Convergence in the ERC program with Illustrations for Nanotechnology - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

convergence in the erc program
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Convergence in the ERC program with Illustrations for Nanotechnology - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Convergence in the ERC program with Illustrations for Nanotechnology Farhang Shadman, Ph.D. Regents Professor of Chemical and Environmental Engineering Regents Professor of Optical Sciences Director, NSF Semiconductor Research Corporation


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Convergence in the ERC program with Illustrations for Nanotechnology

1

Panel 3, NSF NSE Grantees Conference, Westin Alexandria, VA December 9th, 2019

Farhang Shadman, Ph.D.

Regents Professor of Chemical and Environmental Engineering Regents Professor of Optical Sciences Director, NSF Semiconductor Research Corporation Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

Daniel J.C. Herr, Ph.D.

Professor of Nanoscience University of North Carolina Greensboro 336-285-2862; djherr@uncg.edu

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Opening Thought Some Stories Appendix Additional Results and Back-up Information

Overview

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Let not what you do define what you are. Rather, let what you want to become define what you do.

  • John Hurt [NSF, 1997 CEBSM Review]

Opening Thought

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Early Perceptions

  • f ESH Technology
  • ~1995
slide-5
SLIDE 5

A Crisis and a Challenge Water May 16, 1994

slide-6
SLIDE 6

An Epiphany Win-Win Resource Management Spring 1995

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Convergence #1 NSF-SRC Partnership December 1, 1995

SRC NSF MOU

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Convergence #2 Launched a Joint ERC on Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing [CEBSM]

High Performance and Sustainable Materials and Processes

1996

Semiconductor Technology Environment, Safety and Health High Performance & Sustainable

slide-9
SLIDE 9

NSF Semiconductor Research Corporation Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing Founding Leadership Team

  • Prof. Farhang

Shadman, UAz Tucson

  • Prof. Robert Helms,

Stanford University

  • Prof. Rafael Reif,

MIT

slide-10
SLIDE 10

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

University-Industry Collaborative Research

  • n the ESH Aspects of SC Manufacturing

Other University members

  • Arizona State U
  • UCLA
  • U Colorado
  • Columbia
  • Cornell
  • Georgia Inst. of Tech.
  • Johns Hopkins
  • U Maryland
  • U Massachusetts
  • U North Carolina
  • North Carolina A&T
  • Purdue
  • U Texas - Dallas
  • Tufts
  • U Utah
  • U Washington
  • U Wisconsin

22 years rs of

Expe perie rienc nce

Founding Universities (1996)

➢ U Arizona ➢ U California – Berkeley ➢ MIT ➢ Stanford

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

ERC Mission and Vision for ESH

ESH Impact Performance Obstacles

Upper Level Constraint Upper Level Constraint

Sustainability Triangle

Cost

  • 1. Research to develop science and

technology leading to simultaneous performance improvement, cost reduction, and ESH gain 2. Incorporating ESH principles in engineering and science education 3. Promoting Design for Environment and Sustainability as a Technology Driver and not a burden

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Convergence #3 A New Culture of Stewardship 1997

Business School CEBSM Performance, Sustainability & Cost

slide-13
SLIDE 13

* ITRS ≡ International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors

ITRS* Crises New Semiconductor Nanomaterials

Potential Toxicity and Hazards Competitive Barriers

e.g., PFOS in Photoresists

2001

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Convergence #4 Semiconductor, ESH, Business And Risk Assessment Communities, e.g., Carbon Nanotubes 2006

Biologists and Toxicologists CEBSM Performance, Sustainability, Risk Assessment & Cost

slide-15
SLIDE 15

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

New ERC Thrust and Projects on Assessment of Toxicity of New Materials

➢ A major shift in the focus of the new ERC projects (2nd decade of the program, after the end of NSF funding). ➢ Emphasis on: a) new metrology methods, and b) data analysis and

  • verall ESH assessment.

➢ New PIs with new expertise, including Toxicology, Environmental Science, and theoretical anf predictive methods for modeling and analysis of large /complex data sets. ➢ The early PIs in this collaborative effort included: Alex Tropsha, Rocky Draper, Paul Westerhoff, Reyes Sierra, Jim Field, Scott Boitano. ➢ Currently the major focus area of the program (fully funded by industry)

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Convergent Applications to Benefit Society More-than-Moore, e.g., Cell-based Toxicity Assays 2011

More-than- Moore CEBSM Expanded Scope

slide-17
SLIDE 17

The CEBSM Legacy Continues 1996 -

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

What if? herr@src.org

Thank You

… the smallest sustainable SemiSynBio factory?

Ultra-micro-bacteria (~200 nm)

Extracted from a glacial ice core sample, 120,000 years old Miteva (2005)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

SRC/NSF Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

Multidisciplinary Research

  • n

Environmental Aspects

  • f

Semiconductor Manufacturing

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

University-Industry Collaborative Research

  • n the ESH Aspects of SC Manufacturing

Other University members

  • Arizona State U
  • UCLA
  • U Colorado
  • Columbia
  • Cornell
  • Georgia Inst. of Tech.
  • Johns Hopkins
  • U Maryland
  • U Massachusetts
  • U North Carolina
  • North Carolina A&T
  • Purdue
  • U Texas - Dallas
  • Tufts
  • U Utah
  • U Washington
  • U Wisconsin

22 years rs of

Expe perie rienc nce

Founding Universities (1996)

➢ U Arizona ➢ U California – Berkeley ➢ MIT ➢ Stanford

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

ERC Mission and Vision for ESH

ESH Impact Performance Obstacles

Upper Level Constraint Upper Level Constraint

Sustainability Triangle

Cost

  • 1. Research to develop science and

technology leading to simultaneous performance improvement, cost reduction, and ESH gain 2. Incorporating ESH principles in engineering and science education 3. Promoting Design for Environment and Sustainability as a Technology Driver and not a burden

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

Examples of Research Results

Greener Chemistries for Patterning: Deposition, Lithography, Etching, and Chamber Cleaning

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Focus on identifying potential alternative chemistries (1996) PECVD chamber clean experiments (NF3 and C4F8O) (1996 – 1998) Drop-in dielectric etch replacements (hydrofluorocarbons) (1996 – 1998) More exotic dielectric etch replacements (iodofluorocarbons) (1997 – 1999) Decouple C and F (NF3/hydrocarbon) (1999 – 2001) Unsaturated molecules for dielectric etch (UFC) (1999 – 2002) Future generation processes (Deep-submicron low-k & ultra low-k) (2001 – 2003)

Silicon Oxide Etch

Low-k Etch

Post-CVD Chamber Clean Several novel chemistries, developed by ERC were adopted and used by industry

Early ERC Projects on PFC Alternatives

23

MIT-Stanford- UC Berkeley teams

slide-24
SLIDE 24

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing Sugar based “Sweet” PAG Natural molecules based Biocompatible/ Biodegradable PAG

Hydrophilic Hydrophobic Aromatic Aliphatic Polar Nonpolar Linear branch ring

1st & 2nd Generation 3rd Generation

Environmentally Friendly PAGs

PFOS-Free alternatives

24

By Ober

slide-25
SLIDE 25

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

Computer-Aided Process Simulation Examples of Development and Application

25

Water and Energy Use Reduction

slide-26
SLIDE 26

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

Lowering Water Usage

➢ Surface preparation is the largest user of UPW ➢ Conventional processes are typically based on recipes that use large excess cleaning, with no on- line monitoring ➢ Critical need: Real-time and on-line monitoring for detection of cleaning end-point

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

Mechanism Time Scale Flow Effect Boundary Diffusion d2/D ~ 10 s Indirect, mild Convection d/u ~ 1-3 s Direct, strong Desorption 1/kd ~ 0 - 105 s No effect

Desorption Convection/ Diffusion Convection Desorption Convection

Cleaning of Nano-Structures

Lowering water and energy usage Better metrology and process control Needs:

27

By Helms- Shadman

slide-28
SLIDE 28

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

Novel Electro-Chemical Residue Sensor (ECRS)

Solution (pH) (ppt) UPW (pH=7) HCl(pH=6) HCl (pH=5) 18 5 2.3 30 0.23 400 Resolution Resistivity (MΩ)

KEY FEATURES:

  • Real Time
  • In-situ
  • Online
  • High Sensitivity
  • Non-destructive
  • Quick Response

28

By Shadman

slide-29
SLIDE 29

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

Convection Diffusion

wafer water

Extent of Cleaning Time

Diffusion

wafer water

Desorption

Dominant Operation Parameters:

  • Temperature
  • Time
  • Water Purity
  • Additives

Dominant Operation Parameters:

  • Flow
  • Mixing

Purge Transition Final Surface Cleaning

Dynamics of Cleaning and Rinsing Processes

29

By Helms- Shadman

slide-30
SLIDE 30

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

Novel Staged Rinsing Methods

Post SC-1 Rinsing

  • Savings:
  • ~ 25% cold water
  • ~ 80% hot water

30

By Zhao

slide-31
SLIDE 31

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

➢ Conventional purge or vacuum:

  • Extra equipment and pipelines

(costly)

  • Back streaming into the supply line

during evacuation ➢ Proposed PCP

  • No evacuation
  • Pressure-induced flow to assist purge
  • Purge enhancement by the fluid

mechanic resonance of the system

31

Reducing UHP Gas Usage

Pressure-Cyclic Purge (PCP)

Evacuation Back Streaming Induced Pressure Cycle

Customized project by Intel

By Shadman

slide-32
SLIDE 32

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

Purging of Complex Distribution Systems

By Shadman

slide-33
SLIDE 33

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

PCP Results and Model Verification

Purge time (min) Purge gas usage (sl) SSP w/o lateral 425 850 SSP w/ lateral 1760 3520 SSP-PCP-SSP w/ lateral 1065 2070

By Shadman

slide-34
SLIDE 34

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

EP SS pipe with 1.5 inch OD and 76 inch length. Initial conc. 90 ppb

PCP for Reducing the UHP Gas Usage

Moisture Conc. at Pipe Outlet, Cg ((ppb) Purge Time, t (min)

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140

1

1: Conventional purge 2: Cyclic purge

To reach 1 ppb baseline: conventional purge takes 80 minutes; cyclic purge takes 45 minutes (40% less purge gas)

2 34

By Shadman

slide-35
SLIDE 35

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

Examples of Research Results

Alternate Low-Energy Deposition

35

slide-36
SLIDE 36

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

Pyrolytic CVD

Solventless Low-Energy Deposition

36

By Gleason

slide-37
SLIDE 37

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

Examples of Research Results

ESH and Process Gains in Chemical Mechanical Planarization (CMP)

37

slide-38
SLIDE 38

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

Layered Structures of Advanced Devices

source Spacer Gate oxide Poly-silicon gate Isolation Drain Silicon Tungsten plug Copper lines Copper plug Inter-layer dielectric 130 nm Six Cu layer 180 nm Six Al layers 250 nm Five Al layers 90 nm Seven Cu layers 65 nm Eight Cu layers

By Philipossian- Boning

slide-39
SLIDE 39

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

Chemical Mechanical Planarization (CMP)

Slurry 45% Equipment 22% Labor 8% Other 9% Pad 16% Slurry 45% Equipment 22% Labor 8% Other 9% Pad 16%

Total slurry input Amount of slurry that never reaches the wafer Amount of slurry that reaches the wafer but does not get underneath

Amount of slurry that does the actual polishing is often less than 10%

  • Fastest growing process segment
  • Major source of nano particle emission in S/C

fabs.

  • Costly and wasteful operation: For a typical

200-mm factory: – 6,000,000 liters of slurry ($20M) per year – 300 metric tons of solid waste per year CMP Cost

By Philipossian- Boning

slide-40
SLIDE 40

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

CMP Waste Reduction

Novel Pad Design and Rheology Optimization

Joint projects with Sematech, Intel, IBM, Fujimi, Hitachi Chemicals, Arkema, and Cabot.

By Philipossian

slide-41
SLIDE 41

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

Examples of Research Results

ESH Challenges of Nano-Particles Used in Semiconductor Manufacturing

41

slide-42
SLIDE 42

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

ESH Impact and Risk

Introduction of New Materials

Time Number

42

slide-43
SLIDE 43

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

Introduction of New Materials

Time Complexity

Si, SiO2 Al, SC1 SC2 Compound S/C Complex dielectrics Bio-nano electronics New waste issues Organo-metallic precursors

ESH Impact and Risk

Complex PRs and PFOS replacement

43

slide-44
SLIDE 44

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

Introduction of New Materials

Time Number Complexity

Si SiO2 Al SC1 SC2 Compound S/C Bio-nano electronics Complex dielectrics New waste issues Organo-metallic precursors

Potential ESH Impact

Complex PRs and PFOS replacement

44

slide-45
SLIDE 45

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

Challenges of New Materials Impact Assessment and Mitigation

➢ Large number of new chemicals enter the manufacturing

  • f semiconductor and other high-tech devices.

➢ ESH study of one material costs over $5M and takes at least 6 years. ➢ The time scale of IC technology node is about 3-5 years. ➢ Solution: Critical need for powerful rapid ESH assessment techniques; some experimental but many based on molecular modeling to predict ESH effects and to design green alternatives.

45

slide-46
SLIDE 46

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

Examples of New Materials with ESH Issues

Strontium bismuth tantalate (SrBi2Ta2O9) high thermal budget Lead zirconium titanate (PbZrTiO3) low thermal budget Material Stable with Si k Value Tantalum pentoxide (Ta2O5) no (forms SiO2) k ~ 25 Strontium titanate (SrTiO3) no (e.g. Pt electrodes) k ~ 150 Barium strontium titanate (BaSrTiO3) no (e.g. Pt electrodes) k ~ 300

High-k Dielectrics for DRAM Ferroelectric Dielectrics for Nonvolatile Memory (FeRAM)

slide-47
SLIDE 47

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

What is Unique About Nano-Particles?

  • Nano-particles cannot be effectively removed

by agglomeration, settling, and filtration; they also clog membranes.

  • Active surface
  • Selective adsorption
  • Pore trapping (Kelvin Effect)

Treatment problem:

Shell Adsorbed contaminants

Core

  • Concentration
  • Facilitated transport
  • Enhanced life-time

Consequence Synergistic ESH impact of nano-particles:

Surface Active Sites

47

slide-48
SLIDE 48

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

  • Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 1339.
  • Environ. Health Perspect. 2005, 113, 539.

Global Distribution of PFOS in Wildlife

  • PFOS banned for most application is the US and EU.
  • PFOS listed as chemical for regulation within the Stockholm

Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs)

  • EPA Provisional Health Advisory Levels for PFOS 200 ng L-1

Example: Challenge of Replacing PFOS

PFOS in human blood PFOS in drinking water

PFOS and other PFCs detected in drinking water resources worldwide By Ober-Sierra

slide-49
SLIDE 49

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

New ERC Thrust and Projects on Assessment of Toxicity of New Materials

➢ A major shift in the focus of the new ERC projects (2nd decade of the program, after the end of NSF funding). ➢ Emphasis on: a) new metrology methods, and b) data analysis and

  • verall ESH assessment.

➢ New PIs with new expertise, including Toxicology, Environmental Science, and theoretical anf predictive methods for modeling and analysis of large /complex data sets. ➢ The early PIs in this collaborative effort included: Alex Tropsha, Rocky Draper, Paul Westerhoff, Reyes Sierra, Jim Field, Scott Boitano. ➢ Currently the major focus area of the program (fully funded by industry)

49

slide-50
SLIDE 50

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

Toxicity Mechanisms

Attach achment nt

50

By Field, Sierra, Boitano

slide-51
SLIDE 51

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing aliphatic or aryl unit perfluorinated unit acid size, miscibility, thermal stability, absorption, outgassing. acid strength, absorption photosensitivity, absorption, thermal stability. acid head chromophore

Sugar based “Sweet” PAG Natural molecules Biocompatible/ Biodegradable PAG Hydrophilic Hydrophobic Aromatic Aliphatic Polar Nonpolar Linear branch ring

Molecular Design of PFOS-Free PAGS

51

By Ober

slide-52
SLIDE 52

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

Mining Oil & Gas Chem/Petrochem Pharmaceutical Electronics Semiconductor Petroleum Refining

0% 100%

Product Feed Material

Nano-Technology

?

Material Usage Index in Various Industries

52

slide-53
SLIDE 53

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

ESH Issues Precursors, HAPs, wastes VOCs, radiation VOCs, waste VOCs, HAPs HAPs, PFCs A/B chemicals, solvents A/B chemicals, UPW

Conventional Lithography

development spin-on imaging layer Dielectric deposition Selective irradiation Dielectric patterning Imaging layer strip Resist strip

A Paradigm Change in Manufacturing:

Deposition and Patterning of Dielectrics

53

By Gleason

slide-54
SLIDE 54

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

Conventional Lithography

development in aqueous base spin-on imaging layer dielectric deposition selective irradiation dielectric patterning imaging layer strip resist strip

All-Dry, Resistless Lithography VS. CVD of patternable dielectric layer selective irradiation development in supercritical CO2 wet chemistry eliminated wet chemistry eliminated step eliminated step eliminated

Deposition and Patterning of Dielectrics

Karen Gleason (MIT), Chris Ober (Cornell)

By Gleason

slide-55
SLIDE 55

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

All-Dry, Resistless Lithography

development in aqueous base spin-on imaging layer dielectric deposition selective irradiation dielectric patterning imaging layer strip

Conventional Lithography wet chemistry eliminated (CVD) wet chemistry eliminated (supercritical CO2)

Photo initiated CVD

Selective Dielectric Deposition

ESH Gain

Process Gain

win/win

Cost Reduction

Deposition and Patterning of Dielectrics

Karen Gleason (MIT), Chris Ober (Cornell)

By Gleason

slide-56
SLIDE 56

SRC Engineering Research Center for Environmentally Benign Semiconductor Manufacturing

a) Clean and Pattern Si b) Protect SiO2 c) Activate Si d, e) Maskless selective ALD of high-k dielectric

H H OH OH OH OH SiO

2

SiO

2

Si H H O O Si R Si R O O Si R Si R

RSiCl

3

SiO

2

SiO

2

Si O O Si R Si R O O Si R Si R

Cl

2

(a) (b) (c)

SiO

2

SiO

2

Si SiO

2

SiO

2

Si

HF followed by H2O

H H OH OH OH OH SiO

2

SiO

2

Si SiO

2

SiO

2

Si H H O O Si R Si R Si R Si R O O Si R Si R O O Si R O O Si R Si R

RSiCl

3

O O Si R Si R O O Si R Si R SiO

2

SiO

2

Si SiO

2

SiO

2

Si Cl Cl O O Si R Si R Si R Si R O O Si R Si R O O Si R O O Si R Si R

Cl

2

(a) (b) (c) SiO

2

SiO

2

Si OH OH O O Si R Si R O O Si R Si R

H

2O

HfCl

4

Si R Si R SiO

2

SiO

2

Si O O O O O O Si R Si R Hf Hf Cl3 Cl3

(d) (e)

SiO

2

SiO

2

Si SiO

2

SiO

2

Si O O Si R Si R Si R Si R O O Si R Si R O O Si R O O Si R Si R

H

2O

HfCl

4

Si R Si R O O O O O O Si R Si R Hf Hf Cl3 Cl3 Si R Si R Si R Si R SiO

2

SiO

2

Si O O O O O O Si R Si R Hf Hf Cl3 Cl3 SiO

2

SiO

2

Si SiO

2

SiO

2

Si O O O O O O Si R Si R O O Si R O O Si R Si R Hf Hf Cl3 Cl3

(d) (e)

Example: Additive Deposition of HfO2

56

By Muscat