exoplanets a dynamic field
play

Exoplanets: a dynamic field Alexander James Mustill Amy Bonsor, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Exoplanets: a dynamic field Alexander James Mustill Amy Bonsor, Melvyn B. Davies, Boris Gnsicke, Anders Johansen, Dimitri Veras, Eva Villaver The (transiting) exoplanet population Solar System Hot Jupiters: occurrence ~1% Super-Earths/


  1. Exoplanets: a dynamic field Alexander James Mustill Amy Bonsor, Melvyn B. Davies, Boris Gänsicke, Anders Johansen, Dimitri Veras, Eva Villaver

  2. The (transiting) exoplanet population Solar System Hot Jupiters: occurrence ~1% Super-Earths/ Neptunes: occurrence ~50% 0.1 au 1 au Lissauer et al 14

  3. Orbital eccentricities often high: evidence of dynamical interactions

  4. Planet–planet scattering Time until first close encounter in 3-planet systems • Planet’s gravity dominates in its Hill sphere (~Roche lobe) r H = a ( M pl /3 M ★ ) 1/3 • This is a region where strong scattering is possible: orbits change radically on < orbital timescales • Closely-spaced planets can experience this, with their separation (in Hill radii) setting the timescale for the onset of strong scattering Chambers+96

  5. Scattering explains eccentricity distribution of giant exoplanets • Distribution well- reproduced if ~75-80% of giant planets form in unstable multi-planet systems ( e.g., Juric & Tremaine 08, Raymond+11) Raymond+11

  6. Lidov–Kozai effect • Subclass of secular interactions occurring at high inclination HD80606b • Inclination and eccentricity couple together, conserving L z = [ a (1 – e 2 )] 1/2 cos I • Can drive e to very high values if starting from low- e , high- I state • Important for planets with a wide, inclined, binary stellar companion; and planets after scattering excites orbital eccentricities or inclinations Fabrycky & Tremaine 07

  7. Tidal effects • When bodies (planets, stars, moons,…) are close, they feel a differential gravitational force across their volume • Distortion can lead to energy dissipation and an exchange of angular momentum between orbit and spin • Extremely strong function of physical radius/orbital separation • Severe distortion can result in a Roche = (3 M ★ / M pl ) 1/3 R pl total disruption of a body at the Roche limit = (3 ρ ★ / ρ pl ) 1/3 R ★

  8. Star–planet tides: circularisation and orbital decay High e excited by perturber eccentricity Tide raised on planet by star dominates: orbital energy lost but orbital angular momentum constant Tide raised on star by planet dominates: orbital energy and angular momentum lost Planet disrupted by semi-major axis strong tidal force

  9. Why hot Jupiters are single Solar System Hot Jupiters: occurrence ~1%, usually single or with wide-orbit ( ≳ 1au) companion Super-Earths/ Neptunes: occurrence ~50%, single or multiple 0.1 au 1 au Lissauer et al 14

  10. High-eccentricity Hot Jupiter Migration Rasio & Ford 96, Wu & Murray 03, Fabrycky & Tremaine 07, Wu & Lithwick 11, Petrovich 15… Scattering/Kozai/secular Tidal circularisation

  11. Destruction of any inner planets by high-eccentricity giants ~0.1 au Binary star 3 au Giant planet 3 super-Earths 100 au Mustill+15, 17

  12. Loss of planets by stellar collision: potential cause of chemical enrichment • HD80606: star with eccentric proto-hot Jupiter ( a = 0.45 au, e = 0.93) and binary companion HD80607 (~1000au) • Binary can drive Kozai cycles on planet (Fabrycky & Tremaine 07) • HD80606 appears slightly metal-rich compared to HD80607 (Liu et al submitted) Fabrycky & Tremaine 07

  13. Loss of planets by stellar collision: potential cause of chemical enrichment Liu et al submitted

  14. Indirect evidence for planetary systems around white dwarfs (review: Farihi 16) • Spectroscopic signatures of metals accreted into ~40% flux of WD atmospheres λ • Dust discs detected flux through IR excesses λ • Gas discs detected through Keplerian emission flux features λ • Transits of disintegrating flux asteroids time

  15. White Dwarf atmospheric abundances allow determination of planetary/asteroidal bulk composition Transit + RV = radius + mass Jura & Young 2014 ??? WD spectroscopy: detailed elemental breakdown

  16. exoplanets.org | 3/28/2017 3.0 10 3 ♃ 2.5 Planet Mass [Earth Mass] Mass of Star [Solar Mass] Present-day Solar radius ♄ 100 2.0 ♆ ⛢ 10 1.5 Engulfed by giant star Survive engulfment ⊕ ♀ 1 1.0 ♂ ☿ Mustill & 0.5 0.1 Villaver 2012 survival limit 0.0 0.01 -3 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 10 Semi-Major Axis [Astronomical Units (AU)]

  17. Effects of stellar evolution on planetary orbits • Mass loss causes orbits to expand • Conserve angular momentum L = [ GM ★ a (1 - e 2 )] 1/2 • If mass loss slow compared to orbital timescale, e is an adiabatic invariant • Orbits expand with a final / a initial = M ★ initial / M ★ final • Factor ~3 expansion for a typical 2M ⦿ progenitor • WD should be surrounded by a cleared volume of several au radius: how to get material to the surface?

  18. Effects of stellar evolution on planetary orbits • Mass loss destabilises formerly stable systems (Debes & Sigurdsson 02) • Planetary dynamics set by planet:star mass ratio M pl / M ★ • Planets’ Hill spheres increase in size faster than orbits expand: r H = a ( M pl /3 M ★ ) 1/3 Mustill+14

  19. Delivery of asteroids/comets to WD during and after planetary instability AGB tip instability Mustill+ submitted

  20. Scattering by super-Earth planets well reproduces observed accretion rates Red: inner belt particles Blue: outer belt particles Are super-Earths as common on wide (>several au) orbits as they are on close- in (<1 au) orbits? Mustill+ submitted

  21. Open questions • How representative are the simulated systems of real ones? • Effects of non-gravitational forces (radiation, gas drag,…) on the planetesimals • Circularisation of planets and planetesimals: compare to occurrence of transiting close-in bodies • How do the simulated scattering rates relate to the observed accretion rates? Material will collisionally process, and pass through the dust and gas discs… • Can all phenomena (accretion rates, disc properties, occurrence rates of transiting bodies) be quantitatively reproduced? • Postdoc wanted! Deadline 22 nd February!

  22. Conclusions • Planetary systems are evolving, dynamic entities • Planet–planet or planet–star interactions can significantly change systems after their formation • High-eccentricity migration of hot Jupiters explains why they do not commonly have close companions • Stellar evolution can trigger qualitative changes in planetary dynamics • Wide-orbit super-Earth planets are a good candidate for delivering material to white dwarfs

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend