Contributing Causes and Lessons Learned from NRELs Recent Laser - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

contributing causes and
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Contributing Causes and Lessons Learned from NRELs Recent Laser - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Contributing Causes and Lessons Learned from NRELs Recent Laser Accident Deana Luke, National Renewable Energy Lab Health & Safety Manager & LSO September 27, 2016 Common Denominators in Many Laser Accidents Wavelength and type


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Contributing Causes and Lessons Learned from NREL’s Recent Laser Accident

Deana Luke, National Renewable Energy Lab Health & Safety Manager & LSO

September 27, 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Common Denominators in Many Laser Accidents

  • Wavelength and type of Laser?
slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Common Denominators in Many Laser Accidents

  • Wavelength and type of Laser:
  • Ti:Sapphire 800 nm, repetitively pulsed Class 4 laser
slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Common Denominators in Many Laser Accidents

  • Common task being performed during accident?
slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Common Denominators in Many Laser Accidents

  • Common task performed during accident:
  • Beam alignment
slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Common Denominators in Many Laser Accidents

  • Essential control method that was not in use?
slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Common Denominators in Many Laser Accidents

  • Essential control method that was not in use:
  • Laser Protective Eyewear
slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Common Denominators in Many Laser Accidents

  • Experience level and job status of operator?
slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Common Denominators in Many Laser Accidents

  • Experience level and job status of operator
  • Grad students and Post-docs
slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Incident Overview

Incident Overview

  • New NREL postdoctoral worker performing high precision

alignment of optical component on Class 4 laser system

  • Worker lowered eyewear to view beam with naked eye

instead of using IR viewer or viewing cards.

  • Received strike to eye from stray beam reflected from optical

component

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Retro-Reflector Cube Corners

Front view

Origin of the Stray beam

Top view

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Unshielded Retro-Reflector Cube Corners

Unshrouded retro reflector Unshrouded retro reflector

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Eye Injury

  • Initial eye exam revealed potential damage to retina

and small blind spot

  • Follow-up evaluation by retinal expert indicates no

abnormality in the retina

  • Potential measurement artifact with initial exam
  • Employee is now able to function normally
  • No permanent effect on employee’s vision or retina
slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Initial Actions Taken

  • Affected system locked out from use
  • Safety Pause conducted for all laser users and their

managers to overview incident and share initial lessons learned

  • Post-doc restricted from working with Class 3B and 4

lasers during investigation

  • Lab-wide Extent of Condition conducted to ID locations

where unshrouded retro-reflectors were in use

  • Removed 2 unshrouded retro-reflectors from service
  • Removed 4 additional retro-reflectors which were in

storage

  • Immediately began investigation and causal analysis
slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Incident Investigation – Causal Analysis

  • Cross-organizational investigation team
  • “5 Whys” Causal Analysis
  • Barrier Analysis
  • 7 Contributing Causes
  • 2 Root Causes
slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Causal Factors – Contributing Causes

  • Individual underestimated the problem by using

past event as basis

  • New Post-Doc underestimated risk coming from lax

safety culture at university

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Causal Factors – Contributing Causes

  • Verbal Communication Less Than Adequate
  • Post-doc knew the requirements for wearing PPE
  • Did not know what to do when he perceived those

requirements impacted getting his work done efficiently

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Causal Factors – Contributing Causes

  • Attention was given to wrong issues
  • Post-doc had self-imposed time/efficiency goals
  • To meet those goals he used materials readily

available in the lab rather than obtain proper components for system

  • Existing mounting bracket—too small to fit all 3

retroreflectors

  • Unshielded retro-reflector
slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Contributing Cause - Retroreflector

  • An unshielded retro-reflector was used in beam path
  • Beam misaligned on outer edge of retro-reflector
  • Specular reflection misdirected toward worker
slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Causal Factors – Contributing Causes

  • Attention given to wrong issues
  • Engineering controls not properly applied
  • Improper placement of neutral density filter
  • Insufficient beam shielding
slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Causal Factors – Contributing Causes

  • Step was omitted due to mental lapse
  • Checked first few optics in beam path for stray beams
  • Neglected to check retro-reflectors for stray beams
slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Causal Factors – Contributing Causes

  • Change not identified during task
  • Beam dimensions changed from initial alignment
  • Beam extended to outside edge of retro-reflector

causing it to be misdirected towards worker

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Causal Factors – Contributing Causes

  • LTA review of alignment task based on assumption

that process will not change

  • Laser System Supervisor (LSS) was involved in initial

planning and setup of system with post-doc

  • LSS and post-doc performed initial alignment

procedures together, and LSS did not anticipate any changes in those methods

  • Post-doc changed alignment method without

discussing with LSS

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Causal Factors – Root Cause

  • Incorrect assumption that a correlation existed

between two or more facts

  • Post-doc observed whole beam was present
  • Section of beam being aligned was at lower power

than upstream path due to neutral density filter

  • Post-doc assumed it was safe to lower his eyewear, in

spite of knowing NREL requirements

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Causal Factors – Root Cause

  • Incorrect assumption that a correlation existed

between two or more facts

  • Post-doc used IR viewer and viewing cards for earlier

phases of system set-up and alignment

  • Post-doc believed viewing tools were not adequate

for precision alignment tasks

  • Granularity and low display quality with IR viewer
  • Prior experience with higher quality tools
slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Corrective Actions

  • Communicated lessons learned:
  • NREL’s laser community
  • PNNL/NREL database
  • DOE EFCOG Laser Safety Task Group
  • Conducted extent of condition for:
  • Use of unshielded retroreflectors
  • Completion of Laser Operator Qualification cards
  • Independent subcontractor performed external audit of NREL’s

laser safety program

  • Surveyed and characterized NREL’s safety culture
  • Implementing hands-on laser use/alignment course
  • Evaluating impact of a more formalized lab-wide mentorship

program

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Corrective Actions

  • Laser Safety Lab Level Procedure revised to clarify when

Laser Operator Qualification Card must be completed

  • Beam path diagrams to be developed & reviewed by LSO

prior to building laser systems

  • Updated Annual Lab Safety Refresher to advise workers on

how to balance safety and work priorities

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Lessons Learned

  • Beware of using legacy equipment
  • Shield beams during setup
  • Temporary shields and beam blocks
  • Understand properties of optical components in use
  • Retro-reflectors can change functionality
slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

Lessons Learned

  • Have right tools and equipment readily available for

job

  • Beam alignment may change if beam is expanded
  • Always check for stray beams
  • Don’t assume proper beam alignment
  • Place neutral density filters as close to output as

possible

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Questions?