Cooling Design of Shielding at MOMENT Cooling Design of Shielding at - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Cooling Design of Shielding at MOMENT Cooling Design of Shielding at - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Cooling Design of Shielding at MOMENT Cooling Design of Shielding at MOMENT Jianfei Tong, Qingnian Xu,YuanYe,Binzhou, Tianjiao Liang August 11, 2015 Insititue of High Energy Physics, CAS Outline 1. Introduction 2. Heat Deposition Calculation
Page 散裂中子源进展汇报 August 11, 2015 2
Outline
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Heat Deposition Calculation
- 3. Cooling Structure Design & CFD Analysis
- 4. Conclusion
Page 散裂中子源进展汇报 August 11, 2015
Material: Tungsten Length=8.33 m Diameter=2 m Density=19 g/cc Volume=22.5 m3 Mass=428 t
- 1. Introduction
Proton Shielding Target (Mercury Jet) Shielding
3
Function of Shielding:
- 1. Protect equipments from
high radiation 2.Absorb most of heat load from beam power 3.Minimize the heat load on magnets
Target Magnet
Proton beam power =15 MW
Page 散裂中子源进展汇报 August 11, 2015
Stainless Steel 304 Aluminum Alloys 6061 Nb3Sn NbTi Tungsten
Stainless steel 304: Fe 0.6775, Si 0.01, Mn 0.02, Cr 0.19, Ni 0.0925, N 0.01. Aluminum Alloys 6061:Al 0.9725, Si 0.006, cu 0.002, Mg 0.01, Zn 0.0025, Mn 0.0015, Ti 0.0015, Cr 0.002, Fe 0.0035. Nb3Sn: Nb 0.482, Cu 0.518. NbTi conductor: polyimide 0.079(polyimide C6H11ON,Density1.41g/cc ), Al 0.731, Cu 0.09, NbTi 0.1 Mecury: Density 13.534 g/cc Tungsten: Density 19.3 g/cc
2.1 Heat deposition: Calculation Model of Fluka
Nb3Sn Mercury
4
Page 散裂中子源进展汇报 August 11, 2015
Proton: 1.5 GeV, 10 mA Target:Hg Length=300 mm, R=5 mm Shielding: Tungsten
Heat deposition for Proton beam power = 15 MW
2.2 Heat deposition: Results
Heat load on Shielding: 9.9 MW Max volumetric heat source=2.2x108[W m^-3]
5
Page 散裂中子源进展汇报 August 11, 2015
3.1 Cooling Structure Design Criterion
- 1. For the shielding material density should be as high as possible,
which reduce the heat load on superconducting magnets, the total volume of cooling channel can reduce the density of shielding and should be as small as possible;
- 2. It’s not a good choice of cooling channel face to magnet, or along
the radius direction, for the particle jet effect; The coolant passing through the shielding from front to rear also can prevent the irradiation damage on magnets;
- 3. Multiple rows of Mini-Channel with reasonable size can increase the
heat transfer area and prevent decreasing the density too much. For the possessing difficulty of the tungsten, the channel should be as simple as possible;
- 4. For the high volumetric heat in shielding, the cooling channel
should be designed to keep the shielding in demand especially near the target.
Front Rear
6
Page 散裂中子源进展汇报 August 11, 2015
- 1. Water : good choice, inexpensive, high thermal conductivity, high material
density, tungsten has to be cladded by tantalum
- 2. Helium : alternative choice, expensive, no new nuclide, tungsten no need
cladded by tantanlum
- 3. Liquid metal (difficulty to deal with new generation of nuclides)
3.2 Coolant choice
Heat Condutivity (W /m-K) Special Heat Capacity (J/kg-K) Visousity (Pa/s) Density (kg/m3)
Water
0.6069 4181.7 8.899e-4 997
Helium@1atm 300K
0.1415 5240 1.86e-05 0.179
Helium@3Mpa 300K
0.158 5191 2.01e-05
4.78
Water: Max velocity 5 m/s; Goal: max temperature of water below 150 ℃ (keep in liquid phase), max temperature of tungsten below 800℃ Helium : Max velocity 100 m/s;Goal: max temperature below 800℃
7
Page 散裂中子源进展汇报 August 11, 2015
60 Cut view O-A B B B-B Case 1 First Wall thickness=1cm
3.3 Cooling Structure design
Case 2 No.1 Cooling Channels No.2 No.3 No.4 No.5 No.6 No.7 Cooling Channels No.1 No.2 No.3 No.4 No.5 No.6 No.7 A O Cut into 60 aliquots
8
Page 散裂中子源进展汇报 August 11, 2015
Finite Volume Method Software: Ansys CFX
3.4 Government Equation & Calculation Software
heat source
9
Page 散裂中子源进展汇报 August 11, 2015
3.5 Calculation Model in CFX
Inlet Velocity in channel Water: 5 m/s Helium: 50,75,100 m/s Inlet Temperature 300 K Outlet Pressure 0 Pa Fluid & Solid Domain Fluid Domain Inlet Outlet Cooling Channels Size: 1cmX1cm Heat capacity (J/kg K) Density (Kg/m3) Thermal Conductivity (W/m K) Viscosity (Kg/m s) Tungsten 134 19000 120 Water 4181 997 0.6069 8.8×10-6 Properties of Tungsten and Water Case 2 Case 1 Symm Symm Volume of Cooling Channels: 0.00384648 m3 Volume of Solid: 0.371984 m3 Volume ratio of Cooling Channels = 1%
10
Page 散裂中子源进展汇报 August 11, 2015
Heat load of shielding @Beam Power= 165053W*60=9.9MW Max volumetric heat source=2.2x108 W m^-3
3.6 Heat source in CFX
11
Page 散裂中子源进展汇报 August 11, 2015
Pressure Drop= 0.8 MPa Outlet T=311.7 K ∆T=11.7 K Mass flow rate=7X997 kg/m3*5 m/s*0.0001 cm2=3.49kg/s Total mass flow rate @ Shielding=206kg/s=744 m3/h
3.7 Results: case 1, water, 5 m/s
12
Page 散裂中子源进展汇报 August 11, 2015
5.0x10
5
1.0x10
6
1.5x10
6
2.0x10
6
2.5x10
6
3.0x10
6
1 2 3 4 5
Density (kg/m3) P (Pa) Density
300 400 500 600 700 800 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0
density (kg/m3) T (K) density
300 400 500 600 700 800 5190 5192 5194 5196 5198 5200
cp (J/kg-K) T (K) cp
300 400 500 600 700 800 2.0x10
- 5
2.5x10
- 5
3.0x10
- 5
3.5x10
- 5
4.0x10
- 5
Viscosity (Pa-s) T (K) Viscosity
300 400 500 600 700 800 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40
Conductivity (W/m-K) T (K) Conductivity
3.8 Properties of Helium
Density @300 K against Pressure Density @3 Mpa against Temperature Special Heat Capacity @3 Mpa Viscosity @3 Mpa Heat Conducivity @3 Mpa
13
Page 散裂中子源进展汇报 August 11, 2015
3.9 Comparison of Pressure: case 1, Helium, 100 m/s
Working Pressure=1 Mpa Working Pressure=2 Mpa T@outlet=2204.2 K T@outlet-T@inlet=1904.2 K Max T=2184.5 ℃ Working Pressure=0.1 Mpa T@outlet=617.5 K T@outlet-T@inlet=317.5 K Max T=713.7 ℃ Pressure drop=0.04 Mpa Pressure drop=0.48 Mpa T@outlet=450.4 K T@outlet-T@inlet=150.5 K Max T=493.1 ℃ Pressure drop=0.83 Mpa
14
Page 散裂中子源进展汇报 August 11, 2015
T@outlet=519.3 K T@outlet-T@inlet=219.3 K Max T=603 ℃
3.10 Comparison of veolicity: case 1, Helium, 3Mpa
Pressure drop=0.54Mpa Velocity=50 m/s Velocity=75 m/s Velocity=100 m/s T@outlet=479.2 K T@outlet-T@inlet=179.3 K Max T=483 ℃ Pressure drop=1 Mpa Pressure Drop=1.5 Mpa T@outlet=428.4 K T@outlet-T@inlet=128.4 K Max T= 418 ℃
15
Page 散裂中子源进展汇报 August 11, 2015
3.11 Comparion of Case 1 & Case 2:Water, 5 m/s
Case 1 Case 2
- For the high heat conductivity of water,
the maximum temperature values of shielding and water in Case 1 and Case 2 are nearly same, but the temperature distribution is slightly different.
- The first wall thickness (position of
No.1 channel ) determines the maximum temperature, in this study, we use 1 cm.
A A A A A A Fluid-solid Couping Surface Fluid-solid Couping Surface
Page 散裂中子源进展汇报 August 11, 2015
3.12 Comparion of Case 1 & Case 2:Helium, 100 m/s, 3 Mpa
Case 2 Case 1
Mass flow rate= 0.29879 [kg s^-1] Total flow rate @Shielding=17.92 kg/s The maximum temperature of shielding in Case 2 is higher than Case 1 at current
- conditions. The cooling channel
distribution effect can not be ignored due to cold helium.
Page 散裂中子源进展汇报 August 11, 2015 18
Conclusion
From the Fluka calculation, the total heat load of shielding is about 10 MW and the maximum volumetric heat is above 100 W/cc , which is a challenge work for cooling design . Multiple Rows of Mini-Channel(MRMC), the shape of which is like a fold line to remove the highest volumetric heat, with reasonable channel size(1 cmX1 cm) and first wall thickness(1 cm), and the cooling direction of channel from front to rear, are premiliary ideals in the cooling structure design, and can minimize irradiation demage to magnets. For the corrosion in high temperature, tungsten should be cladded with tantalum, and the coolant water should be kept in single phase, the velocity should be very high. With MRMC and low first wall thickness, helium is a good coolant choice with high pressure and high velocity. Different channel distributions with constant first wall thickness has a different effects on the maximum temperature of shielding based due to the coolent thermal properities. It is possible to remove the high heat load and high volumetic heat on shielding at MOMENT using water or high pressure helium with MRMC.
Page 散裂中子源进展汇报 August 11, 2015