Curriculum and Assessment Management Team -- 2019 MCAS, MAP and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Curriculum and Assessment Management Team -- 2019 MCAS, MAP and Accountability Data Quincy Public Schools School Committee Presentation October 16, 2019

Curriculum and Assessment Management Team Madeline Roy , Director of Middle and High School Curriculum Programs and Initiatives Erin Perkins , Director of Special Education and Elementary Curriculum Sarah Anderson , Coordinator of Special Education 6-12 and Data Support Marisa Forrester , Coordinator of District Data and Assessment Bridget Vaughan , Coordinator of English Language Arts and Literacy K-8 Heather Wojcik , Coordinator of English Learner Education Kim Quinn , Team Administrator for Math Curriculum K-8 Ed Smith , Team Administrator for STEM Curriculum 4-12 Elizabeth Kelly , Elementary Digital Literacy Support Teacher Laura Latini , E lementary Digital Literacy Support Teacher Kim Walsh , Elementary Digital Literacy Support Teacher

Tonight’s Focus Areas District Improvement Plan District Improvement Plan Framework ● Alignment of Goals ● District Data MAP Benchmark Assessment Results ● Next Generation and Legacy MCAS Data ● Accountability Reports ● District Goals MCAS Achievement and MAP Growth Goals ● Next Steps ● Curriculum Initiatives Related Professional Development ●

District Improvement Plan ● District Improvement Plan Framework ● Alignment of Goals

District Improvement Plan Framework Six Standards Evidence of Alignment Leadership and Curriculum and Assessment ● Governance Management Team Plan ● Standards Curriculum and Aligned Curriculum ● Instruction Vertical, Grade-level & Dept ● ● DESE Assessment and Formative and Benchmark ● ● Key Questions Program Evaluation Data Teams and ILTs ● Professional System-wide PD ● ● Specific indicators Development Site-based PD ● Academic Beyond the Bell ● ● CAMT Annual Plan Support Family Engagement ● Financial and Asset Comprehensive Budget ● Management Process

District Improvement Plan Alignment of Goals Quincy School Committee & Superintendent DeCristofaro Curriculum and Assessment Management Team Program Improvement Plans School Improvement Plans Grade Level, Vertical and Departmental Teams Thoughtful Planned Individual Educators Sustained

District Data ● MAP Benchmark Assessment Results ● Next Generation and Legacy MCAS Data ● Accountability Reports

MAP Student Growth

MAP Benchmark Assessment Measure of student growth ● Student Growth Summary Report ● Student Growth National Norms ● Administered ● Fall Winter Spring Grades 2-7 in Reading, Mathematics ● Grades 4-7 General Science* ● *General Science for 18-19 MAP testing is considered a pilot year. Fall 18-19 was administered at an interim period between Fall and Winter testing windows. Winter MAP test was not administered. Therefore, growth measures of 18-19 for General Science data is not establishing a legitimate baseline.

MAP Benchmark Assessment National Growth Norms Student Growth National Norms Fall to Spring Grade Reading Mathematics General Science Grade 2 14.0 15.2 -- Grade 3 10.3 13.0 -- Grade 4 7.8 11.6 6.4 Grade 5 6.1 9.9 5.5 Grade 6 4.8 7.7 4.3 Grade 7 3.7 6.0 3.7

*

MCAS Student Achievement

Spring 2019 MCAS Test Administration Legacy Next Generation High School Biology Grades 3-8 ● ● Spring 2020 ELA & Mathematics - Year 3 ○ Grade 10 - Legacy ■ Grade 9 - Next Gen Grades 5 & 8 ■ ● STE - Year 1 High School ● ELA & Mathematics - Year 1

Spring 2019 MCAS Reporting Categories Legacy Next Gen Exceeding Advanced Expectations Proficient Meeting Expectations Partially Meeting Needs Improvement Expectations Not Meeting Warning/Failing Expectations

Statistical Linking Model (HS ELA Example) 13% Exceeding Expectations % of students 48% Meeting Expectations 31% Partially Meeting Expectations 8% Not Meeting Expectations

Spring 2019 MCAS Scaled Scores Example Average Composite Scaled Score 508 ● A measure of every student’s achievement 494 512 ● Achievement Categories and Scores 503 ○ Exceeding Expectations: 530-560 501 ○ Meeting Expectations: 500-530 449 ○ Partially Meeting Expectations: 470-500 540 ○ Not Meeting Expectations: 440-470 508

Spring 2019 MCAS Results by Percentage of Students in Meeting or Exceeding

Spring 2019 MCAS Results by Average Composite Scaled Score

Scaled Score Average Scaled Scores ELA Change 2017 to 2019 2017 2018 2019 Grade 3 505.0 507.6 508.4 + 3.4 Grade 4 504.9 508.4 508.2 + 3.3 Grade 5 501.2 507.6 507.6 + 6.4 Grade 6 502.8 504.8 505.2 + 2.4 Grade 7 505.7 502.2 508.2 + 2.5 Grade 8 503.6 507.9 504.6 + 1.0 Grades 3-8 503.9 506.4 507.0 + 3.1 Grade 10 -- -- 507.8 --

Average Scaled Scores Math Scaled Score 2017 to 2019 2017 2018 2019 Grade 3 503.8 503.6 502.3 - 1.5 Grade 4 501.4 501.4 501.0 - 0.4 Grade 5 503.7 501.4 502.3 - 1.4 Grade 6 501.5 502.8 504.4 + 2.9 Grade 7 503.2 500.0 505.0 + 1.8 Grade 8 501.5 505.3 503.1 + 1.6 Grades 3-8 502.5 502.4 503.0 + 0.5 Grade 10 -- -- 507.8 --

Average Scaled Scores Math Scaled Score 2017 to 2019 2017 2018 2019 Grade 3 503.8 503.6 502.3 - 1.5 Grade 4 501.4 501.4 501.0 - 0.4 Grade 5 503.7 501.4 502.3 - 1.4 Grade 6 501.5 502.8 504.4 + 2.9 A closer look at Elementary Grade 7 503.2 500.0 505.0 + 1.8 and Computer Based Testing... Grade 8 501.5 505.3 503.1 + 1.6 Grades 3-8 502.5 502.4 503.0 + 0.5 Grade 10 -- -- 507.8 --

Average Scaled Scores STE 2017 2018 2019 Grade 5 -- -- 502.0 Grade 8 -- -- 499.5 Grade 10 -- -- --

Accountability Reports

2019 Accountability Data Performance based ● Official accountability determinations and the reason for classification ● Information about progress towards improvement targets ● Indicators for various subgroups ● 0 1 2 3 4 Points Reason Declined No Change Improved Below Target Met Target Exceeded Target

Achievement - Non-high school Group N Points Reason 4,086 2 Improved Below Target All Students ELA Lowest Performing 717 3 Met Target 2,678 3 Met Target High Needs All Students 4,083 2 Improved Below Target 715 4 Exceeded Target Math Lowest Performing High Needs 2,677 3 Met Target All Students 1,373 0 Declined STE Lowest Performing -- -- -- High Needs 874 0 Declined

Achievement - High school Group N Points Reason 669 4 Exceeded Target All Students ELA Lowest Performing 153 2 Improved Below Target 362 3 Met Target High Needs All Students 670 1 No Change 151 0 Declined Math Lowest Performing High Needs 363 2 Improved Below Target All Students 627 1 No Change STE Lowest Performing -- -- -- High Needs 333 0 Declined

Growth - Non-high school Group N Points Reason 3,065 3 Typical Growth - High All Students ELA Lowest Performing 705 3 Typical Growth - High 1,912 3 Typical Growth - High High Needs All Students 3,062 3 Typical Growth - High 701 3 Typical Growth - High Math Lowest Performing High Needs 1,910 3 Typical Growth - High

Growth - High school Group N Points Reason 580 2 Typical Growth - Low All Students ELA Lowest Performing 139 1 Low Growth 294 2 Typical Growth - Low High Needs All Students 578 2 Typical Growth - Low 137 1 Low Growth Math Lowest Performing High Needs 292 2 Typical Growth - Low

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school Group N Points Reason EL and Former EL 882 2 Improved Below Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school Group N Points Reason EL and Former EL 157 2 Improved Below Target

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school Group N Points Reason All Students 5,850 3 Met Target Lowest Performing 717 2 Improved Below Target High Needs 3,877 3 Met Target

Chronic absenteeism - High school Group N Points Reason All Students 2,917 4 Exceeded Target Lowest Performing 153 4 Exceeded Target High Needs 1,607 3 Met Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school Group N Points Reason 713 1 No Change All Students 4-Year Cohort Grad Lowest Performing -- -- -- Rate 450 0 Declined High Needs All Students 674 3 Met Target Extended -- -- -- Engagement Lowest Performing Rate High Needs 468 2 Improved Below Target All Students 2,759 0 Declined Annual Dropout Lowest Performing -- -- -- Rate High Needs 1,403 0 Declined

District Goals 2019-2020