Contents Quadrant Overview Bob Alexander Peter Englander - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Geography Presentation (3 of 4)

November 18, 2009

Quadrant: Goose Hollow Presenters: Goose Hollow Foothills League, Portland Public Schools, Lincoln High School Long Term Development Committee

• Quadrant Overview

– Bob Alexander – Peter Englander

• Stakeholder Presentations

– Goose Hollow Foothills League

• Stuart Smith

– Portland Public Schools

• David Wynde

– Lincoln High School Long Term Development Committee

• Dick Spies

Contents

Goose Hollow Overview

• 165 acres
• Total Assessed

Value: $491.37 million

Goose Hollow Overview

Tax Increment Node C

• 33.8 acres
• Revenue Generation Potential

–Base: $4.7 M –Low: $25.5 M –Medium: $30 M –High: $43.1 M

Goose Hollow Overview

West of I-405 Central City Study Area City Total Residents 18,600 24,000 14,600 535,000 Under 18 6% 4% 4% 21% 18-24 8% 11% 13% 8% 25-64 76% 73% 69% 59% 65 and Older 11% 12% 14% 12% POPULATION DATA

• S. Of Market
• N. Of Market

Goose Hollow Northwest Total Residents 4,500 5,400 3,800 3,100 Under 18 4% 3% 3% 7% 18-24 24% 7% 6% 7% 25-64 59% 72% 75% 74% 65 and Older 13% 19% 16% 12%

Statistics for the individual quadrant areas are not statistically precise due to a lack of test data All data was collected by a grouping of Census Tracts that best fit the shape of the geography.

Goose Hollow Overview

West of I-405 Study Area Central City Total Households 12,700 9,700 15,900 Average Size 1.42 1.27 1.3 Renters 86% 95% 89% Non-Family 84% 89% 87%

Statistics for the individual quadrant areas are not statistically precise due to a lack of test data. All data was collected by a grouping of Census Tracts that best fit the shape of the geography.

HOUSEHOLD DATA

• S. Of Market
• N. Of Market

Goose Hollow Northwest Total Households 2,900 3,400 2,800 2,200 Average Size 1.4 1.19 1.24 1.37 Renters 86% 95% 94% 96% Non-Family 81% 90% 89% 87%

Goose Hollow Overview

Annual Income West of I-405 Study Area Central City < $25,000 42% 58% 53% $25,000 to $100,000 46% 37% 38% > $100,000 11% 5% 9%

Statistics for the individual quadrant areas are not statistically precise due to a lack of test data. All data was collected by a grouping of Census Tracts that best fit the shape of the geography.

HOUSEHOLD INCOME DATA Annual Income

• S. Of Market
• N. Of Market

Goose Hollow Northwest < $25,000 42% 68% 52% 46% $25,000 to $100,000 45% 28% 43% 46% > $100,000 13% 4% 5% 8%

Goose Hollow Overview

West of I-405 Study Area Central City Labor Force 13,200 8,500 15,300 Employed 12,400 7,500 13,000 Unemployment Rate 6% 11% 15%

Statistics for the individual quadrant areas are not statistically precise due to a lack of test data. All data was collected by a grouping of Census Tracts that best fit the shape of the geography.

EMPLOYMENT DATA (Residents)

• S. Of Market
• N. Of Market

Goose Hollow Northwest Labor Force 2,900 2,400 2,500 2,100 Employed 2,700 2,000 2,200 2,100 Unemployment Rate 8% 16% 11% 4%

Goose Hollow Overview

West of I-405 Study Area Central City Acres of Open Space 33.5 47.8 83.1 % of Open Space 2.7% 6.0% 5.8% Square Foot/Resident 79 143 151

Statistics for the individual quadrant areas are not statistically precise due to a lack of test data. All data was collected by a grouping of Census Tracts that best fit the shape of the geography.

OPEN SPACE

• S. Of Market
• N. Of Market

Goose Hollow Northwest Acres of Open Space 27 25 12 2 % of Open Space 6.3% 7.6% 7.8% 1.7% Square Foot/Resident 264 200 139 33

Goose Hollow Overview

• Existing adopted plans

– Goose Hollow Station Community Plan – Northwest District Plan (Remanded to City)

Existing Adopted Plans

• All quadrants:

– Central City Plan – City Economic Development Strategy – Comprehensive Plan – Portland Plan Update – Streetcar Master Plan – Tri-Met Light Rail Plan – 10-Year Plan to End Homelessness – Metro’s 2040 Growth Concept/Regional Framework Plan

Portland Public Schools

Lincoln HS site

for the Central City Urban Renewal Evaluation Committee

What is a school?

 A school is a program: curriculum, teachers,

students, activities

 A school is a building: bricks and mortar,

the physical location

 A school is a community: a coming together

• f people, in relation to a place

Lincoln HS site: a Rubik’s cube?

 Program: High School system design?  Building: Long-term Capital Plan?  Community: Urban Renewal Area?

Program Dimension: HS System Design

 What system of schools will best meet the

needs of all our kids?

 Community schools  Focus schools  Education options: alternative schools

• Define the parameters and programs
• Determine number of schools
• Identify locations

PPS District-Wide Needs

 PPS 2nd largest property owner (732

acres) after City Parks

 2008 Facilities Assessment

 Over 9 million square feet of buildings  PPS buildings older by 20 years than

• equiv. school districts

 Major building systems need replacement  PPS must modernize its school buildings

Building Dimension: LT Capital Plan

 Rebuild and remodel essentially all of our

school buildings

 Adopted guiding principles  Identified short-term program investment and

building stabilization projects ($289 million)

 Identified immediate action opportunities ($87

million)

 Funded highest priority subset ($26 million)  Next steps?

Schools & Economic Development

 Attraction and retention of employers

tied to quality of public schools

 Retention of families a critical element

• f urban sustainability

 Tied to diverse housing opportunities

and public amenities

Community Dimension: Urban Renewal?

 Blight: site underutilization  Leverage of adjacent amenities: PSU & mass

transit

 Job creation?: L  Housing?: T  Livability?: D  Economic Development?: C  Lincoln LTDC: examples of what might be

possible

Opportunities to engage with PDC and the City?

 Joint planning  Shared use  Mixed use  Relocation  Temporary space  Pilot programs  Infrastructure  Financing

Lincoln High School Long-Term Development Committee

Lincoln High School Project Strategy:

• Develop a vision for Lincoln High School
• Consider incorporating other compatible

uses on the property

• Leverage public funding through

public/private partnerships

Lincoln High School Long-Term Development Committee

The Need for Improved Facilities:

• Overcrowding
• Outdated facility
• Life-safety issues – seismic/ADA
• Equity and Opportunities
• 21st Century schools

Lincoln High School Long-Term Development Committee

Sustainability:

• Think green
• Build green
• Teach green

Working to build the new green economy

Lincoln High School Long-Term Development Committee

Create a True Community Partnership

• Serving the entire community
• Partnerships with government, businesses,

neighborhoods

• Services for:

Students Families Community

Lincoln High School Long-Term Development Committee

Existing Conditions

• Site Area: 11.388 Acres
• 8 City Blocks
• Existing School: 227,000 SF

Lincoln High School Long-Term Development Committee

Existing LHS Second Floor

• Needs:
• Seismic Upgrade
• HVAC
• Lighting
• Lacks Adequate:
• Auditorium
• Gymnasium
• Classroom Space
• Science &

Technology

• Art Space

Lincoln High School Long-Term Development Committee

Adjacent Sites – Development Capacity

Offsite Open Space Development Capacity

Lincoln High School Long-Term Development Committee

Lincoln Site – Development Capacity

• Floor Area Ratio: FAR 4 to 1
• Development Capacity: 1,984,368 SF
• Height Limitation: 250’

Lincoln High School Long-Term Development Committee

Concept A

• Remodel Existing School
• No Partnering Development
• Leave Field

Lincoln High School Long-Term Development Committee

Concept B

• Replace Existing School with

New 21st Century School

• Leave Field

Lincoln High School Long-Term Development Committee

Concept C

• Remodel School
• Add Partnering Development
• Leave Field

Lincoln High School Long-Term Development Committee

Vertically Oriented High School

Lincoln High School Long-Term Development Committee

Conceptual Exterior Perspective

Lincoln High School Long-Term Development Committee

Concept D

• New Vertically Oriented High School
• Partnering Development to the East
• Leave Field

Lincoln High School Long-Term Development Committee

Concept E

• Build to max capacity with partnering

development to the east; and above a new vertically oriented high school.

• Leave Field

Lincoln High School Long-Term Development Committee

Concept F

• New Partnering Development
• Consideration of a Decentralized School.
• Major Connections to Neighborhood to East

and North/South.

• Leave Field

Lincoln High School Long-Term Development Committee

Concept G

• New Vertically Oriented School Along 18th
• New Field Over Parking
• Partnering Development to the East

Lincoln High School Long-Term Development Committee

• Vertically Oriented High School Over Field and Parking Below
• Housing Above School and to the East

Lincoln High School Long-Term Development Committee

Lincoln High School Long-Term Development Committee

Lincoln High School Long-Term Development Committee

Lincoln High School Long-Term Development Committee