courtney luque and robert snyder february 26 2016 welcome
play

Courtney Luque and Robert Snyder February 26, 2016 Welcome! - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Courtney Luque and Robert Snyder February 26, 2016 Welcome! Introductions Courtney Luque, International Student Advisor, International Services Office (cluque@gwu.edu) Robert Snyder, Executive Director, DSA Planning and Outreach


  1. Courtney Luque and Robert Snyder February 26, 2016

  2. Welcome! • Introductions • Courtney Luque, International Student Advisor, International Services Office (cluque@gwu.edu) • Robert Snyder, Executive Director, DSA Planning and Outreach (rsnyder@gwu.edu) • Learning Outcomes • Participants will be able to … … define benchmarking and its importance to their work. … explain the process of benchmarking. … apply benchmarking practices to at least one project on which they are working. … relate benchmarking knowledge gained in this workshop to future projects in their department.

  3. How Can We Use Assessment in DSA? • Understand the needs of our stakeholders, especially students and parents • Validate our - #onlyatgw – strengths • Align with national best practices, professional standards, and academic program evaluation methods • Guide continuous improvement and strategic decision-making • Amplify the case for philanthropic and university financial support • Advocate for enhanced services and programs

  4. What is benchmarking? YOUR PERSPECTIVES

  5. What is benchmarking? (as defined) • “A structural approach for looking outside an organization to study and adapt the best outside practices to complement internal operations with new, creative ideas” (Schuler, 1998, p. 40) • Discovery of promising practices (Newcomer, 2012) • An opportunity to “...diagnose problems in performance and to identify areas of strength” (Schofield, 1998, p. 14) • Validate our practices and solicit external perspectives (Alstete, 1996)

  6. Preparing to benchmark • Why are you benchmarking? • Purpose • Need(s) • Desired outcome(s) • Three types of benchmarking (Upcraft & Schuh, 1996) • Internal (other departments at GW) • Competitive (best practices in the marketbasket) • Generic (off-list/best practices in the field)

  7. Conducting background research • Web searches • GW Libraries • Education Advisory Board • Professional standards (CAS, NASPA/ACPA, etc.) • Professional associations / listservs • Professional / personal contacts • Colleague referrals • Convenience • Consider personal / professional travel, including conferences

  8. Defining market basket • What is a market basket? • Colleges and universities with which GW is most frequently compared and/or to which GW aspires • How do you use a market basket list? • GW’s market basket list • Generic/off-list schools

  9. GW’s Market Basket Schools • American University • Southern Methodist University* • Boston University* • Tufts University* • Duke University • Tulane University* • Emory University • University of Miami* • Georgetown University • University of Pennsylvania • New York University* • University of Rochester • Northeastern University* • University of Southern California • Northwestern University • Vanderbilt University • Syracuse University* • Washington University in St. Louis *Also members of the Colonial Group, which also includes Boston College, Brandeis University, Lehigh University, University of Notre Dame, and Wake Forest University

  10. Developing questions • Who to include in the conversation and roles? • Leadership • Staff • Interested colleagues • Students? • Develop a written list of questions • Build on information from background research • Test GW ideas • Seek feedback on questions • Ask interested GW colleagues (including leadership) before finalizing

  11. Contacting institutions • Initial request for benchmarking (via email) • Purpose • Likely participants • Desired approach (phone, Skype/web conference, in person) • Send information in advance • Questions • Relevant GW information • Confirmed participants

  12. Having the conversation • Roles • Facilitator • Participant • Note taker • Conversation using written questions • “What can we do for you?” • Follow up items • Any additional information requests Thank you note •

  13. Using the results • Share the notes • Include additional information from follow up conversations • What did we learn from this experience? • For this effort? • For other efforts in DSA/at GW?

  14. Now that you know more about benchmarking … • What else do you want to know about benchmarking? • How will you use the information? • What topics/projects do you have in mind? • How will you share this presentation with your colleagues?

  15. References and Additional Reading • Alstete, J. (1996). Benchmarking in Higher Education ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 5. Washington, D.C.: The George Washington University Graduate School of Education and Human Development. • Culp, M. M., & Dungy, G. J. (2012). Building a Culture of Evidence in Student Affairs: A Guide for Leaders and Practitioners. Washington, DC: National Association of Student Personnel Administrators. • Newcomer, K. (2012). Building Capacity to Measure, Analyze and Evaluate Government Performance. Retrieved from: http://www.lib.noaa.gov/about/ news/newcomer_sep192012.pdf • Schofield, A. (1998). Benchmarking in Higher Education: an International Review . London: Commonwealth Higher Education Management Service (CHEMS). • Schuh, J., & Upcraft, M. (1996). Assessment in Student Affairs: A Guide for Practitioners . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. • Schuler, R. (1998). Managing Human Resources . (6th ed.) Cincinnati, Ohio: South- Western College Publications. Education Advisory Board

  16. Courtney Luque and Robert Snyder February 26, 2016

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend