conway and iteration semirings
play

Conway and Iteration Semirings Stephen L. Bloom Stevens Institute - PDF document

Conway and Iteration Semirings Stephen L. Bloom Stevens Institute of Technology Hoboken, NJ International Category Theory Conference 2008 Joint work with Zoltan Esik Outline Some categories with fixed points Conway and iteration


  1. Conway and Iteration Semirings Stephen L. Bloom Stevens Institute of Technology Hoboken, NJ International Category Theory Conference 2008

  2. Joint work with Zoltan ´ Esik

  3. Outline • Some categories with fixed points • Conway and iteration theories • Matrix theories and star semirings • A Kleene type theorem • Some characterizations of N rat � � A ∗ � � and � A ∗ � N ∞ rat � � • Open problems

  4. Some categories with fixed point operators

  5. Suppose C is a category with coproducts. A parameterized fixed point operation is a func- tion † � C ( X, Y ) C ( X, X + Y ) such that � f † , 1 Y � f f † � X + Y � Y. = X † � C ( Y, X ) such In product form: C ( X × Y, X ) that � f † , 1 Y � f f † � X × Y � X = Y

  6. Pfn ( A ) • A is a collection of sets closed under finite coproducts + • Pfn ( A ) is category with objects X ∈ A � Y is partial function • an arrow f : X � X + Y , f † : X � Y is “do • if f : X f while value is in X ”. � f † , 1 Y � f f † = X � X + Y � Y.

  7. F ω ( A ) • A is a collection of ω -complete posets closed under finite products × • F ω ( A ) is category with objects X ∈ A � Y is continuous func- • an arrow f : X tion � X , f † : Y � X is least • if f : X × Y x such that f ( x, y ) = x . � f † , 1 Y � f f † � X × Y � X = Y f † ( y ) f ( f † ( y ) , y ) . =

  8. � � Fn ( A ) • A a collection of ω -complete categories closed under finite products • objects in Fn ( A ) are categories in A • an arrow in Fn ( A ) is ω -continuous functor � B f : A � A , for each b ∈ B , • if f : A × B f b : A A is = f ( − , b ) f b • f † : B � A on b is initial f b -algebra f b ( f † ( b )) f † ( b ) .

  9. Trees Σ ⊥ TR • Σ a ranked set ; ⊥ ∈ Σ 0 . � p is node labeled Σ- • a morphism 1 tree with internal nodes with n -successors labeled by letter in Σ n ; leaves labeled either by letter in Σ 0 or “variable” x 1 , . . . , x p � p is n -tuple of trees 1 • a morphism n � p . • composition: tree substition � 1 + p , f † : 1 � p is unique • if f : 1 tree such that � f † , 1 p � f f † = 1 � 1 + p � p.

  10. Matrices The subsets of words on an alphabet X form a semiring 2 X ∗ where A + B = A ∪ B and A · B = { uv : u ∈ A, v ∈ B } . Matrices over this semiring form a category Mat (2 X ∗ ): � p is n × p matrix • an arrow f : n • f · g matrix product � n + p , f † = [ a ∗ b ], where • if f = [ a b ] : n = 1 n + a + a 2 + . . . . a ∗

  11. Theories with fixed points Each of the above examples are categories T with • finite coproducts or products • a parameterized fixed point operation • In Pfn, Mat, F ω , f † is a least fixed point • In Σ ⊥ TR , f † is a unique fixed point • In Fn , f † is an initial fixed point

  12. Main Results • (Bloom, ´ Esik) A large number of the com- putationally interesting structures have one of two equational theories IT, IT 0 . • IT := Id ( F ω ( A )) = Id ( Fn ( A )) = Id (Σ ⊥ TR ) IT is the iteration theory identities. • IT 0 = IT + { x = y : x, y : 1 → 0 } = Id ( Pfn ( A )) = Id ( Mat (2 X ∗ )), • (Simpson, Plotkin) Every consistent itera- tion theory is either IT or IT 0 .

  13. Axiomatization Axioms for iteration theory identities fall into two groups. • The “Conway axioms”: fixed point, pa- rameter, simple composition and double- dagger • The group axioms.

  14. Representing f † X X Y X = f f Y

  15. Parameter identity f = f g g f † · g ( f · ( 1 X ⊕ g )) † = � X + Y , g : Y � Z . f : X

  16. � � � Another formulation of the parameter identity † � C ( X, Y ) C ( X, X + Y ) C ( X, X + Y ) C ( X, Y ) C ( 1 X , 1 X ⊕ g ) C ( 1 X ,g ) C ( X, X + Z ) C ( X, X + Z ) C ( X, Z ) C ( X, Z ) † � Z . commutes, for any g : Y

  17. Simple Composition identity f g = f g f ( f · g ) † f · ( g · f ) † = � Y , g : Y � X . f : X

  18. Double dagger Identity f f = f:X −> X+X+Y f †† ( f · ( � 1 X , 1 X � ⊕ 1 Y )) † =

  19. Traced monoidal categories Conway theories are essentially the same as traced monoidal categories of Joyal, Street and Verity. (Feedback replaces dagger.)

  20. Iteration Theories An iteration theory is a Conway theory satisfying all group identities. For the two element group G 2 : f = f f 1 2 · � f · ρ 1 , f · ρ 2 � † f †† . = The G 2 -identity

  21. Star semirings A semiring, or rig, S consists of • a commutative monoid ( S, + , 0), and • a monoid ( S, · , 1), such that • multiplication distributes over addition x ( y + z ) = xy + xz ( y + z ) x = yx + zx 0 · x = x · 0 = 0 . • A star semiring is semiring with ∗ : S → S .

  22. Conway and iteration matrix theories Mat ( S ), the theory of matrices over a semiring S , is a Conway theory iff S is a star semiring satisfying • the sum star identity : ( x + y ) ∗ ( x ∗ y ) ∗ x ∗ , = • the product star identity : ( xy ) ∗ 1 + x ( yx ) ∗ y. = Special cases: zero and fixed point identity : 0 ∗ = 1 1 + xx ∗ = 1 + x ∗ x. x ∗ =

  23. Definition. A Conway semiring is star semiring satisfying the sum and product star identities. Examples • Language semirings: (2 X ∗ , + , · , 0 , 1 , ∗ ), where X is an alphabet, and for A, B ⊆ X ∗ , A + B = A ∪ B ; 0 = ∅ ; 1 = { ǫ } A · B = { uv : u ∈ A, v ∈ B } ∞ A ∗ A k . � = k =0

  24. More Examples • N ∞ = { 0 , 1 , . . . , } ∪ {∞} , with 0 ∗ = 1 , x ∗ = ∞ , otherwise. • The boolean semiring B = { 0 , 1 } , with x ∗ = 1 = 1 + x .

  25. Which Rings are reducts of Conway semirings? • The star fixed point identity: x ∗ 1 + x · x ∗ = implies x ∗ · (1 − x ) = 1 . • Letting x = 1: 0 = 1 .

  26. Inductive definition of M ∗ If M is n × n , n > 1, write � � a b = M c d with a, d square. The Conway identities imply that M ∗ is ( a + bd ∗ c ) ∗ ( a + bd ∗ c ) ∗ bd ∗ � � M ∗ = ( d + ca ∗ b ) ∗ ca ∗ ( d + ca ∗ b ) ∗

  27. Group identities for matrix theories Suppose G is a group with underlying set { 1 , 2 , . . . , n } . The G identity is ( x 1 + . . . + x n ) ∗ e 1 M ∗ = G u n M G is n × n matrix with entries in { x 1 , . . . , x n } M G [ i, j ] = x i − 1 · j i − 1 · j is computed in G . = [1 0 . . . 0] . e 1 u n is n × 1 matrix of 1’s.

  28. Example When G = G 2 is the 2-element group, � � x 1 x 2 = M G x 2 x 1 The G 2 -identity is ( x 1 + x 2 ) ∗ ( x 1 + x 2 x ∗ 1 x 2 ) ∗ (1 + x ∗ = 1 x 2 ) . Special case: x 1 = 0 and x 2 = 1, 1 ∗ (1 + 1) = 1 ∗ + 1 ∗ . 1 ∗ =

  29. Iteration semirings • Suppose S is a Conway semiring. Mat ( S ) is an iteration theory iff S satisfies all group identities. • Definition. An iteration semiring is a Con- way semiring satisfying all group identities.

  30. Closure Properties If S is Conway or iteration semiring, so is S n × n for n ≥ 0, the semiring of n × n matrices over S , with matrix product as product, pointwise sum, and star computed using the inductive formula.

  31. Power series semirings If S is Conway or iteration semiring, so is � A ∗ � S � � the semiring of formal power series. Elements are functions A ∗ � S . • Notational convention: � = ( f, u ) u, f u ∈ A ∗ where ( f, u ), the coefficient of u , is f ( u ). • Examples. For a ∈ A, s ∈ S : τ a ( u ) = 1 if u = a, 0 otherwise. σ s ( u ) = s if u = ǫ, 0 otherwise. • The notational convention implies = a τ a = s σ s .

  32. � A ∗ � Semiring operations in S � � • If � = ( f, u ) u f u ∈ A ∗ � = ( g, u ) u g u ∈ A ∗ then � f + g := (( f, u ) + ( g, u )) u u ∈ A ∗ � � f · g := ( ( f, x ) · ( g, y )) u. xy = u u ∈ A ∗ • Example If f = 2 + 3 a, g = 2 b + ab , 4 b + 8 ab + 3 a 2 b. = fg ab = ǫ · ( ab ) or a · b .

  33. f ∗ in S � � A ∗ � � ? • If f ( ǫ ) = 0, there is unique f ∗ satisfying f ∗ 1 + f · f ∗ = f ∗ ( f, x )( f ∗ , y )) u. � � = 1 + ( xy = u u • If f = s + g , g ( ǫ ) = 0, the sum star identity implies ( s + g ) ∗ = ( s ∗ g ) ∗ s ∗ . f ∗ =

  34. Some iteration and Conway semirings • Each of B = { 0 , 1 } , N ∞ , 2 X ∗ is an iteration semiring. • The initial Conway semiring S 0 has ele- ments 0 , 1 , 2 , . . . , k (1 ∗ ) p , and 1 ∗∗ . • In any iteration semiring 1 ∗ + 1 ∗ 1 ∗ . = • The initial iteration semiring S 1 has ele- ments 0 , 1 , 2 , . . . , (1 ∗ ) p , 1 ∗∗ .

  35. (Countably) complete semirings S is (countably) complete if for any (count- able) set I , � i ∈ I s i exists, and has the usual properties. We may define 1 + s + s 2 + . . . s ∗ := and the resulting star semiring is an iteration semiring. Example: N ∞ is countably complete. In N ∞ ,  1 x = 0 x ∗  = ∞ otherwise. 

  36. For each n ≥ 1, • S n × n is a Conway, but not an iteration 0 semiring, and � A ∗ � • For each alphabet A , S 0 � � is a Conway, but not an iteration semiring.

  37. Rational power series For a Conway semiring S and alphabet A , � A ∗ � • S rat � � , the rational series, is the least � A ∗ � sub star semiring of S � � containing each series σ s , and τ a , for s ∈ S, a ∈ A .

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend