strange meson production near threshold strange meson
play

Strange meson production near threshold Strange meson production - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Strange meson production near threshold Strange meson production near threshold FOPI FOPI in nucleus-nucleus collisions in nucleus-nucleus collisions Krzysztof Piasecki for the FOPI Collaboration Institute of Experimental Physics, University


  1. Strange meson production near threshold Strange meson production near threshold FOPI FOPI in nucleus-nucleus collisions in nucleus-nucleus collisions Krzysztof Piasecki for the FOPI Collaboration Institute of Experimental Physics, University of Warsaw, Poland • Physics motivation • • Primary or secondary production? • • K – production: a complex case • • In-medium modifications of K +, – , 0 • • K * (892) strange meson resonance • • Summary and conclusions • 1 K. Piasecki (FOPI) 13 th Intl. Workshop on Meson Production, Properties and Interaction 2.06.2014

  2. Strange mesons in AA collisions Strange mesons in AA collisions NN → N K +/ ° Λ T lab = 1.6 GeV • Production thresholds • NN → NN K – K + T lab = 2.5 GeV in free NN collision : NN → NN φ T lab = 2.6 GeV G. Agakishiev, Phys Rev C 80, 025209 (2009) P. Gasik, Ph. D. Thesis, University of Warsaw Al+Al @ 1.93 GeV F. Laue et al. , PRL 82 (1999), updated φ P.Senger et al. (KAOS), φ Ar+KCl @ 1.76 GeV HADES KaoS They a r e here . . . • Strange mesons in AA collisions Strange mesons in AA collisions: : • – Are the production processes primary or secondary? – Decays? Contributions from intermediate resonances? – Modification of properties in medium? – Production of strange resonances? 2 K. Piasecki (FOPI) 13 th Intl. Workshop on Meson Production, Properties and Interaction 2.06.2014

  3. Probing partial restoration of chiral symmetry Probing partial restoration of chiral symmetry Gell-Mann O Oakes R Renner – relation : G m u + m s FOPI AA ∗ 2 f K ∗ 2 = − s s 〉 + Θ ( m s 2 ) m K 〈̄ uu +̄ 2 Decay constant Mass M. Kotulla et al., Physik Journal 8 (2009) 3 • First approaches: Potential • • Chiral effective field theory w/ couple-channels • J. Schaffner-Bielich et al . NPA 625(1997) 325 U(K + ) M.F. M. Lutz, PPNP 53 (2004) 125 K + U(K - ) K – F =− ⃗ • ⇒ K - attracted, K + repelled ⃗ • „Potential” only on average ∇ U 3 K. Piasecki (FOPI) 13 th Intl. Workshop on Meson Production, Properties and Interaction 2.06.2014

  4. FOPI experimental setup FOPI experimental setup Nearly 4 π coverage Drift chambers Drift chambers: CDC, Helitron ToF ToF : Plastic Barrel, RPC Forward Forward: Plastic Wall, Zero Degree Direct PID of π ± , K ± , p, d, t, 3,4 He MMRPC t t d d p p + Plastic Barrel K + K p / |q| [GeV/c] π + + π + e + e t t d d - e - p [GeV/c] e p p π - - π - K - K + K + K π + π v (cm/ns) v (cm/ns) 4 K. Piasecki (FOPI) 13 th Intl. Workshop on Meson Production, Properties and Interaction 2.06.2014

  5. Production of Kaons in AA: Primary or secondary? Production of Kaons in AA: Primary or secondary? If primary: σ K MUL K = σ inelastic = const For pA → KX: M.Merschmeyer et al., PRC 76, 024906 (2007) AA→ KX: Glauber: AA = A ⊗ NA FOPI FOPI AA = A × MUL K pA ∝ A ⇒ MUL K Ni+Ni, 1.9A GeV KaoS A. Förster et al., PRC 75, 024906 (2007) K 0 : secondary processes involved K +0 +0 near-threshold production processes: near-threshold production processes: K • N beam + N target , N target has Fermi motion • • predominantly via ΔN , ΔΔ • ΔN , ΔΔ → K → K +,0 Y B +,0 Y B π N , π Δ π N , π Δ → K → K +,0 +,0 Y Y Y = [ Λ , Σ ] • • A U U KN involved (increases K mass → lower yields) → lower yields) KN involved (increases K mass secondary processes are involved secondary processes are involved 5 K. Piasecki (FOPI) 13 th Intl. Workshop on Meson Production, Properties and Interaction 2.06.2014

  6. Sub- and near-threshold Production of K – Sub- and near-threshold Production of K – • in medium: mainly strangeness exchange : • Au+Au, T b = 1.5A GeV (IQMD IQMD transport code) π Y → , π Y → – B BY → NNK BY → NNK – K K – B – , π Y ◦ ◦ strong reabsorption: K K – B → π Y – B → ◦ ◦ coupled to resonances Σ Σ(1385) (1385), Λ Λ(1405) (1405) Σ* Σ* π π + Y → → + Y → → – + B K K – + B Λ* Λ* Q: Can we see them? K − • φ (1020) → K – K + decay (mostly outside collision zone) • Q: How strong is this contribution? • I n-medium effects: “U KN • potential” or “spectral density” φ Q: How strong is this influence? t (fm/c) K − K + 6 K. Piasecki (FOPI) 13 th Intl. Workshop on Meson Production, Properties and Interaction 2.06.2014

  7. φ φ (1020) mesons mesons (1020) • φ (ss) → K + K – (BR = 49%) • Ar+KCl, T b = 1.76A GeV m = 1019 MeV HADES c τ = 50 fm ( decays mostly outside collision zone ) S = 168 E th = 2.6 GeV ( for SIS-18, deeply subthreshold) φ / K – Al+Al, T b = 1.9A GeV S = 108 (FOPI) S/B = 1.0 (FOPI) (FOPI) (FOPI) (FOPI) Signif = 7.4 Ni+Ni, T b = 1.9A GeV (FOPI) S = 170 S/B = 0.7 Signif = 8.4 • P φ possibly ~ <A part > • preliminary φ - ≈ 1 ~ 15 .. 20% of K -- ~ 15 .. 20% of K -- • • 3 φ decays K produced from φ produced from decays G. Agakishiev, Phys Rev C 80, 025209 (2009) P. Gasik, Ph. D. Thesis, University of Warsaw 7 K. Piasecki (FOPI) 13 th Intl. Workshop on Meson Production, Properties and Interaction 2.06.2014

  8. φ /K φ /K – excitation function – excitation function G. Agakishiev et al., PRC 80, 025209 (2009) p + p J. Cleymans et al. PLB 603, 146 (2004) within S S tatistical M M odel • For S≠0, Canonical ensemble • • φ : non-strange , K – : strange • • At low √ s , φ /K – sensitive to R Canonical FOPI • R Canonical ~ 2-3 fm φ phase space Exploring φ phase space Exploring Ni+Ni @ 1.9A GeV Ar+KCl @ 1.76A GeV Al+Al @ 1.9A GeV T eff = 84 ± 8 MeV T eff = 91 ± 20 MeV T = 92 ± 12 MeV HADES preliminary 95°< ϑ CM <150° preliminary 8 K. Piasecki (FOPI) 13 th Intl. Workshop on Meson Production, Properties and Interaction 2.06.2014

  9. Σ ∗ Σ ∗ (1385) resonance (1385) resonance • Al+Al, T beam = 1.9A GeV • Chiral effective field theory w/ coupled-channels Chiral effective field theory w/ coupled-channels Σ ±* (1385) → Λ + π ± (88 ± 2%) K – production in medium ( π Y → K – N ) coupled • • p + π – ↳ to strange resonances e.g. Σ ∗ (1385), Λ ∗ (1405) : X. Lopez et al. (FOPI), PRC 76, 052203(R) (2007) ( πΛ → Σ ∗ → K – N ) Λπ - + Λπ + M.F. M. Lutz, PPNP 53 (2004) 125 Σ ∗ (1385) m N +m K Y (Σ ∗ − +Σ ∗+ ) Y (Λ+Σ 0 ) FOPI 0.125 ± 0.042 Σ * resonance found in HI collisions • • Statist. Model 0.097 Input to fix π + Λ → K – + N in medium UrQMD 0.177 9 K. Piasecki (FOPI) 13 th Intl. Workshop on Meson Production, Properties and Interaction 2.06.2014

  10. K – /K + : experiment vs transport K – /K + : experiment vs transport Al+Al, T beam = 1.9A GeV, 9% most central events • K + : U KN repulsive • (P. Gasik) K – : U KN ~attractive K – /K + : promising observable • IQMD • IQMD transport code m K ± (ρ) = m K ± (ρ 0 ) ⋅ ( 1 +α ± ⋅ρ ρ 0 ) ◦ ◦ ◦ at ρ = ρ 0 ◦ preliminary ∆ m K+ = 40 MeV, ∆ m K- = ‒ 100 MeV 136° < Θ cm < 150° • HSD • HSD transport code ◦ K + as in IQMD ◦ HSD, U K+N =40 MeV, K- Not Modified IQMD, NO Pot. ◦ K – : off-shell G-matrix approach ◦ HSD, U K+N =40 MeV, U K-N = G-Matrix HSD , NO Pot. IQMD, U K+N =40 MeV, U K-N =-100 MeV • • Clear preference for U KN ≠ 0 option • ”U K+ only” scenario : insufficient • • IQMD: potentials used probably too strong • 10 K. Piasecki (FOPI) 13 th Intl. Workshop on Meson Production, Properties and Interaction 2.06.2014

  11. Flow of charged kaons Flow of charged kaons directed flow v 1 dN d   1  2v 1 cos   2v 2 cos  2   ... v 1 v 1 , v v 2 2 = Fourier coefficients Ni+Ni , T beam = 1.9A GeV 40% central V. Zinyuk et al, arXiv: 1403.1504v2 K – K + p more preliminary 11% central peripheral : U K+N = 20 MeV U K-N ≈ -50 MeV HSD HSD ~ In favour of the potential IQMD IQMD : U K+N = 20 MeV U K-N = -40 MeV 11 K. Piasecki (FOPI) 13 th Intl. Workshop on Meson Production, Properties and Interaction 2.06.2014

  12. ρ < ρ 0 at ρ < ρ In-medium modifications of K +/0 In-medium modifications of K +/0 at 0 γ, π , p Beam π – (p=1.15 GeV/c) + A → K 0 + … FOPI p (p=2.25 GeV/c) + A → K + + … ANKE M. Kotulla et al., Physik Journal 8 (2009) 3 M.L. Benabderrahmane et al., PRL 102, 182501 (2009) M. Nekipelov et al, PLB 540, 207 (2002) p = 1.15 ANKE p + A → K + + … Z. Rudy et al., EPJA 23, 379 (2005) p = 3.1 p p = 2.25 GeV/c U KN = 0 MeV CBUU CBUU U KN = 10 MeV transport code U KN = 20 MeV 12 K. Piasecki (FOPI) 13 th Intl. Workshop on Meson Production, Properties and Interaction 2.06.2014

  13. Modifications of K 0 in AA collisions AA collisions Modifications of K 0 in 0 K S 0 c τ = 2.7 cm from Ar + KCl @ 1.76A GeV K S c τ = 15.3 m 0 K L IQMD transport calc. : IQMD No potential U K0N = 46 MeV HADES U KN at ρ ~ 2 ρ 0 seems to be stronger than for π – A → K 0 + … at ρ ≤ ρ 0 G. Agakichiev et al., Phys. Rev. C 82, 044907 (2010) 13 K. Piasecki (FOPI) 13 th Intl. Workshop on Meson Production, Properties and Interaction 2.06.2014

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend