Non Woven Abrasives Unraveling the Mystery Production Process - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Non Woven Abrasives Unraveling the Mystery Production Process - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Non Woven Abrasives Unraveling the Mystery Production Process Plant Tour in Pictures Spray Impregnation Fiber Blender Spray Impregnation Rolling Needling Carding Fiber Fiber Physical Properties Type Polyester vs Nylon Cost
Production Process
Plant Tour in Pictures
Fiber Blender Carding Needling Spray Impregnation Spray Impregnation Rolling Fiber
Fiber
Physical Properties
- Type
– Polyester vs Nylon
- Cost vs performance
- Denier
– Size matters
- Strength
- Flexibility
- Durability
- Cut
Color Dyed vs natural
Resin
Phenol vs Urethane
- Phenol attacks fiber
- Phenol is temp resistant
- Urethane is more flexible
- Urethane is more expensive
- Phenol changes color
- Urethane has better adhesion to Nylon
Principle of Function
Position of Non Woven products in relation to other abrasive media
Heavy Stock removal Light Stock removal / good finish Conditioning Surface / Good finish Scratch removal / polishing Bonded Abrasives Coated Abrasives
Wire / Filament Products Grit / Set up wheels
Non Woven Products
Polishing Buffs / Wheels
Coated vs Nonwoven
- Scratch depth
- Micro deburring
- Consistency of finish
- Lower temperature
coated abrasive nonwoven abrasive
Comparison of abrasive cut over time for a P120 grit coated abrasive compared to a Coarse A surface conditioning disc
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 5 10 15 20 25 30 Time / mins Cut / g P120# CRS A
Comparison of abrasive finish over time for a P120 grit coated abrasive compared to a Coarse A surface conditioning disc
0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 1 5 10 15 20 25 30 Time (Minutes)
____ P120 coated ____ CRS A scm
Surface finish comparison
[mm] 4.400 2.400 0.400 0.291mm/cm, x34.375 [um] 5.159
- 1.507
- 8.174
3.333um/cm, x3000.000 Profile=R_ISO - Section=[1]
- P60 Resin Fiber Disk
- Ra = 2.24
- Rt = 13.17
- Rz = 11.94
[mm] 4.400 2.400 0.400 0.291mm/cm, x34.375 [um] 6.270
- 0.396
- 7.063
3.333um/cm, x3000.000 Profile=R_ISO - Section=[1]
- P120 Resin Fiber
Disk
- Ra = 0.5
- Rt = 3.17
- Rz = 2.97
[mm] 4.400 2.400 0.400 0.291mm/cm, x34.375 [um] 6.310
- 0.357
- 7.024
3.333um/cm, x3000.000 Profile=R_ISO - Section=[1]
- Coarse SCM (P60)
- Ra = 0.45
- Rt = 3.5
- Rz = 2.9
Surface finish comparison
- P120 Resin
Fiber Disk
- Ra = 0.5
- Rt = 3.17
- Rz = 2.97
[um] 1.604
- 0.396
- 2.396
Profile=R_ISO - Section=[1]
- Coarse SCM
- Ra = 0.45
- Rt = 3.5
- Rz = 2.9
[um] 1.955
- 0.357
- 2.670
Temperature increase over time for a P120 grit coated abrasive compared to a Coarse A surface conditioning disc
50 100 150 200 250 300 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 time / secs Temp / deg C 120# S / Steel SCM S / Steel 120# Aluminum SCM Aluminum
Foam Vs. Nonwoven
Foam shares properties of both Coated and Non-Wovens
– Flexibility – Conformability – 2 dimensional abrasive structure – Surface finish changes over time – Shaped forms (built in tool)
Application
Fleece
- CF – Nylon, smaller denier, phenolic.
– Handwork, handpads etc. – Light machine finishing
- HD – Nylon, large denier, more resin and grit.
– Heavy Machine Finishing – Intricate Shapes
- SD – Nylon, urethane
– Deburring / Edge breaking – Flexibility to access extreme angles
Surface Conditioning Material
- Applications for Belts
– Cookware – Hardware – Metal Fabrication
- Applications for Disks
– Weld blending – Refining Coated abrasive grind lines
Technical Wheels
- Unitized
– Deburring – Weld Blending – Cleaning
- Convolute