Current in the Soya Strait Wei Zhang 1 , Naoto Ebuchi 1 , Yasushi - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

current in the soya strait
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Current in the Soya Strait Wei Zhang 1 , Naoto Ebuchi 1 , Yasushi - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Estimation of Wind Drift Current in the Soya Strait Wei Zhang 1 , Naoto Ebuchi 1 , Yasushi Fukamachi 1 , and Yutaka Yoshikawa 2 1 Institute of Low Temperature Science, Hokkaido University 2 Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University 1 The


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Estimation of Wind Drift Current in the Soya Strait

Wei Zhang1, Naoto Ebuchi1, Yasushi Fukamachi1, and Yutaka Yoshikawa2

1Institute of Low Temperature Science,

Hokkaido University

2Graduate School of Science, Kyoto

University

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

The Soya Strait

  • Connection of Sea
  • f Japan Sea and Sea
  • f Okhotsk
  • Soya warm current
  • Fishery

Sea of Okhotsk

Japan Russia China

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Geostrophic Current Surface current

uwd: Wind Drift Current

Wind Drift Current

Wind

Cushuman-Roisin (1994)

g s wd

  u u u

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Drift Parameter

Cushuman-Roisin (1994)

c

  • s

s i n ( , ) s i n c

  • s

               A α: speed factor θ: deflection angle W: wind vector us: surface current ug: geostrophic current

= ( , )

wd s g

    A u u u W

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

How to calculate wind drift parameter

  • Surface current (HF radar data)
  • Geostrophic current

(ADCP data / Tide gauges data)

  • Wind (JMA GPV/MSM)

( , )

min[( ) ( , ) ]

s g  

    A u W u

LSM *Complex PCA/EOF

1 1

( , )

wd st st s g

CEOF                          u W u u W

* Kundu and Allen (1976)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

CEOF Brief Introduction

1 1

( ) ( ) ( )

st st

CEOF EOF W U Vi U V i    

Kundu and Allen (1976)

( , ) U V W U Vi  

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Observation

Long Term:

  • HF Radars
  • Tide Gauges
  • Wind

(JMA GPV/MSM)

Short Term: (22 months)

  • ADCP

(Bottom mounted)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Example of HF Radar Snapshot

17h20m (JST) 3 Aug 2003

http://wwwoc.lowtem.hokudai.ac.jp/hf-radar/index.html

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Example of ADCP vertical profiles

Monthly-mean of alongshore velocity observed by ADCP.

Fukamachi et al.(2010)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

0.2 0.4 5 10 15 20 25 Velocity (m/s) Bin Number Along-shore Component

  • 0.2

0.2 5 10 15 20 25 Velocity (m/s) Bin number Cross-shore Component

10

Geostrophic Current Estimation (Method 1)

5-day geostrophic current estimation from ADCP

  • Dec. 23 2007 ~ Dec. 27 2007

Extrapolation

LSM 1 Complex PCA/EOF

slide-11
SLIDE 11

0.77 0.78 0.79 0.8 0.81 0.82 0.83 0.84 Correlation Coeffiicent 0.77 0.78 0.79 0.8 0.81 0.82 0.83 0.84 5 10 15 20 25 ADCP bins Number

Correlation Coefficient between Sea Level Difference (SLD) and alongshore velocities of ADCP bins.

11

Sea Level Difference vs. Along-shore Current

Alongshore velocities correspond well with sea level difference. Bottom Surface ~51m

Bin15 Bin10 Bin5 Bin22 Bin1 Bin24

slide-12
SLIDE 12

5 5 10 15 20 25 Coefficient Bins Coefficient aiBin 0.5 1 5 10 15 20 25 Coefficient Bins Coefficient biBin

12

Geostrophic Current Estimation (Method 2)

24 24 Bin g Bin

u b a    

1 5 5 1 15 B n B in Bi in

u b a    

1 8 8 1 18 B n B in Bi in

u b a    

2 2 2 2 22 B n B in Bi in

u b a    

Geostrophic current estimated from Sea Level Difference Coefficient

iBin iBi iB n in

a u b    

  • Aug. 2007

LSM 2 Complex PCA/EOF

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Nov/06 Feb/07 Jun/07 Sep/07 Dec/07 Apr/08 Jul/08

  • 50

50 100

Turning Angle (deg.)

LSM 1 LSM 2 CEOF

Nov/06 Feb/07 Jun/07 Sep/07 Dec/07 Apr/08 Jul/08 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 time (month) number of data

13

Monthly-Mean Drift Parameters

The drift parameters are roughly similar.

Nov/06 Feb/07 Jun/07 Sep/07 Dec/07 Apr/08 Jul/08 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03

Speed Factor

LSM 1 LSM 2 CEOF

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Annual-Mean Drift Parameter

Root-Mean-Square error with daily drift parameters

α (×10-2) θ (deg.) Value LSM1 0.87 18 LSM2 1.39 34 CEOF 1.10 21 RMSE LSM1 1.64 78 LSM2 2.60 77 CEOF 1.93 98

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Wind Drift Current Estimation

The wind drift current is strong in winter, but weak in summer.

Nov/06 Feb/07 Jun/07 Sep/07 Dec/07 Apr/08 Jul/08

  • 0.1
  • 0.05

0.05 0.1

Velocity (m/s) (a) By monthly-mean wind drift parameters

LSM 1 LSM 2 CEOF Nov/06 Feb/07 Jun/07 Sep/07 Dec/07 Apr/08 Jul/08

  • 0.1
  • 0.05

0.05 0.1

Velocity (m/s) (b) By annual-mean wind drift parameters

LSM 1 LSM 2 CEOF

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Affection of coastline on drift parameter

1/2 2 1

2 2.2 200 , 50

H H E H

A D km f A m s D m  

         

The horizontal boundary layer effect on the wind drift current can be neglected. The horizontal boundary layer width*:

+ ADCP

* Yoshikawa and Masuda (2009); Pedlosky (1987)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Affection of bottom on drift parameter

* 2 1 4 1 *

0.4 40 10 , 1 10

E

U m f U ms f s 

   

    

The bottom boundary layer affects on the wind drift current. The bottom boundary layer depth*:

Bottom boundary * Yoshikawa and Masuda (2009); Cushuman-Roisin (1994)

Surface Bottom ~51m 40m

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Wind in Summer

The wind is weak, and its direction is unstable.

  • Oct. 07
  • Oct. 06
  • Aug. 07
  • Sept. 07
  • Jul. 07
  • Jul. 08
slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Wind in Winter

  • Dec. 07
  • Jan. 08
  • Feb. 08
  • Dec. 06
  • Jan. 07
  • Feb. 07

The wind is strong, and its direction is stable.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Nov/06 Feb/07 Jun/07 Sep/07 Dec/07 Apr/08 Jul/08 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Velocity (m/s) Along-shore Current

Surface Current Estimated Geocurrent

20

Evaluation

ˆ ˆ ( ˆ , )

g s

A     u u W

Along-shore current vs. sea level difference

HF LSM 1 LSM 2 CEOF

Corre lation

us Monthly Mean Monthly Mean Monthly Mean 0.710 0.757 0.759 0.785 0.774 0.763 0.768

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Summary

  • Wind drift parameters calculated from 3

methods are roughly similar.

  • Annual-mean wind drift parameters are a

simple and effective way to estimate wind drift current.

  • Wind drift current estimation is more
  • bvious in winter, but weak in summer.
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Main reference

  • Yoshikawa, Y. and A. Masuda (2009): Seasonal variations in the

speed factor and deflection angle of the wind-driven surface flow in the Tsushima Strait. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, 114, C12022, doi:10.1029/2009JC005632.

  • Cushuman-Roisin, B. (1994), Introduction to Geophysical Fluid

Dynamics, 320 pp., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.

  • Fukamachi, Y., K. I. Ohshima, N. Ebuchi, T. Bando, K. Ono, and
  • M. Sano (2010): Volume Transport in the Soya Strait during 2006-

2008, Journal of Oceanography, 66, 685-696.

  • Kundu, P. K., and J. S. Allen (1976), Some three-dimensional

characteristics of low-frequency current fluctuations near the Oregon coast, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 6, 181– 199.

  • Pedlosky, J. (1987), Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, 2nd ed., 710 pp.,

Springer, New York.

  • Yoshikawa, Y., et al. A surface velocity spiral observed with ADCP

and HF radar in the Tsushima Strait. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans (1978–2012) 112.C6 (2007).

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Thank you for your Attention

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Back Up

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Nov/06 Feb/07 Jun/07 Sep/07 Dec/07 Apr/08 Jul/08 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 time (month) number of data

Nov/06 Feb/07 Jun/07 Sep/07 Dec/07 Apr/08 Jul/08

  • 60
  • 40
  • 20

20 40 60 80 100 120 time (month) deflection angle (deg.) LSM 1 LSM 2 CEOF

25

Monthly Drift Parameters

Nov/06 Feb/07 Jun/07 Sep/07 Dec/07 Apr/08 Jul/08 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 time (month) speed factor LSM 1 LSM 2 CEOF

CEOF is a better way to estimate wind drift parameter.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Annual-Mean Drift Parameter

Root-Mean-Square error with daily drift parameters

α (×10-2) θ (deg.)

Value LSM1 0.87 18 LSM2 1.39 34 CEOF 1.10 21 RMSE LSM1 1.64 78 LSM2 2.60 77 CEOF 1.93 98

Nov/06 Feb/07 Jun/07 Sep/07 Dec/07 Apr/08 Jul/08

  • 0.1
  • 0.05

0.05 0.1

Velocity (m/s) (b) By annual-mean wind drift parameters

LSM 1 LSM 2 CEOF

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

LSM 2 ( , ) ( ) ( , )

err err s g

u v      u A u W

( , ) ( , )

( , ) min( ) min(( ) ( cos(

g err s

u u u

   

          

LSM1

* Kundu and Allen (1976)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

LSM 2 ( , ) ( ) ( , )

err err s g

u v      u A u W

( , )

( , ) min( )

err

u

 

  

* Kundu and Allen (1976)

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

LSM1 & CEOF

( , ) ( ) ( , )

err err s g

u v      u A u W

( , )

( , ) min[( , ] )

err err

u v

 

  

LSM1 *CEOF

1 1

( , )

wd st st s g

CEOF                          u W u u W

* Kundu and Allen (1976)

* W U V i  