constructing slow invariant manifolds for reacting
play

Constructing Slow Invariant Manifolds for Reacting Systems with - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Constructing Slow Invariant Manifolds for Reacting Systems with Detailed Kinetics A. N. Al-Khateeb, J. M. Powers, S. Paolucci, J. D. Mengers Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering A. J. Sommese, J. D. Hauenstein, and J. Diller


  1. Constructing Slow Invariant Manifolds for Reacting Systems with Detailed Kinetics A. N. Al-Khateeb, J. M. Powers, S. Paolucci, J. D. Mengers Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering A. J. Sommese, J. D. Hauenstein, and J. Diller Department of Mathematics University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 61st APS Division of Fluid Dynamics Meeting San Antonio, Texas 24 November 2008

  2. Introduction Motivation and background • Detailed kinetics are essential for accurate modeling of real reactive systems. • Reactive systems contain many scales and subsequently severe stiffness arises. • Computational cost for reactive flow simulations increases with the spatio-temporal scales’ range, the number of species, and the number of reactions. • Manifold methods provide a potential for computational savings.

  3. Slow Invariant Manifold (SIM) • The composition phase space for closed spatially homogeneous reactive system: d z z ∈ R N − L − C . dt = f ( z ) , Phase space Fast modes trajectory Phase space trajectory 1-D manifold Slow modes 2-D manifold 0-D manifold ( i.e. equilibrium point)

  4. Method of Construction • For isothermal reactive systems, reactions speeds depend on combinations of polynomials of species concentrations. • The set of equilibria of the full reaction network is complex: { z e ∈ C N − L − C | f ( z e ) = 0 } ; we focus on real equilibria. • The set consists of several different dimensional components and contains finite and infinite equilibria. • A 1 - D SIM has a maximum of two branches that connect the unique 0 - D physical critical point (a sink) to two saddles. • These saddles are identified by their special dynamical character: their eigenvalue spectrum contains only one unstable direction.

  5. Sketch of SIM Construction R 3 R 1 S I M R 2

  6. Projective Space for Equilibria at Infinity • One-to-one mapping of the composition space, R N − L − C → R N − L − C , 1 Z k = , k ∈ { 1 , . . . , N − L − C } , z k z i Z i = , i � = k, i = 1 , . . . , N − L − C. z k • This transformation maps equilibria located at infinity into a finite domain. • To address the time singularity, we add the following transforma- tion dt dτ = ( Z k ) n − 1 , where n is the highest polynomial degree of f ( z ) .

  7. Computational strategy • We use the Bertini software (based on a homotopy continuation numerical technique) to compute the system’s equilibria up to any desired accuracy. • Thermodynamic data is obtained from Chemkin-II . • The SIM heteroclinic orbits are obtained by numerical integration of the species evolution equations using a computationally inex- pensive scheme. • Computation time is typically less than 1 minute on a 2 . 16 GHz Mac Pro machine.

  8. Zel’dovich Mechanism for NO Formation • The mechanism (see Baulch et al. , 2005) consists of J = 2 reversible bimolecular reactions involving N = 5 species { NO, N, O, N 2 , O 2 } and L = 2 elements { N, O } . In addition, since the total number of moles is constant, C = 1 . Subsequently, z ∈ R 2 . • Spatially homogenous with isothermal and isochoric conditions, T = 4000 K, p 0 = 1 . 65 atm . • We find three 0 - D finite equilibria ( R 1 : source, R 2 : saddle, R 3 : sink, physical ) and three 0 - D infinite equilibria ( I 1 : saddle-node, I 2 : source, I 3 : source)

  9. The system’s 1-D SIM -2 ×10 2 1 [ ] N mol/g R 3 I 1 SIM 0 R 2 −1 R 1 −2 -0.5 0 1 1.5 2 2.5 0.5 -2 ×10 NO mol/g [ ]

  10. Equilibrium Thermodynamics and SIM -5 Within the physically accessible domain, ×10 8 7 − 1 [ ] = T ( ∇ G · f ) ≥ 0 , N mol/g σ 6 5 I 1 at equilibrium 4 R 3 SIM 3 − 2 2 = T ( H G · J f ) . H σ R 2 1 0 4 1 2 3 5 -3 ×10 NO mol/g [ ] -10 ×10 • The major/minor axes are aligned I 1 10 with the Hessian eigenvectors. N N [mol/g] 5 R 3 • Eigenvectors of equilibrium thermo- 0 e SIM dynamic potentials do not coincide _ -5 with system’s SIM, even at the -10 R 2 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 physical equilibrium point! -7 ×10 e NO NO [mol/g] _

  11. Hydrogen-Air System • The mechanism (Miller et al. , 1982) consists of J = 19 reversible reactions involving N = 9 species, L = 3 elements, and C = 0 , so that z ∈ R 6 . • Closed and spatially homogenous system of 2 H 2 + ( O 2 + 3 . 76 N 2 ) with isothermal and isochoric conditions at T = 1500 K , and p 0 = 10 7 dyne/cm 2 . • The system has 284 finite ( 90 0 - D real) and 42 infinite ( 18 0 - D real) equilibria. • Only 14 critical points have an eigenvalue spectrum that contains only one unstable direction. • There is a unique physical equilibrium, R 19 .

  12. 3-D Projection of the system’s SIM -5 ×10 1 [ ] 0.5 mol/g 0 SIM R 19 −0.5 −1 OH R 79 −1.5 −2 R 74 -5 ×10 8 6 H 2 4 −1 0 2 1 [ ] m 2 0 3 o 4 l O mol/g [ ] 5 / g -5 2 ×10

  13. Summary • Constructing the actual SIM is computationally efficient and algo- rithmically easy, thus there is no need to identify it only approxi- mately. • Identifying all critical points, finite and infinite, plays a major role in the construction of the SIM. • Irreversibility production rate and equilibrium thermodynamic po- tentials do not provide information on the dynamics towards physical equilibrium.

  14. Center for Applied Mathematics The 2nd International Workshop on Model Reduction in Reacting Flow March 30—April 2, 2009 ACCEPTED � INVITED � SPEAKERS � �� Henry � Curran, � National � University � of � Ireland � �� Yannis � Kevrekidis, � Princeton � University � �� Marc � Massot, � CNRS—Universite � Claude � Bernard � �� Linda � Petzold, � University � of � California—Santa � Barbara � �� James � Rawlings, � University � of � Wisconsin � �� James � Robinson, � University � of � Warwick � Scientific � Committee: � Local � Organizing � Committee: � M. � Giona, � University � of � Rome � “La � Sapienza” � S. � Paolucci, � University � of � Notre � Dame � D. � Goussis, � University � of � Athens � J. � M. � Powers, � University � of � Notre � Dame � H. � Najm, � Sandia � National � Laboratories, � Livermore � A. � J. � Sommese, � University � of � Notre � Dame � S. � Paolucci, � University � of � Notre � Dame � J. � M. � Powers, � University � of � Notre � Dame � A. � J. � Sommese, � University � of � Notre � Dame � M. � Valorani, � University � of � Rome � “La � Sapienza” � For up-to-date information please go to the following web site: http://cam.nd.edu/upcoming-conferences/spring2009

  15. Idealized Hydrogen-Oxygen • Kinetic model adopted from Ren et al. a • Model consists of J = 6 reversible reactions involving N = 6 species { H 2 , O, H 2 O, H, OH, N 2 } and L = 3 elements { H, O, N } , with C = 0 , so that z ∈ R 3 . • Spatially homogenous with isothermal and isobaric conditions with T = 3000 K, p 0 = 1 atm . • Major species are i = { 1 , 2 , 3 } = { H 2 , O, H 2 O } , • Initial conditions satisfying the element conservation constraints are identical to those presented by Ren et al. a Z. Ren, S. Pope, A. Vladimirsky, J. Guckenheimer, 2006, J. Chem. Phys. 124 , 114111.

  16. The system’s 1-D SIM R 6 -3 ×10 4 [ ] z mol/g R 7 2 R 1 0 SIM 3 −12 0 2 4 6 8 −10 −8 −6 -3 −4 ×10 −2 z mol/g 0 2 z mol/g 2 [ ] 4 [ ] 6 -3 1 ×10

  17. The system’s 1-D SIM R 6 -3 ×10 5 R 7 4 [ ] z mol/g 3 2 -3 ×10 1 0 1 0 R 1 3 2 [ ] z mol/g SIM 3 −1 4 7 5 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 −1 2 z mol/g [ -3 ] 1 ×10

  18. 1-D SIM vs. 2-D ICE manifold S I M 4.2 R 6 -3 3.8 ×10 4 3.4 [ ] z mol/g R 7 3 1.5 0 2 0.2 2 2.5 1 3 SIM R 1 0 0 0 z mol/g 2 2 -3 1 ×10 4 4 [ ] 6 z mol/g [ ] -3 ×10 2

  19. Outline • Introduction • Slow Invariant Manifold (SIM) • Method of Construction • Illustration Using Model Problem • Application to Hydrogen-Air Reactive System • Summary

  20. Long-term objective Create an efficient algorithm that reduces the computational cost for simulating reactive flows based on a reduction in the stiffness and dimension of the composition phase space. Immediate objective The construction of 1-D Slow Invariant Manifolds (SIMs) for dynam- ical system arising from modeling unsteady spatially homogenous closed reactive systems.

  21. Partial review of manifold construction in reactive systems • ILDM, CSP , and ICE-PIC are approximations of the reaction slow invariant manifold. • MEPT and similar methods are based on minimizing a thermody- namics potential function. • Iterative methods require “ reasonable ” initial conditions. • Davis and Skodje, 1999, present a technique to construct the 1-D SIM based on global phase analysis, • Creta et al. and Giona et al. , 2006, extend the technique to slightly higher dimensional reactive systems.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend