SLIDE 1
Contaminated Sediment in the St. Clair River: Ecological Implications and the Path Forward
ENVIRON International Corporation Public Consultation
SLIDE 2 Presentation Topics
- 1. Background
- 2. COA Framework Overview
- 3. Lines of Evidence
- 4. Prioritization of Zones for Sediment
Management
SLIDE 3
- St. Clair Area of Concern (AOC)
- International Joint Commission identified 43
AOCs under the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement
- St. Clair River named an AOC in 1985
– Contaminated sediment in the upper St. Clair River defined as high priority issue – Portions of upper St. Clair River remediated in 2004
– Evaluate risks posed by key chemicals in the remainder of the AOC – Help prioritize sediment management solutions
SLIDE 4
Area of Interest (AOI)
SLIDE 5
1. Will fish or wildlife be harmed by chemicals in the sediment, invertebrates and fish? 2. Does the sediment need to be cleaned up to prevent harm to fish or wildlife? 3. If so, which areas are most important for cleanup? 4. What areas need to be studied more before decisions can be made? These questions are answered by applying the COA Framework
Key Questions Evaluated in this Study
SLIDE 6
What is Sediment?
Mud at the bottom of the river
= minerals + water + decaying plants & animals (“organic matter”) + insects, clams and worms (“invertebrates”)
Home to invertebrates, which are the base of the food chain
– Food for fish
Sediment sampling
SLIDE 7 What Are Chemicals?
Everything is made of chemicals
– Caffeine is a chemical – Organic chemicals contain carbon – Inorganic chemicals are everything else
Pollution occurs when people add harmful chemicals to the environment
– Dose
Many sources of pollution to the
– Mercury and octachlorostyrene pollution are of primary concern – There are natural sources of mercury and
Caffeine Octachlorostyrene
SLIDE 8
What are Mercury and Octachlorosytrene?
Mercury
– Occurs naturally and as pollution – Converted in sediment from mercury (like in a thermometer) to methylmercury (methylation) – Methylmercury is biologically available
Octachlorosytrene
– Byproduct of chlorination of organic chemicals – From industrial discharges
Both are persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic
– Don’t break down much over time (persistent) – Build up in fish and animals that eat fish (bioaccumulative) – Potential to cause injury or harm (toxic) – Goal is to eliminate such chemicals from the natural environment, including sediment
SLIDE 9
How are Levels of Chemicals Described?
“parts per million” or ppm In a jar of 1,000,000 jelly beans, 20 are green Concentration of green jelly beans = 20 ppm
SLIDE 10
Are Chemicals in Sediment Causing Harm?
The answer depends on: Which chemicals are found in the sediments, where, and at what level? Which chemicals may move in the environment, how, and where? What levels of chemicals are safe for fish and wildlife?
SLIDE 11 Summary of Key Messages
Risk from Biomagnification
- Risk to some fish species
- No risk to fish-eating wildlife
Sediment Chemistry
- All samples exceed Lowest Effect Level for Hg
- 61% of samples exceed Severe Effect Level for Hg
- Deep sediment 4 – 5 x surface sediment concentrations for
Hg
- No exceedances for octachlorostyrene (OCS)
Benthic Alteration
- No clear evidence of differences compared to reference
sites due to Hg or OCS
Sediment Toxicity
- No strong evidence of toxicity
SLIDE 12
Methylmercury in Surface Sediment of the AOI
Blue = lowest levels Brown = highest levels
SLIDE 13 Octachlorostyrene in Surface Sediment
Blue = lowest levels Brown = highest levels
SLIDE 14 What is the COA Framework?
decisions about how to manage the contaminated sediment
sediment management actions
SLIDE 15 COA Framework Uses Four Main Lines of Evidence
- 1. Risk from Biomagnification
- 2. Sediment Chemistry
- 3. Benthos* Alteration
- 4. Sediment Toxicity
* insects, worms, clams etc. that live in sediment
SLIDE 16 How are the Lines of Evidence Evaluated?
– Adverse effects likely – Adverse effects uncertain – Adverse effects unlikely
are combined to decide whether
– No further action necessary – Further study necessary – Sediment management necessary
SLIDE 17 Which Species Were Studied?
Invertebrates (insects, clams, and worms) Fish (sportfish such as northern pike and pickerel, and forage fish such as shiners) Birds (herring gull, double- crested cormorant) Mammal (raccoon)
Zebra mussels
Mayfly
Redhorse sucker Emerald shiner Herring gull Double- crested cormorant
Raccoon
SLIDE 18 Why Do Invertebrates Matter?
Important food for fish
– No invertebrates → no fish
They recycle nutrients
– One species' waste is another’s food
They live in the sediment with the mercury and
– Pass chemicals to fish when eaten
Mayfly Midge Amphipod
SLIDE 19 Why Do Fish Matter?
Central to aquatic ecosystems Fish eat invertebrates People and wildlife eat fish People enjoy fishing Fish are key indicator of water and sediment quality
Northern pike Pickerel
SLIDE 20 Why Do These Wildlife Matter?
Top of this food chain
– Eat the big fish that eat the little fish that eat the bugs that live in the sediment
Their biology is well known, so studying them is possible Sensitive to mercury and organic chemicals Indicators of sediment quality and ecosystem health
Raccoon Double-crested cormorant Herring gull
SLIDE 21 Lines of Evidence
- 1. Risk from Biomagnification
For each species, depends on
- a. Exposure
- b. Toxicity
- 2. Sediment Chemistry
- 3. Benthos Alteration
- 4. Sediment Toxicity
SLIDE 22
- 1a. How Is Exposure Measured in
Invertebrates and Fish?
For invertebrates
– Levels of mercury and
- ctachlorostyrene in sediment
For fish
– Levels of mercury and
- ctachlorostyrene in fish and
their prey
Sediment Sampling Fish Tissue Sampling
SLIDE 23
- 1a. How Is Exposure Estimated
for Wildlife?
What do the wildlife living in/near the AOI eat? How much food do they eat? How often? What levels of chemicals are in their food? This information in used in mathematical equations to estimate “exposure”
SLIDE 24
- 1b. How Is Toxicity Measured in
Fish?
Field data
– Are they “fit”? – Are there equal numbers of males and females? – How do they compare to fish in
– Are differences linked to mercury and octachlorostyrene levels?
Safe fish tissue levels from scientific literature
– Mercury: 0.2 ppm – Octachlorostyrene: 0.015 to 0.18 ppm
Fish Sampling
SLIDE 25
Toxicity in Wildlife?
We reviewed and summarized published studies that report safe levels of mercury and
birds and mammals Calculate safe levels in their prey
SLIDE 26
- 2. How Is Sediment Chemistry
Measured?
- Chemicals settle out of the water and build up
- Sediment samples collected as core or grab
- Laboratory analyzes sediment samples for chemical
concentrations
- Physical properties of sediment provides information on
how chemicals move
Sediment Core Sampling Sediment Grab Sampling
SLIDE 27
- 3. How Is Benthos Alteration
Measured?
Community survey
– Collect sediment from the AOI and from “reference” areas – Count the types and numbers
- f invertebrates that live in the
sediment – Compare the AOI community to reference area communities
Benthic Sampling Sorting and Identifying Benthic Invertebrates
SLIDE 28
- 4. How Is Sediment Toxicity
Measured?
Divide AOI sediment into jars Add lab-reared invertebrates Over time, record growth, reproduction, and survival Compare the AOI results to reference area results
Toxicity Testing Toxicity Testing
SLIDE 29 Results
- 1. Risk from Biomagnification
- 2. Sediment Chemistry
- 3. Benthos Alteration
- 4. Sediment Toxicity
SLIDE 30
- 1. Are AOI Fish at Risk from
Biomagnification?
Compared levels in fish tissue to safe levels
– Categorized risk based on % of samples exceeding safe levels
Evaluated sex ratios and fitness of fish sampled for SFCMP
– No evidence of decreased fitness – SMB & YP appear female-biased in St. Clair River, compared to other regional waterbodies – Female bias correlated with mercury concentrations in fish tissue in FWD, SMB, NP & YP – But correlation ≠ causation and there are potential confounding factors
medium Freshwater drum Medium White sucker Northern pike Redhorse sucker Carp Yellow perch Rock bass Species high High medium medium low Risk
Conclusion: Some Fish Species May Be Harmed
SLIDE 31
- 1. Are AOI Wildlife at Risk from
Biomagnification?
Wildlife not at risk from mercury or
prey levels below safe levels
Safe Prey Levels Conclusion: Wildlife Not Likely To Be Harmed
SLIDE 32
Chemistry Levels Elevated?
All mercury concentrations above the LEL
[But sediment chemistry not necessarily related to biological effects]
No locations exceed calculated benchmark for
SLIDE 33
Chemistry Levels Elevated?
In most significantly elevated locations, subsurface mercury levels are 4 – 5 X higher than in surface sediment No locations exceed benchmark for
Contaminated sediment is being buried Potential for risk if subsurface sediment is disturbed and mobilized
SLIDE 34 Are Invertebrates at Risk?
– Compared the number and type of invertebrates in the AOI to reference areas – No clear evidence of differences between AOI and reference areas – Pollution tolerant invertebrates common throughout river
– Compared growth, survival, and reproduction of invertebrates in AOI to reference areas – Mixed results from different studies, but limited toxicity not likely due to mercury and octachlorostyrene Conclusion: Invertebrates Not Likely To Be Harmed
SLIDE 35 What Areas Contribute Greatest Risk to Fish?
mercury in fish’s prey
concentrations in that prey
“hot spots” until average equals safe level
- Prioritized zones of risk
to fish for sediment management (low, intermediate, high)
SLIDE 36
What About Mercury in Deep Sediment?
Factors that could disturb sediment
– Ice scour – Physical structures like docks
Several areas have conditions where mobilization is possible
SLIDE 37 Recommendation
Before deciding extent and methods of sediment management,
– Evaluate existing data and/or conduct new studies – To understand effects of
physical structures/ice
and potential sediment disturbance
SLIDE 38
Questions & Discussion