Creating and Using Taxonomies to Support Implementation of High - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

creating and using taxonomies to support implementation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Creating and Using Taxonomies to Support Implementation of High - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Creating and Using Taxonomies to Support Implementation of High Impact Practices (rise.iupui.edu/ taxonom ies) Jennifer Thorington Springer Julie Hatcher Matthew Rust Enrollm ent Research Com m unity Engagem ent 30K students $428.9


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Creating and Using Taxonomies to Support Implementation of High Impact Practices

(rise.iupui.edu/ taxonom ies)

Jennifer Thorington Springer Julie Hatcher Matthew Rust

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Enrollm ent Research Com m unity Engagem ent

  • 30K students

(20K Undergrad)

  • 80% of Undergrads

attend full-time

  • 87% are in-state
  • 18 Schools
  • $428.9 million in

external funding in 2015–2016

  • 100 research

Centers

  • TRIP and publicly-

engaged scholarship

  • >800 Community

Partners (‘15-’16)

  • > 10K students

participate annually

  • >1.1 million hours of

course-based service contributed annually

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Discussion Session Overview

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Framing the Discussion Questions

  • 1. Assume you are in a fa culty d ev elop m ent role

(e.g., a CTL, dept chair), how could you use a taxonomy for faculty and course development?

  • 2. Assume you are an instructor using the

taxonomy, how could you use it to support your

  • w n a ssessm ent/ resea rch/ SoTL?
  • 3. Assume you are responsible for course or

p rogra m a ssessm ent/ im p rov em ent, how could you use the taxonomy to support institutional assessment goals?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

RISE (HIPs) at IUPUI

slide-6
SLIDE 6

RISE Mission

To provide all students with broad access to quality education through inclusive and equitable high-im pact practices that result in transform ative student learning in support of tim ely graduation and prepare students to become actively engaged and inform ed citizens ready to participate in a global society.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Research International Service-Learning Experiential

slide-8
SLIDE 8

RISE Goals For Students

  • Challenges Students to Participate in at Least Two

High Impact Practices

  • Engages Students More Deeply in Their Learning
  • Promotes Application of Knowledge through

guided reflection

  • Helps Students Further Clarify and Commit to

Their Career Goals

  • Allows students opportunities to reflect on

personal growth and development

slide-9
SLIDE 9

HIP Participation Rates

First Years Seniors

  • IUPUI students significantly more likely to participate in learning

communities, service learning, internships or field experience, and capstones.

  • IUPUI students less likely to participate in study abroad.
  • Similar levels of participation in undergraduate research.
slide-10
SLIDE 10

HIP Participation Rates

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0%

1st Years with 1+ HIP 1st Years with 2+ HIPs Seniors with 1+ HIP Seniors with 2+ HIPs White Black/Af. Am. Hisp./Latinx

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Taxonomies Background

  • Exec. Vice Chancellor
  • Cal State University
  • AAC&U
  • IUPUI
  • rise.iupui.edu/ taxonomies
slide-12
SLIDE 12

HIPs Done Well

  • Expectations
  • Time/ effort
  • Faculty + Peer Interaction
  • Diversity
  • Feedback
  • Reflection
  • Relevance
  • Public Demonstration
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Intended Benefits of Taxonomy Approach

  • Qua lity Course/

Progra m Dev elop m ent

  • Fid elity
  • Assessm ent
  • Resource
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Challenges

  • Instructor Suspicion
  • Incentives
  • Taxonomy vs. Rubric
  • Low, Medium, and High

Descriptors

  • Process for Input
  • What next?
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Service Learning Taxonomy

  • Development
  • Unique

Features/ Challenges

  • Implementation
  • FLC use and feedback
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Service Learning Course Attributes

Civic Com petencies Reciprocal Partnerships Critical Reflection Assessm ent Com m unity Project Diversity of Interactions and Dialogue

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Service Learning Course Attributes

Civic Com petencies Reciprocal Partnerships Critical Reflection Assessm ent Com m unity Project Diversity of Interactions and Dialogue Cam pus Mission & Culture Teaching Philos. Epist. Prior Learning Experiences

  • f Student

Duration

  • f Com m unity

Project Institutional Type & Location

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Internship Taxonomy

  • Development
  • Unique

Features/ Challenges

  • Implementation
slide-19
SLIDE 19

High Im pact Higher Im pact Highest Im pact 1) Student performs som e menial tasks at internship site but majority of work is directly applying classroom learning, under the close supervision of a professional. 1) Student performs very few menial tasks at internship site; majority of students’ work is directly applying classroom learning, under the supervision of a professional. 1) Student performs no menial tasks at internship site; students’ work is directly applying classroom learning, under the supervision

  • f a professional, but

with a few

  • pportunities for

discretionary decision-m aking.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Themed Learning Communities Taxonomy

  • Development
  • Unique

Features/ Challenges

  • Implementation
slide-21
SLIDE 21

TLC Advisory Board Process

  • What are the

hallmarks of a TLC?

  • Discussion/ Debate
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Processes

slide-23
SLIDE 23

THEMED LEARNING COMMUNITIES

5 Attributes

  • Interdisciplinary

theme

  • Integration
  • Out-of-class activities
  • Active learning
  • Collaboration
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Q+A Session

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Discussion Question

  • 1. Fa culty d ev elop m ent role (e.g., a CTL, dept

chair), how could you use the taxonomy for faculty and course development?

  • 2. Instructor role, how could you use the taxonomy

to support your ow n a ssessm ent/ resea rch/ SoTL?

  • 3. Pogra m a ssessm ent/ im p rov em ent role, how

could you use the taxonomy to support institutional assessment goals?

slide-26
SLIDE 26

New Institute for Engaged Learning

  • To provide greater access and opportunity for

students to engage in evidence-based high-im pact practices designed to foster their academic achievement, identity development, retention, and persistence to timely degree completion.

  • Leverage existing resources—human, fiscal, physical,

and intellectual—across campus that contribute to engaged learning in order to generate greater efficiencies through better coordination and integration of student-facing programs and services.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

New Institute for Engaged Learning

Supports and develops m eaningful curricular pathw ays that are integrative, applied, and experiential.

  • Intensive planning this academic year
  • HIPS - curricular and co-curricular
  • Community engagement
  • Assessment, SoTL, research on best practice
  • National search for Exec. Associate Dean this

spring/ summer

~ We w elcom e and value your ideas ~

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Jennifer Thorington Springer Director, RISE Program jtspring@iupui.edu Julie Hatcher Executive Director, Center for Service and Learning jhatcher@iupui.edu Matthew Rust Director, Cam pus Career and Advising Services mmrust@iupui.edu rise.iupui.edu/ taxonom ies