constraints from leptoproduction of vector meson within
play

Constraints from leptoproduction of vector meson within different - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Constraints from leptoproduction of vector meson within different frameworks Adrien Besse Irfu - SPhN MESON 2014, Cracow Adrien Besse Constraints from the leptoproduction of vector meson within different framework MESON2014, June 2nd 1 / 25


  1. Constraints from leptoproduction of vector meson within different frameworks Adrien Besse Irfu - SPhN MESON 2014, Cracow Adrien Besse Constraints from the leptoproduction of vector meson within different framework MESON2014, June 2nd 1 / 25

  2. Observables and kinematic ranges γ ∗ , λ γ V , λ V − Q 2 e − , k ′ e − , k → M V, { λ V ν ′ ; λ γ ,ν } = V , p V W 2 N, ν ′ N, ν p p ′ t W 2 ≫ | t | , Q 2 ≫ Λ 2 Q 2 QCD , the Bjorken x ∼ W 2+ Q 2 Spin density matrix elements (SDME) linked to the helicity amplitudes : [Schilling Wolf, ’73] & [Dielh, ’07] small x HERA (H1 and ZEUS) mid- x region: COMPASS, HERMES, E665, NMC valence region: CLAS Adrien Besse Constraints from the leptoproduction of vector meson within different framework MESON2014, June 2nd 2 / 25

  3. Theoretical descriptions Color dipole picture (small − x ) Collinear fact. picture γ ∗ γ ∗ V V N q ¯ q GPD N ′ N ′ N N Interaction via gluons exchange Interaction via gluon and quark exchange Convenient to introduce Valid from small − x to saturation effects at small − x the valence region Adrien Besse Constraints from the leptoproduction of vector meson within different framework MESON2014, June 2nd 3 / 25

  4. Dipole model picture Color dipole factorization scheme Impact parameter space representation of the amplitudes in the infinite momentum frame Nikolaev, Zakharov, ’91, Mueller, ’90 γ ∗ y V Ψ f Ψ i � r r b N ( x, r, b ) b N ( x, r, b ) = p ′ p Initial Ψ i and final Ψ f states wave functions. Universal dipole/target scattering amplitude N ( x, r, b ) : (DIS structure functions, diffractive DIS, exclusive processes ...) Adrien Besse Constraints from the leptoproduction of vector meson within different framework MESON2014, June 2nd 4 / 25

  5. Dipole model picture Skewness effects can be taken into account in dipole cross-section model [Shuvaev, Golec-Biernat, Martin, Ryskin, ’99] N ( x, r ) ≡ N ( x, ξ, r ) such that N ( x, ξ = 0 , r ) = s ˆ σ ( x, r ) Dipole models : access to I m M g V R e M g V can be deduced from I m M g V using dispersion relations In the limit ∆ = 0 , i.e. | t | = | t | min , � � I m M λ V λ γ ( Q 2 , x ) ∝ i dr ˆ Ψ ∗ λ V ( y, r ) ˆ dy Ψ λ γ ( y, r ) N ( x, ξ, r ) Adrien Besse Constraints from the leptoproduction of vector meson within different framework MESON2014, June 2nd 5 / 25

  6. DVMP within Collinear factorization Description of exclusive processes within Collinear factorization approach Description of DVMP , DVCS, TCS, ... in the Bjorken limit Collinear factorization proven for LT amplitude M V, { 0+;0+ } [Collins, Frankfurt, Strikman, ’97, Radyushkin, ’97] Set of GPDs, H ( x, ξ, t ) , E ( x, ξ, t ) , ˜ H ( x, ξ, t ) , ˜ E ( x, ξ, t ) Quark and Gluon contributions: ℓ 1 ℓ 1 q q V V ℓ 2 ℓ 2 k − ∆ k − ∆ k + ∆ k + ∆ N ′ N ′ N N ∼ H g ∼ H q Adrien Besse Constraints from the leptoproduction of vector meson within different framework MESON2014, June 2nd 6 / 25

  7. Modified perturbative approach (MPA) Gluon contribution in MPA ℓ 2 ℓ q = yp 1 + ℓ ⊥ + 2 sy p 2 q z 2 � V ( p 1 ) | ¯ ψ i ( z 2 ) ψ j (0) | 0 � d 2 ℓ M g V = � dx � dy � z 1 0 → / p 1 ,ij Ψ V ( y, ℓ ⊥ ) (2 π ) 2 x + ξ x − ξ H g ( x,ξ,t ) ε ( λ ) ε ( λ ) ∗ � N ( p ′ ) | / A ∗ (0) | N ( p ) � → � A ( z 1 ) / λ / ⊥ / ⊥ x 2 − ( ξ − iǫ ) 2 ℓ 2 Neglect then yQ 2 terms in numerator in the MPA spirit ⊥ y ¯ Fourier transform in transverse space → impact parameter space Sudakov form factor [Sterman, Li ,’92] (Resums soft gluon emmisions from the quark-antiquark dipole) Adrien Besse Constraints from the leptoproduction of vector meson within different framework MESON2014, June 2nd 7 / 25

  8. DVMP within MPA Model dependences Models from [ Kroll, Goloskokov, ’08] : GPDs with evolution approximated by the DGLAP evolution Wavefunction models (Gaussian ansatz) � � − r 2 ˆ Ψ V ( y, r ) ∝ Leading twist DA × exp y ¯ y 4 a 2 V Sudakov form factor [Dahm, Jakob, Kroll, ’95] Kroll&Goloskokov GPD model based on double distribution ansatz [ Musatov, Radyushkin, ’00 ] � 1 � 1 −| β | dα δ ( β + ξα − x ) f ( β, α, t ′ ) H ( x, ξ ) = dβ − 1 − 1+ | β | Adrien Besse Constraints from the leptoproduction of vector meson within different framework MESON2014, June 2nd 8 / 25

  9. MPA results MPA result for the helicity amplitude γ ∗ L N ( p ) → V L N ( p ′ ) [A.B. in preparation] : � 1 s � � � � Ψ V ( y, − r )ˆ ˆ d 2 r C f Ψ f M V, { 0+ , 0+ } = √ dy L ( y, r ) V γ ∗ 2 2 π 0 f � �� 1 2 ξH g ( x, ξ, t ) + 2 x C F ξH f � � � π α s ( µ 2 ) singlet ( x, ξ, t ) � 4 × dx N c y ¯ y (2 ξs ) ( x − ξ + iǫ )( x + ξ − iǫ ) 0 Adrien Besse Constraints from the leptoproduction of vector meson within different framework MESON2014, June 2nd 9 / 25

  10. Dipole model vs MPA results Results in the two different approaches in the limit t ∼ 0 MPA result for the helicity amplitude γ ∗ L N ( p ) → V L N ( p ′ ) [A.B. in preparation] : � 1 s � � � I m M g d 2 r � C f Ψ V ( y, − r )ˆ ˆ Ψ f √ V, { 0+ , 0+ } = dy L ( y, r ) γ ∗ V 2 2 π 0 f − π 2 4 � � yQ 2 α s H g ( ξ, ξ, 0) × N c y ¯ Dipole model result for the helicity amplitude γ ∗ L N ( p ) → V L N ( p ′ ) : s � � � � I m M g d 2 r � C f Ψ V ( y, − r )ˆ ˆ Ψ f V, { 0+ , 0+ } = √ dy L ( y, r ) γ ∗ V 2 2 π f − N ( x, ξ, r ) � � × s At small − x : 2 ξs ≈ Q 2 Adrien Besse Constraints from the leptoproduction of vector meson within different framework MESON2014, June 2nd 10 / 25

  11. Analogy between the results Interpretation Forward dipole cross-section [Frankfurt, Radyushkin, Strikman, ’97] : σ ( x, r ) = π 2 α s N ( x, 0 , r ) r 2 xg ( x ) = ˆ (color transparency) s N c Comparing the results for DVMP , (Forward limit of gluon GPD : H g ( x, ξ → 0 , 0) = x g ( x ) ): ↔ π 2 α s H g ( ξ, ξ, 0) = π 2 α S N ( x, ξ, r ) � � 4 ( r 2 0 ) H g ( ξ, ξ, 0) s N c y ¯ yQ 2 N c 4 with r 2 0 = yQ 2 y ¯ 0 � ≥ 2 R 0 ( x ) (Saturation radius) for Q 2 ∼ 5 GeV 2 for W = 75 GeV � � r 2 Adrien Besse Constraints from the leptoproduction of vector meson within different framework MESON2014, June 2nd 11 / 25

  12. Comparison of predictions Σ L � Ρ �� nb � Imaginary part of t � channel 1000 gluon exchange 500 100 50 H1 W=75 GeV Leading twist asymptotic 10 Μ 2 � Q 2 � m V 2 5 Leading twist DA � GBW saturation 1 Q 2 � GeV 2 � 2.0 3.0 5.0 7.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 30.0 Leading twist result from collinear factorization (Blue) Leading twist DA + dipole cross-section with saturation (Red) Adrien Besse Constraints from the leptoproduction of vector meson within different framework MESON2014, June 2nd 12 / 25

  13. Beyond the imaginary part of gluon contribution in MPA Contribution from gluons and quarks q f r 0 r 0 ˆ f C f + � Ψ V V q f ¯ H g ( x, ξ, t ) H f ( x, ξ, t ) π α s ( µ 2 ) � 4 � � e f C f � e f C f − V N ( x, r ) ← → V N c y ¯ yQ 2 f f �� 1 2 ξH g ( x, ξ, t ) + 2 x C F ξH f � singlet ( x, ξ, t ) × dx ( x − ξ + iǫ )( x + ξ − iǫ ) 0 Adrien Besse Constraints from the leptoproduction of vector meson within different framework MESON2014, June 2nd 13 / 25

  14. Contributions of other amplitudes � Im Mg � 2 �� M 2 � Im Mg � 2 �� M 2 1.0 1.0 Φ meson W = 75 GeV Ρ meson W = 75 GeV 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 MPA MPA Leading Twist Leading Twist 0.2 0.2 Q 2 � GeV 2 � Q 2 � GeV 2 � 0 5 10 15 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 V ) 2 / |M V | 2 ∼ 70% V ) 2 / |M V | 2 ∼ 60% ( I m M g ( I m M g Sea quark contribution (via interference term) not negligeable in MPA approach with GK GPDs based on [CTEQ6M, ’02] fits ( 10 − 4 < x < 0 . 5 and 4 < Q 2 < 40 GeV 2 ) Adrien Besse Constraints from the leptoproduction of vector meson within different framework MESON2014, June 2nd 14 / 25

  15. Results Comparison Gluon vs Total contributions Σ L � Φ �� nb � Σ L � Ρ �� nb � 1000 H1 W=75 GeV 100 500 H1 W=75 GeV 100 10 50 Leading twist asymptotic Leading twist asymptotic Μ 2 � Q 2 � m V 2 Μ 2 � Q 2 � m V 2 10 1 5 Total Total Imaginary part Gluon exchange Imaginary part Gluon exchange 1 0.1 Q 2 � GeV 2 � Q 2 � GeV 2 � 2.0 3.0 5.0 7.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 30.0 2.0 3.0 5.0 7.0 10.0 15.0 Adrien Besse Constraints from the leptoproduction of vector meson within different framework MESON2014, June 2nd 15 / 25

  16. Results Sudakov + meson wavefunction ansatz Σ L � Φ �� nb � Σ L � Ρ �� nb � Sudakov � 1000 Gaussian a V � 0.5 GeV � 1 100 500 Μ 2 � Q 2 � m V 2 100 10 50 Sudakov � 10 1 Gaussian a V � 0.5 GeV � 1 5 Μ 2 � Q 2 � m V 2 H1 W=75 GeV H1 W=75 GeV 1 0.1 Q 2 � GeV 2 � Q 2 � GeV 2 � 2.0 3.0 5.0 7.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 30.0 2.0 3.0 5.0 7.0 10.0 15.0 Adrien Besse Constraints from the leptoproduction of vector meson within different framework MESON2014, June 2nd 16 / 25

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend