[PPT] - CSBA Roseville Joint Union High School District Presenters: Paige PowerPoint Presentation

SLIDE 1

CSBA

Roseville Joint Union High School District Presenters: Paige Stauss, Board Vice President Ron Severson, Superintendent

SLIDE 2

Our Board

Linda M. Park President Paige K. Stauss Vice President

R. Jan Pinney

Member Scott E. Huber Member Rene Aguilera Member

SLIDE 3

Overview

district profile
changing the goal setting process

(the role of the board)

focus on data
A-G - a case study

SLIDE 4

Granite Bay High School 2,033 Antelope High School 1,820 Roseville High School 1,958

Woodcreek

High School 2,207 Oakmont High School 1,834

SLIDE 5

Adelante High School

(continuation)

120 Independence High School

(independent study/credit recovery)

140 Roseville Adult School 900

SLIDE 6

Total Enrollment by Ethnicity

SLIDE 7

2014-15 Target Unduplicated Population Summary

SLIDE 8

2014-15 Target Unduplicated Population Summary

72% 27% 0% 1% Non-target population Free/Reduced Eligible English Learners Foster Youth

SLIDE 9

Antelope, 994 Granite Bay, 216 Independence 63 Oakmont, 554 Roseville, 683 Woodcreek, 481 Adelante, 97 Independence, 63

2014-15 Target Students By School

SLIDE 10

English Learners by Language

30% 6% 17% 47% Other Punjabi Russian/Eukrainian Spanish 40 Languages in “Other”

SLIDE 11

CAHSEE

2013-14 2012-13 2011-12 Math ELA Math ELA Math ELA Antelope 94 92 93 92 94 92 Granite Bay 98 97 99 98 99 99 Roseville 89 89 91 92 88 87 Oakmont 96 94 95 92 92 91 Woodcreek 96 97 98 98 96 95

SLIDE 12

2014-15 Graduation Rate

SLIDE 13

Four by Four Block

Four 87-minute

periods each day

Intervention periods

built in at three sites

Capacity - access to

32 vs 24 courses

SLIDE 14

Old Paradigm

Step 1

Cabinet developed goals Board priorities for Superintendent

Step 2

Cursory involvement of site leadership

Step 3

Focus was

n tasks,

processes, budget

Step 4 Step 5

Board rubber stamped Document that was put on a shelf

SLIDE 15

Problems

Timing Goals developed in July/August – budget and staffing in January-April Alignment No focus on the primary mission

f the District –

Improved student achievement Response No buy in from sites or staff

SLIDE 16

SLIDE 17

What if...

2006

we focused on high priority

student outcomes

we focused on data –

SMART goals

the board engaged in a

dialogue with key leaders

we focused accountability

around our goals

we prioritized our budget and

staffing decisions to match

SLIDE 18

Revisit the vision Consider relevant data Examine current goals

2 3 1

Purpose of Goals Meeting

Revise and establish new goals

4

SLIDE 19

S M A R T

SLIDE 20

Roseville Joint Union High School District 2007--2008 District Goals

1. Increase % of students who are eligible to apply directly to

a 4-year college or university.

2. Develop CTE master plan that increases the breadth and

accessibility of CTE and ROP programs.

3. Develop district end-of-course common assessments in

the five core areas.

4. Identify at-risk students by the 7th grade and create

embedded interventions.

5. Improve API, SAT, AP, A-G data to move up in the similar

schools’ band.

SLIDE 21

SLIDE 22

Gold Medals

CTE Intervention A through G

SLIDE 23

Made the Team

PLC’s Common Assessments

SLIDE 24

Agony of Defeat

...so far :-)

Grades

SLIDE 25

Roseville Joint Union High School District 2009--2010 District Goals

1. Increase by 3 percentage points the number of graduates who complete A-G requirements. 2. Develop and implement two or more CTE programs of study at each site. 3. Analyze, evaluate, revise, and achieve 100% implementation of current district-wide end-of-course common assessments and develop and implement new assessments in additional core academic areas. (Eng. 11/12, Government/Economics, Spanish 3, Algebra 2/Integrates 3, and Earth Science) 4. Decrease by a minimum of 5 percentage points the number of students receiving Ds and Fs in English 9, Algebra 1, and Geometry courses. 5. Train and develop five additional PLC facilitators at each site to implement methods and strategies of professional learning communities. 6. Meet mandated proficiency rates for CAHSEE with all groups on 10th grade census tests.

SLIDE 26

A-G completion rate

A. History/Social Science (2 years)
B. English (4 years)
C. Mathematics

(3 years, UC recommends 4)

D. Laboratory Science

(2 years, UC recommends 3)

E. Language Other than English

(2 years, UC recommends 3)

F. Visual/Performing Arts (1 year)
G. College Preparatory Elective

(1 year)

SLIDE 27

Why A-G?

Synergistic Data Point
Community Expectations
Equity
Creates Opportunity

SLIDE 28

A-G Completion Comparison 2006-2008

2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total School Granite Bay HS 58.7 73.1 65.8 53.8 72.5 62.2 64.9 72.1 68.4 Oakmont HS 41.3 51.3 46.7 28.4 40.1 34.8 30.5 47.6 39.3 Roseville HS 29.3 40.1 34.8 29.7 32.1 30.9 36.4 54.2 44.4 Woodcreek HS 34.1 51.5 43.3 47.9 58.7 53.5 45.3 59.9 52.4

SLIDE 29

SLIDE 30

Accountability

Changes published and celebrated

Ubiquitous

Back to school nights, 8th grade orientation, registration, individual conferences, group conferences, board meetings, goals

Structures

CTE, electives, recommended schedules, drop processes, AVID, AP, IB

Supported

Budget, staffing

Strategies

SLIDE 31

Interventions

Credit recovery
A-G recovery
After school tutoring
Intervention

periods/counselors

Learning support

specialists

MFT/social work interns

SLIDE 32

Stand alone CTE or
ther non-A-G electives
Less choice with

professional development

Angst and pushback
Lower mean scores on AP/

SAT/ ACT (short term)

More awards – longer

celebrations

Interventions

❖ Credit Recovery ❖ A-G Recovery ❖ After School Tutoring ❖ Intervention periods/counselors ❖ Learning Support Specialists ❖ MFT/Social work interns

Collateral Damage

SLIDE 33

Advanced Placement –

EOS

CST/CAHSEE
Blended learning
Partner schools
GPA’s – 123
Unleashed creativity –

Econ/AP gov pilot

Quality of applicants
Gratitude of families

Collateral Improvements

SLIDE 34

SLIDE 35

Roseville Joint Union High School District 2012--2013 District Goals

1. Improve student proficiency on California Standards Tests by 10 percentage points in Algebra 1, Geometry and Algebra 2.

2. Increase by 3 percentage points, with every district-wide significant

subgroup, the number of graduates who complete UC a-g requirements.

3. Increase by 5 percentage points the number of students who score 70% or

better on the District Common Assessments.

4. Provide training for 25 teachers at each site on effective instructional

practices and PLC concepts to improve student learning and increase the effectiveness of their professional learning teams.

5. Improve student performance, with every district-wide significant subgroup,
n California High School Exit Exams (CaHSEE) to meet mandated Adequate

Yearly Progress (AYP) targets.

SLIDE 36

A-G Completion Comparison 2006-2008

2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total School Granite Bay HS 58.7 73.1 65.8 53.8 72.5 62.2 64.9 72.1 68.4 Oakmont HS 41.3 51.3 46.7 28.4 40.1 34.8 30.5 47.6 39.3 Roseville HS 29.3 40.1 34.8 29.7 32.1 30.9 36.4 54.2 44.4 Woodcreek HS 34.1 51.5 43.3 47.9 58.7 53.5 45.3 59.9 52.4

SLIDE 37

UC A-G Economic Status

Econ. Disadvantaged

All Students 2013-14 Female Male Total Female Male Total District 65.1 51.8 58.4 76.4 67.5 72.1 Antelope 78.9 70.6 74.8 80.1 72.8 76.5 Granite Bay 63 44.8 53.6 81 74.4 77.7 Oakmont 68.3 61.1 65 77.6 70.8 74.6 Roseville 59.2 47.2 53.4 73 62.3 68.3 Woodcreek 80 47.2 53.4 86.6 73.5 79.5

SLIDE 38

SLIDE 39 2012-2013 2011-2012 2010-2011 Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Sacramento 91.7 94.1 93 88.1 96.3 93.4 92.5 92.8 92.7 Davis 73.3 84.9 79.5 74.3 80.4 77.4 71.4 82.4 77.3 Woodcreek 72.9 82.3 77.8 65.9 82.6 74.4 62.4 73 67.7 Whitney 68.5 85.2 77.2 66.3 78.8 72.6 60.4 66.3 63.6 Granite Bay 68.7 83.7 75.7 67.4 73.6 70.2 64.5 77 70.9 Rocklin 69.1 79.7 74.5 64.4 79.2 71.4 75.6 82.1 78.9 Antelope 66.8 80.1 73.8 57.6 75.6 67.3 47.8 65.7 56.9 Oakmont 63.1 76.4 70.4 52.2 68.3 59.7 55.6 66.2 61.1 Franklin 60.1 79.5 70.2 67.9 73.1 70.6 57.1 69.6 63.1 Roseville 61 75.1 68.5 64.5 72.7 68.5 46.9 67.5 57.9 Vista Del Lago 54.9 75.6 64.8 59.7 62.1 61.1 46.7 55.3 50.8 Oakridge 52.7 71.4 62.5 60.9 77.3 68.8 51.6 66.2 59.1 Pleasant Grove 56.5 62.1 59.4 48.3 68.3 58.5 49.6 60.2 54.6 Union Mine 54.7 63.3 58.8 54.3 66.3 59.9 57.1 63.2 60.1 Consum Oaks 51.1 66.3 58.4 45.2 63.6 55.1 36.8 52 43.9 Elk Grove 54.9 59.8 57.2 42.6 50.8 46.6 47 58.1 52.7 Mira Loma 52.7 60 56.5 59.5 47.2 54.1 35 42.5 39.2 Laguna Creek 50 59.7 55.2 47.3 50.9 49 38.9 47 43.3 Monterey Trail 49.6 59.8 54.8 54.9 58.1 56.5 44.4 61.1 53.5 Folsom 47 62 54.7 55.4 54.3 54.8 50.5 53 51.7 Casa Roble 43.5 63.1 54.6 41.9 55.7 49.1 34.5 56.6 46.2 Bella Vista 41.9 65.9 53.8 47.8 52.9 50.5 39.4 45.4 42.6 Rio 45.3 61.6 53.1 50 58.3 54 51.5 70.9 60.9 Del Oro 42.1 59.9 51.4 50.8 53.6 52.2 40.8 58.6 50 El Camino 42.7 59.4 50.3 38.7 54.5 47.2 51.2 62.3 57 Colfax 39.8 60.6 48.8 35.4 53.8 43.6 33.6 51.6 41.4 El Dorado 40 55.2 48.3 38.9 48.3 43.7 37.8 54.5 47 Sheldon 39.2 56 47.6 38.4 47.8 43.7 35.1 49.8 42.2 Bear River 39.4 56 47.4 42.1 59.7 51.1 44.9 63.6 53.9 Ponderosa 34.3 58.6 46.2 41.6 53.9 48.2 40.5 50.3 45.2 Nevada Union 36.6 51.7 44.5 36.1 49.3 43.3 38.3 56.6 47.3 Del Campo 36.8 51.2 43.5 39.6 50.9 44.7 32.6 36.8 41.1 Lincoln 35.6 50.6 43 31.8 37.4 34.8 25.2 40.4 32.7

A-G Completion Comparison

2011-2013

SLIDE 40

Roseville Joint Union High School District 2015--2016 District Goals

1. Sites will identify, publish, teach, and assess Tier 3 academic vocabulary lists

in every content area.

2. Professional Learning Teams will develop and administer formative

assessments of three essential learning outcomes in every content area.

3. All Professional Learning Teams will reduce their D and F rate by 5%.
4. Increase by 3% the number of economically disadvantaged, English learners,

and male students who meet UC A-G requirements.

5. All teachers will be trained to demonstrate highly effective Professional

Learning Teams practices.

SLIDE 41

SLIDE 42

SLIDE 43

Roseville Joint Union High School District @rjuhsd @rseverson54 roseville_joint_uhsd