current and future management of symptomatic aortic
play

Current and Future Management of Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Current and Future Management of Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis Alexander (Sandy) Dick, MD Disclosures None pertaining to this talk Technique vs Technology SAVR vs TAVR TAVR and SAVR Equivalency? Mortality/Stroke Morbidity


  1. Current and Future Management of Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis Alexander (Sandy) Dick, MD

  2. Disclosures • None pertaining to this talk

  3. Technique vs Technology SAVR vs TAVR

  4. TAVR and SAVR Equivalency? • Mortality/Stroke • Morbidity – Vascular, PVL, PPM • Hemodynamics • Quality of life • Durability • Patient acceptance

  5. Risk 6.2% High Risk ( STS >8% ) +++ Data Intermediate Risk 13.9% Partner II (STS 4-8%) Low Risk 79.9% CorValve Evolute R (STS <4%) Partner III Durability

  6. Evolut R 2.0 • Self expanding Nitinol • Recapture, Reposition and Redeployment • Extended sealing skirt to reduce PVL

  7. Lotus • Nitinol wire frame • Bovine tissue valve • Outer PU skirt • Mechanical expansion and locking

  8. The PARTNER 2A Trial Study Design Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis ASSESSMENT by Heart Valve Team Operable (STS ≥ 4%) Randomized Patients n = 2032 ASSESSMENT: Yes No Transfemoral Access Transfemoral (TF) Transapical (TA) / TransAortic (TAo) 1:1 Randomization (n = 1550) 1:1 Randomization (n = 482) TF TAVR Surgical AVR TA/TAo TAVR Surgical AVR VS. VS. (n = 775) (n = 775) (n = 236) (n = 246) Primary Endpoint: All-Cause Mortality or Disabling Stroke at Two Years

  9. Primary Endpoint (ITT) All-Cause Mortality or Disabling Stroke 1 All-Cause Mortality or Disabling Stroke (%) 50 Surgery HR [95% CI] = 0.89 [0.73, 1.09] p (log rank) = 0.253 TAVR 40 30 21.1% 20 16.4% 19.3% 8.0% 14.5% 10 6.1% 0 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 Months from Procedure Number at risk: Surgery 1021 838 812 783 770 747 735 717 695 TAVR 1011 918 901 870 842 825 811 801 774

  10. Primary Endpoint (AT) All-Cause Mortality or Disabling Stroke 1 All-Cause Mortality or Disabling Stroke (%) 50 Surgery HR [95% CI] = 0.87 [0.71, 1.07] TAVR p (log rank) = 0.180 40 30 21.0% 20 16.6% 18.9% 8.0% 14.0% 10 5.7% 0 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 Months from Procedure Number at risk: Surgery 944 826 807 779 766 743 731 715 694 TAVR 994 917 900 870 842 825 811 801 774

  11. Primary Endpoint (ITT) All-cause Mortality or Disabling Stroke TAVR SAVR Relative Risk Ratio 0.92 Non-Inferiority p- n = 1011 n = 1021 Upper 1-sided 97.5%CI 1.09 value = 0.001 19.3% 21.1% Pre-specified non-inferiority margin = 1.2 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Risk ratio (test/control) Favors TAVR Favors Surgery Primary Non-Inferiority Endpoint Met

  12. Primary Endpoint Subgroup Analysis (ITT) TAVR (%) AVR (%) Hazard Ratio HR p-value for Subgroup n = 1011 n = 1021 (95% CI) (95% CI) interaction Overall 19.3 21.1 0.89 [0.73-1.09] Age 18.0 19.5 0.90 [0.69-1.17] 0.96 < 85 23.6 0.89 [0.65-1.20] 21.5 ≥ 85 Sex 16.9 20.3 0.81 [0.59-1.10] 0.37 Female 0.96 [0.74-1.25] 21.4 21.7 Male STS Score 15.8 18.4 0.84 [0.61-1.16] 0.60 ≤ 5 0.94 [0.73-1.21] 22.4 23.1 > 5 LV Ejection Fraction 19.1 21.5 0.84 [0.56-1.25] 0.27 ≤ 55 1.11 [0.81-1.53] 20.1 18.0 > 55 Mod or Severe Mitral Regurgitation 17.8 20.3 0.85 [0.67-1.08] 0.53 No 1.00 [0.64-1.57] 25.9 24.4 Yes Previous CABG 20.6 22.2 0.91 [0.73-1.13] 0.69 No 0.82 [0.53-1.27] 15.3 18.0 Yes Peripheral Vascular Disease 18.2 20.7 0.85 [0.67-1.09] 0.47 No 0.99 [0.71-1.40] 22.3 22.0 Yes 15 Foot Walk Test 17.7 20.9 0.82 [0.62-1.09] 0.43 ≤ 7 secs 0.97 [0.71-1.31] 20.7 20.8 > 7 secs Access Route 16.8 20.4 0.79 [0.62-1.00] 0.06 Transfemoral 1.21 [0.84-1.74] 27.7 23.4 Transthoracic 0.5 1.0 2.0 Favors TAVR Favors Surgery

  13. TF Primary Endpoint (ITT) All-cause Mortality or Disabling Stroke 1 All-Cause Mortality or Disabling Stroke (%) 50 TF Surgery HR: 0.79 [95% CI: 0.62, 1.00] TF TAVR p (log rank) = 0.05 40 30 20.4% 20 15.9% 16.8% 7.7% 10 12.3% 4.9% 0 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 Months from Procedure Number at risk: TF Surgery 775 643 628 604 595 577 569 557 538 TF TAVR 775 718 709 685 663 652 644 634 612

  14. TF Primary Endpoint (AT) All-Cause Mortality or Disabling Stroke 1 All-Cause Mortality or Disabling Stroke (%) 50 TF Surgery HR: 0.78 [95% CI: 0.61, 0.99] TF TAVR p (log rank) = 0.04 40 30 20.0% 20 15.8% 16.3% 7.5% 10 11.7% 4.5% 0 0 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 Months from Procedure Number at risk: TF Surgery 636 624 600 591 573 565 555 537 722 TF TAVR 762 717 708 685 663 652 644 634 612

  15. JACC, Feb1, 2017

  16. Recommendation (Transcaval Favorable; Feasible; Unfavorable suitability) Basis for recommendation No unfavorable features. Target entry site lumbar vertebra L 2.5 Projection angles AP / Lateral Interposed & nearby structures No interposed structures. Aortic lumen diameter (+3/0/-3cm) 15 mm / 15 mm / 13 mm Target distance below renal artery 30 mm Target to aorto-iliac bifurcation 53 mm Covered stent bailout limb access & size L 4.0 mm / R 3.2 mm Working sheath distance to target 28 cm Mesenteric arteries Celiac patent; SMA patent. Caveat & Comments Exam more than 6 months old. Reviewers NHLBI Table version 2016-07 R Lederman read 2016-11-15

  17. PARTNER SAPIEN Platforms Device Evolution SAPIEN XT SAPIEN SAPIEN 3 Valve Technology Sheath 22-24F 16-20F 14-16F Compatibility Available Valve Sizes 23 mm 26 mm 23mm 26mm 29mm* 20 mm 23 mm 26 mm 29 mm *First Implant Oct 30, 2012

  18. Philippe Généreux et al. JACC 2012;60:1043-1052 American College of Cardiology Foundation

  19. Other Clinical Endpoints (ITT) At 30 Days and 2 Years 30 Days 2 Years Events (%) TAVR Surgery TAVR Surgery p-value* p-value* (n = 1011) (n = 1021) (n = 1011) (n = 1021) 6.5 6.5 0.99 19.6 17.3 0.22 Rehospitalization MI 1.2 1.9 0.22 3.6 4.1 0.56 Major Vascular 7.9 5.0 0.008 8.6 5.5 0.006 Complications Life-Threatening / 10.4 43.4 <0.001 17.3 47.0 <0.001 Disabling Bleeding AKI (Stage III) 1.3 3.1 0.006 3.8 6.2 0.02 New Atrial Fibrillation 9.1 26.4 <0.001 11.3 27.3 <0.001 New Permanent 8.5 6.9 0.17 11.8 10.3 0.29 Pacemaker 0.4 0.0 0.05 1.4 0.6 0.09 Re-intervention 0.0 0.0 NA 1.2 0.7 0.22 Endocarditis *Event rates are KM estimates, p-values are point in time

  20. The PARTNER 2A and S3i Trials Study Design Intermediate Risk Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis Intermediate Risk ASSESSMENT by Heart Valve Team P2 S3i P2A n = 1078 n = 2032 ASSESSMENT: ASSESSMENT: Optimal Valve Transfemoral No Yes Delivery Access Access Transapical / Transapical / Transfemoral (TF) Transfemoral (TF) Transaortic (TA/TAo) TransAortic (TA/TAo) 1:1 Randomization 1:1 Randomization TF TAVR TA/TAo TAVR TF TAVR TA/Tao TAVR Surgical Surgical VS VS SAPIEN 3 SAPIEN 3 SAPIEN XT SAPIEN 3 AVR AVR Primary Endpoint: All-Cause Mortality, All Stroke, or Mod/Sev AR at One Year (Non-inferiority Propensity Score Analysis)

  21. Primary Endpoint - Non-inferiority Death, Stroke, or AR ≥ Mod at 1 Year (VI) Weighted Difference -9.2% Non-Inferiority p- Upper 1-sided 95% CI -6.0% value < 0.001 Pre-specified non-inferiority margin = 7.5% -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 Favors TAVR Favors Surgery Primary Non-Inferiority Endpoint Met

  22. Primary Endpoint - Superiority Death, Stroke, or AR ≥ Mod at 1 Year (VI) Weighted Difference -9.2% Superiority Testing p- Upper 2-sided 95.0% CI -5.4% value < 0.001 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 Favors Surgery Favors TAVR Superiority Achieved

  23. Other Unadjusted Clinical Outcomes At 30 Days and 1 Year (AT) 30 Days 1 Year Events (%) TAVR Surgery TAVR Surgery (n = 1077) (n = 944) (n = 1077) (n = 944) Re-hospitalization 4.6 6.8 11.4 15.1 0.3 1.9 1.8 3.1 MI 6.1 5.4 --- --- Major Vascular Complication 0.5 3.3 --- --- AKI (Stage III) Life-Threatening/Disabling 4.6 46.7 --- --- Bleeding 5.0 28.3 5.9 29.2 New Atrial Fibrillation 10.2 7.3 12.4 9.4 New Permanent Pacemaker 0.1 0.0 0.6 0.5 Re-intervention Endocarditis 0.2 0.0 0.8 0.7

  24. Severity of PVR at 30 Days and All-cause Mortality at 2 Years (VI) 50 Moderate/Severe Overall Log-Rank p = 0.001 Mild Mod/Sev (reference = None/Trace) None/Trace 40 p (Log-Rank) < 0.001 All-Cause Mortality (%) 34.0% 30 Mild (reference = None/Trace) 20 p (Log-Rank) = 0.82 14.1% 10 13.5% 0 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 Months from Procedure Number at risk: Moderate/Sev 36 32 32 26 26 24 22 22 21 Mild 210 204 199 194 188 184 182 180 175 None/Trace 701 678 664 647 628 621 612 605 585

  25. Paravalvular Regurgitation (VI) 3-Class Grading Scheme P < 0.001 P < 0.001 ≥ Moderate 0.6% 100% ≥ Moderate Mild 3.5% 8.0% Mild 80% 26.8% Severe 60% Moderate Mild None/Trace 40% 20% 0% TAVR Surgery TAVR Surgery No. of echos 30 Days 2 Years TAVR 872 600 Surgery 757 514

  26. Paravalvular Regurgitation 3-Class Grading Scheme (VI) P < 0.001 P < 0.001 ≥ Moderate 100% 1.5% Mild 80% 39.8% 60% Severe Moderate Mild 40% None/Trace 20% 0% TAVR Surgery TAVR Surgery No. of echos 30 Days 1 Year P2A Surgery 755 610 S3i TAVR 992 875

  27. Quality of Life • American TVT registry 2011-2016 in 31636 patients • KCCQ-OS – Baseline 42.3 (23.7) – 30 day 69.9 (27.6) – 1 yr 74.2 (31.9) Arnold et al; JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Feb 1

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend