CORE F UNDI NG RE PORT CYCL E 24 F UNDI NG CYCL E 30 L - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CORE F UNDI NG RE PORT

CYCL E 24 F UNDI NG CYCL E

CYCL E 24 F UNDI NG SUCCE SS

L OI Submit- te d L OI Ac c e pt- e d (suc c e ss r ate ) Applic a- tions Gr ants (suc c e ss r ate )

I DE As 28 19 (68%) 17 6 (35%) T ra nsla tio na l 11 4 (36%) 3 0 (0%) CRC Pilo t 10 3 (30%) CRC F ull 5 2 (40%) 5 10 15 20 25 30 Gra nts Unfunde d Applic a tio ns L OI s no sub missio n De c line d L OI s

CYCL E 24 F UNDI NG DE CI SI ONS

Awa rd T ype b y Do lla rs Awa rd T ype b y numb e rs

Community Re se ar c h Collabor atio n - F ull, 2, 18% Community Re se ar c h Collabor atio n - Pilot, 3, 27% IDE A, 6, 55% Community Re se ar c h Collabor ati

• n - F

ull, $1,712,896, 48% Community Re se ar c h Collabor ati

• n - Pilot,

$574,051, 16% IDE A, $1,281,661, 36%

CYCL E 24 F UNDI NG DE CI SI ONS

Prio rity I ssue b y Do lla rs Prio rity I ssue b y Numb e rs

Biolog y

• f the

Bre a st Ce ll, 1, 9% Communi ty Impa c t

• f Bre a st

Ca nc e r, 2, 18% De te c tion / Prog nosi s/ T re a tme nt, 5, 46% E tiolog y a nd Pre ve ntio n, 3, 27% Biolog y of the Bre a st Ce ll, $288,000, 8% Community Impa c t of Bre a st Ca nc e r, $354,051, 10% De te c tion/ P rog nosis/ T r e a tme nt, $993,661, 28% E tiolog y a nd Pre ve ntion, $1,932,896, 54%

CYCL E 24 F UNDI NG

I nstitutio ns b y Do lla rs

Institution # of Gra nts Breast Cancer Over Time 1 Carrie’s TOUCH African American Breast Cancer 1 Cedars-Sinai Medical Center 1 Clinica de Salud del Valle de Salinas 1 Esperanza Community Housing Corporation 1 Haus of Volta 1 San Diego Biomedical Research Institute 1 Sutter Bay Hospital dba California Pacific Medical Center 1 UC Berkeley

1

UCLA 4 UC San Diego 2 USC 1 Gra nd T

• ta l

17

Bre a st Ca nc e r Ove r T ime , $183,334, 5% Ca rrie 's T OUCH Afric a n Ame ric a n Bre a st Ca nc e r, $82,336, 2% Ce da rs- Sina i Me dic a l Ce nte r, $255,867, 7% Clinic a de Sa lud de l Va lle de Sa lina s, $95,401, 3% E spe ra nza Community Housing Corpora tion, $55,000, 2% Ha us of Volta , $69,598, 2% Sa n Die g o Biome dic a l Re se a rc h Institute , $288,000, 8% Sutte r Ba y Hosp

• CPMC,

$788,664, 22% UCB, $645,497, 18% UCL A, $643,898, 18% UCSD, $296,013, 8% USC, $165,000, 5%

CYCL E 25 F UNDI NG CYCL E

2018- 2019 F unding T ime line Ove r vie w

• Applicants submit IDEA LOIs by Oct. 25,

2018.

• Council committees receive LOIs

by Nov. 1

• Scoring completed by Nov. 27
• CRC awards do not require LOIs, but

applicants may submit research plans for review by Oct. 25, 2018

• LOI invitation and conference award

funding decisions made at Dec. meeting

• Conference Awards are due Nov. 1, 2018

– Outreach committee (and ad hoc members) review and bring recommendations to full council

Letter of Intent Review

Ma y April Ma r De c No v Oc t Ja n July July June F e b Aug

Oct-Dec 2018

Ma y April Ma r De c No v Oc t Ja n July July June F e b Aug

L OI Re vie w App submission Sc ie ntific Re vie w Pr

• gr

ammatic Re vie w Gr ant F unding L OI submission Conf Re vie w

2018- 2019 F unding T ime line Ove r vie w

• Applicants submit CRC and IDEA

applications by Mar 7, 2019.

• Council begins programmatic review in

April

• Council committees assigned at

March meeting and members receive review materials Mar 22. Notify member of triaged applications in May

• Preliminary scores due by May 31
• Funding decisions made at June 7 council

meeting

• Finalize programmatic scores in

sub-committee

• Make final funding

recommendations after discussion by the full council

Programmatic Review

Ma y April Ma r De c No v Oc t Ja n July July June F e b Aug

L OI Re vie w App submission

Jan-June 2019

L OI submission Conf Re vie w Sc ie ntific Re vie w Pr

• gr

ammatic Re vie w Gr ant F unding

CONF E RE NCE AWARD RE VI E W

 T

wo awards pe r c yc le for up to $50,000 total

 One Sta nda r

d Confe r e nc e Awa r d

 One Community- L

e d  Re vie we d by Outre ac h Committe e and Ad Hoc Me mbe rs  E

valuate d for:

 E

lig ibility

 Re sponsive ne ss  Outr

e a c h

 Appr

• a c h (for

g e ne r a ting ne w ide a s a nd fa c ilita ting c olla bor a tion)

 Qua lific a tions of the or

g a nize r s  F

unding de c ision made at De c e mbe r 1 me e ting

 T

ime line de pe nde nt on ad hoc me mbe rs and numbe rs of applic ations and L OIs

L E T T E R OF I NT E NT PURPOSE

 se le c t pr

• je c ts that be st me e t our

pr

• gr

ammatic goals;

 r

e duc e ove r all applic ation volume to e nsur e that PIs submitting a full applic ation have a mor e r e asonable c hanc e of suc c e ss;

 lowe r

s the c ost of r e vie w c ommitte e s by r e duc ing the numbe r

• f applic ations to pr
• c e ss and

r e vie we r s to r e c r uit.

L OIs Submitte d L OI Pr e liminar y Re vie w

Sc o re s c o mpile d & c o unc i me mb e rs

De c 17 De c 1 Mo rn. No v 30 No v 27 No v 1 Oc t 25

Co unc il d isc uss sc o re s a nd ma ke s d e c isio n

Sc or e s c ompile d

L OI so rte d , c o mmitte e s a ssig ne d , ma te ria ls pro d uc e d L OIs re vie we d a c c o rd ing to c rite ria a nd sc o re s a re sub mitte d .

Counc il Me e ts

L e tte r

• f Inte nt Re vie w Pr
• c e ss

Applic ants Notifie d

BOOK L E T CONT E NT S

2- pa g e le tte r of inte nt PI Bioske tc h only Advoc a c y L

e tte r of Commitme nt

RE VI E W CRI T E RI A -15 POI NT T OT AL



Aims a nd spe c ific ity to bre a st c a nc e r: Are the a ims c o nsiste nt with a n I

DE A-le ve l pro je c t. Are the a ims spe c ific to b re a st c a nc e r?



Innova tion: T

he de g re e o f inno va tive a spe c ts o f the pro po se d pro je c t.



Critic a l Pa th: I

s the pa th to imple me nta tio n o f so me thing o f pra c tic a l va lue a t the pa tie nt (risk re duc tio n/ pre ve ntio n o r tre a tme nt) o r c o mmunity le ve l c le a r a nd we ll-de sc rib e d?



Inve stig a tive te a m: Do e s the PI

ha ve de mo nstra te d e xpe rtise in b re a st c a nc e r re se a rc h, o r a re c o lla b o ra tio ns pro po se d to a ddre ss this issue ?



Involve me nt of a dvoc a te s. Ha s the PI

c o nta c te d a n a ppro pria te a dvo c a c y

• rg a niza tio n a b o ut the pro po se d re se a rc h q ue stio n? Are a dvo c a te s a de q ua te ly

invo lve d in the de sig n, imple me nta tio n, inte rpre ta tio n, a nd disse mina tio n o f the re sults?

RE VI E W COMMI T T E E E ST I MAT E S

 Me e t as full c ounc il  Appr

• ximate ly 26 L

OIs to r e vie w

 All L

OIs c an be invite d

Que stions???

Ka the rine .Mc Ke nzie @uc op.e du (510) 987- 9876