contract services make a comeback
play

Contract Services Make a Comeback Jim Miller - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Contract Services Make a Comeback Jim Miller PharmSource-Pharmaceutical Technology Breakfast November 15, 2010 Contract Services Make a Comeback? Jim Miller PharmSource-Pharmaceutical Technology Breakfast November 15, 2010 Overview Agenda


  1. Contract Services Make a Comeback Jim Miller PharmSource-Pharmaceutical Technology Breakfast November 15, 2010

  2. Contract Services Make a Comeback? Jim Miller PharmSource-Pharmaceutical Technology Breakfast November 15, 2010

  3. Overview Agenda Key points  Industry performance  Gradual but choppy improvement in  Performance drivers business  Industry consolidation  Supply base consolidation under way  Final thoughts  Industry becoming more intensely competitive 3

  4. Industry performance Some recovery, but early development lags Contractor Performance 30% 25% Year-Over-Year Revenue Change 20% 07 H1 15% 07H2 10% 08 H1 5% 08 H2 09 H1 0% 09 H2 -5% CMC API CLIN EARLY 10 H1 -10% -15% -20% 4

  5. Industry performance Early development – Early Warning?  Too much capacity  “Pig in the python” – Pharma in-house & CRO – Fewer preclinical compounds means less – Pharma keeps work in CTM and approvals  Prices down < 30%  Facility closings and  Clients delaying high layoffs presage similar value studies CMC challenges  20% fewer compounds entering development 5

  6. Performance drivers R&D spending is flat External finance-dependent  R&D Spend Index companies not recovering 07 Q1 = 100 – Breakout 120 – Early 100 80 Global pharma better  Index 60 – Suspect less goes to products vs. partners 40 – More outsourced 20 0 06 Q1 06 Q2 06 Q3 06 Q4 07 Q1 07 Q2 07 Q3 07 Q4 08 Q1 08 Q2 08 Q3 08 Q4 09 Q1 09 Q2 09 Q3 09 Q4 10 Q1 10 Q2 Note: Q4 spend bumps due to  stock option/bonus expense Global Self-Sustaining Breakout Early 6

  7. Performance drivers New funding directed toward late stage $5.0 Cash Position Index $4.5 Q1 2007 = 100 $4.0 120 $3.5 100 $3.0 80 $2.5 60 $2.0 40 $1.5 $1.0 20 $0.5 0 $0.0 09 Q109 Q209 Q309 Q410 Q110 Q2 Public-Early Public-B/O VC Breakout Early Stage Source: PharmSource Lead Sheet, public filings 7

  8. Performance drivers Poor returns threaten VC availability Returns on VC Investment VC Fundraising 35% Quarterly $9.0 30% Funds Raised - $ billions $8.0 25% $7.0 20% $6.0 $5.0 15% $4.0 10% $3.0 5% $2.0 0% $1.0 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 $0.0 -5% -10% Pharma Biotech All VC Source: National Venture Capital Association, Cambridge Associates 8

  9. Performance drivers Low NME approvals hurt CMO industry  High % of older APIs NDA Approvals by FDA among 2010 approvals 120 40% – Generics companies 100 Number of Approvals 40% 32% 33% manufacture in-house 43% 80 63 60 45 57 41  High safety and efficacy 49 40 barriers for NME 42 approvals 20 36 34 28 27 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Outsourced In-house Unknown •% above bar is % of approvals outsourced. •Source: FDA data, PharmSource analysis 9

  10. Performance drivers Global pharma capex declining  Global pharma capex Capital Expenditures decline suggests more $20.0 outsourcing in future $15.0 $10.0 – PharmSource analysis Global $5.0 indicates more outsourcing of small $0.0 molecules $1.5 Self-Sustaining $1.0  Mid-size companies $0.5 more willing to invest $0.0 10

  11. Performance drivers Factors affecting future outlook Positive factors Negative factors  General economic recovery  Restructuring of pharma pipelines  Positive industry growth  Difficult approval  Exchange rates environment  Global pharma investments  Government spend cutbacks in early stage companies in EU and US  Global pharma commitment  Reduced availability of VC to outsourcing finance 11

  12. Supply base consolidation is major trend Perceived benefits of “ We want to work with reduced supply base a smaller number of  Improved pricing suppliers”  Better governance  Tighter integration Richard Spoor, SVP Global  Continuous improvement Procurement, Merck & Co., and innovation DCAT Sourcing Summit, November 3, 2010  Reduced sourcing and oversight OH expense 12

  13. Industry consolidation Clinical research initial focus of consolidation Pharma CRO Service  Why focus on clinical? sanofi Covance P1-P4, lab, preclin – Few hard assets; mostly Lilly Covance P1-P4, lab, preclin staff Lilly Quintiles Site mgmt-Americas – Fluctuations in resource Lilly Icon Site mgmt - Europe demand Lilly Icon Data mgmt – Europe – In-house inefficiency/ Lilly i3 Data mgmt - US poor operating skills Lilly Parexel Site mgmt - Asia – Globalization of trials GSK Parexel Multiple CR services GSK PPD Multiple CR services – Need for IT skills BMS Icon Multiple CR services – Longer history of BMS Parexel Multiple CR services outsourcing and CRO Eisai PPD Multiple CR services relationships Otsuka Covance Multiple CR services 13 Source: public reports

  14. Industry consolidation CRO industry is consolidating  Top 6 companies CRO Market Share $14 B Market account for 50% of industry revenues Q 15%  Largest CROs gaining CVD 10% momentum at expense Others 47% of mid-size companies PPD 9% PRXL 7% Icon  A sign of industry 6% maturity KNDL RPS INC 3% 1% 2% Source: public financial reports, PharmSource estimates 14

  15. Industry consolidation Backlog growth reflects consolidating share  Largest CROs enjoy CRO Backlog greatest backlog growth $18 $16 – Multi-year strategic deals $14 – Preferred providers $12 CVD – Larger studies $10 PPD $8 PRXL $6 ICON  Smaller CROs treading KNDL $4 water 6 Other $2 – Some leaving altogether, $0 e.g. MDS Source: public financial reports 15

  16. Industry consolidation Top 5 CROs gaining market share vs. next 5 CROs Revenue Performance of Top 8 Public CROs Since 2005 $1,600 PPD (1) $1,400 Revenues - $ million $1,200 PRXL (3) $1,000 CVD (2) $800 Icon (5) $600 MDS (4) KNDL (7) $400 PharmaNet (6) $200 Omni (8) $- 05 06 07 08 09 Note: Quintiles (# 1 overall) and PRA (#7 overall) went private 2006-7 Source: public financial reports 16

  17. Industry consolidation Covance: the power of scope and scale sanofi-aventis Why Covance?  Acquired 2 sites for $25 million  Scope of services – Preclinical  Received take-or-pay contracts – Clinical worth $1.2 billion – CMC  Named sole source for central  Scale of operations labs – worth $1 billion – Largest player in preclinical & central labs Lilly – Global site network  Acquired1 site for $50 million  Performance record in existing relationships  Received take-or-pay contracts worth $1.6 billion  Financial strength 17

  18. Industry consolidation Contract manufacturing faces big hurdles Demand side Supply side impediments impediments  Supply chain risk fears  CMO capabilities limited relative to needs  Large fixed asset base – Technologies  High cost of closing facilities – Logistics & IT  Emerging markets expect  CMO financial stability and local presence strategic commitment  Technologies viewed as  Networks not sufficiently strategic global Lab and clinical supply services face fewer impediments 18

  19. Final thoughts  Don’t expect big pipeline-driven improvements – Funding, portfolio restructuring will limit pipeline growth  More outsourcing by global pharma will drive industry opportunity – But will favor larger CRO/CMOs with broader capabilities  Gradual but steady shift toward emerging markets – Following the revenue growth  No longer a “nice little business” – Entering an aggressively competitive phase 19

  20. PharmSource Market Intelligence Services  PharmSource Lead Sheet  PharmSource A DVANTAGE  PharmSource P RISM  Custom consulting services 20

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend