Cinical Informatics and Decision Making: Challenges for Large-Scale - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

cinical informatics and decision making
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Cinical Informatics and Decision Making: Challenges for Large-Scale - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Cinical Informatics and Decision Making: Challenges for Large-Scale Analytics and Intelligent Services Mark Musen Stanford University musen@stanford.edu What are the gaps? Intelligent services based on individual rule bases will never


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Cinical Informatics and Decision Making: Challenges for Large-Scale Analytics and

Intelligent Services

Mark Musen Stanford University musen@stanford.edu

slide-2
SLIDE 2

What are the gaps?

  • Intelligent services based on individual

rule bases will never scale

  • It is difficult to characterize the feature space

that leads to a diagnosis

  • It is difficult to characterize the category space

when you decide on a diagnosis

  • Imprecision in the category spaces mean

imprecision in therapeutics

  • The underlying information infrastructure is

evolving—very slowly—from a 19th century model

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Ontologies are essential for biology

slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5

The Foundational Model of Anatomy

slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Biomedical scientists have adopted ontologies

  • To provide canonical representation of

scientific knowledge

  • To annotate experimental data to enable

interpretation, comparison, and discovery across databases

  • To facilitate knowledge-based applications for
  • Decision support
  • Natural language-processing
  • Data integration
slide-8
SLIDE 8

The International Classification of Diseases

724 Unspecified disorders of the back 724.0 Spinal stenosis, other than cervical 724.00 Spinal stenosis, unspecified region 724.01 Spinal stenosis, thoracic region 724.02 Spinal stenosis, lumbar region 724.09 Spinal stenosis, other 724.1 Pain in thoracic spine 724.2 Lumbago 724.3 Sciatica 724.4 Thoracic or lumbosacral neuritis 724.5 Backache, unspecified 724.6 Disorders of sacrum 724.7 Disorders of coccyx 724.70 Unspecified disorder of coccyx 724.71 Hypermobility of coccyx 724.71 Coccygodynia 724.8 Other symptoms referable to back 724.9 Other unspecified back disorders

slide-9
SLIDE 9

ICD9 (1977): A handful of codes for traffic accidents

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • V31.22 Occupant of three-wheeled motor vehicle injured in

collision with pedal cycle, person on outside of vehicle, nontraffic accident, while working for income

  • W65.40 Drowning and submersion while in bath-tub, street and

highway, while engaged in sports activity

  • X35.44 Victim of volcanic eruption, street and highway, while

resting, sleeping, eating or engaging in other vital activities

ICD10 (1999): 587 codes for such accidents

slide-11
SLIDE 11

There is a plethora of controlled terminologies!

  • Diseases: ICD-9, ICD-9-CM, ICD-10,

ICD-10-CM, DRG

  • Procedures: CPT-4, ICD-10-PCS
  • Laboratory tests: LOINC
  • Nursing activities: NIC, NOC, HHCC, Omaha
  • Drugs: NDC, Multum, Micromedex, NDDF,
  • Biomedical literature: MeSH
  • Clinical documentation: Medcin, Purkinjie
  • Cross-references among terminologies: UMLS
slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

What are some of the Advisors recommendations?

  • Continue incentives for “meaningful use” of

EHRs

  • Encourge exchange of information across

health-care facilities

  • Establish a “universal exchange language”

for clinical data

  • Initiate pilot projects to allow the approach

to scale

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

www.bioontology.org

slide-15
SLIDE 15

NCBO: Key activities

  • We create and maintain a library of

biomedical ontologies and terminologies.

  • We build tools and Web services to enable

the use of ontologies and terminologies.

  • We collaborate with scientific communities

that develop and use ontologies and terminologies in biomedicine.

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

http://bioportal.bioontology.org

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

BioPortal allows us to experiment with new models for

  • Dissemination of terminologies, ontologies,

and knowledge on the Web

  • Integration and alignment of online

content

  • Knowledge visualization and cognitive

support

  • Peer review of online content

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Biomedical Resource Ontology in BioPortal

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

“Notes” in BioPortal

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

BioPortal is building an online community of users who

  • Develop, upload, and apply ontologies
  • Map ontologies to one another
  • Comment on ontologies via “notes” to give

feedback

  • To the ontology developers
  • To one another
  • Make proposals for specific changes to ontologies
  • Stay informed about ontology changes and

proposed changes via “push” technology

  • Incorporate BioPortal services into their own

technologies

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

WebProtégé allows collaborative

  • ntology authoring online
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Like BioPortal, WebProtégé supports notes and threaded discussions

slide-25
SLIDE 25

As with BioPortal, notes may include multimedia

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Integration of Ontology Authoring, Publishing, and Peer Review

slide-27
SLIDE 27

NCBO will support the complete

  • ntology lifecycle
slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

SYNTHETIC PATIENT DATA

slide-29
SLIDE 29

The task: guideline-based patient management

Consider adding an ACE Inhibitor because of a compelling indication (heart failure) Patient Data EON Decision- Support System

slide-30
SLIDE 30

A handful of encoded guidelines gives you, well, a handful of encoded guidelines

ATHENA Renal Disease ATHENA Hyperlipidemia ATHENA Heart Failure ATHENA Diabetes ATHENA Opioid Therapy ATHENA Hypertension

slide-31
SLIDE 31

GLINDA Task–Method Decomposition

Multi- guideline CDS Get Data

Select Guideline

Apply Guideline

Consolidat e Advisories

ATHENA ATHENA w/ Additional Knowledge Source Apply Guideline Get KS ATHENA Detect Interactions Repair

Prioritize

DB query

Manual selection Goal satisfied? Heuristic Rules based on Interaction Ontology Interaction- Specific Strategy Weight

  • f

Support

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Semantic computing is crucial for biomedicine

  • Myriad controlled terminologies in

medicine are yielding to new ontologies

  • Mandates for “meaningful use” of

electronic patient records require processing of symbolic representations of patient data and situations

  • The terabytes of data spewing from life-

sciences laboratories cannot be managed without semantic organization and interpretation

32

slide-33
SLIDE 33

What are the gaps?

  • Intelligent services based on individual

rule bases will never scale

  • It is difficult to characterize the feature space

that leads to a diagnosis

  • It is difficult to characterize the category space

when you decide on a diagnosis

  • Imprecision in the category spaces mean

imprecision in therapeutics

  • The underlying information infrastructure is

evolving—very slowly—from a 19th century model

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

http://bioontology.org

34