control and stabilization of the bloch equation
play

Control and stabilization of the Bloch equation Karine Beauchard - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Bloch equation Linearized system Non exact controllability with bounded controls Approximate controllability with unbounded controls Explicit controls for the asymptotic exact controllability Feedback stabilization Control and


  1. The Bloch equation Linearized system Non exact controllability with bounded controls Approximate controllability with unbounded controls Explicit controls for the asymptotic exact controllability Feedback stabilization Control and stabilization of the Bloch equation Karine Beauchard (CNRS, CMLA, ENS Cachan) joint works with Jean-Michel Coron (LJLL, Paris 6) Pierre Rouchon (CAS, Mines de Paris) Paulo Sergio Pereira da Silva (Sao Polo) IHP , December, 8, 2010 K. Beauchard

  2. The Bloch equation Linearized system Non exact controllability with bounded controls Approximate controllability with unbounded controls Explicit controls for the asymptotic exact controllability Feedback stabilization Plan The Bloch equation 1 Linearized system 2 Non exact controllability with bounded controls 3 Approximate controllability with unbounded controls 4 Explicit controls for the asymptotic exact controllability 5 Feedback stabilization 6 K. Beauchard

  3. The Bloch equation Linearized system Non exact controllability with bounded controls Approximate controllability with unbounded controls Explicit controls for the asymptotic exact controllability Feedback stabilization The Bloch equation An ensemble of non interacting spins, in a magnetic field B ( t ) := ( u ( t ) , v ( t ) , B 0 ) , with dispersion in the Larmor frequency ω = γ B 0 ∈ ( ω ∗ , ω ∗ ) (=rotation speed around z ). M ( t , ω ) ∈ S 2 one spin : � � ∂ M ∧ M ( t , ω ) , ω ∈ ( ω ∗ , ω ∗ ) ∂ t ( t , ω ) = u ( t ) e 1 + v ( t ) e 2 + ω e 3 State : M Controls : u , v controllability of an ODE, simultaneously w.r.t. ω ∈ ( ω ∗ , ω ∗ ) Li-Khaneja(06) Application : Nuclear Magnetic Resonance K. Beauchard

  4. The Bloch equation Linearized system Non exact controllability with bounded controls Approximate controllability with unbounded controls Explicit controls for the asymptotic exact controllability Feedback stabilization Controllability question for the Bloch equation � � ∂ M ∧ M ( t , ω ) , ( t , ω ) ∈ [ 0 , + ∞ ) × ( ω ∗ , ω ∗ ) ∂ t ( t , ω ) = u ( t ) e 1 + v ( t ) e 2 + ω e 3 Ex : M 0 ( ω ) ≡ − e 3 , M f ( ω ) ≡ + e 3 , But spins with different ω have different dynamics ! Goal : Use the control to compensate for the dispersion in ω . Rk : If ω is fixed, the controllability of one ODE on S 2 is trivial. K. Beauchard

  5. The Bloch equation Linearized system Non exact controllability with bounded controls Approximate controllability with unbounded controls Explicit controls for the asymptotic exact controllability Feedback stabilization A prototype for infinite dimensional bilinear systems with continuous spectrum � � ∂ M ∧ M ( t , ω ) , ω ∈ ( ω ∗ , ω ∗ ) ∂ t ( t , ω ) = u ( t ) e 1 + v ( t ) e 2 + ω e 3 � Sp ( A ) = − i ( ω ∗ , ω ∗ ) i ( ω ∗ , ω ∗ ) A M := ω e 3 ∧ M ( ω ) →   1   δ � λ = ± i � ω → M λ ( ω ) = ∓ i ω ( ω ) 0 ⇒ Toy model i ∂ t ψ = ( − ∆ + V ) ψ − u ( t ) µ ( x ) ψ K. Beauchard

  6. The Bloch equation Linearized system Non exact controllability with bounded controls Approximate controllability with unbounded controls Explicit controls for the asymptotic exact controllability Feedback stabilization State of the art : bilinear control for Schrödinger PDEs Quite well understood : exact controllability 1D negative results : Ball-Marsden-Slemrod(82), Turinici(00), Ilner-Lange-Teismann(06), Mirrahimi-Rouchon(04) Nersesyan(10). positive local results with discrete spectrum + gap (1D) : KB(05), KB-Laurent(09). positive global results : KB-Coron(06), Nersesyan(09). approximate controllability with discrete spectrum Chambrion-Mason-Sigalotti-Boscain(09), Nersesyan(09), Ervedoza-Puel(09). Not well understood : with continuous spectrum : Mirrahimi(09) K. Beauchard

  7. The Bloch equation Linearized system Non exact controllability with bounded controls Approximate controllability with unbounded controls Explicit controls for the asymptotic exact controllability Feedback stabilization Linearized system around ( M ≡ e 3 , u ≡ v ≡ 0 ) : non exact controllability, approximate controllability M = ( x , y , z ) , Z ( t , ω ) := ( x + iy )( t , ω ) , w ( t ) := ( v − iu )( t ) � T � � w ( t ) e − i ω t dt e i ω T Z ( T , ω ) = Z 0 ( ω ) + 0 T > 0, the reachable set from Z 0 = 0 is F [ L 1 ( − T , 0 )] the Z 0 asymptotically zero controllable are F [ L 1 ( 0 , + ∞ )] ∀Z 0 in that space, the control is unique ∀ T > 0, approximate controllability in C 0 [ ω ∗ , ω ∗ ] with C ∞ c ( 0 , T ) -controls. We will see that the NL syst has better controllability properties. K. Beauchard

  8. The Bloch equation Linearized system Non exact controllability with bounded controls Approximate controllability with unbounded controls Explicit controls for the asymptotic exact controllability Feedback stabilization Whole space : structure of the reachable set � � ∂ M ∂ t ( t , ω ) = u ( t ) e 1 + v ( t ) e 2 + ω e 3 ∧ M ( t , ω ) , ( t , ω ) ∈ ( 0 , T ) × R √ Theorem : Let T > 0 and R := 1 / ( 8 3 T ) . ∀ u , v ∈ B R [ L 2 ( 0 , T )] , ∃ ! M = ( x , y , z ) solution with Z := x + iy ∈ C 0 ([ 0 , T ] , L 2 ( R )) ∩ C 0 b ([ 0 , T ] × R ) , the image of L 2 ∩ C 0 B R [ L 2 ( 0 , T )] 2 F T : → b ( R ) ( u , v ) �→ Z ( T , . ) is a non flat submanifold of L 2 ∩ C 0 b ( R ) , with ∞ codim. 2 nd order Proof : Inverse mapping dF T ( 0 , 0 ) . ( U , V ) ∼ F ( U + iV ) + K. Beauchard

  9. The Bloch equation Linearized system Non exact controllability with bounded controls Approximate controllability with unbounded controls Explicit controls for the asymptotic exact controllability Feedback stabilization On a bounded interval : analyticity argument � � ∂ M ∧ M ( t , ω ) , ( t , ω ) ∈ ( 0 , T ) × ( ω ∗ , ω ∗ ) ∂ t ( t , ω ) = u ( t ) e 1 + v ( t ) e 2 + ω e 3 T > 0 , u , v ∈ L 2 ( 0 , T ) ⇒ Z ( T , . ) analytic √ T > 0, R := 1 / ( 8 3 T ) . There exists arbitrarily small analytic targets that cannot be reached exactly in time T with controls in B R [ L 2 ( 0 , T )] . The non controllability is not a question of regularity. K. Beauchard

  10. The Bloch equation Linearized system Non exact controllability with bounded controls Approximate controllability with unbounded controls Explicit controls for the asymptotic exact controllability Feedback stabilization Solutions associated to Dirac controls � � ∂ M ∧ M ( t , ω ) , ( t , ω ) ∈ ( 0 , T ) × ( ω ∗ , ω ∗ ) ∂ t ( t , ω ) = u ( t ) e 1 + v ( t ) e 2 + ω e 3 Classical solution for u , v ∈ L 1 loc ( R ) . If u = αδ a and v = 0 then M ( a + , ω ) = exp ( α Ω x ) M ( a − , ω ) → instantaneous rotation of angle α around the x -axis, ∀ ω Rk : limit [ ǫ → 0 ] of solutions associated to u = α ǫ 1 [ a , a + ǫ ] . K. Beauchard

  11. The Bloch equation Linearized system Non exact controllability with bounded controls Approximate controllability with unbounded controls Explicit controls for the asymptotic exact controllability Feedback stabilization Approximate controllability result −∞ < ω ∗ < ω ∗ < + ∞ � � ∂ M ∧ M ( t , ω ) , ( t , ω ) ∈ [ 0 , + ∞ ) × ( ω ∗ , ω ∗ ) ∂ t ( t , ω ) = u ( t ) e 1 + v ( t ) e 2 + ω e 3 Theorem : Let M 0 ∈ H 1 (( ω ∗ , ω ∗ ) , S 2 ) . There exist ( t n ) n ∈ N ∈ [ 0 , + ∞ ) N , ( u n ) n ∈ N , ( v n ) n ∈ N finite sums of Dirac masses such that U [ t + n ; u n , v n , M 0 ] → e 3 weakly in H 1 . Rk : Same result with u , v ∈ L ∞ αδ a ← α loc [ 0 , + ∞ ) : ǫ 1 [ a , a + ǫ ] Approximate controllability in H s , ∀ s < 1, in L ∞ ... K. Beauchard

  12. The Bloch equation Linearized system Non exact controllability with bounded controls Approximate controllability with unbounded controls Explicit controls for the asymptotic exact controllability Feedback stabilization First step : Li-Khaneja ’s non commutativity result � � ∂ M ∧ M ( t , ω ) , ( t , ω ) ∈ [ 0 , + ∞ ) × ( ω ∗ , ω ∗ ) ∂ t ( t , ω ) = u ( t ) e 1 + v ( t ) e 2 + ω e 3 Theorem : Let P , Q ∈ R [ X ] . ∀ ǫ > 0 , ∃ τ ∗ > 0 such that ∀ τ ∈ ( 0 , τ ∗ ) , ∃ T > 0 , u , v ∼ Dirac such that � � �� � � � U [ T + ; u , v , . ] − I + τ [ P ( ω )Ω x + Q ( ω )Ω y ] H 1 ( ω ∗ ,ω ∗ ) � ǫτ. � Proof : Explicit controls → cancel the drift term, Lie brackets. Rk : It is not sufficient for the global approximate controllability. τω N needs T N ∼ 2 N τ 1 N and more than 2 N N-S. K. Beauchard

  13. The Bloch equation Linearized system Non exact controllability with bounded controls Approximate controllability with unbounded controls Explicit controls for the asymptotic exact controllability Feedback stabilization Second step : Variationnal method Let M 0 ∈ H 1 (( ω ∗ , ω ∗ ) , S 2 ) be such that M 0 � = e 3 . n ; u n , v n , M 0 ] ⇀ e 3 in H 1 when n → + ∞ Goal : Find U [ t + � M in H 1 � � n ; u n , v n , M 0 ] ⇀ � M ; ∃ U [ t + K := � � � � M ′ � L 2 ; � m := inf M ∈ K 1) ∃ e ∈ K such that m = � e ′ � L 2 2) m = 0 . Otherwise, one may decrease more : ∃ P , Q ∈ R [ X ] st � �� � �� � d � � L 2 < � e ′ � L 2 I + τ [ P ( ω )Ω x + Q ( ω )Ω y ] e � d ω 3) e 3 ∈ K ∩ S 2 K. Beauchard

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend