenet-Serret Darboux Triad Scalars Equation
Invariance of under folding, :
θ(s) = 2 arccos κg(s) κ(s)
Folding angle and curvature :
θ(s)
Concave and convex:
κ(1)
N (s) = −κ(2) N (s)
β1(s) = β2(s) ≡ θ(s) 2 κg(s)
ϕ
β1
β2
ˆ u(1)
ˆ u(2) ˆ n ˆ t
θ(s) κ(s)/κg
Developables Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A (1982). Helmut Pottmann & Johannes Wallner, Computational Line Geometry (2010).
τ (2)
g (s) − τ (1) g (s) = θ′(s)
Geodesic torsion:
Two developable Surfaces connected by a curve (fold) : Generators on the surface:
S(i)(s, v) = c(s) + v(i)ˆ g(i)(s), i = 1, 2
cos γ(i)(s) ≡ ˆ t(s), ˆ g(i)(s)
∴ cot γ(i)(s) = ∓τ (i)
g (s)
κ(i)
N (s)
ˆ g(1) ˆ g(2)
ˆ t
s v c(s)
Bending Energy:
Eel = B 2
κ(i)
N (s) csc γ(i)(s)
sin γ(i)(s) ∓ v(i) κg(s) ± γ(i)′(s)
Generators on the surface:
S(i)(s, v) = c(s) + v(i)ˆ g(i)(s), i = 1, 2
cos γ(i)(s) ≡ ˆ t(s), ˆ g(i)(s)
∴ cot γ(i)(s) = ∓τ (i)
g (s)
κ(i)
N (s)
ˆ g(1) ˆ g(2)
ˆ t
s v c(s)
= B 2 2π f[θ(κ), τ; s]ds
Integration along the generator
Bending Energy:
Eel = B 2
κ(i)
N (s) csc γ(i)(s)
sin γ(i)(s) ∓ v(i) κg(s) ± γ(i)′(s)
Generators on the surface:
S(i)(s, v) = c(s) + v(i)ˆ g(i)(s), i = 1, 2
cos γ(i)(s) ≡ ˆ t(s), ˆ g(i)(s)
∴ cot γ(i)(s) = ∓τ (i)
g (s)
κ(i)
N (s)
ˆ g(1) ˆ g(2)
ˆ t
s v c(s)
= B 2 2π f[θ(κ), τ; s]ds
Integration along the generator
f[θ(κ), τ; s] ≡ κN(s)2 4
κg + γ(1)′ ln
sin γ(1) − w(1) κg + γ(1)′
κg − γ(2)′ ln
sin γ(2) − w(2) κg − γ(2)′
Eel = B 2
κ(i)
N (s) csc γ(i)(s)
sin γ(i)(s) ∓ v(i) κg(s) ± γ(i)′(s)
Generators on the surface:
S(i)(s, v) = c(s) + v(i)ˆ g(i)(s), i = 1, 2
cos γ(i)(s) ≡ ˆ t(s), ˆ g(i)(s)
∴ cot γ(i)(s) = ∓τ (i)
g (s)
κ(i)
N (s)
ˆ g(1) ˆ g(2)
ˆ t
s v c(s)
(i) Inextensible ribbons.
f[θ(κ), τ; s]
κg(s) = 0
f[κ, κ′, τ, τ ′; s] = κ2
κ2 2 1 w (τ/κ)′ log 1 + w (τ/κ)′ 1 − w (τ/κ)′
(i) Inextensible ribbons.
f[θ(κ), τ; s]
κg(s) = 0
f[κ, κ′, τ, τ ′; s] = κ2
κ2 2 1 w (τ/κ)′ log 1 + w (τ/κ)′ 1 − w (τ/κ)′
f[θ(κ), τ; s]
lim
w→0
≈ wκ(1)2
N
(s)
g
(s) κ(1)2
N
(s) 2 + wκ(2)2
N
(s)
g
(s) κ(2)2
N
(s) 2
Sadowsky, M
22, 412–415 (1930).
f[κ, τ; s] = κ2
κ2 2
κg(s) = 0
˜ f[θ(κ), τ; s] = f[θ(κ), τ; s] + ǫ
θ 2
θ0 2 2
Creasing the paper Preferred Angle: θ0 = 2 arccos
κg + ∆κ
κ(s)/κg
κg + ∆κ κg
θ0
c(s) → c(s) + δc(s) E =
δc(s) = ǫˆ t + ǫ1ˆ n + ǫ2ˆ b δE =
EL(f)ǫi +
Q = fǫ + Qi
0ǫi + Qi 1ǫ′ i + ...
F′ + Ω × F = 0 M′ + Ω × M + ˆ t × F = 0
Closed of constant
c0(s)
κg
c(s)
Closed of constant
c0(s)
κg
c(s)
τ(s) ∼ sin [γ1(s) + γ2(s)] & θ′(s) ∼ sin [γ1(s) − γ2(s)]
Closed of constant
c0(s)
κg
c(s)
τ(s) ∼ sin [γ1(s) + γ2(s)] & θ′(s) ∼ sin [γ1(s) − γ2(s)] (i) Torsion inflection: τ(s) = 0 ⇒ γ1 + γ2 = π (ii) Extreme angle: θ′(s) = 0 ⇒ γ1 = γ2 = π/2
Closed of constant
c0(s)
κg
c(s)
τ(s) ∼ sin [γ1(s) + γ2(s)] & θ′(s) ∼ sin [γ1(s) − γ2(s)] (i) Torsion inflection: τ(s) = 0 ⇒ γ1 + γ2 = π (ii) Extreme angle: θ′(s) = 0 ⇒ γ1 = γ2 = π/2
Closed of constant
c0(s)
κg
c(s)
τ(s) ∼ sin [γ1(s) + γ2(s)] & θ′(s) ∼ sin [γ1(s) − γ2(s)] (i) Torsion inflection: τ(s) = 0 ⇒ γ1 + γ2 = π (ii) Extreme angle: θ′(s) = 0 ⇒ γ1 = γ2 = π/2
Closed of constant
c0(s)
κg
c(s)
τ(s) ∼ sin [γ1(s) + γ2(s)] & θ′(s) ∼ sin [γ1(s) − γ2(s)] (i) Torsion inflection: τ(s) = 0 ⇒ γ1 + γ2 = π (ii) Extreme angle: θ′(s) = 0 ⇒ γ1 = γ2 = π/2
Let the curve have nowhere vanishing curvature. Definition: Zero-torsion points of the curve are called its verteces Theorem: Every smooth closed connected convex curve in R3 with nowhere vanishing curvature has at least four vertices.
κ1(0) = α, κ1 π 2
τ ′
1(0) = τp
4th
κ1(s) 3th
τ1(s)
κ(s) = κ0 + εκ1(s) τ(s) = ετ1(s)
d ds ˆ t ˆ n ˆ b = κ −κ τ −τ ˆ t ˆ n ˆ b
(2002) 6571-6587
α β Eel/B
α
β τp
τp(α, β)
Manifold gives the range
closed curves Total energy as a function and .
α
β
α β Eel/B
α
β τp
τp(α, β)
Manifold gives the range
closed curves Total energy as a function and .
α
β
Minimum
Torsion Curvature Angle
s
s
w=0.1 w=0.2
s
Torsion Curvature Angle
s
s
w=0.1 w=0.2
s
Torsion Curvature Angle
s
s
w=0.1 w=0.2
s
New and more complex set of shapes can be explored. Geometry of developable surfaces is not enough to explain the problem. Equilibrium configuration is found as a result of the competition between uncreased and creased regions. Potential practical application and a new window to understand shape formation in
Multiple-folds: ET otal = lim
max ∆wi→0 #creases
Eel(wi)∆wi
Erik Demaine, et al., Curved Crease Origami