1
Estimation of Wind Drift Current in the Soya Strait
Wei Zhang1, Naoto Ebuchi1, Yasushi Fukamachi1, and Yutaka Yoshikawa2
1Institute of Low Temperature Science,
Hokkaido University
2Graduate School of Science, Kyoto
University
Current in the Soya Strait Wei Zhang 1 , Naoto Ebuchi 1 , Yasushi - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Estimation of Wind Drift Current in the Soya Strait Wei Zhang 1 , Naoto Ebuchi 1 , Yasushi Fukamachi 1 , and Yutaka Yoshikawa 2 1 Institute of Low Temperature Science, Hokkaido University 2 Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University 1 The
1
Wei Zhang1, Naoto Ebuchi1, Yasushi Fukamachi1, and Yutaka Yoshikawa2
1Institute of Low Temperature Science,
Hokkaido University
2Graduate School of Science, Kyoto
University
2
Sea of Okhotsk
Japan Russia China
3
Geostrophic Current Surface current
Wind
Cushuman-Roisin (1994)
g s wd
4
Cushuman-Roisin (1994)
c
s i n ( , ) s i n c
A α: speed factor θ: deflection angle W: wind vector us: surface current ug: geostrophic current
= ( , )
wd s g
A u u u W
5
(ADCP data / Tide gauges data)
( , )
s g
LSM *Complex PCA/EOF
1 1
wd st st s g
* Kundu and Allen (1976)
6
1 1
st st
Kundu and Allen (1976)
7
Long Term:
(JMA GPV/MSM)
Short Term: (22 months)
(Bottom mounted)
17h20m (JST) 3 Aug 2003
http://wwwoc.lowtem.hokudai.ac.jp/hf-radar/index.html
Monthly-mean of alongshore velocity observed by ADCP.
Fukamachi et al.(2010)
0.2 0.4 5 10 15 20 25 Velocity (m/s) Bin Number Along-shore Component
0.2 5 10 15 20 25 Velocity (m/s) Bin number Cross-shore Component
10
5-day geostrophic current estimation from ADCP
Extrapolation
LSM 1 Complex PCA/EOF
0.77 0.78 0.79 0.8 0.81 0.82 0.83 0.84 Correlation Coeffiicent 0.77 0.78 0.79 0.8 0.81 0.82 0.83 0.84 5 10 15 20 25 ADCP bins Number
Correlation Coefficient between Sea Level Difference (SLD) and alongshore velocities of ADCP bins.
11
Alongshore velocities correspond well with sea level difference. Bottom Surface ~51m
Bin15 Bin10 Bin5 Bin22 Bin1 Bin24
5 5 10 15 20 25 Coefficient Bins Coefficient aiBin 0.5 1 5 10 15 20 25 Coefficient Bins Coefficient biBin
12
24 24 Bin g Bin
u b a
1 5 5 1 15 B n B in Bi in
u b a
1 8 8 1 18 B n B in Bi in
u b a
2 2 2 2 22 B n B in Bi in
u b a
Geostrophic current estimated from Sea Level Difference Coefficient
iBin iBi iB n in
a u b
LSM 2 Complex PCA/EOF
Nov/06 Feb/07 Jun/07 Sep/07 Dec/07 Apr/08 Jul/08
50 100
Turning Angle (deg.)
LSM 1 LSM 2 CEOF
Nov/06 Feb/07 Jun/07 Sep/07 Dec/07 Apr/08 Jul/08 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 time (month) number of data
13
The drift parameters are roughly similar.
Nov/06 Feb/07 Jun/07 Sep/07 Dec/07 Apr/08 Jul/08 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03
Speed Factor
LSM 1 LSM 2 CEOF
14
Root-Mean-Square error with daily drift parameters
α (×10-2) θ (deg.) Value LSM1 0.87 18 LSM2 1.39 34 CEOF 1.10 21 RMSE LSM1 1.64 78 LSM2 2.60 77 CEOF 1.93 98
15
The wind drift current is strong in winter, but weak in summer.
Nov/06 Feb/07 Jun/07 Sep/07 Dec/07 Apr/08 Jul/08
0.05 0.1
Velocity (m/s) (a) By monthly-mean wind drift parameters
LSM 1 LSM 2 CEOF Nov/06 Feb/07 Jun/07 Sep/07 Dec/07 Apr/08 Jul/08
0.05 0.1
Velocity (m/s) (b) By annual-mean wind drift parameters
LSM 1 LSM 2 CEOF
16
1/2 2 1
2 2.2 200 , 50
H H E H
A D km f A m s D m
The horizontal boundary layer effect on the wind drift current can be neglected. The horizontal boundary layer width*:
+ ADCP
* Yoshikawa and Masuda (2009); Pedlosky (1987)
17
* 2 1 4 1 *
0.4 40 10 , 1 10
E
U m f U ms f s
The bottom boundary layer affects on the wind drift current. The bottom boundary layer depth*:
Bottom boundary * Yoshikawa and Masuda (2009); Cushuman-Roisin (1994)
Surface Bottom ~51m 40m
18
The wind is weak, and its direction is unstable.
19
The wind is strong, and its direction is stable.
Nov/06 Feb/07 Jun/07 Sep/07 Dec/07 Apr/08 Jul/08 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Velocity (m/s) Along-shore Current
Surface Current Estimated Geocurrent
20
g s
Along-shore current vs. sea level difference
HF LSM 1 LSM 2 CEOF
Corre lation
us Monthly Mean Monthly Mean Monthly Mean 0.710 0.757 0.759 0.785 0.774 0.763 0.768
21
speed factor and deflection angle of the wind-driven surface flow in the Tsushima Strait. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, 114, C12022, doi:10.1029/2009JC005632.
Dynamics, 320 pp., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.
2008, Journal of Oceanography, 66, 685-696.
characteristics of low-frequency current fluctuations near the Oregon coast, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 6, 181– 199.
Springer, New York.
and HF radar in the Tsushima Strait. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans (1978–2012) 112.C6 (2007).
Nov/06 Feb/07 Jun/07 Sep/07 Dec/07 Apr/08 Jul/08 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 time (month) number of data
Nov/06 Feb/07 Jun/07 Sep/07 Dec/07 Apr/08 Jul/08
20 40 60 80 100 120 time (month) deflection angle (deg.) LSM 1 LSM 2 CEOF
25
Nov/06 Feb/07 Jun/07 Sep/07 Dec/07 Apr/08 Jul/08 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 time (month) speed factor LSM 1 LSM 2 CEOF
CEOF is a better way to estimate wind drift parameter.
26
Root-Mean-Square error with daily drift parameters
α (×10-2) θ (deg.)
Value LSM1 0.87 18 LSM2 1.39 34 CEOF 1.10 21 RMSE LSM1 1.64 78 LSM2 2.60 77 CEOF 1.93 98
Nov/06 Feb/07 Jun/07 Sep/07 Dec/07 Apr/08 Jul/08
0.05 0.1
Velocity (m/s) (b) By annual-mean wind drift parameters
LSM 1 LSM 2 CEOF
27
err err s g
( , ) ( , )
g err s
LSM1
* Kundu and Allen (1976)
28
err err s g
( , )
err
* Kundu and Allen (1976)
29
( , ) ( ) ( , )
err err s g
u v u A u W
( , )
err err
LSM1 *CEOF
1 1
wd st st s g
* Kundu and Allen (1976)