CONTENT 3 Transition metal and transition metal ions as activator - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

content
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

CONTENT 3 Transition metal and transition metal ions as activator - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Influence Factors of Phenol Wastewater Treatment Using Persulfate Activated by Fe 0 Bing Wang, Jiani Li, Lan Fang, Jia Fu Municipal & Environmental Engineering College, Shenyang Jianzhu University Email: wangbing8835829@163.com


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The Influence Factors

  • f

Phenol Wastewater Treatment Using Persulfate Activated by Fe0

Bing Wang, Jiani Li, Lan Fang, Jia Fu Municipal & Environmental Engineering College, Shenyang Jianzhu University Email: wangbing8835829@163.com

slide-2
SLIDE 2

CONTENT

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

A small-scale phenol wastewater treatment will be implemented.

Transition metal and transition metal ions as activator for persulfate have become a hot. Heavy metal ions could cause secondary pollution. Fe2+has obvious advantages, but many problems also exist inevitably. Fe0 whose principle is similar to Fe2+ became the first choice of replacement as activator. The reaction time, activator dosing quantity, K2S2O8 dosing quantity, pH value, and phenol initial concentration on the effect of phenol wastewater treatment were discussed in detail. The optimum operation parameters were obtained.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Raw water

Artificial wastewater was used to simulate the phenol wastewater in this experiment.

Methods

The COD value and phenol value could be measured respectively, and the corresponding removal rate could be calculated. Ascertain the main factors for phenol wastewater treatment using orthogonal test of 5 factors and 4 levels with the variables of reaction time, activator dosing quantity, K2S2O8 dosing quantity, pH value and phenol initial concentration. Use 4-AAP direct photometric method to determine the phenol concentration, and the fast airtight catalytic decomposition method for COD.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

A B D E C

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

slide-6
SLIDE 6

m(K2S2O8):m(C6H6O)=1 CK2S2O8 = 0.05 mol/L n(K2S2O8):n(Fe0)=1 Cphenol 200mg L pH= 3 T= 35℃

The Fe0 played a good activated role, and when reaction time was around 200 min, the degradation of phenol wastewater was basically completed.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

When Fe0 dosing quantity reached a certain value, the quantity of Fe2+ produced by Fe0 was enough to activate the potassium persulfate, furthermore, adding more Fe0 was not benefit to the phenol and COD removal. Therefore, set the reasonable ratio of metal activator and oxidant about 1:1.

m(K2S2O8):m(C6H6O)=1 CK2S2O8 = 0.05 mol/L Cphenol 200mg L pH= 3 T= 35℃ n(Fe0):n(K2S2O8)=0.2-2

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Considering the economy and the treatment effect, m (K2S2O8):m (C6H6O) = 1.0 as a reference type dosing ratio was more appropriate.

n(Fe0):n(K2S2O8)=1 CK2S2O8 = 0.05 mol/L Cphenol 200mg L pH= 3 T= 35℃ m(K2S2O8):m(C6H6O)=0.2-2

slide-9
SLIDE 9

m(K2S2O8):m(C6H6O)=1 n(Fe0):n(K2S2O8)=1 CK2S2O8 = 0.05 mol/L Cphenol 200mg L T= 35℃ pH= 1-10.6

When pH value is equal to 3.0, phenol wastewater treatment experiment achieved the best effect, and the phenol and the COD removal rate reached the maximum of 78.66% and 68.61% at the same time, so 3.0 was the

  • ptimum pH value.
slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

m(K2S2O8):m(C6H6O)=1 n(Fe0):n(K2S2O8)=1 CK2S2O8 = 0.05 mol/L T= 35℃ pH= 3 Cphenol 50-300mg L

With the increase of the initial concentration of phenol, the quantity of oxidant gradually can not meet the needs of pollutants consumption quantity, so that the degradation of phenol wastewater effect gradually declined.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Factorlevel A(pH) B(time/min) C(Fe0/mg/L)D(K2S2O8/mg/L)E(C6H6O/mg/L) Level 1 1 120 50 50 50 level 2 2 140 100 100 100 level 3 3 160 150 150 150 level 4 4 180 200 200 200

slide-12
SLIDE 12

NO. A B C D E pH Time (min ) Fe0 (mg/L) K2S2O8 (mg/L) C6H6O (initial) (mg/L) C6H6O removal rate(%)

1 1 120 50 50 50 70.52 2 1 140 100 100 100 72.11 3 1 160 150 150 150 72.74 4 1 180 200 200 200 73.18 5 2 120 100 150 200 70.45 6 2 140 50 200 150 68.87 7 2 160 200 50 100 59.69 8 2 180 150 100 50 76.54 9 3 120 150 200 100 74.04 10 3 140 200 150 50 73.38 11 3 160 50 100 200 61.57 12 3 180 100 50 150 70.78 13 4 120 200 100 150 69.65 14 4 140 150 50 200 56.24 15 4 160 100 200 50 75.41 16 4 180 50 150 100 69.88

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Factor A pH B Time(min) C Fe0(mg/L) D K2S2O8(mg/L) E C6H6O(mg/L) 72.17 71.17 67.71 69.10 73.96 68.89 67.65 72.19 69.97 68.93 69.94 67.35 69.89 71.61 70.51 67.80 72.60 68.98 72.88 65.36 R 4.34 5.25 4.48 3.78 8.60 Primary and secondary factors EBCAD

 1

K

2 

K

3 

K

4 

K

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

(1) Under the medium temperature (35℃) , influence factors of phenol wastewater treatment using persulfate activated by Fe0 were studied. Discuss the reaction time, the activator dosing amount, the K2S2O8 dosing quantity, the pH value, and the initial concentration of phenol in detail for the research of phenol wastewater treatment, and obtain the best operating conditions through orthogonal test. (2) When the initial phenol concentration was 200 mg/L, the reaction time lasted 180 min, the pH value was 3.0, m (K2S2O8) : m (C6H6O) = 1, and n(K2S2O8):n(Fe0)=1, the phenol and the COD removal efficiency were the highest, which reached 78.66% and 68.61%. (3) Analyze the L16(45) orthogonal experiment with the varieties of the reaction time, activator dosing amount (Fe0), K2S2O8 dosing quantity, pH value and initial phenol

  • concentration. The phenol wastewater treatment using persulfate activated by Fe0 effect was

more ideal, when the reaction temperature was 35℃, the pH value was equal to 3.0, the reaction time lasted 180 min, the Fe0 activator dosing quantity was 200 mg/L, the K2S2O8 dosing quantity is 200 mg/L, and the phenol initial concentration was 150 mg/L.

slide-15
SLIDE 15