credit market problems in developing countries
play

Credit Market Problems in Developing Countries September 2007 () - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Credit Market Problems in Developing Countries September 2007 () Credit Market Problems September 2007 1 / 17 Should Governments Intervene in Credit Markets Moneylenders historically viewed as exploitive: high interest rates , ! BUT


  1. Credit Market Problems in Developing Countries September 2007 () Credit Market Problems September 2007 1 / 17

  2. Should Governments Intervene in Credit Markets Moneylenders historically viewed as exploitive: high interest rates , ! BUT displacing them may remove valuable/unique services , ! and interest rates may re‡ect high costs (Aleem, 1990 and Steel et. al. 1997) Two main rationales for intervention , ! E¢ciency: are productive investments not being undertaken? , ! Distribution: is access to credit equitable? , ! need not be a trade-o¤ () Credit Market Problems September 2007 2 / 17

  3. Agency Problems Reasons for absence of formal institutions in village economies A result of limited liability (lack of collateral) and asymmetric information Even when titled land is available, formal banks may not accept it as collateral () Credit Market Problems September 2007 3 / 17

  4. Adverse Selection Example Investment requires $1, but borrowers have no wealth A fraction q of borrowers are “safe”: earn certain output y A fraction 1 � q of borrowers are “risky”: � ¯ y with probability p Output = 0 with probability 1 � p Bank cannot distinguish borrower types Equal expected return: p ¯ y = y . Gross cost to bank per $1 lent = k , where y > k Bank charges gross (interest plus principle) lending rate = R () Credit Market Problems September 2007 4 / 17

  5. How does the bank’s expected pro…t vary with R? Given R , the bank’s expected return per dollar lent is [ q + ( 1 � q ) p ] R De…ne the “break-even” value of R as R b [ q + ( 1 � q ) p ] R b = k k R b = q + ( 1 � q ) p k + ( 1 � q )( 1 � p ) k = R b q + ( 1 � q ) p = k + A R b Bank’s expected pro…t: � [ q + ( 1 � q ) p ] R � k if R < y π = ¯ pR � k if R > y () Credit Market Problems September 2007 5 / 17

  6. π 0 R y y/p k k/p k+A () Credit Market Problems September 2007 6 / 17

  7. π 0 R y k+A k/p y/p k () Credit Market Problems September 2007 7 / 17

  8. Implications Raising interest rates need not increase pro…ts linearly If p falls, the bank may not be able to break even at a rate low enough for safe borrowers ) Banks will only serve risky borrowers , ! this is ine¢cient (since y > k ) and inequitable , ! credit rationing () Credit Market Problems September 2007 8 / 17

  9. Moral Hazard Example (Ghosh, Mookherjee and Ray 2000) Indivisible project requires funds L All agents risk neutral Likelihood of high output depend on non-contractible e¤ort e : � Q if good harvest with prob. p ( e ) Output = 0 if crop failure with prob. 1 � p ( e ) where p 0 ( e ) > 0 , p 00 ( e ) < 0 () Credit Market Problems September 2007 9 / 17

  10. Case 1: Self–…nanced farmer (benchmark) Farmer chooses e to solve max p ( e ) . Q � e � L e , ! FOC p 0 ( e � ) = 1 Q where e � = …rst–best (e¢cient) e¤ort level () Credit Market Problems September 2007 10 / 17

  11. Case 2: Debt–…nanced farmer Total debt: R = ( 1 + i ) L Limited Liability: In case of default can only lose collateral, w < L Farmer chooses e to solve max p ( e ) . ( Q � R ) + ( 1 � p ( e )) . ( � w ) � e e , ! FOC yields the incentive curve: 1 p 0 ( ˆ e ) = (IC) Q + w � R , ! ˆ e ( w , R ) is decreasing in R and increasing in w , ! if R > L > w , it follows that e < e � ˆ () Credit Market Problems September 2007 11 / 17

  12. Lender’s pro…t: π = p ( e ) R + [ 1 � p ( e )] w � L Competitive lending (Figure 1) ) π = 0 : R = L � w p ( e ) + w = L � ( 1 � p ( e )) w (ZP) p ( e ) , ! equilibrium: determined by intersection of (IC) and (ZP) Monopoly lending ) maximize pro…ts subject to IC (Figure 2) ! if max pro…t is π M then isopro…t line is , R = L � π M � ( 1 � p ( e )) w (MP) p ( e ) () Credit Market Problems September 2007 12 / 17

  13. R Isoprofit Curve Incentive Curve E ^ R ^ e e* e Figure 1: Equilibrium Debt and Effort in the Credit Market. by the lender’s market power (although that certainly exacerbates the problem), but

  14. R Isoprofit Curve Incentive Curve E' ^ E R ^ e e* e Figure 2: Effect of an Increase in the Lender’s Profit. The observation that borrower-friendly equilibria are more efficient has broad im-

  15. An increase in collateral, w (Figure 3) , ! fall in the equilibrium interest rate and debt, and an increase in the e¤ort level. , ! for a …xed π , the borrower’s income increases ) interest rate dispersion, even in competitive credit markets ) exaccerbates pre-existing inequality () Credit Market Problems September 2007 13 / 17

  16. R E Isoprofit Curve E' Incentive Curve e Figure 3: Effect of Higher Borrower Wealth (Collateral).

  17. Enforcement Problems (Ex Post Moral Hazard) Example (Ghosh, Mookherjee and Ray 2000) In…nite horizon lending–borrowing game with no saving and discount factor δ Borrower’s production technology is F ( L ) where F 0 ( L ) > 0 and F 00 ( L ) < 0 r = bank rate of interest (opportunity cost of funds) Self–…nanced farmer (benchmark): max F ( L ) � ( 1 + r ) L L , ! FOC: F 0 ( L � ) = 1 + r () Credit Market Problems September 2007 14 / 17

  18. Partial Equilibrium: Single Lender Assume that a defaulting borrower goes into “autarky” and receives v (exogenous for now) Borrower’s incentive constraint: δ 1 F ( L ) + 1 � δ v � 1 � δ [ F ( L ) � R ] (IC) Optimal contract solves max F ( L ) � R L , R subject to R � δ [ F ( L ) � v ] (IC) z = R � ( 1 + r ) L (PC) where z is lender’s minimum pro…t () Credit Market Problems September 2007 15 / 17

  19. R Borrower's indifference curve ~ B R Incentive constraint Isoprofit line A ~ L * L L Figure 4: Optimal Solution to the Enforcement Problem. subject to the constraints

  20. Two types of solution: (1) if indi¤erence curves are tangent to isopro…t curve between A and B at L � , this is the solution and IC is not binding (2) if not, both constraints are binding and solution ˆ L ( v , z ) is at corner B , ! in general, the constrained optimal level of lending is � � ˜ L � , ˆ L ( v , z ) = min L ( v , z ) () Credit Market Problems September 2007 16 / 17

  21. Some Implications Increase in lender’s pro…t z ! PC shifts up (Figure 5) , ! reduced lending, L , ! increase in interest rate, R / L Increase in value of outside option, v ! IC shifts down (Figure 6) , ! reduced lending, L , ! increase in interest rate, R / L Can credit rationing arise in equilibrium ? , ! yes: if z or v become high enough there is no combination of L and R that satis…es both (IC) and (PC) () Credit Market Problems September 2007 17 / 17

  22. R Incentive constraint Isoprofit line L Figure 5: Effect of an Increase in Lender’s Profit. leads to the conclusion:

  23. Isoprofit Line R Incentive Constraint B B' L Figure 6: Effect of an Increase in Borrower’s Outside Option.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend