cooling systems in power plants
play

cooling systems in power plants 11th PICWS Meeting Chatou, 28-29 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The EU Project MATChING: Materials & technologies for performance improvement of cooling systems in power plants 11th PICWS Meeting Chatou, 28-29 January 2016 Content Introduction and Background The objectives of MATChING The Consortium


  1. The EU Project MATChING: Materials & technologies for performance improvement of cooling systems in power plants 11th PICWS Meeting Chatou, 28-29 January 2016

  2. Content Introduction and Background The objectives of MATChING The Consortium MATChING approach and methodology Demonstration program Focus on antifouling materials and coatings User’s group 2

  3. Introduction MATChING is the acronym of a project titled: “Materials & technologies for performance improvement of cooling systems in power plants” which has been submitted for the call NMP-15 of H2020 EU funding program. CALL NMP 15 – 2015 is on “ Materials innovations for the optimisation of cooling in power plants ” The CALL is within Section 5 of HORIZON 2020 – WORK PROGRAMME 2014-2015 : Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies. Nanotechnologies, Advanced Material, Biotechnology and Advanced Manufacturing and Processing MATChING has been selected for funding and it is now in the phase of Grant Agreement Preparation Current Status 3 3

  4. Background Background European Commission’s Resource Efficient Europe Roadmap 2050, indicates that by 2020 “ Water abstraction should stay below 20% of available renewable water resources ”(1). MATChING aims to reduce the water demand and improve Power generation is a sector requiring great amounts of water: cooling water for energy efficiency for cooling energy production accounts in fact, for 43-45% of total water abstraction in European systems in the energy sector Union second behind agriculture (2,4). through the use of advanced and There is currently a gap between water demand and water availability. Following the nano-technology based materials business as usual approach this gap is expected to increase in the upcoming years and innovative configurations (3): to meet EU requirements, Additional innovation actions are needed. EU Water abstraction per sector – EEA 90’s vs 2007 Average EU Water withdrawal 4) World water demand and supply gap (3) Titolo del grafico Power sector 43% 57% Other Uses (1)Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe, EC COM (2011) 571 Final (2) The European Environment State and outlook (2010) EEA (3) Charting Out Water Future, 2030 Water Resource Group (2009);(4)Rübbelke and Vögele, 2011

  5. The Objectives of MATChING Two areas of the energy sector have been taken into account: Geothermal and Fossil fuelled plants Thermal Power Plant Geothermal Power Plant Increase the robustness of cooling equipments to allow the use OBJECTIVES of non-traditional waters; Reduce evaporative losses and plume visibility in Increase the heat exchange efficiency of condenser and geothermal power plants to increment the geo- cooling equipments; fluid re-injected fraction; Promote the use of alternative water sources (low quality waters, blow down waters, municipal waters) Overall plant efficiency increase up to 0.4-0.5%, enhancing the heat transfer efficiency in the condenser both on the Overall reduction of geothermal steam emitted into the steam side and water side via the use of advanced nano- TARGET atmosphere up to 15% and extension of production wells engineered coatings and surfaces.. life up to 10% using hybrid solutions for cooling towers and advanced materials and coatings for dry modules Overall reduction of fresh water abstraction in fossil fuelled power plants of about 30% validating a set of solutions (6) for the recovery and treatment of cooling water in CT equipped plants. 5

  6. The Consortium Consortium is made of 4 Utilities, 5 Technology Providers, 6 Research institute and 1Service provider. Partners are from 6 EU Counties: 4 from Italy, 4 from Belgium,3 from Spain,3 from Netherland and 1 from Denmark 1 3 4 1 4 3

  7. MATChING approach and methodology : REDUCE RECOVER EVAPORATION EVAPORATION EVAPORATION Advanced Water recovery from plume Hybrid through membrane Systems condenser (MC) COOLING ENHANCE HEAT TOWER CONDENSER TRANSFER AND ALTERNATIVE INTAKE EQUIPMENT WATER SOURCES WATER ROBUSTNESS Coating to promote Special Novel membrane Special Recirculating drop-wise materials/coatings to based technologies materials/coati water handle “dirty” fluids condensation for intake water ngs to handle “dirty” fluids pretreatment REDUCE BLOWDOWN RECOVER BLOWDOWN BLOWDOWN WATER Special Novel membrane Novel Circulating Novel membrane based materials/coatings to based technologies to water technologies for blowdown handle “dirty” fluids in conditioning enhance intake water recovery CT and condenser quality systems

  8. MATChING approach and methodology Water saving options for CT Percentage of water saving achievable [%] Current practice systems ~14%: COC increase from 4 to 8 by means of softening process. Not applied Unless too bad quality of Intake water pre-treatment intake water. ~24%: blowdown elimination (COC of 4) through intake water demineralization. Not applied Unless site specific Reuse of other available waste Up to 100% fresh water reduction conditions are met, i.e. a dry region is possible wate r streams, as make up water. depending on the amount of available waste water sources. or huge amount of (municipal) waste water available. Commonly applied Adoption of Reduce blowdown through operation cooling water treatment programs; ~ 9% assuming to increase COC from 4 to 6. at high COC. implying use of chemicals to avoid scaling and corrosion problems. Not applied unless site specific ~24% assuming to completely recover the blowdown water conditions (dry climates and/or Recovery of blowdown. (starting from a COC of 4.) restrictions on waste water discharge). ~15% assuming to reduce the evaporative losses of 15% Sometimes adopted: this option Reduce the evaporation. (without changing COC) through the installation of dry reduce also considerably the plume visibility. modules. ~ 60% - 65% assuming to recover the 80% of evaporated Not applied Dry cooling is adopted Recover the evaporated water. water. alternatively

  9. MATChING approach and methodology Thermal Power Plant Geothermal Power Plant MATChING Steam Condenser &Cooling water circuit Low-T geothermal Source WP8. Coatings and surface texturing on Exploitation & Dissemination steam side of condenser tubes to Development and testing (BALMATT promote drop-wise condensation. Up IN MOL- Belgium) of coatings for to five technological approaches wil be geothermal pipes with: tested ; WP7. • Anti-scaling properties; Validation & Cost/benefits analysis • Anti-corrosion properties: Antifouling and fouling release coatings and alloys with biocide properties on cooling water side of Conceptual design of a hybryd Geo-Power Plants Thermal Power Plants condenser tube bundles to contrast cooling system coupling a ORC biofouling. Up to six technologies will be binary cycle with ground water WP3. developped and tested. WP4. cooling (GWC) and Air Cooled WP5. WP6. Low-T High-T Condensers (ACC) Water Condenser Geo- Geo- Water treatment and recovery & cooling Treatment Sources Sources High – T geothermal Source Pretreatment of intake water through membrane capacitive deionization (MCDi); New Filling media for Wet Cooling Towers (advanced geometries for WP2. Combination of pressure driven PVC film filling and 3D splash plastic Targets, KPI, Scenarios membranes (MF/UF/NF/RO) and MD fillings) to be tested in Nuova to recover and reuse waste water Radicondoli (ITALY ) geothermal site streams available at power plants (CT WP1. blowdown,FGD waste water ecc..); Project Management Novel circulating water conditioning Coatings for dry section modules systems to allow higher COC of hybrid geothermal cooling Towers to be tested in Nuova Radicondoli (ITALY ) Membrane condenser (MC) for the recovery of water vapour from CT

  10. MATChING approach and methodology PROJECT LEVEL First step Second step: Third Step Identification of technical and economical real Assessment of results coming from second Strong demonstration program with 9 test sites . success indicators (KPI); step allowing the techno economical Laboratory scale investigation ,new pilot plants validation of solutions applied in selected Definition of the scenarios (present and /existing facilities, AND Full SCALE DEMO European power plants in consideration of future). the present and future scenarios KPI DEMONSTRATION COST BENEFIT AN. TECHNOLOGY LEVEL Second step: First step Third Step NT Characterization and test of the technologies Pre-testing activities in Laboratory . Aim is to selected in in the first step in pilot scale facilities do a first screening of candidate Real Environment test in Power Plant and mimicking full scale operating conditions. materials/coatings or even membrane and long run test (i.e.through by-pass of existing Selection of the two/three most promising pretreatment process to select most promising components, or even by replacement of full options ones for further demonstration scale modules) REAL LAB. PILOT ENVIRONMENT

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend